Connect with us

Accounting

Tax Fraud Blotter: Go for broke

Published

on

Speedy sentencing; WWTF; no longer Confident; and other highlights of recent tax cases.

Washington, D.C.: Tax preparer Awett Tedla, now of Indianapolis, has been sentenced to 21 months in prison for conspiring to file false tax returns, wire fraud and tax evasion.

Tedla owned and operated Speedy Tax Services in Washington, D.C., and District Heights, Maryland, and from 2012 through 2016 she and her co-conspirators prepared and e-filed false income tax returns for clients that reported fictitious businesses and claimed certain tax credits, including the Earned Income Tax Credits, to inflate refunds. Tedla and her co-conspirators charged their clients different fees that depended on the size of the fraudulent refund.

In 2016, she also filed a return for herself that underreported gross receipts and taxable income from her business.

Tedla caused a tax loss to the IRS of some $171,534.

She was also ordered to serve three years of supervised release and to pay $171,534 in restitution to the United States.

Bozeman, Montana: Joseph Glen Dickey, owner of a construction company who was accused of not paying IRS employee-related taxes of more than $800,000, has admitted to tax crimes.

Dickey is the owner of Alpine Customs, a commercial construction company that has employed 60 or more individuals. As Alpine’s GM he controlled every aspect of the business, including approving payments and overseeing bank accounts. Alpine withheld payroll taxes from employees’ paychecks and was required to make quarterly deposits of those payroll taxes and additional employer payroll contributions to the IRS.

Dickey did not timely deposit several employee or employer payroll taxes from 2018 to 2021. He knew of the requirements and his bookkeepers and IRS officers repeatedly advised him of these obligations.

In total, Dickey failed to timely pay $803,374 in payroll taxes.

He faces up to five years in prison, a $250,000 fine and three years of supervised release. Sentencing is Aug. 14.

Barrington, Illinois: Tax preparer Gary Sandiego has pleaded guilty to preparing false income tax returns for clients.

Sandiego owned and operated the tax prep business G. Sandiego and Associates and for tax years 2014 through 2017 prepared and filed false income tax returns for clients. Instead of relying on information provided by the clients, he either inflated or entirely fabricated expenses to falsely claim residential energy credits and employment-related expense deductions.

He caused a tax loss to the IRS of some $4,586,154.

Sentencing is Aug. 14. He faces up to three years in prison for each count as well as a period of supervised release, restitution and monetary penalties. 

Freeport, Texas: Tax preparer Krystal Wright has pleaded guilty to aiding and assisting in the preparation and filing of false income tax returns.

Wright was the sole owner and only tax preparer at WW2F for six years. Most of her clients did not have a business nor did they discuss any business income or expenses with her. After Wright completed a return, she did not review the completed documents with clients and only provided them with the refund amount and first two pages of the return, preventing her clients from identifying overstated or false items on their returns.

From 2017 through 2020, Wright prepared and filed some 83 federal income tax returns that contained false and fraudulent items. Some included qualified solar electric property costs, gifts by cash or check, business expenses, wages, salaries, tips and supplies.

The false and fraudulent filings resulted in a total tax harm of $525,404.

Sentencing is June 26. Wright faces up to three years in prison and a $250,000 fine.

jail2-fotolia.jpg

Atlanta: Former municipal CFO Jimmie “Jim” A. Beard, now of Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, has pleaded guilty to theft of government funds and to obstructing federal tax laws.

From about November 2011 to May 2018, Beard was CFO of the City of Atlanta with primary responsibility for oversight and management of the city’s financial condition. During his tenure, he schemed to steal money and property from the city for private use, including to pay for personal travel expenses for himself, his family, and his travel companions; to buy items for personal use, including two machine guns; to pay for travel to conferences or meetings for which the conference or meeting host reimbursed Beard; and to pay for travel that he falsely claimed to the IRS was related to his personal consulting business.

Beard stole at least tens of thousands of dollars from the city. Among other infractions, in December 2015 Beard ordered two custom-built machine guns using a $2,641.90 check from the city, telling the manufacturer that the machine guns were for the Atlanta Police Department; he kept the guns until about March 2017, when he abandoned them to the Atlanta police.

During his tenure as CFO, Beard also submitted to the IRS a return for 2013 on which he claimed that he owned a consulting business that had incurred more than $33,500 in business losses in 2013, including $12,000 for travel expenses and $7,115 for deductible M&E expenses.

In 2015, the IRS advised Beard that it was auditing that return and requested documentation to support the expenses for his consulting business. Beard falsely provided receipts for fraudulent airfare and hotels; expense reports for personal meals with his wife and personal companions; and altered receipts that hid from the IRS that the charges were incurred in connection with Beard’s work for Atlanta.

Sentencing is July 12.

Jackson, Mississippi: Tax preparer Jonathan Barefoot has been sentenced to 30 months in prison for conspiring to prepare and file false returns for clients and for preparing false returns.

He worked at Sunbelt Tax Service where he conspired with others to claim inflated refunds for clients by reporting false education credits, itemized deductions and business profits or losses on clients’ returns. Barefoot and his co-conspirators prepared thousands of fraudulent returns, causing more than $3.5 million in tax losses to the IRS.

Barefoot was also ordered to serve a year of supervised release. Four of his co-conspirators were previously sentenced to 15 to one hundred months in prison.

Canton, Ohio: Stephanie Condric has pleaded guilty to conspiring to defraud the IRS related to her operation of an illegal gambling business.

From 2014 through 2018, she managed and later co-owned Gametastic, an illegal gambling business. Condric and her co-conspirators did not report to the IRS the cash wages paid to Gametastic’s employees, which caused the business to underpay its employment taxes. She also filed false personal returns that concealed a portion of the income she received from Gametastic.

Condric faces up to five years in prison, as well as a period of supervised release, restitution and monetary penalties. 

Chambersburg, Pennsylvania: Tax preparer Guibbonz Marcellus has been sentenced to 27 months in prison on 23 counts of aiding and assisting the preparation of false and fraudulent returns.

Marcellus, convicted last year, operated the tax prep business M&M Confident Multi Services from 2013 to 2016. To inflate refunds and generate business, he regularly included false numbers on the returns he prepared and filed. The returns falsely claimed, among other things, the federal fuel-tax credit, business losses, and deductions for charitable gifts and unreimbursed employee expenses.

The total loss to the government exceeded $208,000.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

on

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance and Global Regulatory Harmonization in 2026

Published

on

Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.

Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.

Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.

Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.

This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.

Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.

By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.

Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.

Continue Reading

Trending