Connect with us

Accounting

SEC and PCAOB relax enforcement against auditors

Published

on

The Securities and Exchange Commission and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board have been lightening the load on audit firms, with the SEC initiating only one enforcement action against auditors in the third quarter of the year, according to a new report.

The report, released Thursday by the Brattle Group, follows up on a report released in March by the research firm that showed early signs of a more deregulatory approach by the SEC and PCAOB in the early months of the Trump administration. The new analysis finds that the third quarter of 2025 marked a defining inflection point for auditor oversight in the U.S., especially after the confirmation in April of a new SEC chair, Paul Atkins, following the exit of former SEC chair Gary Gensler on Trump’s Inauguration Day, and the ouster of former PCAOB chair Erica Williams by Atkins. The report found the PCAOB initiated 32 actions during the third quarter, which was comparable to recent years, but one occurred before Williams’s departure in July.

“After several months of uncertainty, the third quarter of 2025 marked a defining inflection point for auditor oversight in the United States,” said the report. “With leadership changes at both agencies signaling a shift away from the aggressive enforcement posture that characterized the Gensler/Williams era, Q3 activity provided the first clear indications of how the new administration’s priorities may reshape the regulatory landscape.”

The report noted that during Q3, the PCAOB’s continued existence came under threat by a proposal to dissolve the PCAOB through President Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill.” But the PCAOB received a reprieve when the Senate Parliamentarian ruled that the measure could not proceed under budget reconciliation procedures. However, not long after that, Atkins announced plans to initiate an overhaul of the PCAOB board, which suggests a probably realignment of the PCAOB’s oversight priorities.

Other big leadership changes and developments happened, including the appointment of a new chief accountant, Kurt Hohl, and enforcement director, Margaret Ryan, at the SEC, and the creation of the SEC’s Cross-Border Task Force.

“Together, these events signal a shift away from the aggressive enforcement posture that characterized prior SEC and PCAOB administrations and point to a realignment of priorities,” said Alison Forman, a principal in the Brattle Group’s Chicago office and co-leader of the firm’s accounting practice.

Ongoing constitutional challenges have only added to the regulatory uncertainty at the SEC and the PCAOB, the report noted. The Supreme Court’s June 2024 decision in the case of SEC v. Jarkesy limited the SEC’s use of administrative proceedings, along with parallel “John Doe” challenges to the PCAOB’s disciplinary process, raising questions about both agencies’ adjudicatory authority. Those developments could have contributed to lower auditor-related enforcement activity during Q3 and may fundamentally change how future cases are brought and resolved.

From Q1 through Q3 2025, the PCAOB and SEC together imposed total monetary sanctions of $17.7 million on auditors and audit firms, according to the report. In comparison, monetary sanctions in the first nine months of 2024 totaled $51.1 million. The PCAOB imposed all but $230,000 of the total penalties.

The PCAOB levied penalties of more than $17.4 million in the first three quarters of 2025,more than total annual penalties imposed by the PCAOB every year except 2023 and 2024, but all but $100,000 was imposed prior to former Williams’s resignation on July 22.

Most of the penalties hit firms in other countries. Nearly two-thirds of Q1–Q3 2025 penalties ($11.25 million) were imposed on four foreign affiliates of Big Four firms for violations related to improper answer sharing. Nearly 20% of Q1–Q3 2025 penalties ($3.4 million) were levied on nine foreign affiliates of a Big Four firm for allegedly inaccurate Form APs, Auditor Reporting of Certain Audit Participants, in violation of the PCAOB’s Rule 3211. Two auditing firms were required by the PCAOB to procure an independent consultant to review and make recommendations about the firms’ systems of quality control. 

PCAOB priorities

The report’s release comes as the PCAOB hosted a two-day gathering this week of the International Institute on Audit Regulation, in Washington, D.C. The PCAOB’s acting chair, George Botic, discussed two of the emerging concerns of the PCAOB during a speech Tuesday at the conference: private equity investment in accounting firms and the rapid adoption of artificial intelligence in audits.

“These trends have the potential to transform auditing as we know it and require our continued attention,” he said. “First, private equity investments and other alternative financing arrangements in accounting firms are reshaping ownership structures. These investments can be used to acquire advanced technologies, streamline operations, and assist in attracting and retaining professionals, which can lead to enhanced audit quality. But there are concerns from regulators and standard-setters around the globe.”

Botic pointed out that this summer, the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants issued a staff alert about the risks that private equity investments in the audit pose to auditor independence and the potential for conflicts of interest. He noted that data from the Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets shows several trends in private equity-backed audits: a decline in statutory auditor involvement, reduced identification of significant risks, and increased threats to independence.

“I, too, have my own concerns that the private equity model focused on short-term ownership and possible cost-savings may change long established incentive structures and behaviors within accounting firms and may, over time, undermine the core principles of audit quality,” said Botic.

However, he added that he recognizes that many accounting firms now face additional demands for capital that need to be met to remain competitive, and those demands may not be achieved through the traditional partnership structure.

“As regulators, we must ensure our oversight remains vigilant as this trend continues,” said Botic. “This vigilance requires engagement with all stakeholders, and in particular, it requires encouraging academic research to ensure we have a comprehensive understanding of not only the challenges and risks, but also the benefits of these investments and structures.”

On the subject of AI, Boptic cited a recent Accounting Today survey showing that 72% of respondents are “comfortable using technology for work that traditionally required human effort” with 53% of respondents reporting that AI makes them more effective. 

“A challenge then lies in the deployment of this technology and what exactly it is being used for,” said Botic.

He also cited another recent study from Wolters Kluwer that found 70% of U.S. audit professionals say they use AI weekly in their role, and more than three-quarters of firms plan to increase their AI investments.

“As AI tools begin to influence judgments traditionally made by humans, auditors must grapple with how to preserve due professional care, professional skepticism, independence, and accountability in a rapidly changing digital landscape,” said Botic.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending