Connect with us

Accounting

OBBBA and the repurposing of life insurance portfolios

Published

on

One of the most significant features of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act that Congress passed in July is it permanently eliminated the federal estate tax liabilities for individuals with less than $15 million of assets in their estates, or $30 million for married couples.

This brings up an important choice for many ultra-high-net-worth individuals who previously had to allocate up to 40-45% of their assets to pay their share of their federal estate tax liability, which for the most part was due nine months after an individual’s death. The vast majority of those high-net-worth individuals chose to pay for those death taxes using a life insurance policy because it was the most tax efficient, leveraged and economical vehicle available.  

The advisor’s role, guiding choices

Legal and tax advisors can play a significant role in alerting their UHNW clients to the availability of the various options and strategies regarding what to do with their now unneeded life insurance death benefit. In addition, an advisor should also be aware of the increasing numbers of clients that are continuously being notified by their life insurance company that their non-guaranteed universal life insurance coverage, which was so popular over the last 25+ years, is now expiring years earlier than anticipated. This is occurring as a result of years of reduced interest rates and neglect on the part of the owners who weren’t aware they should have increased their premiums over the years when interest rates kept declining. 

The question today becomes what to do with those multiple millions of dollars of the client’s current death benefit that are no longer needed as a result of the increased estate tax exemptions. Secondly, since more than 45% of those policies were non-guaranteed universal policies, 30-35% of the coverage in those policies is currently expiring prematurely and needs to be dealt with as well.

Advisors to these high-net-worth clients should have an understanding of the available options rather than just assume that if the death benefit is no longer required for estate tax purposes, then the client should just surrender the policy for its cash value. The purpose of this article is to provide you with several other options to re-arrange or re-purpose a client’s current life insurance portfolio in the most beneficial manner.  

An evaluation should be made as to which policies to keep or alter the premium in some manner to obtain additional benefits, or in some cases end the coverage. It’s imperative not to allow a policy to lapse prior to the insured’s death if there are any gains in the policy, because a lapse in coverage would trigger a phantom income tax on those gains, as well as any outstanding loans.

Options worth considering

Any of the options listed below is effective for a $250,000 policy, a $2.5 million policy or a $25 million policy. These same options are available for a trust-owned life insurance policy as well as for an individually owned life insurance policy.

A client can simply maintain their existing coverage to make a charitable donation to a hospital or university for tax purposes or for assets allocated to the  next generation in a generation skipping/dynasty trust for grandkids who certainly may have significant estate tax problems of their own one day.

Due to the passage of the Pension Protection Act, an individual can now transfer the cash value of a life insurance policy on a tax-free basis to a “linked benefit policy,” which in addition to offering a death benefit, also offers an individual the ability to withdraw dollars from the death benefit of their life insurance policy tax-free, to pay for qualified long-term care benefits where one dollar can become four to five dollars.  

People are now living longer as a result of modern pharmacology and have accordingly influenced the life insurance Industry to financially reward individuals for living healthier lifestyles. Many of today’s life insurance policies contain provisions and policies that were not available 20+ years ago. One such life insurance policy is called Private Placement Life Insurance. 

The advantage of a PPLI type of a product is that it rewards the purchasers of such multimillion-dollar death benefit policies with institutional products that contain lower costs and fees, fewer restrictions on withdrawals, and are managed by hedge funds rather than mutual funds. This type of specialized product often results in better returns with significantly lower costs than traditional retail life insurance policies that are typically offered to the general public.

Another strategy could be to reduce the death benefit by 15-20% using any of the means described below.  They can then increase the premiums up to the modified endowment limits and use the policy for its ability to accumulate cash value on a tax-deferred basis with the intent to later withdraw the cash value on a tax-free basis through a series of surrenders and loans against the death benefit that will never have to be paid back as long as the policy survives the Insured.

This opportunity to supplement one’s retirement with tax-deferred dollars, otherwise known as a private pension, was recently made even more attractive as a result of the passage of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021 (Section 7702). which reduced the actuarial interest rate assumptions used by the life insurance companies to define a life insurance contract. Doing so made it possible for the owner of a life insurance policy to place an even larger premium into the policy’s cash value without negatively affecting the policies’ ability to continue to shelter the growth and distribution of the cash value on a tax-free basis.

Surrender the policy for its cash value

The great majority of individuals who decide to cancel their policies in exchange for the remaining cash surrender value can merely contact their agent or broker (or the company directly) and request a form which, once it’s signed, notarized and returned, will conveniently serve to surrender the policy back to the insurance company that issued it in exchange for the stated cash surrender value.

Policies are often surrendered to the insurance company for several reasons: Customers perhaps no longer need or can afford the increased cost of the coverage. They may want to use the existing cash surrender value to supplement their own retirement income, or they want to make a gift to their heirs while they are alive to enjoy it. Life insurance companies are happy to accommodate both goals as they profit nicely when a policy is surrendered back to the insurer as they get to keep all the premiums and never have to pay out a death benefit. There are better ways for the client to accomplish both of those goals. 

An alternate exit strategy

An individual is entitled to sell their life insurance policy as they would their car, boat or home.  The U.S. Supreme Court case of Grigsby v. Russell (1911), established a life insurance policy as “private property,” placing the ownership rights on the same legal footing as an investment property such as stocks and bonds. As such, a life insurance policy can be transferred in whole or part to another person at the discretion of the policy owner. The life settlement market, primarily funded by hedge funds and often referred to as the institutional or secondary market, has greatly enhanced the consumer value of a life insurance policy, often by two to three times the cash value offered by the insurance company, according to a London Business School study.

However, the majority of clients, and many of their advisors, are not familiar with the concept of a life settlement, nor do they feel comfortable about another person owning a life insurance policy on their lives, and in my opinion, rightfully so. The only buyer one should deal with is an institutional buyer. 

While a life settlement can be entered into by anyone who owns a life insurance policy, only those policies that have a face value of at least $100,000, preferably $250,000, with an insured who is at least 65 years old will be of interest to most institutional investors. Contrary to popular belief, even a healthy individual can receive an offer on a term policy, if the policy is still within the convertible period, However, the more severe the health conditions, the more likely they are to receive a higher offer. 

One of the smartest pieces of advice an advisor can give their client is to remind them that if they are in their 60s to 70s and they have a term life insurance policy that’s no longer needed or wanted, rather than let it lapse with no value, the owner should attempt to sell the policy as they may be very pleasantly surprised to learn they could turn the unneeded term life policy with no value into a cash offer as long as the policy is still in its convertibility period usually between ages 65 to 75. 

Taxation of life settlement

A life settlement on a universal life insurance policy is a taxable event, and the proceeds are taxed in three tiers. 

• Tier 1: Tax-free return of cost basis: A portion of the sale proceeds up to the amount of the cost basis or amount paid in premiums is tax free. 
• Tier 2: Ordinary income: A portion of the sale proceeds above the cost basis and up to the policy’s surrender value is taxed as ordinary income. 
• Tier 3: Long-term capital gain: Any remaining sale proceeds above the surrender value are only taxed as long-term capital gains. 

Life settlement taxation case example

• Policy type: $1 million universal life 
• Premiums: $70,000 (cost basis)
• Cash value: $80,000 (surrender value) 
• Policy sale price: $300,000 (settlement amount paid to policy owner) 
• Tax-free return of cost basis: $70,000 (cost basis or amount paid in premiums) 
• Ordinary income: $10,000 (portion of sale proceeds above cost basis ($70,000) and up to surrender value ($80,000)) 
• Long-term capital gains: $220,000(remaining sale proceeds ($300,000 less $70,000 less $10,000))

Ever since the creation of the first non-guaranteed life insurance policy  known as universal life insurance came into being in 1982, life insurance policies have required active management to continue to operate as the owner hoped they would. However, as a result of sustained reduced interest rates and neglect over the last 25+ years, 35-40% of those policies are now expiring prematurely.

Today more than ever, UHNW clients face a choice of what to do with their unneeded life Insurance policies, while many other clients are in the process of discovering that their non-guaranteed universal policies are expiring earlier than anticipated, and the ability to sell a policy to an institutional investor can make the difference between receiving cash or a tax bill.                        

While there are many options and strategies to consider before a decision is made, many clients will just take the easiest way out by simply surrendering their policy back to the insurance company. In so doing the insured will inadvertently be giving up valuable benefits they are contractually entitled to as well as opportunities and cash assets.

The most important decision in considering a settlement option is selecting an independent, experienced licensed life settlement broker, a professional who will provide guidance and assistance while contractually affirming their fiduciary duty to the seller and assist the accountant, their client and their trustee in obtaining the best possible offer, one who has access to and understands the marketplace and is adept with the negotiating process necessary to represent the client’s best interest.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending