Connect with us

Accounting

PCAOB ramp up enforcement against auditors

Published

on

Enforcement by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board against auditors in 2024 is off to its fastest start in recent years, according to a new report. 

The report, released last week by the Brattle Group, found that under PCAOB chair Erica Williams’ leadership, the PCAOB has already brought more actions — 34 actions against 45 respondents — in the first six months of this year than each year under its previous leadership in 2018–2021.

In comparison, through June of last year, the PCAOB brought seven enforcement matters involving nine respondents (three individuals and six firms). Twenty of the 34 actions (59%) brought by the PCAOB during the first half of 2024 involved U.S. respondents (12 individuals and 15 firms). In the 14 actions involving non-U.S. respondents in the first half of 2024, eight individual respondents and 10 firms were charged. Approximately 30% of PCAOB actions disclosed in the first half of 2024 involved respondents associated with the six largest global networks. More than half of the actions involving firm respondents in the first half of 2024 alleged violations related to firms’ systems of quality control.

In contrast, SEC activity through the first half of 2024 is at its lowest levels in recent years. The SEC initiated three actions in the first half of 2024 involving four respondents (two individuals and two firms). In comparison, in the first half of 2018, the year with the highest H1 activity in the analysis’s sample, the SEC initiated 13 actions involving 17 respondents (nine individuals and eight firms). Neither of the two SEC actions involving firm respondents alleged violations related to the firms’ systems of quality control.

PCAOB logo - office - NEW 2022

The report attributes the low level of enforcement activity to the SEC awaiting the outcome of a Supreme Court decision involving the use of administrative law judges, who typically preside over cases instead of the overcrowded courts in order to speed cases. Ultimately, the Supreme Court curtailed the SEC’s ability to use the in-house judges and gave defendants the right to bring the case to a federal jury.

“The low levels of SEC enforcement activity in the first half of 2024 may be due, in part, to uncertainties related to the constitutionality of the SEC’s in-house ALJs while the agency awaited the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in the SEC v Jarkesy matter,” said the report. “For example, on April 29, 2024, the SEC agreed to stay an in-house proceeding against a partner at accounting firm Marcum LLP, postponing the proceeding until 30 days after the Supreme Court issued its decision in Jarkesy.”

The PCAOB imposed penalties of nearly $35 million in the first half of 2024, more than the combined penalties imposed by the SEC and PCAOB during all of 2023 and three of the four years under the SEC and PCAOB’s prior administrations. In comparison, the PCAOB imposed a then-record $20 million during all of 2023, up from its previous annual high of $11 million in 2022. The $35 million in penalties in the first half of 2024 was driven by one mega-settlement of $25 million with KPMG Netherlands in April.

That represented the largest penalty in PCAOB history and was more than three times greater than the regulator’s prior record of $8 million imposed on a firm in 2016.

“Even setting aside the $25 million settlement, penalties in 2024 are outpacing 2023,” said the report. “Monetary penalties were imposed on respondents in more than 95% of actions initiated in H1 2024.”

Five firm respondents settled for $1 million or more, while four firms were required to engage an independent consultant. The PCAOB took four firm respondents’ cooperation into consideration when determining sanctions.

The SEC imposed monetary penalties of $14 million in the two actions that were finalized in the first half 2024. Despite finalizing only two actions in the first half of 2024, penalties in the first half of 2024 are greater than the $11.5 million imposed by the SEC in all of 2023 and three of the four full years under the SEC’s prior administration.

The SEC imposed severe nonmonetary penalties in both actions it settled in the first half of 2024. In one settlement, the SEC required a firm respondent to retain an independent consultant. In the second action, both the firm (BF Borgers) and individual respondents were permanently barred.

“PCAOB enforcement in 2024 is off to its fastest start in the agency’s history, bringing 34 actions against 45 respondents and imposing a record $35 million in penalties by the end of June,” said Brattle principal Alison Forman, who authored the report with associate Adam Karageorge, in a statement. “And the SEC, despite settling only two actions in the first half of the year, has already imposed higher penalties on auditors so far in 2024 than in all of 2023.”

The report also includes a discussion of how developments in the first half of 2024 – including the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. Jarkesy and amendments to PCAOB Rule 3502 governing contributory liability — could profoundly impact enforcement activity against auditors moving forward.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending