Connect with us

Accounting

SEC names George Botic as acting chair of PCAOB

Published

on

The Securities and Exchange Commission has tapped George Botic as acting chair of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, effective July 23, 2025, after Erica Williams steps down.

Williams was asked to resign last week by the new SEC chair Paul Atkins and her last day is Tuesday, July 22. She told Accounting Today in an interview about her hopes for the PCAOB to continue its work and its accomplishments.

“I thank Erica Williams for her dedicated service on the Board, and I look forward to working with George Botic as Acting Chair,” Atkins said in a statement Monday.

“I am honored to work with the SEC and the staff of the PCAOB as Acting Chair to ensure that we meet the mission established by Congress,” said Mr. Botic.

Botic is a CPA and became a PCAOB board member on Oct. 25, 2023. He has considerable experience on the board. Prior to joining the PCAOB, he served as director of the PCAOB’s Division of Registration and Inspections, where he oversaw the registration and inspection of all domestic and foreign accounting firms that audit public companies whose securities trade in the U.S., as well as all broker-dealer audits. 

Botic previously served in various roles at the PCAOB, including as its director of the Office of International Affairs, special advisor to former PCAOB chairperson James R. Doty, and deputy director of the Registration and Inspections Division. Earlier in his career, Botic was a senior manager with PricewaterhouseCoopers. He is a graduate of Shepherd University and received a Master of Accountancy from Virginia Tech.

The leadership and membership of the PCAOB changed dramatically in both the first Trump administration and the Biden administration, when Williams was appointed chair in 2022. “This wasn’t a surprise, and was the third time in a row that it’s happened,” said Steve Soter, former head of SEC reporting at Overstock and currently a vice president at the financial reporting technology company Workiva. “The real takeaway is that the fast-swinging pendulum of PCAOB rulemaking and enforcement inevitably comes back. With years-long workpaper retention requirements, there will be significant risk for auditors and their clients who don’t stay focused on accounting and audit quality under the misperception that there’s now an open window to relax.”

He doubts that a CPA will remain in charge of the PCAOB. “PCAOB rules prohibit practicing CPAs from serving as chair, plus the reasons and optics for such a change would seem to favor an outsider,” said Soter. “It seems likely that the future board will shift their current focus and be led by an industry outsider.”

Richard Chambers, former president and CEO of The Institute of Internal Auditors and now senior advisor at AuditBoard, pointed to the history of the PCAOB as well as legislative changes. 

“We saw this happen shortly after Trump came in, and we saw it shortly after Biden took office,” he said. “I think if there’s any surprise, it’s that it didn’t happen sooner. But there was a lot of uncertainty about the legislative future of the PCAOB.” 

Last month, the Senate Parliamentarian rejected a provision in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act that would have folded the PCAOB and handed its responsibilities to the SEC, although it was part of the version of the bill passed by the House

“This is conjecture, but perhaps they were holding off until they could figure out what was going to happen with the proposal to dissolve the PCAOB,” said Chambers. “I guess when that ended up not happening, thanks to the Senate Parliamentarian saying that couldn’t be considered in the reconciliation bill, perhaps that’s when the SEC chair decided that he would move forward, but it’s certainly not unprecedented in terms of what’s happened.”

He is unsure how much the rest of the board will change. “What typically ends up happening is that the changes made with the chair, perhaps other board members, although I think it appears to be limited to the chair at this point, those changes are designed to ensure that the PCAOB is sort of operating within the regulatory philosophy of the SEC, which, of course, is operating within the regulatory philosophy of the administration,” said Chambers. “If you look back at the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the way it’s set up, the governance structure over the PCAOB sort of ensured this kind of connection over the long term between the regulatory philosophy and the SEC would be reflected in the PCAOB. I don’t think we saw the direct connection as much as we have maybe in the last few years. Certainly we didn’t see it as much in the early years of the SEC-PCAOB relationship. But I think we now see that they’re very closely linked.”

In keeping with the Trump administration’s deregulatory priorities, the PCAOB is likely to emphasize regulation less than under Williams. “My instincts tell me we’ll see it be less aggressive from a regulatory standpoint in the next couple of years than we might have seen over the last couple of years from Chairman Williams, and other members of the board,” said Chambers. “It remains to be seen how that’s going to change, but I do believe that we’ll see a much different approach. That’s got to be that’s got to be raising questions within the firms and and within the broader community of listed companies whose audits are subject to PCAOB oversight\. That’s where people are going to need to reflect on what could a change mean, and what should their response be?”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending