Connect with us

Accounting

Tax Fraud Blotter: Time’s up

Published

on

Vertigo; not workin’ on the railroad; bad company; and other highlights of recent tax cases.

Washington, D.C.: Recent IRS Office of Professional Responsibility disciplinary actions sanctions include censure, suspension or disbarment from practice before the IRS. Individuals disciplined this year are:

Florida: CPA Ralph J. Anderson, Naples, indefinite from June 23.

Georgia: CPA Herbert E. Lewis, Peachtree Corners, indefinite from April 21.

Illinois: Enrolled Agent Holly M. Wilson, Granville, indefinite from April 7.

Michigan: Attorney Jeffrey S. Freeman, West Bloomfield, indefinite from May 21.

Puerto Rico: Appraiser Milton E. Martinez-Rodriguez, San German, indefinite from April 25.

Ozark, Missouri: Salesman Ryan J. McMillin has pleaded guilty to one count of attempting to evade or defeat taxation.

McMillin did not report income he received while employed as a timeshare salesman with four companies from 2018 to 2023, claiming exempt status on his W-4s. He also failed to file an income tax return or pay federal income taxes for those years.

McMillin owes the IRS an estimated $581,981 in unpaid taxes and faces up to five years in prison.

Philadelphia: Businessman John “Jack” Griffin has pleaded guilty to wire fraud and tax evasion.

Griffin was the principal and founder of Second Story Farming, which had several lines of business, including growing crops in vertical farms to sell to customers, developing sustainable vertical farming technologies and selling vertical farming systems to customers. (Vertical farming is a practice of growing crops vertically and in horizontally stacked layers.)

In 2017, Griffin, through Second Story, sold vertical farming systems along with the equipment, supplies, materials and operational instructions necessary to operate them to two companies. Before entering into the contracts, he provided financial projections that overstated anticipated revenues and understated anticipated expenses. Relying on the financial projections, the companies paid Second Story Farming to set up vertical farms for them.

Griffin used most of the money to pay his personal expenses and operate Second Story’s R&D. In 2017, Griffin earned income from Second Story but didn’t file an income tax return. He tried to conceal that he received any income in 2017 by, among other things, withdrawing cash and paying personal expenses from his business’s bank accounts, transferring funds from his business to his wife and withdrawing cash from Second Story’s business account.  

Sentencing is Oct. 22. He faces up to 20 years in prison on each of the wire fraud charges and up to five years on the tax evasion charge. He also faces a period of supervised release, restitution and monetary penalties.

Kansas City, Kansas: Tax preparer Hophine Bwosinde, 61, of Lenexa, Kansas, has been sentenced to three years in prison for filing false income tax returns for his clients leading to a tax loss of more than $1.5 million to the IRS.

From 2018 through 2022, Bwosinde, who previously pleaded guilty, used his tax prep business to file fraudulent returns for clients. He either inflated legitimate business expenses or claimed losses related to fake businesses. He also falsely reported negative income on clients’ returns.

Gillette, Wyoming: Resident James M. Alexander has been sentenced to a year in prison, to be followed by two years of supervised release, for theft of government property (disability benefits) and for filing a false income tax return. 

As a result of an injury suffered on his railroad job, Alexander applied for and received disability benefits from the U.S. Railroad Retirement Board. He agreed to inform the RRB if he earned any income or his condition improved. From 2016 to 2024, Alexander failed to report that his disability did not prevent him from working and that he had received almost $331,000 for construction and remodeling work. He also admitted to filing returns that underreported his income.

The court also ordered him to pay $409,422.28 in restitution and a special assessment of $200.

Hands-in-jail-Blotter

Seattle: Nigerian citizen Onomen Uduebor, a.k.a. Onomen Onohi, 30, has been sentenced to 40 months in prison after pleading guilty to conspiracy to commit wire fraud and aggravated ID theft in the scheme to steal and use income tax data for fraud. 

Between February 2016 and April 2017, the scheme’s conspirators targeted companies nationwide, creating emails that appeared to come from a company exec asking human resources recipients for W-2 data. The conspirators then used the information to file more than 300 bogus returns claiming more than $1 million in refunds.

Uduebor filed 150 of the false returns and tracked the refunds and payments to bank accounts that the conspirators had set up in the names of the victims. While the IRS paid about $140,000 to the fraudsters, Uduebor claimed he received only $10,000 from the scheme. The IRS was able to seize some of the money back from the conspirators, so the total restitution owed to the U.S. Treasury is $122,720.

Uduebor, who previously pleaded guilty and will likely be deported to Nigeria after his prison term, was also ordered to forfeit the $10,000 and to pay $122,720 in restitution to the IRS.

West Berlin, New Jersey: Tax preparer Michael Sigall, 55, has pleaded guilty to two counts of aiding or assisting the preparation of false returns for clients and causing more than $16 million in tax losses.

From 2018 through 2024, Sigall operated a tax prep business and during this period prepared and filed income tax returns for hundreds of clients that contained materially false statements relating to tax credits for residential energy improvements.

Each count of aiding or assisting the preparation of false returns carries a maximum of three years in prison and a maximum fine of $250,000, or twice the gross loss or gain from the offense, whichever is greater. Sentencing is Dec. 2.

Chicago: Tax preparer Farooq Khan, 31, has been sentenced to 42 months in prison for his role in a scheme to fraudulently obtain more than $3.6 million in loans under the Paycheck Protection Program and Economic Injury Disaster Loan programs.

He owned and operated Hannan Tax Services and from approximately May 2020 through October 2021 prepared and facilitated submission of at least 30 fraudulent applications for loans. Kahn knew that the companies for which he sought the loans were non-operational and did not qualify; he falsified information in the applications, including the number of employees and tax records of the defunct companies.

Khan caused approximately $3.6 million to be fraudulently distributed by the Small Business Administration and PPP lenders. He also attempted to obtain at least an additional $588,900 in loans through other EIDL applications for non-existent companies that were never funded. He personally obtained some $1.2 million of the fraudulent loan proceeds.     

Khan was also ordered to pay $3,645,104 in restitution. 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending