Connect with us

Accounting

OBBBA boosts estate and gift planning opportunities

Published

on

The sprawling new tax law dubbed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act includes a number of provisions that present opportunities for accountants and tax professionals to discuss estate and gift planning. 

“There was a lot of anticipation about this bill, both from an estate planning point of view and otherwise,” said Tasha Dickinson, a partner at the law firm Day Pitney in West Palm Beach, Florida. “The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 had implemented a $5 million estate and gift tax exemption amount that was set to double to $10 million. Indexed for inflation, in 2025 the exemption amount is $13.99 million per person. What that means is that each person can give away $13.99 million either during their lifetime or at death, and there’s no estate or gift tax implication of that. That was set to sunset as of Jan. 1, 2026 so the exemption amount was going to roll back to $5 million indexed for inflation. While we hadn’t seen an exact number, based on calculations that estate planners had done, the thought was that the exemption was going to be somewhere around $7.23 million per person.”

Estate planning

Under the new tax law, the estate and gift tax exemption is “permanently” set at $15 million per person. 

“I look at this not as a big change when we compare it to current law,” said Dickinson. “It’s more to be viewed as an extension of current law. If we took the $13.99 million and we indexed that for inflation, we probably wouldn’t be at $15 million, but we would be somewhere in the neighborhood of that. The benefit to clients now is that instead of facing an exemption amount of between seven and seven and a half million dollars per person, they’ll have double that in 2026. For clients who are inclined to do planning, the door is still open to do that going forward, whereas what we had feared is that the door was closing.”

Tax pros and their clients may also want to take a fresh look at the generation-skipping transfer tax.

“The generation skipping transfer tax is paired with the estate and gift tax exemption,” said Dickinson. “The GST exemption is moving along with the estate and gift, so the $15 million will also be a generation skipping transfer tax exemption for 2026.” 

That means more opportunities in the future for long-term tax planning for accountants and clients alike, while considering options such as lifetime gifting and trusts. Nevertheless, some taxpayers have opted to move quickly.

“In 2025 a lot of clients have been working to use their exemption for fear that it was going to go away in 2026,” said Dickinson. “Although the urgency of completing these gifts has gone away somewhat, what I found so far is that clients haven’t invested the intellectual capital in structuring these gifts. They have decided to go ahead and do it, notwithstanding the fact that the time pressure isn’t as significant as it was earlier in the year.”

It’s still a good idea to keep planning. “The message is that clients can continue doing the planning that they had been doing before, without worry of a decreased exemption into the foreseeable future,” said Dickinson. “One of the things that we’ve learned with the tax laws, which is more true now probably than ever, is that the tax laws seem to be ever changing, and the concept of permanence is not a good monitor, because really the only thing that’s permanent is the constant changes that are happening in the tax laws. The message to clients is, even though you may have a little bit more time, it doesn’t mean that you should shelve the planning that you might otherwise be thinking of doing, because it can all change very quickly.”

Clients should also consider the increase in the cap for the state and local tax deduction, even though it’s only temporary, and there are limitations.

“One of the other provisions that was much talked about in the media was under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 there was a $10,000 cap on deductions for state and local tax called the SALT deduction,” said Dickinson. “Under the new tax bill, that cap is raised to $40,000, but this is a case where I think not everything is maybe as good as it seems, because $40,000 is only available for people who have an adjusted gross income of less than $500,000 in 2025 and that gets adjusted every year, but there’s a phase out. For high-income earners, it’s still going to be $10,000, and this is only applicable through 2029 at such time as the SALT deduction goes back to $10,000, so this is kind of a temporary play. This bill is riddled with a lot of carveouts and a lot of temporary measures that may sound good on their face, but may not be as helpful to taxpayers as one might think.”

Another holdover from the TCJA involves opportunity zones, which encourage investment in “economically distressed communities” and now have been made a permanent part of the Tax Code. 

“Opportunity zones are a planning technique where people invest in areas that are compromised, and there are tax incentives for doing that,” said Dickinson. “That has been a popular estate planning strategy. The tax benefit of opportunity zones was set to sunset in 2028 under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. The new tax bill has extended opportunity zones permanently. Opportunity zones were very popular back in 2017 and the years that followed, but now they’ve become less popular because they’re about to sunset. A  lot of that opportunity zone activity has been tapped out in certain areas. Now there’s new life for opportunity zones, and I expect to see renewed activity in that area.”

There has been controversy over the years about whether many of the designated opportunity zones should even qualify for special tax breaks since many were already located in gentrifying areas that were attractive to investors.

“In the new tax bill, there’s some new regulatory guidance about how sites qualify as opportunity zones and their ability to register as an opportunity zone that will cycle every 10 years,” said Dickinson. “But they have met with some controversy based on how they’ve been managed.”

She expects to see more guidance coming on opportunity zones and other parts of the new tax law. 

“I think additional guidance is going to be required on some of the personal income tax provisions of the tax bill,” said Dickinson, pointing to the provisions giving tax exemptions for tips and overtime income. The new “Trump accounts” for providing savings for young children are another example. “There will have to be some more meat around those concepts that are new,” said Dickinson.

It will be up to the Treasury Department and the IRS to draft such guidance, although budget and staffing cuts this year may make that more challenging. 

“The IRS, given its slimmed down budget and workforce, is now having to turn their attention to drafting the regulatory authority around this tax bill, and they’re probably less focused on some of the objectives that they’ve had over the years,” said Dickinson. “The example that comes to mind is for many years, there’s been talk about the IRS curbing the ability for clients to do short-term GRATs [grantor retained annuity trusts], for example. I think that probably it’s all hands on deck right now to deal with what they need to do to implement this tax bill, so I would expect to see a further delay on any authority coming out of the Treasury and IRS on some of these things that we’ve been waiting to get guidance on for some time.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending