Connect with us

Accounting

Tax Fraud Blotter: In the gutter

Published

on

Host of problems; comp it; plan to fail; and other highlights of recent tax cases.

Portland, Maine: Colleen Holt-Thompson, of Kentucky, has been sentenced to three years of probation and ordered to pay $172,158.79 in restitution for conspiracy to commit visa fraud and for tax evasion.

Holt-Thompson founded Host Ukraine in 2015 in Newport, Kentucky, and served as the nonprofit’s executive director. The organization brought children living in orphanages in Ukraine to stay with American families for short periods over the summer or winter holidays. Host Ukraine was required to have the permission of the Ministry of Social Policy in Ukraine to transport each child, and the name and address of a hosting family was required before permission would be granted. Once permission was granted, the U.S. embassy in Kyiv, Ukraine, would issue a non-immigrant visa to the child. Between 2015 and 2019, Thompson applied for and received ministry hosting permission for 828 U.S. non-immigrant visas for Ukrainian children.

To obtain the visas, Holt-Thompson provided placeholder names — names and addresses of American families who had not actually agreed to serve as hosts — when she submitted names of Ukrainian children to the Ministry. Before the children traveled to the U.S., she would find actual host families for each child. During the period of the conspiracy, a conspirator who lived in Maine and was the Northeast contact for Host Ukraine was responsible for identifying placeholder families in Maine and recruiting families to serve as host families for the Ukrainian children who traveled to the U.S. on fraudulently obtained visas. Host families were charged a $3,000 fee to host a child; Host Ukraine collected donations.

In 2016, Holt-Thompson spent some $127,610 in personal expenses and paid for those expenses from Host Ukraine’s checking account or paid personal credit card bills using that checking account.

Money spent on personal expenses was not reported as income on the return that Holt-Thompson and her husband filed; she reported her taxable income for that year as only $47,226. She also failed to file a return for Host Ukraine.

Buffalo, New York: Workers’ comp claim handler Maureen Holleran has pleaded guilty to filing a false return.

Between September 2015 and October 2023, Holleran worked remotely as a workers’ comp handler for an insurance company in Canada. She evaluated and paid workers’ comp claims for policies issued by the company. Holleran had authority to send payments to a claimant of up to $2,000 without further approval by her supervisor. Between July 2020 and June 2023, Holleran submitted more than 1,200 fraudulent claims in the insurance company’s processing system, each claim below the $2,000 threshold. Claims were paid into bank accounts controlled by Holleran. She created fictitious expenses, such as claims for lost wages and reimbursements for medical supplies and copays, to justify the fraudulent payments.

She submitted some $2.37 million in fraudulent claims, creating fictitious email accounts that appeared to be associated with the policy claimant, then used these email addresses to sign up for the insurance company’s client portal. She then input her own banking information into the portal.

For 2020 through 2022, Holleran embezzled some $1,592,095 from the company that she failed to report on her income tax returns for those years. The IRS estimates that the tax for these tax years is $545,792.

Sentencing is Nov. 4. The charge carries a maximum of three years in prison and a fine of $250,000.

Jackson, Mississippi: A U.S. District Court has entered permanent injunctions against Thomas Walt Dallas, Jason Todd Mardis and Capital Preservation Services to bar them from making statements about tax benefits for compensation, among other relief. The defendants consented to the injunctions.

According to the complaint, Dallas, Mardis and Capital Preservation Services marketed a tax scheme at numerous professional conferences and media appearances, targeting medical professionals and small-business owners. They allegedly falsely claimed that customers following “Tax Plans” could claim multiple deductions to which they were in fact not entitled. This included claims that customers’ businesses could deduct large, unnecessary “marketing fees” to marketing companies; that those companies could employ family members and deduct family meals, vehicle expenses and tuition, among other items; and that customers could “rent” homes to businesses short-term at exorbitant rates and avoid taxes on the rental income.

The alleged harm from the scheme could be as much as $130 million in tax revenue since 2014.

jail2-fotolia.jpg

Lewisville, Texas: Bookkeeper Barbara Chalmers has been sentenced to 10 years in prison, to be followed by three years of supervised release, for a scheme to embezzle at least $29 million from her employer, a charitable foundation and other companies run by a Dallas family. 

She admitted that starting in at least 2012 she used her position as bookkeeper for the family’s companies and her signatory authority over bank accounts to write herself at least 175 checks that she deposited into her personal accounts. She also provided false paperwork to tax preparers that misstated year-end cash-on-hand for the accounts from which she was embezzling.

Chalmers used more than $25 million of the stolen money to fund a construction business; she used $6 million to pay off credit card debt.

She was also ordered to pay $44,809,438 in restitution to her victims.

Rochester, New York: Business owner Jeffrey Tome, 62, has pleaded guilty to filing a false return.

Tome owns Tome Enterprises Inc., which provides gutter repair and installation services. For 2017 through 2021, he failed to deposit 1,679 customer checks totaling $1,719,283.45 into the business bank account, instead cashing the checks at a local check-cashing business.

Tome then intentionally failed to advise the business’ tax preparer of the money received from cashing the business checks, resulting in the $1,719,283.45 not being reported on the corporate income tax returns.

He failed to include the net profits from the corporation as income on his personal federal income tax returns, resulting in his failing to pay personal income taxes of $330,137. He also paid his employees $407,573.60 in cash, which represented wages for which payroll taxes should have been paid. The payroll taxes that Tome failed to pay totaled $62,358.76.

Sentencing is Dec. 11. Tome faces up to three years in prison and a fine of $250,000.

New York: Business owner Nicholas Arcuri, of Staten Island, has pleaded guilty to failing to collect and pay over employment taxes from his company’s employees.

Between 2015 and 2021, Arcuri, owner and president of Capri Upholstery Custom Furnishing, paid some $2.6 million in off-the-books cash to employees, from which he did not withhold Social Security, Medicare or income taxes or pay over those taxes to the IRS. Arcuri also concealed the cash payroll from his return preparer. 

In total, Arcuri caused a tax loss to the IRS of $486,753.

Sentencing is Jan. 23. He faces up to five years in prison as well as a period of supervised release, restitution and monetary penalties. 

Sunrise, Florida: Resident Yolanda Dewar has pleaded guilty to filing false federal returns to fraudulently obtain refunds. 

Between 2018 and 2020, she created a trust and filed four false returns on behalf of the trust for nearly $2 million in refunds. Dewar continued filing such returns even after the IRS notified her that her claims were frivolous and had no basis in law. Nevertheless, the IRS issued nearly $500,000 to the trust in response to Dewar’s false claims. 

Dewar allegedly used a portion of those refunds to purchase a car for a family member, get plastic surgery and renovate her home.

Sentencing is Oct. 24. She faces up to three years in prison, a period of supervised release, restitution and monetary penalties.

Continue Reading

Accounting

AI-Driven Automation and Continuous Accounting Frameworks

Published

on

The accounting profession is undergoing a fundamental structural transition as enterprise finance departments shift from periodic month-end closes toward automated continuous accounting models. By integrating specialized machine learning algorithms directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms, chief accounting officers are transforming financial reporting from a retrospective exercise into a real-time operational asset.

The Shift from Periodic Close to Continuous Financial Reporting
Traditional accounting workflows heavily relied on manual data reconciliation, spreadsheet calculations, and multi-week closing cycles at the end of each fiscal period. In contrast, continuous accounting frameworks utilize automated software agents to process, validate, and post transactional data in real time as business activities occur.

Automated bank reconciliation tools cross-reference incoming bank feeds, invoice records, and purchase orders automatically. By resolving transactional variances instantly throughout the month, corporate accounting teams eliminate the traditional workload spikes associated with quarterly and annual closes.

Machine Learning in Audit Trails and Anomaly Detection
Advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning tools are redefining internal audit and financial control environments. Automated systems analyze 100% of general ledger entries, identifying anomalous transactions, duplicate payments, and unauthorized journal entries in real time.

Rather than relying on random statistical sampling, corporate internal auditors can focus their attention on high-risk flags automatically surfaced by algorithmic monitoring platforms. This continuous risk assessment strengthens internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) and significantly reduces fraud risk.

Evolving Roles for Accounting Professionals
As routine data entry and manual reconciliation tasks become fully automated, the skill set required for accounting professionals is shifting toward data analysis, system design, and strategic business advisory.
– Systems Governance: Accountants are increasingly responsible for monitoring algorithmic accuracy and managing data integration pipelines.
– Business Partnership: Finance professionals leverage real-time financial dashboards to advise operational leaders on margin management and working capital allocation.
– Regulatory Compliance Management: Accounting teams utilize automated platforms to ensure compliance with dynamic tax codes and international accounting standards.

Core Implementation Recommendations
1. Deploy Automated Reconciliation Tools: Integrate continuous transaction processing modules into existing enterprise ERP architectures.
2. Establish Algorithmic Governance Controls: Implement strict internal testing protocols to ensure automated accounting rules comply with GAAP/IFRS standards.
3. Reskill Accounting Teams: Invest in training finance staff on data analytics, workflow automation, and predictive financial modeling.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

on

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Trending