Connect with us

Accounting

Senate bill calls for NIST to make third party AI audit standards

Published

on

A recently introduced Senate bill would, if passed, direct the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to develop standards for third-party audits of AI.

The bill — sponsored by Sen. John Hickenlooper, D-Colorado, and Shelley Moore Capito, R-West Virginia — specifically would require the Director of the NIST to develop voluntary guidelines and specifications for internal and external assurances of artificial intelligence systems, and for other purposes. These specifications would require considerations for data privacy protections, mitigations against potential harms to individuals from an AI system, dataset quality, and governance and communications processes of a developer or deployer throughout the AI systems’ development lifecycles.

It would also establish a collaborative Advisory Committee to review and recommend criteria for individuals or organizations seeking to obtain certification of their ability to conduct internal or external assurance for AI systems, and require NIST to conduct a study examining various aspects of the ecosystem of AI assurance, including the current capabilities and methodologies used, facilities or resources needed, and overall market demand for internal and external AI assurance.

“AI is moving faster than any of us thought it would two years ago,” said Sen. Hickenlooper, who serves as the chair of the Senate Subcommittee on Consumer Protection, Product Safety and Data Security. “But we have to move just as fast to get sensible guardrails in place to develop AI responsibly before it’s too late. Otherwise, AI could bring more harm than good to our lives.”

The bill defines AI along the lines of the National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Act of 2020, which said AI means a machine-based system that can, for a given set of human-defined objectives, make predictions, recommendations or decisions influencing real or virtual environments, using machine and human-based inputs to perceive real and virtual environments; abstract such perceptions into models through analysis in an automated manner; and use model inference to formulate options for information or action.

This represents but the latest in a series of actions to encourage regulation and oversight of artificial intelligence, not least of which was the executive order from the White House at the beginning of this year. Others include the Algorithmic Accountability Act of 2023, the Federal Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Act of 2023, the Artificial Intelligence Environmental Impacts Act of 2024 and the No Robot Bosses Act. Across the ocean, the EU has also been very interested in AI regulation, as evidenced in its EU Artificial Intelligence Act.

Continue Reading

Accounting

House tax bill calls for $30K SALT, omits millionaire tax

Published

on

The House tax committee is seeking to increase the state and local deduction and make official several of President Donald Trump’s campaign tax pledges in a multitrillion-dollar package that will serve as Republicans’ signature legislative effort.

The House Ways and Means Committee release of the tax measures, ahead of planned debate on the panel Tuesday, is a sign the Republican-controlled chamber is moving toward a floor vote this month on the legislation. The bill aims to cut taxes by more than $4 trillion and reduce spending by at least $1.5 trillion over a decade.

The proposal doesn’t include a tax hike on the wealthiest Americans, after weeks of debate among Republicans about whether to raise levies on millionaires. The bill would permanently extend the 37% top rate for individuals that was set in Trump’s 2017 tax law. That’s despite Trump telling Speaker Mike Johnson as recently as last week that he wanted a 39.6% rate for individuals making more than $2.5 million.

The package — which Trump has dubbed his “one big, beautiful bill” is the centerpiece of his legislative agenda. It renews many of his first-term tax cuts, set to expire at the end of the year. But narrow Republican margins in the House mean that the president needs near-unanimous support from his party to pass the bill.

The bill would raise the nation’s borrowing limit by $4 trillion. This is smaller than the Senate’s preferred $5 trillion level. Lawmakers are hoping to push any additional votes on raising the debt ceiling until after the 2026 midterms.

The draft language eliminates income taxes on tips and overtime pay through 2028. House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith had vowed to follow through on Trump’s campaign pledges to end those levies.

Trump had also campaigned on ending taxes on Social Security benefits, but that cannot be done in the special budget process that Congress is using to advance the tax package. Instead, the bill provides a $4,000 bonus for seniors on top of the regular standard deduction.

One of the thorniest issues — including a contentious standoff over increasing the state and local tax deduction — is still not resolved. The draft calls for increasing the state and local tax deduction to $30,000 for both individuals and couples, up from $10,000, with income limits for single taxpayers earning $200,000 or joint filers making twice that. But some lawmakers representing high-tax areas want an even bigger tax break — as much as $124,000 for joint filers.

On the hook for tax increases: wealthy private universities, which could see an increase in the levy on endowments from 1.4% to as high as 21% on investment income. 

Johnson told reporters Monday that the House is on track to pass the legislation by Memorial Day. It would then go to the Senate, where it could be subject to major revisions.

The new details come after the tax-writing committee released some initial provisions late Friday. Those included raising the maximum child tax credit to $2,500 from $2,000 and increasing the standard deduction, both retroactive to 2025 to put more money in voters’ pockets before the 2026 election. 

The bill also raises the estate tax exemption to $15 million and increases the 20% deduction for closely-held businesses to 23%.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Jon Voight joins studios, unions to press Trump for film aid

Published

on

President Donald Trump’s Hollywood ambassadors joined studios, labor unions and producers in asking the White House to expand and extend tax incentives as part of an upcoming budget reconciliation bill.

A letter dated Monday asked the president to include three film and TV incentives in the budget bill being drafted by Congress. The coalition includes the Motion Picture Association, which represents Hollywood studios, as well as unions of writers, actors and other trades.

Actor Jon Voight, who was named one of three special ambassadors to Hollywood in January, is leading the effort to obtain assistance from Washington to boost US film and TV jobs. The groups signing the letter represent nearly 400,000 industry professionals. Sylvester Stallone, another Trump ambassador, also signed the letter.

The U.S. film and TV industry has struggled in recent years as entertainment companies reduced their spending and moved production overseas, where cheaper labor and more generous government subsidies make their business more profitable. 

The letter doesn’t mention tariffs on foreign film production, which Trump said he would pursue in a social media post on May 4. His 100% tariff proposal, made after a visit with Voight, sent the shares of studios such as Netflix Inc. and Walt Disney Co. tumbling as investors considered the possibility of rising costs and a trade war in the entertainment business. 

The specific proposals in the new letter involve reviving Section 199 of the tax code, which provided deductions for manufacturing to film and TV production, extending Section 181, which allows for accelerated deductions, and restoring Section 461, which lets businesses use past losses to reduce future taxes.

Continue Reading

Accounting

State AI regulation ban tucked into Republican tax, fiscal bill

Published

on

A powerful House committee has tucked language preventing states from regulating artificial intelligence into President Donald Trump’s massive tax and spending bill, a move that would benefit many of the U.S.’s largest tech and AI companies. 

OpenAI, Meta Platforms Inc., and Alphabet Inc.’s Google are among the firms that have argued that state AI regulations would hamstring the burgeoning technology. Meta in April comments to the White House also said state-level rules would raise compliance costs for AI companies. 

The House Energy and Commerce Committee’s draft bill, which the panel will debate on Tuesday, would place a 10-year moratorium on “any law or regulation regulating artificial intelligence models, artificial intelligence systems, or automated decision systems,” according to language released late Sunday. 

It’s unlikely the language will meet the strict bar for ultimate inclusion in the tax bill, which is being pushed through Congress with only Republican support using a special parliamentary procedure. Senate rules require that provisions passed using the procedure be primarily fiscal in nature.

But its inclusion signals where key Republicans stand on the matter just one month after tech executives urged Congress to pass federal AI legislation to prevent states from creating their own rules. 

AI safety advocates and critics of big tech on Monday warned that the language, if passed, would hamstring state governments seeking to ensure the technology is deployed safely and ethically.  

Brad Carson, president of the AI safety think tank Americans for Responsible Innovation, called the language a “giveaway to Big Tech that will come back to bite us.”

“Tying the hands of lawmakers when it comes to taking on big tech could have catastrophic consequences for the public, for small businesses, and for young people online,” Carson said. 

Patchwork solution

This year alone, at least 45 states and Puerto Rico introduced at least 550 AI bills, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. And that number is only set to grow in the months ahead. 

California lawmakers’ push last year to pass AI safety laws was opposed by tech companies and venture capital firms, such as OpenAI and Andreessen Horowitz, and ultimately vetoed by California Governor Gavin Newsom, a Democrat. State lawmakers are trying again this year to pass a pared-back bill aimed at holding AI developers accountable for any severe harm caused by their products. 

During an April Energy and Commerce hearing, Scale AI Inc. CEO Alexandr Wang called for “one federal standard” on AI. 

“We cannot afford a patchwork of 50 different state standards that we have to execute against,” Wang said. 

Representative Jay Obernolte, a California Republican on the panel, agreed with Wang, saying Congress has a “limited amount of legislative runway to be able to get that problem solved before the states get too far ahead.” 

But Jan Schakowsky, a senior Democrat on the committee, said the provision would give tech companies “free reign to take advantage of children and families.” 

“This ban will allow AI companies to ignore consumer privacy protections, let deepfakes spread, and allow companies to profile and deceive customers using AI,” she added.

Continue Reading

Trending