Connect with us

Accounting

Tax Fraud Blotter: Mass misdeeds

Published

on

Noted; loan sharks; lowering the Boomer; and other highlights of recent tax cases.

Orlando, Florida: Christopher Johnson and Jasen Harvey, who is from Tampa, Florida, have pleaded guilty to conspiring to defraud the U.S. with a tax fraud called the “Note Program.” 

Arthur Grimes, of Ocoee and Orlando, Florida, pleaded guilty on April 2 to obstructing the IRS in connection with the fraud.

From 2015 to 2018, Johnson and Harvey promoted a scheme in which Harvey and others prepared returns for clients that claimed large nonexistent income tax withholdings had been paid to the IRS and sought large refunds based on those withholdings. The conspirators charged clients fees and required them to pay over a portion of the fraudulently obtained refunds.

Overall, the defendants claimed more than $3 million in fraudulent refunds on clients’ returns, of which the IRS paid about $1.5 million.

Grimes caused four false income tax returns prepared by Harvey to be filed. When the IRS attempted to recover a refund issued to Grimes based on one of those returns, Grimes made false statements and submitted false documents to an IRS revenue officer and transferred funds to a nominee bank account.

Johnson was paid more than $200,000 in 2016 and more than $100,000 in 2017 as his share of the proceeds from the scheme. He filed returns for those years that did not report that income, resulting in a tax loss of $78,259.

Johnson and Harvey each face up to five years in prison for the conspiracy charge. Grimes will be sentenced on Nov. 12; he faces a maximum of three years in prison for the tax obstruction charge. All three also face a period of supervised release, restitution and monetary penalties.

Farmington, Connecticut: Accountant and tax preparer Mark Legowski, 60, has pleaded guilty to filing false returns.

From January 2015 through December 2017, Legowski was a self-employed accountant and tax preparer doing business as Legowski & Company Inc. He prepared income tax returns for some 400 to 500 individual clients and some 50 to 60 businesses.

For the 2015 through 2017 tax years, to reduce his personal income tax liability, Legowski willfully underreported his firm’s gross receipts in its bookkeeping system by excluding some client payment checks. He then filed false personal income tax returns that failed to report more than $1.4 million in business income, which resulted in a loss to the IRS of $499,289.

Sentencing is Nov. 25. Legowski faces a maximum of three years in prison. He has agreed to cooperate with the IRS to pay $499,289 in back taxes, as well as penalties and interest.

San Diego: Andre Shammas, 43, owner of the accounting and tax prep business Shammas Funding Inc., has pleaded guilty to fraud charges, admitting that he submitted bogus applications for more than $5 million in pandemic-related loans.

Shammas admitted using his business to illegally apply for more than 40 Paycheck Protection Program loans. He solicited and recruited clients of the tax prep business and others to apply for fraudulent loans, then prepared fraudulent tax and other documentation to support fraudulent applications.

The applications included false and fraudulent statements in the loan applications, including false representations regarding the number of employees, the average monthly payroll and the gross receipts earned by the purported businesses. 

Sentencing is Nov. 18. He faces up to 20 years in prison.

jail2-fotolia.jpg

Reedsville, Pennsylvania: Vincent Minervini has pleaded guilty to filing a false return in 2018.

From 2014 through 2018, Minervini operated various companies that he either owned on his own or controlled through a partnership, including VM Holdings; Supreme Star Property Management; Boomer Builders; Debt Free Partnerships; Boomer Ranches DS; and VMJH Holdings.

Minervini filed personal and business returns in each of these years and made it appear that his businesses were incurring expenses, which were deducted from his businesses’ taxable income, by moving money from one of his companies to another and labeling such payments “Management Services,” “Management Fees,” “Operating Expenses,” “Operating Budget” and “Transfers.”

He also made payments from his companies to himself without reporting the transfers as income in his personal returns. As a result of these actions, Minervini underreported some $2,102,512 in income.

Minervini admitted that the tax returns for 2014 to 2018 contained knowingly false information and accepted responsibility for $266,618 in unpaid taxes, which was the full amount of unpaid taxes for 2014 to 2018. He also agreed to pay restitution to the IRS in that amount.

St. David, Arizona: Resident Roy L. Layne has pleaded guilty to wire fraud and filing a false refund claim with the IRS.

In 2020 and 2021, he submitted false applications on behalf of several bogus businesses to the U.S. Small Business Administration for loans from the PPP and the Economic Injury Disaster Loan programs. Layne claimed that the businesses had dozens of employees and earned hundreds of thousands in gross receipts; he created false business and employment tax forms that he filed with the IRS and submitted to the SBA.

Layne requested and received more than $300,000 in loans to which he was not entitled. In 2022, he also filed false returns with the IRS that sought nearly $7.5 million in refunds, of which the IRS paid some $550,000. 

Sentencing is Feb. 3. He faces a maximum of 30 years in prison for each wire fraud charge and five years for the false claim charge. He also faces a period of supervised release, restitution and monetary penalties.

Conyngham, Pennsylvania: Attorney Jill Moran, 55, has pleaded guilty to a three-count criminal information charging her with failing to pay individual income taxes for 2016, 2017 and 2018, in connection with substantial legal fees she earned as the owner and operator of the Powell Law Group, a local law firm, and as a member of the trust advisory committee for a mass tort litigation.

Moran did not pay individual income taxes for tax year 2016 on some $1,215,000 she received, and did not pay individual income taxes on substantial income she received in tax years 2017 and 2018. She caused a total tax loss to the IRS of $250,000 to $550,000. 

In 2009, Moran became the managing director and president of the Powell Law Group, when the founder and owner of the firm, Robert J. Powell, was suspended from the practice of law and ultimately disbarred. Moran and Powell agreed that she would collect 10% and he would collect 90% of any future fees the firm earned after expenses.

The Powell Law Group represented thousands of plaintiffs in a mass tort litigation that settled for some $5.15 billion in 2015, from which the firm was expected to receive some $120 million in attorneys’ fees. Prior to the attorneys’ fees disbursement, Powell Group and its co-counsel used those future legal fees as collateral to obtain loans totaling more than $125 million.

In 2014 and 2015, Moran received two disbursements of $500,000 each from those loan proceeds. She also received some $215,000 for her work on the trust advisory committee. In June 2016, most of the attorneys’ fees were finally disbursed and the loans repaid.

Still Moran paid no taxes on both the $1 million she received in attorney’s fees that year and the $215,000 she received for her work on the advisory committee. Likewise, in both 2017 and 2018 Moran received substantial income but paid no taxes on it.

On Aug. 14, Robert Powell pleaded guilty to evading taxes on the income he received in legal fees from the mass tort litigation. He awaits sentencing. 

Continue Reading

Accounting

Mandatory ESG Reporting Standards Demand Standardized Non-Financial Audit Trails

Published

on

Mandatory ESG Reporting Standards Demand Standardized Non-Financial Audit Trails

Corporate accounting departments face an expanded regulatory mandate as mandatory sustainability and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) reporting frameworks take full effect internationally. Governed by the European Union’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) IFRS S1 and S2 standards, enterprise financial controllers are now legally required to track, verify, and report non-financial data with the same internal controls and auditability as traditional financial statements.

The expansion shifts ESG compliance

This regulatory expansion shifts ESG compliance from marketing departments to corporate accounting offices. Financial managers are now responsible for gathering, consolidating, and verifying carbon emissions metrics, supply chain labor conditions, water usage, and climate risk exposures across multi-tiered corporate structures. These non-financial metrics must be integrated into standardized general ledgers to withstand rigorous third-party audit assurance processes.

To comply with these rigorous reporting mandates, accounting software providers have added dedicated ESG modules designed to aggregate data from IoT sensors, utility platforms, and vendor management systems. Controllers are implementing internal control frameworks—modeled after traditional COSO frameworks—to ensure the completeness, accuracy, and consistency of sustainability disclosures, protecting organizations against greenwashing penalties and litigation risks.

The transition requires significant cross-functional collaboration between accounting teams, legal counsel, and operational directors. Accounting professionals are expanding their technical expertise beyond financial ledgers to master carbon accounting methodologies, lifecycle assessment standards, and non-financial data governance protocols, fundamentally expanding the role of the modern corporate accountant.

Why This Information Matters
Mandatory ESG disclosures require companies to treat environmental and social metrics as audited financial records. Executives, accountants, and board members must institute formal tracking and assurance processes to satisfy legal mandates, maintain investor confidence, and mitigate regulatory non-compliance risks.

Continue Reading

Accounting

SEC’s Semiannual Reporting Proposal Faces Investor Pushback: What CFOs Need to Know

Published

on

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)

A proposal from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to potentially shift some public companies away from quarterly financial reporting toward a semiannual model is drawing significant pushback from investors, even as it continues moving through the regulatory process. The debate has direct implications for corporate finance teams, auditors, and the broader transparency of U.S. capital markets.

What the SEC Proposed

According to a summary published by accounting advisory firm Cohen & Co., the SEC issued a proposed rule on May 19, 2026, aimed at simplifying financial reporting requirements for many U.S. public companies. The proposal would potentially reduce the frequency of certain mandatory disclosures from quarterly to semiannual, a structural change that has not been made to core U.S. reporting requirements in decades.

The proposal follows an extended debate within U.S. policy circles, with proponents arguing that reduced reporting frequency could lower compliance costs and free up management time for longer-term strategic planning rather than quarter-to-quarter results management.

Why Investors Are Pushing Back

Comment letters submitted in response to the proposal have been extensive, and according to Cohen & Co.’s review of the public record, investors “appear to be largely opposed” to the shift, viewing frequent interim reporting as a core benefit of U.S. capital markets relative to other jurisdictions.

Accounting and law firms have taken a more measured position, generally urging any changes to remain aligned with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), whose existing disclosure requirements and guidance are built around a quarterly reporting cadence. A shift to semiannual reporting without corresponding changes to FASB guidance could create friction between SEC filing requirements and GAAP-based disclosure expectations.

Lessons From the U.K. Experience

The debate is not without precedent. The United Kingdom moved away from mandatory quarterly reporting for listed companies in 2014, returning to a semiannual disclosure requirement. According to Cohen & Co.’s analysis, that experience offers a cautionary data point: there was no measurable increase in capital expenditure or R&D investment following the change, while analyst coverage of affected companies declined as reliable interim information became less available — a particular risk for smaller and newly public companies that rely on analyst coverage to maintain investor visibility.

Practical Implications for Finance Teams

Beyond the debate over disclosure philosophy, the proposal carries practical complications. Many companies have debt covenants and credit agreements structured around quarterly financial delivery; a shift to semiannual reporting could require renegotiating those terms. Reduced reporting frequency would also extend the “window of market silence” between disclosures, a factor that governance and investor-relations teams would need to manage carefully to avoid information asymmetry.

Separately, and unrelated to the reporting-frequency debate, the SEC and FASB have continued finalizing more routine updates this year. New Accounting Standards Updates are taking effect for December 31, 2026, fiscal year-ends covering income tax disclosures, credit loss measurement, induced debt conversions, and stock compensation, according to Eide Bailly’s review of 2026 ASU activity. Additional guidance on paid-in-kind dividends and environmental credits is also on the near-term horizon.

What to Watch Next

The semiannual reporting proposal remains in the comment and review phase, and no final rule has been adopted as of this writing. Finance leaders should monitor the SEC’s regulatory agenda for further movement, while treating the current quarterly reporting requirement as the operative standard until any final rule is issued and an effective date is set.

Given the extent of investor opposition documented in the comment file, a full shift to mandatory semiannual reporting appears more likely to result in either a scaled-back compromise or continued study rather than swift adoption — though the SEC’s ultimate direction remains uncertain.

 

Continue Reading

Accounting

AI-Driven Automation and Continuous Accounting Frameworks

Published

on

The accounting profession is undergoing a fundamental structural transition as enterprise finance departments shift from periodic month-end closes toward automated continuous accounting models. By integrating specialized machine learning algorithms directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms, chief accounting officers are transforming financial reporting from a retrospective exercise into a real-time operational asset.

The Shift from Periodic Close to Continuous Financial Reporting
Traditional accounting workflows heavily relied on manual data reconciliation, spreadsheet calculations, and multi-week closing cycles at the end of each fiscal period. In contrast, continuous accounting frameworks utilize automated software agents to process, validate, and post transactional data in real time as business activities occur.

Automated bank reconciliation tools cross-reference incoming bank feeds, invoice records, and purchase orders automatically. By resolving transactional variances instantly throughout the month, corporate accounting teams eliminate the traditional workload spikes associated with quarterly and annual closes.

Machine Learning in Audit Trails and Anomaly Detection
Advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning tools are redefining internal audit and financial control environments. Automated systems analyze 100% of general ledger entries, identifying anomalous transactions, duplicate payments, and unauthorized journal entries in real time.

Rather than relying on random statistical sampling, corporate internal auditors can focus their attention on high-risk flags automatically surfaced by algorithmic monitoring platforms. This continuous risk assessment strengthens internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) and significantly reduces fraud risk.

Evolving Roles for Accounting Professionals
As routine data entry and manual reconciliation tasks become fully automated, the skill set required for accounting professionals is shifting toward data analysis, system design, and strategic business advisory.
– Systems Governance: Accountants are increasingly responsible for monitoring algorithmic accuracy and managing data integration pipelines.
– Business Partnership: Finance professionals leverage real-time financial dashboards to advise operational leaders on margin management and working capital allocation.
– Regulatory Compliance Management: Accounting teams utilize automated platforms to ensure compliance with dynamic tax codes and international accounting standards.

Core Implementation Recommendations
1. Deploy Automated Reconciliation Tools: Integrate continuous transaction processing modules into existing enterprise ERP architectures.
2. Establish Algorithmic Governance Controls: Implement strict internal testing protocols to ensure automated accounting rules comply with GAAP/IFRS standards.
3. Reskill Accounting Teams: Invest in training finance staff on data analytics, workflow automation, and predictive financial modeling.

Continue Reading

Trending