Connect with us

Accounting

PCAOB sanctions Raines & Fischer for deceiving inspection staff

Published

on

The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board today announced settled disciplinary orders sanctioning Raines & Fischer and three of its partners — William Fischer, Brian Uhlman and Steven Sarrel — for attempting to deceive PCAOB inspection staff and other violations.

Firm personnel improperly created and modified workpapers after document completion dates and in anticipation of PCAOB inspections in 2020 and 2022, violating PCAOB Rule 4006, Duty to Cooperate with Inspectors, and AS 1215, Audit Documentation. The personnel concealed the altered workpapers before they were provided to inspectors, taking steps such as changing computer clocks and printing documents to PDF. 

“Attempting to deceive the PCAOB’s inspection staff undermines investor protection,” PCAOB Chair Erica Williams said in a statement. “To protect investors and safeguard the integrity of the inspection process, the PCAOB will continue to pursue disciplinary action against firms and individuals that fail to cooperate with inspections.”

PCAOB logo - office - NEW 2022

Sarrel and Uhlman also violated Rule 4006. Sarrel was responsible for the alteration of workpapers prior to the 2020 inspection of a broker-dealer engagement for which he was engagement partner. Uhlman was responsible for the alteration of workpapers prior to the 2022 inspection of two broker-dealer engagements for which he was engagement partner. Neither partners informed the inspectors of the alterations, despite participating in meetings with PCAOB staff during the inspections.

Fischer was the firm’s managing partner and in charge of its audit department and quality control during this period. He took no action, despite being aware in both instances of the alterations, and failed to prevent the altered workpapers from being provided to PCAOB staff.

The PCAOB found that Raines & Fischer’s quality control system was deficient. The firm also violated documentation standards by failing to assemble for retention complete and final sets of workpapers for four broker-dealer engagements in addition to the three subject to inspection. The firm also repeatedly violated PCAOB Rule 2201 by falling to timely file its Form 2 for four consecutive years.

Uhlman additionally failed to comply with audit and attestation standards related to the audit and examination of carrying a broker-dealer. During that engagement, he failed to test key internal controls over compliance and supplemental information included in the schedules supporting the broker-dealer’s financial statements.

Fischer also violated AS 1220, Engagement Quality Review, by falling to perform adequate engagement quality reviews for seven broker-dealer engagements. He also violated PCAOB Rule 3502, Responsibility Not to Knowingly or Recklessly Contribute to Violations, by contributing to the firm’s noncooperation for both inspections and its violations of rules and standards.

“These respondents were responsible for a host of audit and attestation deficiencies and compounded those violations with their attempts to conceal the shortcomings in their work from the PCAOB’s inspectors. That misconduct warrants the strong sanctions imposed in the orders issued by the Board today,” Robert Rice, director of the PCAOB’s Division of Enforcement and Investigations, said in a statement.

The sanction is the latest in a long line of increased enforcement efforts by the PCAOB, most recently including revoking a firm’s registration and barring its sole partner for audit quality and control failures on Tuesday. In November, it sanctioned five firms for reporting violations. In September, it settled sanctions against four firms for failing to make required communications with audit committees, as well as one firm for violating reporting requirements. The board previously sanctioned Baker Tilly, Grant Thornton Bharat, Mazars and SW Audit in February, as well as three firms in November 2023 and five firms in July 2023.

Without admitting or denying the findings, all four respondents consented to their respective orders:

  • Censure each respondent;
  • Permanently revoke the Firm’s registration;
  • Bar Uhlman from associating with a PCAOB-registered firm with a right to petition the Board to terminate the bar after five years (and requiring additional CPE requirements prior to petitioning);
  • Bar Fischer and Sarrel from associating with a registered firm with the right to petition to terminate the bars after three years; and,
  • Impose civil money penalties of $200,000 on the Firm, $125,000 on Uhlman, $75,000 on Fischer, and $65,000 on Sarrel.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Instead adds AI-driven tax reports

Published

on

Tax management platform Instead launched artificial intelligence-driven tax reports, harnessing AI to analyze full tax returns to glean tax strategies and missed opportunities.

The San Francisco-based company’s reports, which are designed for clarity and compliance, include:

  • Tax Return Analysis Report, which reveals tax-saving opportunities in tax returns for individuals (1040) and businesses (Schedule C, E, F, 1120, 1120S, 1065).
  • Tax Plan Report, which provides a real-time summary and action list of all tax strategies across all entities in a tax year and includes potential and actual savings, summaries for each tax strategy, and IRS and court case references.
  • Tax Strategy Reports for every tax strategy, with detailed calculations of deductions and credits, supporting documentation, and an actionable plan.

Instead users can collaborate with their tax professionals on the platform or search the Instead directory of firms that support the platform and offer tax planning and advisory services. 

Andrew Argue

Andrew Argue

“We are excited to bring our users the future of smart, effective decisions when it comes to filing taxes,” said Andrew Argue, co-founder of Instead, in a statement. “With Instead, users can easily uncover and implement tax strategies and opportunities that will save them money and have the transparent calculations to support a tax return. And this is just the beginning…we have some exciting things on our roadmap and look forward to sharing them very soon!”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Half of accountants expect firms to shrink headcount by 20%

Published

on

Fifty-two percent of accountants expect their firms to shrink in headcount by 20% in the next five years, according to a new report.

The Indiana CPA Society, in collaboration with CPA Crossings, released today a 2025 Workforce Transformation report. Paradoxically, while it found that most respondents anticipate their firms to reduce headcount, 75% said that their firms will need the same amount or more staff to meet future client demand. 

Sixty percent of respondents said that entry-level professionals are the role they anticipate needing fewer employees in the future due to automation. Nearly half as many responded saying experienced professionals (approximately 33%) and manager-level roles (approximately 25%). 

The report highlights the weaknesses of the pyramid-shaped practice structure that is the basis for most firm’s current talent management and workforce development systems. One challenge is the pyramid’s low retention design. 

“The pyramid practice structure was not designed to retain staff. It actually does the opposite. Upward mobility is statistically difficult to attain,” the report reads. “Firms have a lot of requirements for entry-level staff, but there is a lot less need for experienced staff. Firms eventually have a lot of entry-level professionals qualified to become experienced staff but only a few openings. It only gets more difficult as staff try to move from experienced staff to managers. For those who want to move from managers to owners, the wait could be 15 years or more — or maybe never.”

The report discussed the dwindling pipeline of incoming talent, saying, “Currently, there are not enough qualified staff to maintain a bottom layer that is wide enough,” and generational preferences, saying, “Gen Zers are looking for meaning and emotional connection. If they cannot find these connections in their work, it won’t take much for them to decide to move on.”

The final weakness of the pyramid model the report highlighted was advances in technology, particularly automation and artificial intelligence. 

“Advances in technology, especially with automation and artificial intelligence, could obliterate the work being done by the bottom of the pyramid,” the report reads. “This impact is beginning to be seen in accounting firms across the country as manual and time-consuming data entry and reconciliation tasks, once assigned to entry-level staff, are being automated. Firms are already seeing great benefits from this transfer, such as faster and more accurate data processing.”

The report suggests that firms take on a new practice structure that focuses on precision hiring, proactive retention, practical technology implementation, pricing expertise, practice area expansion or focus, and people acceleration. 

Continue Reading

Accounting

Senate Republicans plan major revisions to Trump tax bill

Published

on

The U.S. Capitol

Senate Republicans intend to propose revised tax and health-care provisions to President Donald Trump’s $3 trillion signature economic package this week, shrugging off condemnations of the legislation by Elon Musk as they rush to enact it before July 4. 

The Senate Finance Committee’s plan to extract savings from the Medicaid and — perhaps — Medicare health insurance programs could depart in key respects from the version of the giant bill that narrowly passed the US House in May. The release of the panel’s draft will likely touch off a new round of wrangling between fiscal conservatives and moderates. 

As the debate unfolds, businesses in the energy, health care, manufacturing and financial services industries will be watching closely.  

SALT dilemma

A crucial decision for Majority Leader John Thune, Committee Chairman Mike Crapo and other panel members will be how to handle the $40,000 limit on state and local tax deductions that was crucial to passage of the bill in the House. 

Senate Republicans want to scale back the $350 billion cost of increasing the cap from $10,000 to $40,000 for those making less than $500,000.   

House Speaker Mike Johnson and a group of Republican members from high-tax states have warned that any diminishing of the SALT cap would doom the measure when it comes back to the House for a final vote. At the same time, so-called pass-through businesses in the service sector are pushing to remove a provision in the House bill that limits their ability to claim SALT deductions. 

(Read more:What the House gave the Senate: Inside the ‘Big Beautiful’ bill.“)

The Senate Finance Committee is widely expected to propose extending three business tax breaks that expire after 2029 in the House version to order to make them permanent. They are the research and development deduction, the ability to use depreciation and amortization as the basis for interest expensing and 100% bonus depreciation of certain property, including most machinery and factories.  

Manufacturers and banks are particularly eager to see all of them extended. 

To pay for the items, which most economists rank as the most pro-growth in the overall tax bill, senators may restrict temporary breaks on tips and overtime, which Trump campaigned on during last year’s election in appeals to restaurant and hospitality workers. The White House wants to keep those provisions as is.

White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett said Trump “supports changing” the SALT deduction and it’s up to lawmakers to reach a consensus.

“It’s a horse trading issue with the Senate and the House,” Hassett said Sunday on CBS’s Face the Nation. “The one thing we need and the president wants is a bill that passes, and passes on the Fourth of July.”

The committee will also face tough decisions on green energy tax credits. Scaling those back generates nearly $600 billion in savings in the House bill. 

On Friday, rival House factions released dueling statements. 

The conservative House Freedom Caucus warned that any move to restore some of the credits would prompt its members to vote against the bill. “We want to be crystal clear: If the Senate attempts to water down, strip out, or walk back the hard-fought spending reductions and IRA Green New Scam rollbacks achieved in this legislation, we will not accept it,” the group said. 

In contrast, a group of 13 Republican moderates, led by Pennsylvania’s Brian Fitzpatrick and Virginia’s Jen Kiggans, urged senators to make changes that would benefit renewable energy projects, many in Republican districts, that came about through President Joe Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act. 

(Listen:The state of the ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ and more.“)

“We remain deeply concerned by several provisions, including those which would abruptly terminate several credits just 60 days after enactment for projects that have not yet begun construction,” the lawmakers said in a letter to the Senate. 

Banks are especially interested to ensure that tax credits on their balance sheets as part of renewable energy financing aren’t rendered worthless by the bill. 

Health-care perils

Medicaid and Medicare cuts present the most daunting challenge in the committee’s draft. While Republicans are generally in favor of new work requirements for able-bodied adults to be insured by Medicaid, some moderates like Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska have expressed concern over giving states just a year and a half to implement the requirement.  

Senator Lisa Murkowski House provisions instituting new co-pays for Medicaid recipients and limits on the ability of states to tax Medicaid providers in order to increase federal reimbursement payments are more disputed. 

Senators Josh Hawley of Missouri and Jim Justice of West Virginia have said they oppose these changes.  

To find savings to make up for removing these provisions, Republicans said last week that they are examining whether to put new restrictions on billing practices in Medicare Advantage. Large health insurers that provide those plans would be most affected by such changes. 

Yet overall, GOP leaders say the tax bill remains on schedule and they expect much of the House bill to remain intact. 

The Senate’s rules-keeper is in the process of deciding whether some provisions are not primarily fiscal in nature. Provisions that restrict state regulations on artificial intelligence, ending some gun regulations and putting new limits on federal courts are seen as most vulnerable to being stripped under Senate budget rules. 

Lawmakers are largely taking their cues from Trump and sticking by the $3 trillion bill at the center of the White House’s economic agenda. 

Musk, the biggest political donor of the 2024 campaign, has threatened to help defeat anyone who votes for the legislation, but lawmakers seem to agree that staying in the president’s good graces is the safer path to political survival.

“We are already pretty far down the trail,” Thune told reporters on Thursday afternoon as his colleagues left for the weekend.

Continue Reading

Trending