Connect with us

Accounting

Redesign Social Security for greater retirement security, wealth creation

Published

on

Every day, elderly Americans stock grocery shelves at big-box stores — not by choice, but by necessity. Our nation’s retirement system is failing them at crisis levels. 

The recent preliminary disclosures by the Department of Government Efficiency about alleged Social Security payments to “individuals” age 100 to 150 has only confirmed what many have long suspected: the system is archaic and broken. Its design, oversight and operation need to be carefully reevaluated.

The approach of funding Social Security or other retirement programs with debt of the sponsor (government or private business) should be abolished. What bank would accept loans as collateral instead of property or other assets? We would never tolerate this arrangement in our personal finances, yet we have accepted it for our nation’s retirement system for generations. Utilization of debt may make sense as a unique exception in crisis situations, but such a policy should not be the norm. Putting the fiscal burden on future taxpayers isn’t just unfair — it’s unsustainable.

One potential solution is leveraging the power of ownership and equity through a U.S. sovereign wealth fund — a state-owned investment fund that allocates capital to a diverse range of assets, including stocks, bonds, real estate and alternative investments like private equity funds or hedge funds. In this model, every government bailout, international war settlement or major economic intervention would require equity stakes to be allocated to this fund. Rather than just spending taxpayer money, we would be investing in our collective future. Retirement age Americans would get their allocated sovereign equity fund or a floor Social Security benefit — whichever is greater. Such a benefit could be designed as a no-cost approach initially, and over time only be triggered as a guaranteed minimum benefit in the case of an unexpected financial crisis. Investment diversity features could be added to such a program to minimize citizen risk and the need for government intervention. Such a structure would limit the amount of government assistance required in the next financial crisis and protect citizens or workers so they could have a secure retirement benefit.

For decades, forward-thinking companies have used analogous hybrid structures called “floor-offset” plans. Conceived in the 1970s, the floor-offset plan protected employees against a company’s inability to fund its pension plan or defined benefit plan.

Companies establish an employee stock ownership plan, in which workers would accumulate equity in their company over their career. The company would also guarantee a defined, minimum pension plan. At retirement, workers would receive either the value of their equity stake as an annuity for life or the guaranteed pension — whichever is greater. This design protects workers if their equity underperforms while allowing them to benefit if it grows substantially. Companies benefit too, as the equity portion can reduce pension obligations when investments perform well.

Floor-offset plans have successfully weathered market downturns while providing superior retirement outcomes when compared to either defined benefit or defined contribution plans alone.

A Social Security floor-offset design, utilizing a sovereign wealth fund, can help alleviate current and future Social Security funding obligations. This design lowers costs and moves our country away from using debt in the form of treasuries as funding. If designed properly, the introduction of the sovereign wealth fund feature would not disturb the Social Security promise, but could potentially enhance it. The appreciation of the interest in the sovereign wealth fund would not only provide funding for Social Security but could potentially result in citizens in retirement receiving benefits that exceed their pre-retirement income.

A multidisciplinary task force should be formed immediately to develop this system for future generations. The goal must not be limited to retirement security, but wealth creation for all Americans. Now is not the time to simply talk about innovation, it is time to really innovate. Our seniors don’t need charity. They need a system that works — one that provides not just bare subsistence, but dignity and prosperity in their golden years.

Some may ask why utilize a piece of the sovereign wealth fund to help Social Security? The answer is simple: It allows the system to be funded for the next 50 to 100 years and limits Congress’ ability to divert funds for other initiatives. The Social Security Sovereign Wealth Fund offset design represents a rare opportunity to solve our retirement crisis while creating genuine economic security for all Americans.

Continue Reading

Accounting

XcelLabs launches to help accountants use AI

Published

on

Jody Padar, an author and speaker known as “The Radical CPA,” and Katie Tolin, a growth strategist for CPAs, together launched a training and technology platform called XcelLabs.

XcelLabs provides solutions to help accountants use artificial technology fluently and strategically. The Pennsylvania Institute of CPAs and CPA Crossings joined with Padar and Tolin as strategic partners and investors.

“To reinvent the profession, we must start by training the professional who can then transform their firms,” Padar said in a statement. “By equipping people with data and insights that help them see things differently, they can provide better advice to their clients and firm.”

Padar-Jody- new 2019

Jody Padar

The platform includes XcelLabs Academy, a series of educational online courses on the basics of AI, being a better advisor, leadership and practice management; Navi, a proprietary tool that uses AI to help accountants turn unstructured data like emails, phone calls and meetings into insights; and training and consulting services. These offerings are currently in beta testing.

“Accountants know they need to be more advisory, but not everyone can figure out how to do it,” Tolin said in a statement. “Couple that with the fact that AI will be doing a lot of the lower-level work accountants do today, and we need to create that next level advisor now. By showing accountants how to unlock patterns in their actions and turn client conversations into emotionally intelligent advice, we can create the accounting professional of the future.”

Tolin-Katie-CPA Growth Guides

Katie Tolin

“AI is transforming how CPAs work, and XcelLabs is focused on helping the profession evolve with it,” PICPA CEO Jennifer Cryder said in a statement. “At PICPA, we’re proud to support a mission that aligns so closely with ours: empowering firms to use AI not just for efficiency, but to drive growth, value and long-term relevance.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Accounting is changing, and the world can’t wait until 2026

Published

on

The accountant the world urgently needs has evolved far beyond the traditional role we recognized just a few years ago. 

The transformation of the accounting profession is not merely an anticipated change; it is a pressing reality that is currently shaping business decisions, academic programs and the expected contributions of professionals. Yet, in many areas, accounting education stubbornly clings to outdated, overly technical models that fail to connect with the actual demands of the market. We must confront a critical question: If we continue to train accountants solely to file tax reports, are we truly equipping them for the challenges of today’s world? 

This shift in mindset extends beyond individual countries or educational systems; it is a global movement. The recent announcement of the CIMA/CGMA 2026 syllabus has made it unmistakably clear: merely knowing how to post journal entries is insufficient. Today’s accountants are required to interpret the landscape, anticipate risks and act with strategic awareness. Critical thinking, sustainable finance, technology and human behavior are not just supplementary topics; they are essential components in the education of any professional seeking to remain relevant. 

The CIMA/CGMA proposal for 2026 is not just a curriculum update; it is a powerful manifesto. This new program positions analytical thinking, strategic business partnering and technology application at the core of accounting education. It unequivocally highlights sustainability, aligning with IFRS S1 and S2, and expands the accountant’s responsibilities beyond mere numbers to encompass conscious leadership, environmental impact and corporate governance. 

The current changes in the accounting profession underscore an urgent shift in expectations from both educators and employers. Today, companies of all sizes and industries demand accountants who can do far more than interpret balance sheets. They expect professionals who grasp the deeper context behind the numbers, identify inconsistencies, anticipate potential issues before they escalate into losses, and act decisively as a bridge between data and decision making. 

To meet these expectations, a radical mindset shift is essential. There are firms still operating on autopilot, mindlessly repeating tasks with minimal critical analysis. Likewise, many academic programs continue to treat accounting as purely a technical discipline, disregarding the vital elements of reflection, strategy and behavioral insight. This outdated approach creates a significant mismatch. While the world forges ahead, parts of the accounting profession remain stuck in the past. 

The consequences of this shift are already becoming evident. The demand for compliance, transparency and sustainability now applies not only to large corporations but also to small and mid-sized businesses. Many of these organizations rely on professionals ill-equipped to drive the necessary changes, putting both business performance and the reputation of the profession at risk. 

The positive news is that accountants who are ready to thrive in this new era do not necessarily need additional degrees. What they truly need is a commitment to awareness, a dedication to continuous learning, and the courage to step beyond their comfort zones. The future of accounting is here, and it is firmly rooted in analytical, strategic and human-oriented perspectives. The 2026 curriculum is a clear indication of the changes underway. Those who fail to think critically and holistically will be left behind. 

In contrast, accountants who see the big picture, understand the ripple effects of their decisions, and actively contribute to the financial and ethical health of organizations will undeniably remain indispensable, anywhere in the world.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Republicans push Musk aside as Trump tax bill barrels forward

Published

on

Congressional Republicans are siding with Donald Trump in the messy divorce between the president and Elon Musk, an optimistic sign for eventual passage of a tax cut bill at the root of the two billionaires’ public feud.

Lawmakers are largely taking their cues from Trump and sticking by the $3 trillion bill at the center of the White House’s economic agenda. Musk, the biggest political donor of the 2024 cycle, has threatened to help primary anyone who votes for the legislation, but lawmakers are betting that staying in the president’s good graces is the safer path to political survival.

“The tax bill is not in jeopardy. We are going to deliver on that,” House Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters on Friday.

“I’ll tell you what — do not doubt, don’t second guess and do not challenge the President of the United States Donald Trump,” he added. “He is the leader of the party. He’s the most consequential political figure of our time.”

A fight between Trump and Musk exploded into public view this week. The sparring started with the tech titan calling the president’s tax bill a “disgusting abomination,” but quickly escalated to more personal attacks and Trump threatening to cancel all federal contracts and subsidies to Musk’s companies, such as Tesla Inc. and SpaceX which have benefitted from government ties.

Republicans on Capitol Hill, who had —  until recently — publicly embraced Musk, said they weren’t swayed by the billionaire’s criticism that the bill cost too much. Lawmakers have refuted official estimates of the package, saying that the tax cuts for households, small businesses and politically important groups — including hospitality and hourly workers — will generate enough economic growth to offset the price tag.

“I don’t tell my friend Elon, I don’t argue with him about how to build rockets, and I wish he wouldn’t argue with me about how to craft legislation and pass it,” Johnson told CNBC earlier Friday.

House Budget Committee Chair Jodey Arrington told reporters that House lawmakers are focused on working with the Senate as it revises the bill to make sure the legislation has the political support in both chambers to make it to Trump’s desk for his signature. 

“We move past the drama and we get the substance of what is needed to make the modest improvements that can be made,” he said.

House fiscal hawks said that they hadn’t changed their prior positions on the legislation based on Musk’s statements. They also said they agree with GOP leaders that there will be other chances to make further spending cuts outside the tax bill. 

Representative Tom McClintock, a fiscal conservative, said “the bill will pass because it has to pass,” adding that both Musk and Trump needed to calm down. “They both need to take a nap,” he said.

Even some of the House bill’s most vociferous critics appeared resigned to its passage. Kentucky Representative Thomas Massie, who voted against the House version, predicted that despite Musk’s objections, the Senate will make only small changes.

“The speaker is right about one thing. This barely passed the House. If they muck with it too much in the Senate, it may not pass the House again,” he said.

Trump is pressuring lawmakers to move at breakneck speed to pass the tax-cut bill, demanding they vote on the bill before the July 4 holiday. The president has been quick to blast critics of the bill — including calling Senator Rand Paul “crazy” for objecting to the inclusion of a debt ceiling increase in the package.

As the legislation worked its way through the House last month, Trump took to social media to criticize holdouts and invited undecided members to the White House to compel them to support the package. It passed by one vote.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune — who is planning to unveil his chamber’s version of the bill as soon as next week — said his timeline is unmoved by Musk. 

“We are already pretty far down the trail,” he said.

Continue Reading

Trending