Connect with us

Accounting

States plan votes on tax increases on Election Day

Published

on

Next Tuesday’s off-year election is likely to see far lower turnout at the polls than during last November’s presidential contest, but voters will nevertheless be asked to weigh in on ballot referendums and questions concerning an estimated total of $3.1 billion in potential tax hikes in 20 states, according to a ballot guide released Thursday by the National Taxpayers Union.

The NTU noted that in total, voters will cast ballots on 13 statewide measures and 911 local measures ranging from higher property and sales taxes to new local levies and bond issuances.”These ballot measures may not generate the same headlines as political races, but they have a far more lasting effect on taxpayers’ finances,” Tommy Aiello, senior director of government affairs at the National Taxpayers Union, said in a statement. “Voters deserve clear, accessible information about what they’re being asked to fund, and how much it will cost. We’re proud to provide this state and local level guide for taxpayers across the country.”Of the estimated $3.1 billion in new taxes:

  • $1.7 billion comes from higher property tax rates;
  • $1.3 billion from higher sales tax rates; and,
  • Millions more from other tax sources.

Along with tax increases, voters will also weigh in on $37.3 billion in new bond issuances, imposing long-term obligations on taxpayers for decades to come.

State-level highlights

  • California: Voters won’t decide on any statewide ballot measures with a direct tax or fiscal impact, but 13 local measures will appear across nine counties. The total net statewide revenue collections on the ballot would amount to at least $393 million in annual tax increases or extensions.

  • Colorado: Voters will decide on two statewide ballot measures related to funding for the “Healthy Meals For All” school meal program. In addition, 99 local measures will appear on the ballot across 30 counties. The total net statewide revenue collections on the ballot, including state and local measures, would amount to at least $583 million in annual tax increases or extensions. Voters will also be asked about the issuance of $1.1 billion in bonds.

    • Voters in Telluride will consider whether to impose a 5% excise tax on ski lift tickets to fund local infrastructure improvements. The county has not provided a revenue estimate, but the duration would be permanent if passed. 

  • Texas: Voters in the Lone Star State will decide on 10 statewide ballot measures that directly impact their tax rates. In addition, voters will be asked about 264 local measures across 55 counties. After analyzing these measures, the NTU has found that the total net statewide revenue collections on the ballot would amount to at least $280.7 million in annual tax increases or extensions. The NTU also calculates there to be approximately $26.6 billion in bond measures across the state.

    • Voters in Bexar County will consider a question to increase the County’s lodging tax to 2% and car rental tax to 5% to fund the local coliseum complex venture project, which includes Freeman Coliseum, Frost Bank Center, and other San Antonio Stock Show & Rodeo facilities. A separate question on the ballot will authorize use of that same revenue to construct a new arena for the San Antonio Spurs. This would amount to a permanent tax increase of $16.7 million annually. 

  • Michigan: Voters won’t decide on any statewide ballot measures with a direct tax or fiscal impact this year. Voters will be asked about 153 local measures across 43 counties. The total net statewide revenue collections on the ballot would amount to at least $235.2 million in annual tax increases or extensions. NTU also calculates there to be approximately $3.6 billion in bond measures across the state.

    • Voters in Grout Township will consider whether to allow the town to raise the property tax levy for mosquito abatement. It represents a tax increase of $58,000 annually for two years.
    • Voters in Lowell Charter Township will consider whether to renew the property tax levy, with an increase to $2.20 per $1,000 in assessed value for moth suppression. The measure represents a tax increase of $184,000 annually for three years.

The NTU team couldn’t obtain fiscal data for 562 measures due to inconsistent or incomplete reporting across localities. The report also encountered obstacles in states such as Arizona, where new campaign-finance laws are so broad that they threaten to restrict nonpartisan voter education efforts. Ohio was not included in the report because of the sheer volume of taxing authorities. 

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending