Connect with us

Accounting

President Donald Trump launched his own cryptocurrency, here’s what bankers need to know

Published

on

Trump sworn in

Chip Somodevilla/Bloomberg

President Donald Trump ventured into the crypto-sphere with a new coin released shortly before his inauguration. Like all alt coins, it is subject to volatility and uncertainty. Here’s what bankers need to know, to aid their own decision making and to advise their customers.

It’s a meme coin

Featuring the now-iconic image of Trump raising his fist in the air following the failed assassination attempt over the summer, the new coins named TRUMP and MELANIA fall into the bucket typically called “meme coins,” meaning its value is tied to their personas and brand.

“The way I would describe it is they’re collectors’ items. That’s where people get involved: They get excited about the hype — the president has just been elected and they want to participate in any way they can,” said Rob Krugman, chief digital officer at Broadridge.

“One that I think you often come back to is Dogecoin, another meme coin, and that grew in value largely associated with celebrity, in that case, Elon Musk,” Krugman said.

The current venture is not backed by anything tangible, aside from the celebrity factor, meaning it has no inherent transactional or economic value. The coins are being sold on the Solana Blockchain network via Moonshot, an app that lets people buy meme coins in a variety of ways typical to online shopping: Apple Pay, credit and debit card, Paypal, Venmo and using other crypto currencies.

Seoyoung Kim, an associate professor of finance at USC, likened them to beanie babies.

“This is sort of like, where did the value of beanie babies come from? The meme coins are like your digital beanie babies,” Kim said, and they might have sustained popularity, or they might not.”

The coin’s website states it is “the only Official Trump Meme, by President Donald J. Trump.” The fine print further clarifies: 

“Trump Memes are intended to function as an expression of support for, and engagement with, the ideals and beliefs embodied by the symbol ‘$TRUMP’ and the associated artwork, and are not intended to be, or to be the subject of, an investment opportunity, investment contract, or security of any type.”

The MELANIA coin provides a similar disclaimer, noting the coins are “digital collectables” that “are not intended to be, or to be the subject of, an investment opportunity, investment contract or security of any type.”

Think of these coins like concert tickets

Kim used concert tickets as an analogy for why someone may get involved.

“There’s only two legitimate reasons to buy a concert ticket: You really, really like the artist and you plan to use your concert ticket to gain entry into that performance, or you don’t care about the artist but you think that other people will care, and you think you’ll sell that to get at a higher price later,” Kim said. 

“But it would be totally ridiculous if you said that you’re buying a concert ticket because you think Lady Gaga is innovative and you want profit participation,” she said.

The TRUMP and MELANIA coins are similar in that people may purchase them to show support for the president and they believe in him or because they believe other people will pay more for them down the line, but not because they expect to receive dividends from the Trump Organization’s businesses.

Currently, CIC Digital LLC, an affiliate of the Trump Organization, and a related firm managing the coin’s launch, Fight Fight Fight LLC, own about 80% of the tokens. The latter firm only recently incorporated and its ownership is unclear. In April, holders will be able to begin to sell off their share of the coins, which will continue to unlock over the next three years with 200 million tokens available immediately and ultimately at the end of the three-year period, 1 billion in circulation.

There’s potential future value

It’s unlikely, but it’s possible that the coins could evolve like Ether into a method of payment at places that accept it. Kim noted crypto has the ability to shift categories over time.

“ETH was always a utility token to transact on Ethereum, but it became so popular that people also accept it as currency, as a medium of exchange. So it has the ability to evolve,” she said.

Krugman agreed and likened it to Dogecoin.

“I see comparisons to Dogecoin,” Krugman said. “Dogecoin had a hype factor associated when it first came out and one of the interesting things that happened is as a result of that interest, you started to see utility be associated with that coin for things like payments, and now there’s a large community of developers that are essentially building on top of it and extending the underlying protocol so that people can do interesting things with it.” 

The coin reached a market capitalization of over $10 billion on its first day, making it at that time, the second-largest meme coin by market capitalization, behind only Dogecoin. As of Monday, the market cap has dropped to about $5.3 billion.

“There’s a community of holders that are participating. The question becomes, where does that go? Does that become a utility use case? Is there a payment use case? Or is there another type of use case where people start building on top of it?” Krugman said.

Clients should wade in educated and clear eyed

Crypto can be extremely volatile – something already seen in the TRUMP rollout. The coin was put to market late at night on the Friday before his inauguration a week ago. It quickly soared in value, shooting from $6 to $75 in 36 hours, up more than 1100%. By last Tuesday morning, three and a half days later, it fell to below $40. 

The coin is trading at around $27 as of Monday morning.

“Crypto mentality is still looking for a lottery-like payout,” Kim said. “And the lottery-like payout is only possible if you concentrate in one thing because if you’re widely diversified, you’re not just cutting off your downside, you’re cutting off your extreme upside as well. If, for example, you had just picked Tesla and everything is going well, then you now have a lottery-like upside where if you had been wisely diversified, you wouldn’t have the same kind of upside.”

A disclaimer on the website offering the president’s coin warns buyers the price “may be extremely volatile and you may experience substantial losses in connection with a sale or other disposition of Trump Memes.”

Most importantly, bankers should advise their clients to know what the coins are. Because the meme coins are tied to virality and cultural popularity, measures that are difficult to quantify, buyers can’t rely on traditional investor methods like reviewing balance sheets and income statements, or looking at trade flow and GDP growth as currency traders do. 

“How do you make sure that the people who are buying it actually know what they’re buying? If it is a collectible, let’s make that clear to them. It’s a meme coin; there’s not an intrinsic use case associated with it right now, but that doesn’t mean there will not be a use case associated with it in the future,” Krugman said.

Broadridge, where Krugman serves as chief digital officer, recently released a product that aggregates all relevant information about crypto coins in one place as a solution to the issue.

“How do you ensure that people participating in the market have an understanding of what these assets are?” Krugman said, adding clients can then make decisions on what to buy from there. “No one’s suggesting that people should not be able to buy or sell these things, but how do you make sure that people have access to the appropriate information to make that informed decision?”

Jonathan Zeigler, managing principal at Baker Tilley, noted further regulation may bring clarity.

“Any potential buyer needs to make sure they really understand what they’re getting into, and that’s where further and more clear regulation could help,” Zeigler said. “What are the rules around marketing these? What are the rules around what disclosures need to be made to investors about the rents and the potential risks and things they need to understand?”

“Regulation, I think, will help increase investor confidence, and then just more kind of flows into it,” Zeigler said. “A big game changer last year was the approval of the spot ETFs for Bitcoin and Ethereum, that provided more investor confidence because now these are regulated just like any other ETF.”

What this signals for regulation

The coin’s launch is the latest sign that this is a crypto-friendly administration. 

Even before taking office, Trump vowed to “be the crypto president” at a campaign fundraiser, and over the summer declared at a bitcoin conference in Nashville he would make the United States the “crypto capital of the planet.” 

Trump released an executive order last week that promised his administration will “protect and promote fair and open access to banking services for all law-abiding individual citizens and private-sector entities alike.” Already, the president has appointed or nominated crypto enthusiasts to key positions in the administration. The SEC Tuesday announced the creation of a “crypto task force” and the president tapped Scott Bessent, a crypto-friendly hedge fund manager, to head the Treasury Department.

Zeigler said the crypto community has taken these steps to be positive signs. 

“The crypto community believes it is good, because, not saying this was intentional, but the way that the regulations were being put out, or the enforcement actions were done previously, it created much higher barriers to entry, which, of course, could limit innovation. You had entities that were moving to offshore jurisdictions, because it was unclear what the regulatory environment was here,” Zeigler said. 

“Trump has said, publicly, effectively, he wants the United States to be the crypto capital of the world. He wants the innovation to happen here; he wants the companies to be domiciled and registered here; and in order to incentivize them to do that, there has to be clear regulatory goals,” Zeigler said. “Once people know the rules of the game, they’ll be more willing to make a business decision asking, do we want to enter this space.”

The sentiment has also been reflected in the market: Before Monday’s drop, Bitcoin was up more than 50% since the November election. The cryptocurrency hit a record peak of $109,241 shortly before Trump’s inauguration ceremony.

Continue Reading

Accounting

SEC’s Semiannual Reporting Proposal Faces Investor Pushback: What CFOs Need to Know

Published

on

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)

A proposal from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to potentially shift some public companies away from quarterly financial reporting toward a semiannual model is drawing significant pushback from investors, even as it continues moving through the regulatory process. The debate has direct implications for corporate finance teams, auditors, and the broader transparency of U.S. capital markets.

What the SEC Proposed

According to a summary published by accounting advisory firm Cohen & Co., the SEC issued a proposed rule on May 19, 2026, aimed at simplifying financial reporting requirements for many U.S. public companies. The proposal would potentially reduce the frequency of certain mandatory disclosures from quarterly to semiannual, a structural change that has not been made to core U.S. reporting requirements in decades.

The proposal follows an extended debate within U.S. policy circles, with proponents arguing that reduced reporting frequency could lower compliance costs and free up management time for longer-term strategic planning rather than quarter-to-quarter results management.

Why Investors Are Pushing Back

Comment letters submitted in response to the proposal have been extensive, and according to Cohen & Co.’s review of the public record, investors “appear to be largely opposed” to the shift, viewing frequent interim reporting as a core benefit of U.S. capital markets relative to other jurisdictions.

Accounting and law firms have taken a more measured position, generally urging any changes to remain aligned with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), whose existing disclosure requirements and guidance are built around a quarterly reporting cadence. A shift to semiannual reporting without corresponding changes to FASB guidance could create friction between SEC filing requirements and GAAP-based disclosure expectations.

Lessons From the U.K. Experience

The debate is not without precedent. The United Kingdom moved away from mandatory quarterly reporting for listed companies in 2014, returning to a semiannual disclosure requirement. According to Cohen & Co.’s analysis, that experience offers a cautionary data point: there was no measurable increase in capital expenditure or R&D investment following the change, while analyst coverage of affected companies declined as reliable interim information became less available — a particular risk for smaller and newly public companies that rely on analyst coverage to maintain investor visibility.

Practical Implications for Finance Teams

Beyond the debate over disclosure philosophy, the proposal carries practical complications. Many companies have debt covenants and credit agreements structured around quarterly financial delivery; a shift to semiannual reporting could require renegotiating those terms. Reduced reporting frequency would also extend the “window of market silence” between disclosures, a factor that governance and investor-relations teams would need to manage carefully to avoid information asymmetry.

Separately, and unrelated to the reporting-frequency debate, the SEC and FASB have continued finalizing more routine updates this year. New Accounting Standards Updates are taking effect for December 31, 2026, fiscal year-ends covering income tax disclosures, credit loss measurement, induced debt conversions, and stock compensation, according to Eide Bailly’s review of 2026 ASU activity. Additional guidance on paid-in-kind dividends and environmental credits is also on the near-term horizon.

What to Watch Next

The semiannual reporting proposal remains in the comment and review phase, and no final rule has been adopted as of this writing. Finance leaders should monitor the SEC’s regulatory agenda for further movement, while treating the current quarterly reporting requirement as the operative standard until any final rule is issued and an effective date is set.

Given the extent of investor opposition documented in the comment file, a full shift to mandatory semiannual reporting appears more likely to result in either a scaled-back compromise or continued study rather than swift adoption — though the SEC’s ultimate direction remains uncertain.

 

Continue Reading

Accounting

AI-Driven Automation and Continuous Accounting Frameworks

Published

on

The accounting profession is undergoing a fundamental structural transition as enterprise finance departments shift from periodic month-end closes toward automated continuous accounting models. By integrating specialized machine learning algorithms directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms, chief accounting officers are transforming financial reporting from a retrospective exercise into a real-time operational asset.

The Shift from Periodic Close to Continuous Financial Reporting
Traditional accounting workflows heavily relied on manual data reconciliation, spreadsheet calculations, and multi-week closing cycles at the end of each fiscal period. In contrast, continuous accounting frameworks utilize automated software agents to process, validate, and post transactional data in real time as business activities occur.

Automated bank reconciliation tools cross-reference incoming bank feeds, invoice records, and purchase orders automatically. By resolving transactional variances instantly throughout the month, corporate accounting teams eliminate the traditional workload spikes associated with quarterly and annual closes.

Machine Learning in Audit Trails and Anomaly Detection
Advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning tools are redefining internal audit and financial control environments. Automated systems analyze 100% of general ledger entries, identifying anomalous transactions, duplicate payments, and unauthorized journal entries in real time.

Rather than relying on random statistical sampling, corporate internal auditors can focus their attention on high-risk flags automatically surfaced by algorithmic monitoring platforms. This continuous risk assessment strengthens internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) and significantly reduces fraud risk.

Evolving Roles for Accounting Professionals
As routine data entry and manual reconciliation tasks become fully automated, the skill set required for accounting professionals is shifting toward data analysis, system design, and strategic business advisory.
– Systems Governance: Accountants are increasingly responsible for monitoring algorithmic accuracy and managing data integration pipelines.
– Business Partnership: Finance professionals leverage real-time financial dashboards to advise operational leaders on margin management and working capital allocation.
– Regulatory Compliance Management: Accounting teams utilize automated platforms to ensure compliance with dynamic tax codes and international accounting standards.

Core Implementation Recommendations
1. Deploy Automated Reconciliation Tools: Integrate continuous transaction processing modules into existing enterprise ERP architectures.
2. Establish Algorithmic Governance Controls: Implement strict internal testing protocols to ensure automated accounting rules comply with GAAP/IFRS standards.
3. Reskill Accounting Teams: Invest in training finance staff on data analytics, workflow automation, and predictive financial modeling.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Trending