Connect with us

Accounting

IASB, ISSB advance global accounting, sustainability standards

Published

on

The International Accounting Standards Board and the International Sustainability Standards Board held separate meetings in London this week to work on implementing and formulating standards for companies such as rate-regulated utilities and topics such as the statement of cash flows.

The two global standard-setters operate under the oversight of the International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation and work together on developing standards. The IFRS Foundation formed the ISSB in 2021 in an effort to bring together the various standards developed by the former Sustainability Accounting Standards Board, Climate Disclosure Standards Board, International Integrated Reporting Council, Value Reporting Foundation and Task Force on Climate-rated Financial Disclosures. In 2022, the ISSB unveiled draft versions of two sustainability and climate disclosure standards, IFRS S1, General Requirements for Disclosure of Sustainability-related Financial Information, and IFRS S2, Climate-related Disclosures, and finalized them in 2023. Since then, the ISSB has been working with various countries around the world to adopt the standards. The ISSB Symposium convened Thursday in London, gathering delegates from over 45 jurisdictions to focus on implementation of those ISSB standards.

In a keynote address, ISSB chair Emmanuel Faber announced the expansion of the Jurisdictional Working Group, which is now being renamed the Jurisdictional Adopters Working Group. Currently 40 jurisdictions have announced plans to use the ISSB standards and they hope to develop a kind of “global passport” while trying to avoid fragmentation of the standards by local authorities. Jurisdictions will be able to accept reports prepared in accordance with the ISSB standards as issued by the ISSB, accommodating jurisdiction-specific conditions as needed, to deliver roughly comparable information for capital markets and preparers.

A new Jurisdictional Rationale Guide for the adoption or other use of ISSB standards and an accompanying tool were presented at the symposium. 

“The ISSB standards are being firmly established as the global baseline, covering around 40% of global capital markets,” Faber said in a statement Thursday. “We are committed to maximizing the benefits ISSB standards offer. The expansion of the Jurisdictional Adopters Working Group and our new guide respond to jurisdictions’ needs for forums, tools and resources supporting the effective use of ISSB standards as the global passport.”

Separately, the IASB board held one of its regularly scheduled meetings in London on Wednesday and Thursday. During the meeting, the board members discussed a number of ongoing projects, including one on the statement of cash flows. 

Among the topics of discussion, according to an IASB official who spoke to Accounting Today ahead of the meeting, was noncash transactions, which is a priority for investors who have provided feedback on the project. (Other priorities include disaggregation of items and non-IFRS metrics). Investors pointed out that information on noncash transactions is spread beyond the statement of cash flows and they need to hunt through other financial statements to find it all. They asked for the IASB to look at the existing requirements for disclosing noncash transactions and what can be done to bring it all together. The IASB staff went through and found all the disclosure requirements for noncash transactions, and presented them in a paper for the board. In another paper, they suggested ideas for possible formats where all the information can be collected together to make it more usable for investors. 

Another discussion at the meeting concerns a project on business combinations, specifically in terms of disclosures, goodwill and impairment. The IASB wants companies to disclose performance information for a subset of their acquisitions, and the synergies of the business combinations. The IASB will be discussing the feedback it’s received on the project in several papers.

The agenda also includes a conversation about a longstanding project on rate-regulated activities by organizations such as utility companies. The IASB is working on putting out a final standard in the first half of 2026. The board is looking at the ways utilities are compensated. Some are compensated using a “nominal basis,” such as a consistent 7% return, while some contracts say they’re going to be compensated on a “real basis,” with inflation adjustments such as 2% above inflation. The board members are looking at the feedback they received from stakeholders on ballots and comments on the project. 

The IFRS approach differs from U.S. GAAP, which uses a cost capitalization model, while IFRS is looking at the differences in timing on the revenue and expense sides. The IASB recently met with the U.S.’s Financial Accounting Standards Board in London, where they discussed their ongoing projects. The IASB is working on an intangibles project and looking at pollutant-pricing mechanisms such as carbon credits. FASB has been working on its own project on accounting for environmental credits and proposed an accounting standards update last December. The IASB is taking more of a principles-based standard for trading of carbon credits, along with the trading of cryptocurrency-based tokenized carbon credits. FASB officials told the IASB that one of the problems they encountered was that certain carbon credits actually flip between being used for compliance purposes and being used for trading, suggesting it could be difficult to create a standard that’s strictly for trading carbon credits.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

on

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance and Global Regulatory Harmonization in 2026

Published

on

Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.

Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.

Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.

Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.

This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.

Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.

By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.

Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.

Continue Reading

Trending