Springline Advisory, a private equity-funded firm, is growing by bringing in accounting firms.
Trinity Hunt Partners, a Dallas-based private equity firm, created Springline Advisory earlier this year in partnership with MarksNelson, a Kansas-based firm it invested in last year. In addition to MarksNelson, it later added BGBC Partners, an Indianapolis-based firm.
“We’re trying to find pioneering firms that have strong leadership teams, that are already on a growth trajectory and that are likely stymied because they can’t get access to scale quickly enough,” said Springline Advisory CEO Tim Brackney. “We’re bringing those firms together and evolving into one firm over time, taking some of these pioneering firms as founders to help program in the live code and create the overall firm DNA.”
He has three more deals that he hopes to close this fall, including one in the Southwest, a smaller firm in the Northwest, and a firm that focuses mostly on business valuation, forensics and litigation support that he sees as a “seedling” for a national practice in that area. Eventually the firms will rebrand.
“We’re on a path of evolution into one firm, but the first step is do no harm,” said Brackney. “Then the next step is an endorsed brand. So that would be the next thing that comes out: Marks Nelson, a Springline company. And then eventually we’ll settle under one banner. We’ll be very careful to make sure that we don’t put the cart before the horse. We want our firms to work together and be part of one firm, but we also want to make sure that we’re careful about the existing brand cachet and those things that come with a legacy brand.”
So far, the reaction from employees has been positive. “Until you rip the cover off something, you’re not really sure what the reaction is going to be,” said Brackney. “With any transformative change, you’re concerned with any fallout from it. For both firms, the general mood was excitement. We actually didn’t have any turnover related specifically to the transaction at all. We’ve actually had incoming experienced hires who understand and want to be part of what we’re doing here. It’s actually been really positive. Both firms were voted Best Place to Work post transaction. That’s happened twice now, so we feel really good about how that transition has occurred.”
One possibility is offshoring. “From a capacity standpoint, one of the things that we’ll offer and are exploring right now is how to have a better way to do offshoring,” said Brackney. “Some of the firms we talked to dabble in it, some of them don’t. We’ll obviously think about technology applications, etc., for capacity. For talent, the idea that you can have a large middle market firm that gives you access to opportunity, and if you started in Kansas City and ended up in Portland, Oregon, and still be under the same tent with the same values, I think that will be a compelling proposition to building what we’re hoping to be, an irresistible firm where you’re a talent magnet. You have to make the grass on your side of the fence really, really green.”
One enticement will be the level of compensation. “We’ve approved a program to make equity available below the level of partner to the level of senior manager, at least to start, and probably will increase on that at some point,” said Brackney. “To me, the combination of those things, with the infusion of private equity to invest in some of those things, will allow us to become more of a talent magnet.”
He hopes to attract pioneering firms. “What we’re looking for are pioneers, people who know that they want to be part of a larger firm and are actively growing that way,” said Brackney.
In some cases, the deals can take about three months, although he acknowledged the importance of due diligence. “Seller experience is really important, and due diligence is due diligence,” said Brackney. “There’s not that many things that you can do to make due diligence feel better than it is. What we try to do is be very transparent. We figure, from the time we’ve got an initial meeting to the time of clinking champagne glasses, it’s 90 days. Now the problem is that you’ve got September 15, October 15 and April 15 that you have to work around. But we have a very clear process. We’ll go from an initial meeting to taking a small amount of financial information and turning around a letter of intent, and then doing a fast follow on that.”
The Financial Accounting Standards Board issued a proposed accounting standards update Tuesday to establish authoritative guidance on the accounting for government grants received by business entities.
U.S. GAAP currently doesn’t provide specific authoritative guidance about the recognition, measurement, and presentation of a grant received by a business entity from a government. Instead, many businesses currently apply the International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation’s International Accounting Standard 20, Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance, by analogy, at least in part, to account for government grants.
In 2022 FASB issued an Invitation to Comment, Accounting for Government Grants by Business Entities—Potential Incorporation of IAS 20, Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance, into GAAP. In response, most of FASB’s stakeholders supported leveraging the guidance in IAS 20 to develop accounting guidance for government grants in GAAP, believing it would reduce diversity in practice because entities would apply the guidance instead of analogizing to it or other guidance, thus narrowing the variability in accounting for government grants.
The proposed ASU would leverage the guidance in IAS 20 with targeted improvements to establish guidance on how to recognize, measure, and present a government grant including (1) a grant related to an asset and (2) a grant related to income. It also would require, consistent with current disclosure requirements, disclosure about the nature of the government grant received, the accounting policies used to account for the grant, and significant terms and conditions of the grant, among others.
FASB is asking for comments on the proposed ASU by March 31, 2025.
“It will not be a cut and paste of IAS 20,” said FASB technical director Jackson Day during a session at Financial Executives International’s Current Financial Reporting Insights conference last week. “First of all, the scope is going to be a little bit different, probably a little bit more narrow. Second of all, the threshold of recognizing a government grant will be based on ‘probable,’ and ‘probable’ as we think of it in U.S. GAAP terms. We’re also going to do some work to make clarifications, etc. There is a little bit different thinking around the government grants for assets. There will be a deferred income approach or a cost accumulation approach that you can pick. And finally, there will be different disclosures because the disclosures will be based on what the board had previously issued, but it does leverage IAS 20. A few other things it does as far as reducing diversity. Most people analogized IAS 20. That was our anecdotal findings. But what does that mean? How exactly do they do that? This will set forth the specifics. It will also eliminate from the population those that were analogizing to ASC 450 or 958, because there were a few of those too. So it will go a long way in reducing diversity. It will also head down a model that will be generally internationally converged, which we still think about. We still collaborate with the staff [of the International Accounting Standards Board]. We don’t have any joint projects, but we still do our best when it makes sense to align on projects.”
Mauled Again (http://mauledagain.blogspot.com/): Not long ago, about a dozen states would seize property for failure to pay property taxes and, instead of simply taking their share of unpaid taxes, interest, and penalties and returning the excess to the property owner, they would pocket the entire proceeds of the sales. Did high court intervention stem this practice? Not so much.
Current Federal Tax Developments (https://www.currentfederaltaxdevelopments.com/): In Surk LLC v. Commissioner, the Tax Court was presented with the question of basis computations related to an interest in a partnership. The taxpayer mistakenly deducted losses that exceeded the limitation in IRC Sec. 704(d), raising the question: Should the taxpayer reduce its basis in subsequent years by the amount of those disallowed losses or compute the basis by treating those losses as if they were never deducted?
Parametric (https://www.parametricportfolio.com/blog): If your clients are using more traditional commingled products for their passive exposures, they may not know how much tax money they’re leaving on the table. A look at possible advantages of a separately managed account.
Turbotax (https://blog.turbotax.intuit.com): Whether they’re talking diversification, gainful hobby or income stream, what to remind them about the tax benefits of investing in real estate.
The National Association of Tax Professionals (https://blog.natptax.com/): Q&A from a recent webinar on day cares’ unique income and expense categories.
Boyum & Barenscheer (https://www.myboyum.com/blog/): For larger manufacturers, compliance under IRC 263A is essential. And for all manufacturers, effective inventory management goes beyond balancing stock levels. Key factors affecting inventory accounting for large and small manufacturing businesses.
Withum (https://www.withum.com/resources/): A look at the recent IRS Memorandum 2024-36010 that denied the application of IRC Sec. 245A to dividends received by a controlled foreign corporation.
PwC made a $1.5 million investment to Bryant University, in Smithfield, Rhode Island, to fund the launch of the PwC AI in Accounting Fellowship.
The experiential learning program allows undergraduate students to explore AI’s impact in accounting by way of engaging in research with faculty, corporate-sponsored projects and professional development that blends traditional accounting principles with AI-driven tools and platforms.
The first cohort of PwC AI in Accounting Fellows will be awarded to members of the Bryant Honors Program planning to study accounting. The fellowship funds can be applied to various educational resources, including conference fees, specialized data sheets, software and travel.
“Aligned with our Vision 2030 strategic plan and our commitment to experiential learning and academic excellence, the fellowship also builds upon PwC’s longstanding relationship with Bryant University,” Bryant University president Ross Gittell said in a statement. “This strong partnership supports institutional objectives and includes the annual PwC Accounting Careers Leadership Institute for rising high school seniors, the PwC Endowed Scholarship Fund, the PwC Book Fund, and the PwC Center for Diversity and Inclusion.”
Bob Calabro, a PwC US partner and 1988 Bryant University alumnus and trustee, helped lead the development of the program.
“We are excited to introduce students to the many opportunities available to them in the accounting field and to prepare them to make the most of those opportunities, This program further illustrates the strong relationship between PwC and Bryant University, where so many of our partners and staff began their career journey in accounting” Calabro said in a statement.
“Bryant’s Accounting faculty are excited to work with our PwC AI in Accounting Fellows to help them develop impactful research projects and create important experiential learning opportunities,” professor Daniel Ames, chair of Bryant’s accounting department, said in a statement. “This program provides an invaluable opportunity for students to apply AI concepts to real-world accounting, shaping their educational journey in significant ways.”