Connect with us

Accounting

PCAOB local forums coming to 5 cities

Published

on

The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board plans to host a series of five in-person forums this year, with different members of the board visiting cities including Chicago, Los Angeles, Denver, Miami and Jersey City.

The forums will focus on auditing in the small business environment and on auditing broker-dealers. The initial forum will feature PCAOB chair Erica Williams in Chicago on May 22. Another board member, George Botic, will be hosting a forum in Los Angeles this summer, followed by forums this fall hosted by board members Kara Stein (Denver), Christina Ho (Miami) and Anthony Thompson (Jersey City). The exact dates and locations for those four forums will be announced as those events get closer.

The PCAOB plans to livestream the forums in Chicago and Jersey City over the internet and recordings of all five forums will be made available on the PCAOB’s website for those won’t be able to attend in person. 

“Smaller firms play an important role in our work to protect investors,” said Williams in a statement Wednesday. “These forums allow the PCAOB to share valuable resources and information with small firms to help them improve audit quality, while giving us a chance to hear from them directly about their unique needs and challenges.”

Some firms are likely to be giving the PCAOB board members an earful about some of its recent proposals. Last week, the PCAOB proposed two far-reaching standards on firm and engagement metrics and firm reporting, which together would impose new requirements for reporting on information such as audit resources, fees, governance structure, engagement metrics, workload, experience of audit personnel, financial information, any lawsuits and regulatory actions they’re facing, leadership, network membership and more. The PCAOB is already facing pushback from audit firms over its so-called NOCLAR proposal, which would toughen the requirements for auditors to be on the lookout for signs of fraud and noncompliance with laws and regulations at their clients, effectively putting them in the role of whistleblowers. The Center for Audit Quality organized a letter-writing campaign last year to spur comments opposing the proposal and a number of state CPA societies, CPA firms and business groups like the U.S. Chamber of Commerce registered their opposition to the proposals. The PCAOB pushed back the deadline for receiving comments and heard concerns and feedback for and against the NOCLAR proposal during a roundtable discussion webcast last month. 

PCAOB logo - office - NEW 2022

The Pennsylvania Institute of CPAs is among the groups expressing their opposition to the NOCLAR proposal. “This is one of the most important proposals that I’ve seen come out from standard-setters in my career,” said Allison Henry Allison Henry, PICPA’s vice president of professional and technical standards. “I think it highlights a significant issue that we have in terms of the expectation gap and the differences of perspective from what investors think that we provide in terms of assurance and what we actually are capable of providing.”

PICPA and other accounting organizations are concerned about the scope and the pervasiveness of what is actually being asked for by the PCAOB with the NOCLAR proposal. “When we work, for example, with attorneys, and in many cases, the legal profession, people expect that they are going to use conditional language, and they’re not going to give definitive answers in terms of what’s going to happen in the future,” said Henry. “But then they turn to the auditors, and it’s almost like they want absolute certainty, and absolute assurance, relative to what the opinion is driving at without any limitations whatsoever. And I get the sense from what is being proposed that they want that absolute assurance. They’re looking at what the investors want, and what is being proposed is impossible in terms of the scope.”

She explained her views in a recent article.

The PCAOB is likely to be hearing from auditors at those forums about such proposals. The forums are tailored to PCAOB-registered firms that audit smaller public companies or broker-dealers, giving firms the chance to interact directly with representatives from the PCAOB as well as other regulators in an educational setting. The PCAOB has held similar forms since 2004, and Thompson hosted them virtually in 2022 and 2023. This year marks the first time the forums will be held in person since 2019, as many such events went virtual due to the pandemic.

Participants at this year’s forums will receive a refresher on various auditing requirements as well as learn about new requirements that will become applicable in the near future. In addition to remarks from PCAOB board members, the agenda includes the following:

  • Presentations by PCAOB staff from the Office of the Chief Auditor, the Division of Registration and Inspections, and the Division of Enforcement and Investigations;
  • Illustrative examples related to revenue, critical audit matters, and fraud/journal entries, among other topics; and
  • Presentations by staff of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Registration is required for the May 22 forum in Chicago. There’s no fee to attend it either in-person or virtually, but advance registration needs to be done here. CPE credits will be available only for in-person attendees.

Forum attendees can submit questions in advance via email and attendees will also be able to submit questions during the forum. Registration info, event location and other details for the rest of the in-person forums this year will be announced closer to the date of each event.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

on

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance and Global Regulatory Harmonization in 2026

Published

on

Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.

Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.

Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.

Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.

This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.

Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.

By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.

Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.

Continue Reading

Trending