Connect with us

Accounting

PCAOB offers guidance on auditor responsibilities for detecting, reporting illegal acts

Published

on

The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board issued a new publication Tuesday providing guidance from its staff on the auditor’s responsibilities when it comes to detecting, evaluating and making communications about illegal acts, as a controversial new standard that would toughen these requirements awaits approval.

The PCAOB staff did outreach in connection with the PCAOB’s proposal on making changes in the existing requirements. In June 2023, the PCAOB proposed to replace its existing standard, AS 2405, Illegal Acts by Clients, with AS 2405, A Company’s Noncompliance with Laws and Regulations, as well as make some related amendments to other PCAOB auditing standards. The so-called NOCLAR proposal generated pushback from auditing firms and spurred a letter-writing campaign from the Center for Audit Quality and business groups protesting the proposed changes, which would make auditors more responsible for detecting and reporting signs of fraud and rule-breaking at the companies they audit. The PCAOB has not yet voted on the proposed standard, but it decided the staff publication would help clarify what the existing requirements are right now.

The PCAOB noted that under federal securities laws, auditors have a longstanding responsibility to detect illegal acts; evaluate information indicating that an illegal act has or may have occurred; determine whether it is likely that an illegal act has occurred, and, if so, to consider the possible effect of the illegal act on the financial statements of the company; and make appropriate communications about illegal acts — unless “clearly inconsequential” — to management, the audit committee, and possibly the Securities and Exchange Commission.

PCAOB logo - office - NEW 2022

The PCAOB standards include similar requirements, the board noted. Those responsibilities should also inform an auditor’s obligation to plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance that the company’s financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The staff publication explains the various considerations for auditors when performing procedures to detect, evaluate, and make communications about illegal acts by a company under audit.

“Companies are subject to a variety of legal and regulatory requirements depending on a number of factors, including, among others, geographic location, the product or services provided, and the particular industry,” said the report. “Violations, by act or omission, of laws and regulations that a company is subject to (i.e., illegal acts) can materially affect the financial statements and harm investors. As such, auditors’ procedures related to identifying possible illegal acts are an important part of planning and performing an audit.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Tech roundup: Intuit guarantees tax refunds 5 Days early into any bank account

Published

on


Intuit guarantees tax refunds 5 Days early into any bank account; IRIS beefs up Firm Management solution, customer success function; and other accounting tech news and updates.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Ex-Credit Suisse client charged by US amid tax evasion probe

Published

on

A former Credit Suisse Group AG client was charged with a tax-evasion conspiracy in the U.S. as officials weigh whether the bank — now owned by UBS Group AG — breached a 2014 plea deal in which it paid $2.6 billion and admitted helping thousands of Americans evade taxes.

Gilda Rosenberg, a Florida businesswoman, conspired with two family members in hiding $90 million in assets from the Internal Revenue Service between 2010 and 2017, federal prosecutors charged Wednesday. She’s accused of acting to conceal money in undeclared foreign accounts while also filing false returns and evading taxes on unreported income. 

The extent to which Credit Suisse complied with its plea deal took on new focus after a 2023 Senate Finance Committee report said there were “major violations” of its agreement that requires the bank to identify undeclared U.S. accounts to the IRS. In the report, Democratic staff on the committee said the bank had still failed to fully disclose US assets despite having identified “thousands of previously undeclared accounts” valued at more than $1.3 billion. 

In response to the report, Credit Suisse said it was cooperating and had provided information to U.S. authorities on potentially undeclared accounts held by American clients.

A spokesman for UBS declined to comment Thursday on the case against Rosenberg. An attorney for Rosenberg declined to comment.   

Telling the IRS

The 2023 report doesn’t name the Rosenbergs but describes how the bank allegedly helped a family of dual citizens of the U.S. and Latin American country evade taxes. Whistleblowers told the committee the family members held nearly $100 million at Credit Suisse for a decade before transferring those assets to other banks without telling the IRS. 

The charge against Rosenberg doesn’t identify Credit Suisse, but refer to the same allegations described in the Senate report, according to people familiar with the matter. U.S. authorities are weighing whether the Swiss bank breached the terms of its 2014 deal, said the people, who asked not to be identified discussing internal discussions.

UBS said in its third-quarter report that it had a provision for potential costs tied to inquiries into its cross-border wealth management services, including Credit Suisse’s compliance with the 2014 plea deal. It didn’t disclose an amount for the provision.

UBS could announce a settlement with prosecutors for violating terms of the 2014 deal as soon as this week, the Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday. The bank could agree to pay at least hundreds of millions of dollars, according to the report. The UBS spokesperson declined to comment on a possible settlement. 

Under its plea agreement with the U.S., Credit Suisse had to disclose all undeclared U.S. accounts closed and transferred from 2008 to 2014. Disclosing those account holders, known as “leaver lists,” was a U.S. requirement for Credit Suisse, several other Swiss banks that faced criminal charges, and 80 Swiss banks that made deals to avoid prosecution.

At the time of the report in 2023, Senator Ron Wyden, the Oregon Democrat who chairs the committee, slammed “greedy Swiss bankers” who appeared to be engaged in a “massive, ongoing conspiracy to help ultra-wealthy U.S. citizens to evade taxes.”

The report was released around the same time that Credit Suisse was being sold to rival UBS in a 3 billion franc ($3.3 billion) deal brokered by the Swiss government after years of scandal and mismanagement. 

‘Donate’ assets

Gilda Rosenberg was charged in a so-called criminal information. In a separate case last year, she pleaded guilty in Texas to conspiracy to commit wire fraud involving a Miami vending machine company she owns. She is scheduled to be sentenced on April 30. 

Rosenberg, a U.S. citizen, was born in Colombia and lives in south Florida, according to the tax charge. She conspired with two family members also born in Colombia, the U.S. alleges. They hid money in accounts in Switzerland, Spain, Israel and Andorra, prosecutors charged. 

Rosenberg and one relative agreed to sign documents purporting to “donate” assets in undeclared accounts to the other relative, the U.S. alleges. She also caused her return preparer to underreport income to the IRS and falsely say she had no interest in a foreign financial account, according to the charge.  

Since the bank’s 2014 guilty plea, other U.S. clients of Credit Suisse have been charged in tax cases. In 2016, Dan Horsky pleaded guilty to hiding more than $200 million in assets from the IRS. A Brazilian-American businessman, Dan Rotta, was indicted last year for allegedly using Credit Suisse, UBS and other Swiss banks to hide more than $20 million in assets from U.S. tax authorities over 35 years.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Deadline extended for Top New Products submissions

Published

on

Due to extensive interest, Accounting Today has extended the deadline for submissions to its 2025 Top New Products report. Submissions, which were originally due Jan. 10, can now be made until the end of the day on Wednesday, Jan. 15.

The report will recognize the best new and significantly improved products aimed at tax and accounting professionals, as judged by the editors of Accounting Today.

Products for consideration must be designed for the tax and accounting profession; must have been released no earlier than January 2024; and must be currently available (i.e., not in beta testing) in the U.S. market.

Top-New-Products-trophy-abacus

Submissions must include:

  • Release date;
  • Pricing;
  • A website URL and/or phone number for customer contact;
  • 200 words or less describing the product’s functionality and its relevance to the tax and accounting profession; and
  • A digital image or logo for the product, if available (images can be in JPG, EPS or TIFF format, at 300 dpi or higher).

We will accept up to three submissions per vendor, or three per major division of a vendor.

Submissions may be sent by email to our technology editor, Chris Gaetano, at [email protected],

Continue Reading

Trending