Connect with us

Accounting

Tax Fraud Blotter: Mass misdeeds

Published

on

Noted; loan sharks; lowering the Boomer; and other highlights of recent tax cases.

Orlando, Florida: Christopher Johnson and Jasen Harvey, who is from Tampa, Florida, have pleaded guilty to conspiring to defraud the U.S. with a tax fraud called the “Note Program.” 

Arthur Grimes, of Ocoee and Orlando, Florida, pleaded guilty on April 2 to obstructing the IRS in connection with the fraud.

From 2015 to 2018, Johnson and Harvey promoted a scheme in which Harvey and others prepared returns for clients that claimed large nonexistent income tax withholdings had been paid to the IRS and sought large refunds based on those withholdings. The conspirators charged clients fees and required them to pay over a portion of the fraudulently obtained refunds.

Overall, the defendants claimed more than $3 million in fraudulent refunds on clients’ returns, of which the IRS paid about $1.5 million.

Grimes caused four false income tax returns prepared by Harvey to be filed. When the IRS attempted to recover a refund issued to Grimes based on one of those returns, Grimes made false statements and submitted false documents to an IRS revenue officer and transferred funds to a nominee bank account.

Johnson was paid more than $200,000 in 2016 and more than $100,000 in 2017 as his share of the proceeds from the scheme. He filed returns for those years that did not report that income, resulting in a tax loss of $78,259.

Johnson and Harvey each face up to five years in prison for the conspiracy charge. Grimes will be sentenced on Nov. 12; he faces a maximum of three years in prison for the tax obstruction charge. All three also face a period of supervised release, restitution and monetary penalties.

Farmington, Connecticut: Accountant and tax preparer Mark Legowski, 60, has pleaded guilty to filing false returns.

From January 2015 through December 2017, Legowski was a self-employed accountant and tax preparer doing business as Legowski & Company Inc. He prepared income tax returns for some 400 to 500 individual clients and some 50 to 60 businesses.

For the 2015 through 2017 tax years, to reduce his personal income tax liability, Legowski willfully underreported his firm’s gross receipts in its bookkeeping system by excluding some client payment checks. He then filed false personal income tax returns that failed to report more than $1.4 million in business income, which resulted in a loss to the IRS of $499,289.

Sentencing is Nov. 25. Legowski faces a maximum of three years in prison. He has agreed to cooperate with the IRS to pay $499,289 in back taxes, as well as penalties and interest.

San Diego: Andre Shammas, 43, owner of the accounting and tax prep business Shammas Funding Inc., has pleaded guilty to fraud charges, admitting that he submitted bogus applications for more than $5 million in pandemic-related loans.

Shammas admitted using his business to illegally apply for more than 40 Paycheck Protection Program loans. He solicited and recruited clients of the tax prep business and others to apply for fraudulent loans, then prepared fraudulent tax and other documentation to support fraudulent applications.

The applications included false and fraudulent statements in the loan applications, including false representations regarding the number of employees, the average monthly payroll and the gross receipts earned by the purported businesses. 

Sentencing is Nov. 18. He faces up to 20 years in prison.

jail2-fotolia.jpg

Reedsville, Pennsylvania: Vincent Minervini has pleaded guilty to filing a false return in 2018.

From 2014 through 2018, Minervini operated various companies that he either owned on his own or controlled through a partnership, including VM Holdings; Supreme Star Property Management; Boomer Builders; Debt Free Partnerships; Boomer Ranches DS; and VMJH Holdings.

Minervini filed personal and business returns in each of these years and made it appear that his businesses were incurring expenses, which were deducted from his businesses’ taxable income, by moving money from one of his companies to another and labeling such payments “Management Services,” “Management Fees,” “Operating Expenses,” “Operating Budget” and “Transfers.”

He also made payments from his companies to himself without reporting the transfers as income in his personal returns. As a result of these actions, Minervini underreported some $2,102,512 in income.

Minervini admitted that the tax returns for 2014 to 2018 contained knowingly false information and accepted responsibility for $266,618 in unpaid taxes, which was the full amount of unpaid taxes for 2014 to 2018. He also agreed to pay restitution to the IRS in that amount.

St. David, Arizona: Resident Roy L. Layne has pleaded guilty to wire fraud and filing a false refund claim with the IRS.

In 2020 and 2021, he submitted false applications on behalf of several bogus businesses to the U.S. Small Business Administration for loans from the PPP and the Economic Injury Disaster Loan programs. Layne claimed that the businesses had dozens of employees and earned hundreds of thousands in gross receipts; he created false business and employment tax forms that he filed with the IRS and submitted to the SBA.

Layne requested and received more than $300,000 in loans to which he was not entitled. In 2022, he also filed false returns with the IRS that sought nearly $7.5 million in refunds, of which the IRS paid some $550,000. 

Sentencing is Feb. 3. He faces a maximum of 30 years in prison for each wire fraud charge and five years for the false claim charge. He also faces a period of supervised release, restitution and monetary penalties.

Conyngham, Pennsylvania: Attorney Jill Moran, 55, has pleaded guilty to a three-count criminal information charging her with failing to pay individual income taxes for 2016, 2017 and 2018, in connection with substantial legal fees she earned as the owner and operator of the Powell Law Group, a local law firm, and as a member of the trust advisory committee for a mass tort litigation.

Moran did not pay individual income taxes for tax year 2016 on some $1,215,000 she received, and did not pay individual income taxes on substantial income she received in tax years 2017 and 2018. She caused a total tax loss to the IRS of $250,000 to $550,000. 

In 2009, Moran became the managing director and president of the Powell Law Group, when the founder and owner of the firm, Robert J. Powell, was suspended from the practice of law and ultimately disbarred. Moran and Powell agreed that she would collect 10% and he would collect 90% of any future fees the firm earned after expenses.

The Powell Law Group represented thousands of plaintiffs in a mass tort litigation that settled for some $5.15 billion in 2015, from which the firm was expected to receive some $120 million in attorneys’ fees. Prior to the attorneys’ fees disbursement, Powell Group and its co-counsel used those future legal fees as collateral to obtain loans totaling more than $125 million.

In 2014 and 2015, Moran received two disbursements of $500,000 each from those loan proceeds. She also received some $215,000 for her work on the trust advisory committee. In June 2016, most of the attorneys’ fees were finally disbursed and the loans repaid.

Still Moran paid no taxes on both the $1 million she received in attorney’s fees that year and the $215,000 she received for her work on the advisory committee. Likewise, in both 2017 and 2018 Moran received substantial income but paid no taxes on it.

On Aug. 14, Robert Powell pleaded guilty to evading taxes on the income he received in legal fees from the mass tort litigation. He awaits sentencing. 

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending