Connect with us

Accounting

Speakers: AI can be complex but starting out can be simple

Published

on

While virtually every accountant by now has heard the exhortation to use AI in their practice, many remain mystified as to how to even get started. Speakers at Woodard’s Scaling New Heights conference in Orlando noted that while using AI certainly can be complicated, even simple applications can have impressive results. 

TJ Lewis, innovation strategist with accounting-focused cloud services provider Rightworks, said that the best way to familiarize yourself with AI is to simply use AI, not only at work but personally as well, adding that “it really is that simple.” 

“Because, really, until you use it you can watch all the videos you want but it [won’t] get to the point where you’re understanding how it works and how to interact with it. It can still feel a little formal. I think you won’t understand what it can do for you,” he said. 

AI start

Jertam2567 – stock.adobe.com

But use AI how? For those who have no idea how to even get started with AI, he said a good place to start would be simply asking it to help you write an email. He said to take a message from a client (with personal details removed, if using a public model) and copy it into ChatGPT or a similar model and “just say ‘help me with this.'” Whether it actually helps answer a client query or simply makes your reply sound better, it will be useful. He added that people could also use it for personal things like “plan my summer vacation, where should I go?” or research like “summarize a piece of legislation that comes out, give me the three key points that I need to be able to communicate to clients.” 

“Anything like that. There’s very easy ways to start. And I think often people are overcomplicating it, they go ‘I have to make it do all these wonderful things,” he said, noting the importance of resisting this thought. 

Another speaker, Ariege Mishergi—the senior vice president and general manager of AP, AR and the accountant channel for payments solution provider Bill—made a similar point during her own presentation, saying that even if one is intimidated by some of the more advanced uses of AI, there are a number of simple use cases that firms can implement for great results, especially if they’re new to the technology. 

“Start with areas that are repeatable and predictable processes, things like AP automation, data extraction, routine client communications. These are really, really low hanging fruit, where AI can deliver immediate value,” she said. 

Lewis noted, though, that even with these simple use cases many firm leaders still hesitate. The most common concerns he has seen are privacy risks for both the firm and the client, lack of transparency in the way the models work, the risk of biased results, as well as questions over how much they can really rely on the bots. In such cases, Lewis said having guardrails can do much to set minds at ease. He urged firms to develop AI policies outlining how the technology should and should not be utilized in order to bolster security, reduce liability, and set the right tone for responsible use. 

Mishergi said that another way to ease into AI and overcome anxiety is to select solutions that suggest, rather than apply changes, which ensures the human always remains in control. Over time, as their comfort builds, they may trust bots to do more on their own, “but as a starting point, maintain that control and look for AI suggestions.” 

So then, once a firm is more comfortable and familiar with AI, what would be the practical steps to integrate it more fully into its workflows? Lewis said the first thing to do is to designate someone in the firm as responsible for understanding what AI is capable of and how it fits within the practice, an “AI champion” who he said should be “inspirational, motivational, etcetera, but also really understands what goes on in your firm because they’re going to be the ones helping across the board.” 

Mishergi said it all starts with the tech stack. Only about a third of accountants require clients to use their recommended tech stack, something that she said may be client friendly but is holding firms, as “without a unified tech stack you’re constantly reinventing the wheel,” as the firm must constantly adapt to their technology. 

“If your practice is bouncing between different tools your clients prefer, like without any uniformity, it’s going to be increasingly difficult for you to scale and to incorporate new technologies. So as a starting point, almost as a step zero in this conversation, start working toward having a single, unified tech stack in your practice. If you want to scale, standardize: that’s the foundation for AI,” she said. 

Similarly, Lewis pointed out that the more data an AI has access to, the more context it can account for, which means the better the quality of its outputs. 

“I was talking to a firm that said, you know, they’re dealing with 20 some applications that their client information is in. Whether it’s your practice, your tax office or your general ledger the more that we can pull all this information from across the board into something where they’re all connected… If we can do that in a secure way, we can mine all that information for responses, that’s incredibly powerful,” he said.

Just as vital to Mishergi is choosing the right partner. With so many vendors offering so many flavors of AI today, it can be difficult to determine who is reliable to work with, so she suggested starting with the basics. How well do they protect client data? Do they work with your existing tech stack and apps? Does their solution solve real problems, or does it just look good in a demo? And how much human oversight is there and can humans override the system when needed? 

“But what I really think separates the good from the great is choosing partners who really get accounting professionals: your work, your relationships, your clients, your employees, your goals. They really understand. I’ve seen too many well intentioned teams over promise and under deliver, because they just don’t totally understand the history of this profession. Look for companies with a proven track record in this space, the ones who’ve consistently been solving problems that are actually in your core areas of challenge. One key way to do this is to listen to how company leadership, particularly founders and CEOs, talk about you, talk about accounting professionals. Do they treat you like a user persona or like a partner in a mission?” she said. 

As one gets deeper into AI, she said ultimately firm owners should reconceive their own role and the role of their professionals. While traditionally accountants are in the business of execution tasks, as AI becomes capable of handling more and more jobs, the humans will slowly transition into more orchestration and coordination of tasks that AI will execute. 

“As AI helps you shift away from the role of a manual processor, you’re going to find yourself playing the assistant orchestrator role. You’ll be designing and directing systems that work on your behalf. Now your new value becomes twofold. This is your new value proposition. It’s first the ability to configure the right AI workflows for each of your clients needs, and that requires an understanding of the technology, the tools, of course, of the profession and also of the client. The second is your ability to apply judgment with context and trust on the things that can’t be automated. And with AI managing the mechanical, you get a lot more space with the analysis and for the relationship building,” she said.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending