Connect with us

Accounting

Small businesses saw modest growth in jobs and pay in November

Published

on

Small business jobs growth remained steady in November, while workers’ wages grew only slightly, payroll provider Paychex reported Tuesday.

The Paychex Small Business Employment Watch found hourly earnings growth of 2.97% and weekly earnings growth of 2.84% for workers. Job growth occurred in the areas in the Southeast affected by recent Hurricanes Helene and Milton. Construction job growth in Florida increased 2.55 percentage points to an index level of 99.95. Weekly hours worked in North Carolina (-0.81%) were down in November, but one-month annualized growth rebounded among sectors following Hurricane Helene.

“The states that were impacted by the hurricanes took a pretty big dip right after that happened,” said Frank Fiorille, vice president of risk, compliance and data analytics at Paychex. “But that’s usually the case that we’ve seen for many of these sorts of events that it bounces right back quickly.”

Paychex office

Texas gained 1.22 percentage points as its jobs index climbed to 101.60, which led states for job growth in November. Dallas (101.07) and Houston (100.94) ranked first and second, respectively, among top U.S. metros for job growth in November.

The Midwest (100.62) remained the top region for small business employment growth for the sixth consecutive month.

Hourly earnings growth in Tennessee (3.98%) ranked first among states in November, marking the first time Tennessee has ranked first since reporting began more than 10 years ago.

Probably due to workforce composition changes due to recent hurricanes, Tampa (4.84%) jumped to No. 1 among the top U.S. metropolitan areas for hourly earnings growth in November.

“If you look at the sectors, the leisure and hospitality sector is the softest,” said Fiorille. “The construction and professional business discipline was up the most this past month. Wages are still under that 3% number. We haven’t seen much of a jump on that.”

Paychex has also been tracking numbers for workers who switched jobs or stayed at their jobs. It saw a large jump in pay for those who switched jobs early in the pandemic, but the differences in pay compared to those who remained at their jobs have narrowed in recent years. 

“Especially during COVID, when the labor market was really tight, it was a pretty big gap,” said Fiorille. “People who switched jobs were seeing a pretty big increase in wages. We’re seeing that really compressed to where now there’s almost not much of a gap at all, which validates that the labor market, while still being strong, has definitely cooled a little bit from the last few years.”

He thinks accountants should keep their small business clients informed about the possible tax changes that may occur next year when the Trump administration takes office in Washington. Other important topics include artificial intelligence, privacy and beneficial ownership information reporting.

Small businesses should also be aware that the Biden administration’s expanded overtime rule was struck down in a federal court in Texas in November. The rule would have made an estimated 4 million more people eligible for overtime pay, but the judge ruled that it improperly made overtime dependent on their wages and not their job duties.

Under the rule, starting Jan. 1, 2025, most salaried workers who make under $1,128 per week, or $58,656 per year, would become eligible for overtime pay. The rule temporarily raised the threshold on July 1, 2024 to salaried workers who earn under $844 per week, or $43,888 per year. Overtime pay will now revert to the old level of $684 per week, or $35,568 per year, which was set in 2019 under the first Trump administration after another federal judge struck down a more expansive rule from the Obama administration.

The Department of Labor is appealing the judge’s decision, but it will be up to the incoming Trump administration and its nominee for Secretary of Labor to decide whether to continue to appeal or to set another overtime rule. 

“It does really impact a lot of businesses,” said Fiorille. “We’ll see what happens.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

IAASB tweaks standards on working with outside experts

Published

on

The International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board is proposing to tailor some of its standards to align with recent additions to the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants’ International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants when it comes to using the work of an external expert.

The proposed narrow-scope amendments involve minor changes to several IAASB standards:

  • ISA 620, Using the Work of an Auditor’s Expert;
  • ISRE 2400 (Revised), Engagements to Review Historical Financial Statements;
  • ISAE 3000 (Revised), Assurance Engagements Other than Audits or Reviews of Historical Financial Information;
  • ISRS 4400 (Revised), Agreed-upon Procedures Engagements.

The IAASB is asking for comments via a digital response template that can be found on the IAASB website by July 24, 2025.

In December 2023, the IESBA approved an exposure draft for proposed revisions to the IESBA’s Code of Ethics related to using the work of an external expert. The proposals included three new sections to the Code of Ethics, including provisions for professional accountants in public practice; professional accountants in business and sustainability assurance practitioners. The IESBA approved the provisions on using the work of an external expert at its December 2024 meeting, establishing an ethical framework to guide accountants and sustainability assurance practitioners in evaluating whether an external expert has the necessary competence, capabilities and objectivity to use their work, as well as provisions on applying the Ethics Code’s conceptual framework when using the work of an outside expert.  

Continue Reading

Accounting

Tariffs will hit low-income Americans harder than richest, report says

Published

on

President Donald Trump’s tariffs would effectively cause a tax increase for low-income families that is more than three times higher than what wealthier Americans would pay, according to an analysis from the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy.

The report from the progressive think tank outlined the outcomes for Americans of all backgrounds if the tariffs currently in effect remain in place next year. Those making $28,600 or less would have to spend 6.2% more of their income due to higher prices, while the richest Americans with income of at least $914,900 are expected to spend 1.7% more. Middle-income families making between $55,100 and $94,100 would pay 5% more of their earnings. 

Trump has imposed the steepest U.S. duties in more than a century, including a 145% tariff on many products from China, a 25% rate on most imports from Canada and Mexico, duties on some sectors such as steel and aluminum and a baseline 10% tariff on the rest of the country’s trading partners. He suspended higher, customized tariffs on most countries for 90 days.

Economists have warned that costs from tariff increases would ultimately be passed on to U.S. consumers. And while prices will rise for everyone, lower-income families are expected to lose a larger portion of their budgets because they tend to spend more of their earnings on goods, including food and other necessities, compared to wealthier individuals.

Food prices could rise by 2.6% in the short run due to tariffs, according to an estimate from the Yale Budget Lab. Among all goods impacted, consumers are expected to face the steepest price hikes for clothing at 64%, the report showed. 

The Yale Budget Lab projected that the tariffs would result in a loss of $4,700 a year on average for American households.

Continue Reading

Accounting

At Schellman, AI reshapes a firm’s staffing needs

Published

on

Artificial intelligence is just getting started in the accounting world, but it is already helping firms like technology specialist Schellman do more things with fewer people, allowing the firm to scale back hiring and reduce headcount in certain areas through natural attrition. 

Schellman CEO Avani Desai said there have definitely been some shifts in headcount at the Top 100 Firm, though she stressed it was nothing dramatic, as it mostly reflects natural attrition combined with being more selective with hiring. She said the firm has already made an internal decision to not reduce headcount in force, as that just indicates they didn’t hire properly the first time. 

“It hasn’t been about reducing roles but evolving how we do work, so there wasn’t one specific date where we ‘started’ the reduction. It’s been more case by case. We’ve held back on refilling certain roles when we saw opportunities to streamline, especially with the use of new technologies like AI,” she said. 

One area where the firm has found such opportunities has been in the testing of certain cybersecurity controls, particularly within the SOC framework. The firm examined all the controls it tests on the service side and asked which ones require human judgment or deep expertise. The answer was a lot of them. But for the ones that don’t, AI algorithms have been able to significantly lighten the load. 

“[If] we don’t refill a role, it’s because the need actually has changed, or the process has improved so significantly [that] the workload is lighter or shared across the smarter system. So that’s what’s happening,” said Desai. 

Outside of client services like SOC control testing and reporting, the firm has found efficiencies in administrative functions as well as certain internal operational processes. On the latter point, Desai noted that Schellman’s engineers, including the chief information officer, have been using AI to help develop code, which means they’re not relying as much on outside expertise on the internal service delivery side of things. There are still people in the development process, but their roles are changing: They’re writing less code, and doing more reviewing of code before it gets pushed into production, saving time and creating efficiencies. 

“The best way for me to say this is, to us, this has been intentional. We paused hiring in a few areas where we saw overlaps, where technology was really working,” said Desai.

However, even in an age awash with AI, Schellman acknowledges there are certain jobs that need a human, at least for now. For example, the firm does assessments for the FedRAMP program, which is needed for cloud service providers to contract with certain government agencies. These assessments, even in the most stable of times, can be long and complex engagements, to say nothing of the less predictable nature of the current government. As such, it does not make as much sense to reduce human staff in this area. 

“The way it is right now for us to do FedRAMP engagements, it’s a very manual process. There’s a lot of back and forth between us and a third party, the government, and we don’t see a lot of overall application or technology help… We’re in the federal space and you can imagine, [with] what’s going on right now, there’s a big changing market condition for clients and their pricing pressure,” said Desai. 

As Schellman reduces staff levels in some places, it is increasing them in others. Desai said the firm is actively hiring in certain areas. In particular, it’s adding staff in technical cybersecurity (e.g., penetration testers), the aforementioned FedRAMP engagements, AI assessment (in line with recently becoming an ISO 42001 certification body) and in some client-facing roles like marketing and sales. 

“So, to me, this isn’t about doing more with less … It’s about doing more of the right things with the right people,” said Desai. 

While these moves have resulted in savings, she said that was never really the point, so whatever the firm has saved from staffing efficiencies it has reinvested in its tech stack to build its service line further. When asked for an example, she said the firm would like to focus more on penetration testing by building a SaaS tool for it. While Schellman has a proof of concept developed, she noted it would take a lot of money and time to deploy a full solution — both of which the firm now has more of because of its efficiency moves. 

“What is the ‘why’ behind these decisions? The ‘why’ for us isn’t what I think you traditionally see, which is ‘We need to get profitability high. We need to have less people do more things.’ That’s not what it is like,” said Desai. “I want to be able to focus on quality. And the only way I think I can focus on quality is if my people are not focusing on things that don’t matter … I feel like I’m in a much better place because the smart people that I’ve hired are working on the riskiest and most complicated things.”

Continue Reading

Trending