Connect with us

Accounting

Tax reporting transparency reaches a tipping point

Published

on

Transparency is a critical component of sustainability that is foundational across the environmental, social and governance pillars: transparency in the supply chain, transparency in employee management and transparency in business decision-making. 

To achieve sustainable business models and greater long-term value creation, transparency with stakeholders is fundamental. Tax is one of the items that businesses need to consider within this broader transparency trend. 

We have reached a tipping point in global corporate tax reporting and disclosure. Regulators, investors and the public are demanding ever greater tax transparency, and companies must navigate evolving, complex reporting requirements around the globe. From expanded Financial Accounting Standards Board disclosures in the U.S. to public Country-by-Country Reporting legislation in the EU and reporting requirements under countries’ new Base Erosion and Profit Shifting 2.0 Pillar Two global minimum tax rules, companies face an array of new tax information responsibilities. 

Many of these tax reporting and disclosure regimes are coming online imminently. By proactively assessing these changes, highlighting the global tax footprint and managing the level of tax transparency in ESG agendas, companies can position themselves to tell their own story. Those that proactively adapt to this rapidly changing tax reporting and disclosure landscape will be better equipped to address risks, embrace opportunities and effectively communicate their tax narrative to the wide range of different stakeholders. 

Tax reporting here, there and everywhere

In the United States, in the EU and around the world, tax transparency is becoming commonplace, as governments and regulatory bodies seek additional visibility into corporate tax profiles. In a recent move that reflects the new corporate tax reporting environment, FASB late last year approved expanded income tax disclosures for U.S. companies that file under U.S. GAAP. 

FASB’s Accounting Standards Update 2023-09, which applies to annual periods beginning after Dec. 15, 2024, requires companies to disclose more specific and disaggregated information regarding the effective tax rate reconciliation; income or loss from continuing operations before income tax expense or benefit; and income tax expense or benefit from continuing operations. It also requires disclosure of income tax payments made to international, federal, state and local jurisdictions.  

At the same time, more widespread public CbCR disclosure obligations are being enacted around the globe. Within the EU, 21 member states currently have either proposed or enacted public CbCR legislation following the approval of an EU CbCR directive in December 2021. Differences in local rules, reporting requirements and timing can present challenges to multinational entities headquartered outside the EU and operating in multiple EU jurisdictions. 

Additionally, the BEPS 2.0 Pillar Two initiative of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development is creating new, complex tax reporting requirements for MNEs. Many countries are beginning to implement Pillar Two legislation, but the specifics and timing differ from country to country. Pillar Two calls for a global minimum tax of 15% for multinational corporations with group revenue of more than €750 million, and the necessary calculations require a substantial volume of data, some of which has not been maintained by tax departments for other purposes. 

The details of these various initiatives differ, but taken together, they share common themes and signal a broad shift in expectations about tax disclosures and reporting. In order for companies to keep up, they must transform their systems, processes and overall frameworks for tax reporting.

Opportunities and risk in a more transparent world

Greater tax transparency is quickly becoming the norm, and tax authorities around the globe are increasing their reporting requirements. Understanding the gaps and overlaps between the various tax reporting and disclosure regimes presents an opportunity to re-examine and leverage existing data and systems. Doing so can reveal ways to streamline cross-functional processes and can provide stakeholders with a more complete view of the financial impact on communities and society.

While regulators around the globe are heavily focused on income tax disclosures, those represent only one element of companies’ total tax contributions. Income taxes are significant, but the amount of non-income taxes companies pay similarly is often very significant. Companies also play a role in tax collection when they collect value-added taxes, sales and use taxes and payroll taxes, potentially alleviating some of the burden of governmental entities.      

Adapting to this world will require addressing new data and technology needs associated with addressing the above-mentioned tax disclosure and reporting requirements (e.g., FASB, public CbCR and Pillar Two reporting requirements). Collecting and analyzing the necessary data for reporting will require an in-depth process review and level of granularity not previously required. By proactively addressing these potential barriers and investing in suitable technology tools, companies can help facilitate more accurate, efficient, consistent and timely reporting and disclosures. 

While this may entail new costs, being able to collate data globally for all tax types allows for enhanced analytic capabilities and enables companies to make their societal contributions clearer, a key element of the ESG agenda. Companies will be better able to explain their tax situations to interested parties and demonstrate how their tax contributions support their communities. 

In this way, companies can take ownership of their tax narrative, which enhances trust with investors, customers and the public. This, in turn, can create a competitive advantage. Those that fall behind in responding to global trends calling for a more complete view of companies’ corporate tax profiles risk forfeiting control of their tax narrative and, in the process, losing stakeholder and public trust.  

Making transparency work — meeting the challenge 

Many companies have already started the tax transparency journey as part of their ESG agenda and are highlighting how tax obligations reflect societal commitments. One potential method is global tax footprint reporting, which can bridge the transparency gap and provide a more complete and holistic view of a company’s tax contributions. 

Reassessing data and technology needs and reporting practices in light of increasing transparency trends and reporting requirements allows companies to connect the tax function in a more meaningful way to ESG practices. By promoting a greater understanding of the complete tax picture, the tax function can add clear value to the ESG agenda. 

Proactively addressing transparency and reporting requirements can help companies establish themselves as forward-looking, engaged contributors to communities and society, able to balance business and strategic objectives with obligations to tax authorities, regulatory bodies, investors and the broader public. Below are some questions that can help start the process. 

Questions to consider

  1. How does tax currently fit into the company’s ESG reporting framework, and how might this plan need to change given expanding reporting obligations to tax authorities and public expectations for transparency?
  2. What is the company’s approach to showcase its global tax footprint and access the data and technology platforms needed across various tax jurisdictions to comply with new tax reporting requirements?
  3. What is the communication strategy for helping internal and external stakeholders understand the nuances of the tax data disclosed to the public? 

Tax transparency is here to stay, and companies need to develop action plans to respond. 

Kevin Dehner is EY Americas sustainability tax deputy leader. Other contributors to this article include Kristen Gray, EY Americas sustainability tax leader; David Campbell, EY Americas tax technology and transformation senior manager; and Colleen Sebra, EY Americas tax technology and transformation partner.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending