Connect with us

Finance

Powell speaks on Capitol Hill this week with politics front and center

Published

on

Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell speaks at a news conference on June 18, 2025, in Washington DC, United States.

Yasin Ozturk | Anadolu | Getty Images

Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell heads to Capitol Hill this week, facing increasing pressure both from outside and inside the central bank to start the push for lower interest rates.

Powell’s semiannual testimony to Congress kicks off Tuesday morning, as the central bank leader presents the Fed’s monetary policy report to the House Financial Services Committee. He then heads to the Senate Banking Committee on Wednesday.

Generally, the congressionally mandated sessions allow the Fed chair to drop some basic comments about the state of the economy and monetary policy. Legislators then get a chance to ask questions, which occasionally can turn hostile but are rarely anything severe.

But the backdrop to this appearance is different: Not only President Donald Trump but also multiple White House officials have cranked up the heat on Powell to start lowering rates, and now he’s faced with two key Fed officials who have spoken out in recent days to say they likely will favor a cut as soon as July.

That combination of factors has Wall Street buzzing with the possibility that the normally politics-free Federal Open Market Committee is now seeing some of its protective cover erode.

Fed's Goolsbee: If tariff air clears, we should proceed with cuts

“There’s some political influence starting to come into the FOMC,” Mohamed El-Erian, chief economic advisor at Allianz, said Monday on CNBC.

El-Erian’s comments came shortly after Fed Governor Michelle Bowman said during a speech in Prague that she could see a case for starting to ease policy next month so long as inflation data stays in line.

Coupled with similar remarks Friday on CNBC from Governor Christopher Waller, there would appear to be at least some pushback against Powell’s repeated statements last week that policy is well-positioned for a more patient approach as tariff impacts play out.

What’s more, Waller and Bowman both are Trump appointees dating from his first term in office, and both have been mentioned as potential candidates to succeed Powell next year.

“Now suddenly we’ve had two Republican-leaning governors who came out with this notion of July, and they’ve moved the market,” El-Erian said. “What I do know is that Jay Powell is going to have a lot of difficulty trying to get everybody unified on a message.”

Indeed, traders have upped the odds of a July cut to about 23%, and a much more definitive 82% behind a September move, according to the CME Group’s FedWatch gauge of futures pricing.

More immediately, Powell could have a contentious two days ahead of him as he tries to explain the Fed’s position in the face of what could be some antagonism on both side of the congressional aisle. Following Trump’s lead, Republicans are likely to quiz Powell on what the hold-up is for easier monetary policy, while liberal Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) has been urging Powell to cut as well.

The trouble with Trump’s call

However, Trump’s desire for dramatic cuts — he has suggested at least 2 percentage points’ worth — are unlikely to materialize, either.

In his CNBC interview, Waller said he wants to “start slow” with cutting. At last week’s FOMC meeting, participants suggested that the end point, or terminal rate, for the fed funds rate would be around 3%, which is just 1.25 percentage points below the current level.

Beyond that, such dramatic moves could be counterproductive.

When the Fed cut by a full percentage point from September through December of last year, Treasury yields actually moved higher, almost in tandem with the reductions, as bond market investors priced in the potential for faster economic growth and higher inflation.

“The idea that the Fed does something and there’s immediate transmission and everything works exactly the way it’s supposed to work is just a myth,” said Jai Kedia, a research fellow at the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank. “You know, people way overvalue the Fed’s effect on the economy, especially in an immediate kind of manner.”

Nevertheless, the administration is demanding immediate action from Powell, notwithstanding that the chair is just one of 12 voters on the committee that sets interest rates.

Bill Pulte, director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, posted Monday on X that momentum is “building for Powell’s immediate resignation” — which Trump has not called for — adding that “it is clear that Powell’s political bias against our great President needs to be looked at.”

The Fed’s mission

Kedia, though, said the White House’s demand for dramatic action from the Fed is irresponsible.

For one, he said reducing federal borrowing costs isn’t the Fed’s job.

“The Fed’s mandate is actually to stabilize inflation and stabilize employment,” Kedia said. “We can debate whether it should have that mandate, or how successful it’s been in doing that, but if you put it in charge of the federal debt, you may as well kiss that mandate goodbye.”

Like El-Erian, Kedia does believe the Fed could start cutting rates, though market pricing favors September rather than July for the first move. FOMC members were split at last week’s meeting over the path and extent of cuts.

Kedia said that if Powell and the rest of the FOMC consider following a course that Trump is trying to push, it risks losing the economy as well as its reputation.

“Now I do think that the rates are slightly too high, but the reason to cut rates is basically if you’re following a monetary policy rule, or you’re looking at guidance from the macro economy, none of which will tell you that you have to reduce rates by as much as President Trump wants them to be reduced by,” he said. “A good economic case can be made that the Fed should cut rates, but that’s got nothing to do with the political aspect.”

Wharton's Jeremy Siegel: Waller is right that the Fed should be lowering rates

Continue Reading

Finance

Treasury Yields Rise as Fed Cut Expectations Shift

Published

on

Treasury Yields Rise as Fed Cut Expectations Shift

Fixed-income markets recorded significant re-pricing during the week ending July 25, 2026, as a convergence of strong labor market metrics and surging energy costs drove U.S. Treasury yields higher across all maturities. The benchmark 10-year Treasury yield climbed toward 4.70%, reaching its highest point in several months. Institutional bond investors rapidly adjusted portfolio durations as expectations for near-term interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve faded in response to inflation concerns.

The upward shift in sovereign yields reflects a broader fundamental reassessment of global monetary policy. Earlier in the quarter, money markets had priced in a series of rate reductions designed to support economic activity. However, with initial jobless claims falling to 187,000 and crude oil breaching $100 per barrel, fixed-income traders are pricing in a ‘higher-for-longer’ interest rate environment. The inversion between short-term Treasury bills and long-term bonds narrowed, indicating a shift toward term premium expansion.

Rising Treasury yields present both challenges and opportunities for institutional wealth managers. While commercial lenders and mortgage origination volumes face headwinds from elevated borrowing costs, fixed-income investors are locking in attractive real yields on high-quality sovereign and investment-grade corporate bonds. Institutional debt issuers, conversely, are recalibrating their capital structures, opting for shorter-term refinancing instruments or private credit facilities to avoid committing to elevated long-term coupon rates.

Navigating the current bond market landscape demands strict duration management and credit selection. Wealth advisors recommend maintaining flexible fixed-income allocations, combining short-duration Treasuries with inflation-protected securities (TIPS) to shield capital against potential energy-driven inflation spikes while earning dependable nominal income.

Continue Reading

Finance

Private Credit Expansion Transforms Corporate Loans

Published

on

Private Credit Expansion Transforms Corporate Loans

Private credit markets reached a pivotal milestone during the week ending July 25, 2026, as non-bank direct lending consortiums captured a record share of middle-market corporate debt originations. With commercial banks maintaining conservative credit standards and public bond yields remaining elevated, corporate borrowers are increasingly turning to private fund managers for customized capital solutions. This expansion marks a permanent structural shift in enterprise finance, establishing private credit as a primary pillar of institutional corporate liquidity.

The acceleration of private credit deals is driven by speed, deal certainty, and flexible terms. Unlike traditional syndicated bank loans that require lengthy underwriting, credit rating approvals, and public roadshows, private direct lenders can structure tailored financing packages within days. Middle-market firms facing upcoming debt maturities are utilizing private debt facilities to execute recapitalizations, strategic acquisitions, and growth capital deployments without risking execution delay in public markets.

However, financial regulators and central bank supervisors are scrutinizing the sector’s rapid growth. Supervisory agencies are evaluating potential systemic risks associated with non-bank leverage, valuation transparency, and liquidity mismatches during economic downturns. Despite regulatory interest, major pension funds, insurance firms, and sovereign wealth entities continue to expand capital allocations to private credit funds, attracted by reliable floating-rate yields that outperform public fixed-income benchmarks.

As private credit matures into a dominant asset class, corporate chief financial officers must evaluate non-bank lenders alongside traditional banking relationships. Direct lending partnerships provide valuable balance sheet resilience, enabling companies to secure flexible financing terms even during periods of public market turbulence.

Continue Reading

Finance

Tokenized Debt Shifts How Corporate Manage Short Term Liquidity

Published

on

Tokenized Debt Shifts Corporate Liquidity

The landscape of institutional debt markets is undergoing a profound structural shift on July 21, 2026, as major corporate issuers and commercial banks rapidly accelerate the deployment of tokenized debt instruments. Data published by leading capital market consortiums indicates that primary issuances of digital commercial paper and tokenized corporate bonds have reached record volumes this month. By moving legacy debt origination, underwriting, and secondary distribution onto permissioned distributed ledgers, corporate treasurers are unlocking unprecedented operational flexibility and instantaneous cross-border liquidity.

The adoption of tokenized debt is fundamentally altering how enterprise balance sheets manage short-term liquidity needs. Traditional corporate bond settlement cycles historically required multi-day clearing processes involving numerous intermediaries, custodial entities, and clearinghouses. Through programmable smart contracts on distributed ledgers, issuers can now execute atomic settlement—enabling continuous, 24/7 access to institutional capital pools. This instantaneous clearing mechanism drastically reduces counterparty risk, eliminates costly settlement friction, and allows treasury teams to dynamically optimize working capital in real time.

A major catalyst driving this institutional migration is the establishment of comprehensive digital asset regulatory frameworks across major financial hubs. Clear legal guidelines regarding ledger-based securities ownership have provided institutional compliance officers with the regulatory confidence necessary to transition multi-billion-dollar liquidity facilities onto digital platforms. Furthermore, the integration of automated regulatory reporting directly into token smart contracts simplifies ongoing compliance audits, ensuring that secondary market trades automatically enforce investor accreditation limits and tax withholding requirements.

For chief financial officers and institutional portfolio managers, tokenized debt represents a fundamental evolution in fixed-income strategy. Companies that embrace ledger-based debt structures gain direct access to a broader, global base of digital-native institutional investors while substantially reducing borrowing overhead. As ledger interoperability continues to improve across global exchanges, tokenized debt is poised to become the standard infrastructure for global corporate finance.

Continue Reading

Trending