Connect with us

Accounting

IASB, ISSB advance global accounting, sustainability standards

Published

on

The International Accounting Standards Board and the International Sustainability Standards Board held separate meetings in London this week to work on implementing and formulating standards for companies such as rate-regulated utilities and topics such as the statement of cash flows.

The two global standard-setters operate under the oversight of the International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation and work together on developing standards. The IFRS Foundation formed the ISSB in 2021 in an effort to bring together the various standards developed by the former Sustainability Accounting Standards Board, Climate Disclosure Standards Board, International Integrated Reporting Council, Value Reporting Foundation and Task Force on Climate-rated Financial Disclosures. In 2022, the ISSB unveiled draft versions of two sustainability and climate disclosure standards, IFRS S1, General Requirements for Disclosure of Sustainability-related Financial Information, and IFRS S2, Climate-related Disclosures, and finalized them in 2023. Since then, the ISSB has been working with various countries around the world to adopt the standards. The ISSB Symposium convened Thursday in London, gathering delegates from over 45 jurisdictions to focus on implementation of those ISSB standards.

In a keynote address, ISSB chair Emmanuel Faber announced the expansion of the Jurisdictional Working Group, which is now being renamed the Jurisdictional Adopters Working Group. Currently 40 jurisdictions have announced plans to use the ISSB standards and they hope to develop a kind of “global passport” while trying to avoid fragmentation of the standards by local authorities. Jurisdictions will be able to accept reports prepared in accordance with the ISSB standards as issued by the ISSB, accommodating jurisdiction-specific conditions as needed, to deliver roughly comparable information for capital markets and preparers.

A new Jurisdictional Rationale Guide for the adoption or other use of ISSB standards and an accompanying tool were presented at the symposium. 

“The ISSB standards are being firmly established as the global baseline, covering around 40% of global capital markets,” Faber said in a statement Thursday. “We are committed to maximizing the benefits ISSB standards offer. The expansion of the Jurisdictional Adopters Working Group and our new guide respond to jurisdictions’ needs for forums, tools and resources supporting the effective use of ISSB standards as the global passport.”

Separately, the IASB board held one of its regularly scheduled meetings in London on Wednesday and Thursday. During the meeting, the board members discussed a number of ongoing projects, including one on the statement of cash flows. 

Among the topics of discussion, according to an IASB official who spoke to Accounting Today ahead of the meeting, was noncash transactions, which is a priority for investors who have provided feedback on the project. (Other priorities include disaggregation of items and non-IFRS metrics). Investors pointed out that information on noncash transactions is spread beyond the statement of cash flows and they need to hunt through other financial statements to find it all. They asked for the IASB to look at the existing requirements for disclosing noncash transactions and what can be done to bring it all together. The IASB staff went through and found all the disclosure requirements for noncash transactions, and presented them in a paper for the board. In another paper, they suggested ideas for possible formats where all the information can be collected together to make it more usable for investors. 

Another discussion at the meeting concerns a project on business combinations, specifically in terms of disclosures, goodwill and impairment. The IASB wants companies to disclose performance information for a subset of their acquisitions, and the synergies of the business combinations. The IASB will be discussing the feedback it’s received on the project in several papers.

The agenda also includes a conversation about a longstanding project on rate-regulated activities by organizations such as utility companies. The IASB is working on putting out a final standard in the first half of 2026. The board is looking at the ways utilities are compensated. Some are compensated using a “nominal basis,” such as a consistent 7% return, while some contracts say they’re going to be compensated on a “real basis,” with inflation adjustments such as 2% above inflation. The board members are looking at the feedback they received from stakeholders on ballots and comments on the project. 

The IFRS approach differs from U.S. GAAP, which uses a cost capitalization model, while IFRS is looking at the differences in timing on the revenue and expense sides. The IASB recently met with the U.S.’s Financial Accounting Standards Board in London, where they discussed their ongoing projects. The IASB is working on an intangibles project and looking at pollutant-pricing mechanisms such as carbon credits. FASB has been working on its own project on accounting for environmental credits and proposed an accounting standards update last December. The IASB is taking more of a principles-based standard for trading of carbon credits, along with the trading of cryptocurrency-based tokenized carbon credits. FASB officials told the IASB that one of the problems they encountered was that certain carbon credits actually flip between being used for compliance purposes and being used for trading, suggesting it could be difficult to create a standard that’s strictly for trading carbon credits.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending