Connect with us

Accounting

PE pushes for two-letter tax change to save billions

Published

on

The giants of private equity are preparing to fight for two little letters. 

The $5 trillion industry is embarking on a campaign to change the way taxes for indebted businesses are tallied. Leading lobbyists want to tack two letters — DA — back to an earnings formula used to help calculate tax deductions, a change potentially worth billions. 

The idea is to account for depreciation and amortization when determining the tax deductibility of a company’s debt payments. The maximum amount any company can get in such tax write-offs is calculated as a percentage of earnings. That’s why using EBITDA – which is typically bigger than EBIT — in this process would generate heftier tax deductions.   

That means bigger tax savings for heavily indebted companies and increased returns for private equity firms that own them. It could boost tax deductions by up to 15% in some cases, according to one tally. That’s a major prize for an industry that uses leverage to juice profits.

“This is beneficial to private equity because it’s going to increase tax deductions at the companies in which they invest, which is going to increase their profits, which is what they’re concerned about,” Rebel Cole, a finance professor at Florida Atlantic University, said in an interview. 

But it’s not just a boon for buyout firms. Any business that has borrowed to fund its operations could benefit, providing the investment industry with powerful allies. 

In recent months, the American Investment Council — the lobbying giant funded by firms from Blackstone Inc. to KKR & Co. — has been coordinating with the National Association of Manufacturers to canvass Congressional support on the issue, according to people familiar with the matter. Other private equity lobbyists have been in touch with the Equipment Leasing and Finance Association, which represents companies in the $1 trillion equipment finance sector, said the people, who asked not to be named as the discussions are private. 

Private equity is shrewd to find bedfellows in manufacturers. President Donald Trump has made clear he wants to boost U.S. manufacturers as part of an “America First” agenda. The alliances allow private equity to demonstrate that the fight is broader than protecting dealmakers’ wallets.

“Almost all businesses rely on debt to finance expenses,” said Jason Mulvihill, president of political consultancy Capitol Asset Strategies, who has been involved in past fights on the matter. “Policymakers should not overly restrict the ability of companies to use debt in their operations.” 

These alliances will help amplify private equity’s voice as Congress works to deliver on Trump’s ask: “one big, beautiful” tax bill. His threat to hike taxes on private equity profits known as carried interest has already thrown the industry on the defensive. 

While the fight over carried interest commands headlines, interest deductibility arguably has more far-reaching consequences because of how many companies it would affect. Speculative-grade borrowers backed by private equity firms took out $384 billion in syndicated loans in 2024, the second-highest year on record since 2000, according to PitchBook LCD.

Plain vanilla

Today, businesses can only deduct interest expenses totaling up to 30% of plain vanilla operating income, or EBIT, from their taxable income. Depreciation and amortization allow a business to spread out the cost of things like equipment and capture the changes in value of patents and other assets. The accounting items can create a gulf between EBIT and EBITDA, especially for capital-intensive businesses.

The first Trump administration’s tax reform initially allowed businesses to deduct debt payments of as much as 30% of EBITDA, but the formula flipped back to EBIT three years ago. The change meant businesses that once subtracted an average of roughly 85% of interest payments from their taxable income could only claim 75% of those debt payments in deductions, estimates Thomas Brosy, senior research associate in the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center. 

The American Investment Council has told members and lawmakers it wants to bring back the Trump-era rules first spelled out in 2017. “If you want to encourage manufacturing to return to the US, these sort of provisions are important,” Chief Executive Drew Maloney said

The National Association of Manufacturers meanwhile is leading the charge in lobbying for interest deductibility. It recently hired Ernst & Young to draft a study detailing how the expiration of various Trump provisions could hurt the economy and is planning meetings this month between policymakers and its member manufacturers.

“Reinstating the ‘DA’ would reduce the cost of debt financing and make it easier for manufacturers to invest in job-creating projects here in the U.S.,” said Charles Crain, managing vice president of policy for the organization.

Other groups such as the Equipment Leasing and Finance Association are making even bolder asks. They want lawmakers to consider full deductibility on all interest payments, as was the case for years. The policy “is good for American business,” CEO Leigh Lytle said.

Restoring more generous limits stands to further add to the U.S. deficit by up to $179 billion over the next 10 years, according to a Treasury Department analysis. But higher interest rates squeezing borrowers and a weakening economy provide plenty of fodder for lobbyists looking to make lawmakers look past the fiscal downside. Politicians from both the Democratic and Republican parties have introduced bills on the matter in the past month.

“The fears of recession and the desire to reduce business debt burdens will be difficult for lawmakers to ignore,” Brosy of the Tax Policy Center said.

Continue Reading

Accounting

FASB Standardizes Carbon Offsets Accounting Rules

Published

on

FASB Standardizes Carbon Offsets Accounting Rules

In a decisive move toward standardized environmental financial reporting, accounting standards boards issued updated implementation guidance during the week ending July 25, 2026, regarding the formal recognition and valuation of corporate carbon offsets and environmental credits. The revised frameworks establish precise rules for how enterprises must measure, record, and disclose carbon credits on balance sheets, eliminating years of inconsistent reporting practices across public capital markets.

Under the finalized accounting standard, purchased carbon offsets can no longer be categorized under vague administrative expenses or unstandardized intangible asset accounts. Instead, organizations must classify environmental credits based on underlying operational intent—distinguishing between credits held for immediate compliance compliance obligations, long-term offset obligations, or active market trading. Furthermore, companies are required to evaluate carbon holdings for fair value impairment at the end of each reporting period, ensuring that depreciated or low-quality environmental credits do not distort corporate asset values.

The standardized rules carry significant implications for corporate audit committees and chief accounting officers. External audit firms are implementing rigorous verification protocols to validate the physical legitimacy, legal ownership, and scientific permanence of carbon credits claimed on balance sheets. Inaccurate or overstated carbon accounting claims now carry substantial financial litigation risk, alongside potential regulatory enforcement for misleading ESG disclosures.

To remain fully compliant, corporate accounting departments must establish centralized carbon tracking systems integrated into primary standard ERP ledgers. Accounting teams that proactively adopt standardized environmental reporting protocols will build investor credibility, streamline annual audit processes, and insulate their organizations against evolving regulatory scrutiny.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance Tools Reduce Risk

Published

on

Automated Tax Compliance Tools Reduce Risk

Corporate tax departments reached a critical juncture in automated operational management. With nations worldwide rapidly enacting digital service taxes, localized value-added tax (VAT) mandates, and real-time electronic invoicing requirements, manual tax calculations have become obsolete. Modern corporate tax divisions are aggressively deploying AI-driven tax engine software to automate complex cross-border indirect tax calculations in real time.

The imperative for automated tax compliance stems from the sheer complexity of current trade policies and multi-jurisdictional commerce. E-commerce platforms, software vendors, and global manufacturers face constantly changing regional tax rates, statutory exemption rules, and cross-border tariff structures. Automated tax engines embed directly into enterprise enterprise resource planning (ERP) architectures, automatically applying correct tax codes at the point of sale, calculating real-time withholding amounts, and generating compliant e-invoices.

Automated audit trail generation represents another key advantage of modern tax tech integration. Advanced compliance platforms log every transactional tax determination on immutable digital ledgers, providing tax authorities with transparent, self-verifying audit trails. This capability drastically reduces the operational duration and administrative cost of corporate tax audits, protecting enterprises against severe penalties resulting from calculation errors or missed reporting deadlines.

For chief financial officers and tax directors, investing in automated tax compliance is a vital operational risk mitigation strategy. Automating routine tax calculations frees high-level accounting professionals to focus on strategic tax planning, transfer pricing optimization, and risk management in an increasingly complex global economic environment.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Trending