Connect with us

Accounting

Tax Fraud Blotter: Rampant self-dealing

Published

on

Makin’ a list; caught again; back to school; and other highlights of recent tax cases.

Washington, D.C.: Recent IRS Office of Professional Responsibility disciplinary sanctions include censure, suspension or disbarment from practice before the IRS. Individuals disciplined include (all dates this year):

  • California (all CPAs): Vincente Alvarez, Chatsworth, and Michael D. Robinson, San Francisco, indefinite from April 29; Grigor Demirchyan, Granada Hills, and Todd W. Beutel, Thousand Oaks, indefinite from May 8; and Tiffany C. Detinne, Carmichael, and Bernard Turk, West Hills, indefinite from May 28.
  • Florida: CPA Paul S. Mills, Key West, indefinite from May 8.
  • Massachusetts: Attorney Paul S. Hughes, Wellesley, indefinite from April 29.
  • Michigan: Attorney Brian P. McMahon, Ionia, indefinite from April 3.
  • Missouri: CPA Justin L. Strauser, Sullivan, indefinite from May 28.
  • New Jersey: Attorney James R. Lisa, Jersey City, indefinite from May 8. 
  • Pennsylvania: CPA Daniel J. Carney, Shawnee on Delaware, indefinite from April 2.
  • Tennessee: CPA Richard T. Brown Jr., Brownsville, indefinite from May 8.
  • Texas: CPA David D. Renken, New Braunfels, indefinite from April 2; Attorney Pejman Maadani, Houston, indefinite from May 8.
  • Virginia: CPA Carol A. Jones, Ruckersville, indefinite from May 15.

Reinstated to practice before the IRS effective in April were CPA Robert S. Damiano, of Bridgewater, New Jersey, and attorney Charles E. Hammond III, of Katy, Texas.

San Francisco: Resident Dwayne Lorenzo Richardson has been found guilty of tax evasion.

Richardson evaded his personal income taxes for 2017 to 2019 by claiming to owe only some $28,496 in tax when he’d made more than $1.2 million as a software engineering manager. He declared more than $1.1 million in medical expenses, overstating those expenses by more than $945,000.

Richardson received tax refunds totaling over $165,000 for the three charged tax years, then lied to an IRS agent in two audit interviews, stating that the $1.1 million of medical expenses were related to an appendectomy. Richardson paid no more than a few hundred dollars for treatment related to the appendectomy, which took place in 2010.

As he explained to one of his representatives in the tax audit, Richardson deducted nonexistent medical expenses from his taxes for multiple years because he had not been “caught” the first time he did it.

Brick, New Jersey: Business owner Gerard Artz has pleaded guilty to failing to collect and pay over employee taxes.

Artz owned and operated a construction company in Brick and New York City. Beginning around 2016, his company withheld employment taxes from employees’ paychecks and did not remit those employment taxes to the IRS. From 2016 to 2020, Artz and his company failed to collect and pay over $937,943 in employment taxes.

He faces up to five years in prison and a $250,000 fine; Artz has agreed to pay $937,943 in restitution. Sentencing is Feb. 5.

Encino, California: Tax preparer Bijan Kohanzad, 63, of Calabasas, California, has been sentenced to three months in jail and ordered to pay a $40,000 fine for helping a client file a return that underreported income, according to published reports.

From mid-2015 and to May 2017, Kohanzad, who pleaded guilty earlier this year, reportedly helped and counseled a client to reduce taxable income by falsely increasing business expenses.

The two years’ federal tax loss that Kohanzad caused reportedly totaled some $401,436.

jail2-fotolia.jpg

New York: Martin Handler, of Brooklyn, has been sentenced to 58 months in prison for defrauding the federal Head Start program, for stealing more than $1 million from his federally funded childcare company, and for tax evasion.

Between 2017 and August 2021, Handler secretly “owned” and exercised control over the nonprofit Project Social Care Head Start Inc. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, which administers the Head Start program, annually granted Project Social Care millions of dollars to be used exclusively on the program and from which earning a profit is prohibited. Handler conspired to submit multiple fictitious documents to HHS that fraudulently asserted Project Social Care had an independent board and had in place controls to guard against fraud, waste and abuse. In fact, it had neither an independent board nor sufficient controls in place, and Handler steered Head Start funding to his own for-profit companies through what authorities called rampant undisclosed self-dealing.

Between April 2019 and January 2023, as majority owner of New York City Early Learning Co., a for-profit that also received Head Start grants, Handler misapplied and misappropriated corporate treasury funds to, among other things, repay personal loans and finance the leasing of luxury vehicles for the benefit of two members of Early Learning’s Head Start board.

In 2021 and 2022, Handler falsely reported to the IRS $2 million in charitable contributions, evading taxes of at least $740,000.

Handler was also sentenced to three years of supervised release, ordered to pay a $200,000 fine and to forfeit $1,156,068.10, and to pay $1,156,068.10 in restitution to HHS and $740,000 in restitution to the IRS.

Miami: A U.S. district court has issued a permanent injunction against tax preparers and brothers George and Luis Brito and their businesses.

The injunction bars George Brito from preparing federal income tax returns, working for or having any ownership stake in any prep business, assisting others in preparing returns or setting up business as a preparer and transferring or assigning customer lists to any other person or entity. The court similarly enjoined Luis Brito from preparing income tax returns for individuals. The Britos consented to the injunction.

The complaint alleged that George and Luis Brito owned or controlled Brito and Brito Accounting USA Inc. and prepared returns for clients that claimed various false or fabricated deductions and credits, including fabricated residential energy credits, false and exaggerated itemized deductions, and fictitious and inflated business expenses.

The order requires Luis Brito to inform his clients that he has been permanently enjoined from preparing returns except for certain types of business forms, including those reporting payroll, unemployment and corporate income taxes. The IRS can make unscheduled and random visits to Luis Brito’s business; he must also complete at least 24 hours of tax prep education by Dec. 31.

Union, New Jersey: Tax preparer Emmanuel Amenyo, 59, admitted assisting in the preparation of fraudulent returns, resulting in improperly large refunds.

From 2018 through 2021, Amenyo ran a tax prep business in which he prepared and submitted individual federal returns for clients. He filed numerous false returns and subscribed to false returns with respect to his own taxes.

These returns falsely claimed charitable contributions, itemized deductions, child and dependent care expenses, and other qualified expenses to which Amenyo and his clients were not entitled, causing a tax loss of $250,466.

Amenyo faces up to three years in prison and a $250,000 fine. Sentencing is April 1.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending