Connect with us

Accounting

Tax Fraud Blotter: What nerve

Published

on

Journey’s end; just shocking; house cleaning; and other highlights of recent tax cases.

Pueblo, Colorado: Resident Solomon Paul Garcia has been sentenced to a year and a day in prison, to be followed by three years of supervised release, for tax evasion.

Garcia worked for various employers as a journeyman electrical lineman. From 2016 to January 2020, he avoided income tax by submitting to his employers W-4s that claimed up to 99 allowances or false claims of exemptions. During this time, Garcia was only allowed to claim two allowances.

Although Garcia had an opportunity to pay all taxes due and owing for each calendar year by the respective filing deadlines, he did not file a tax return for any of the years, resulting in the evasion of $267,028.50 in federal taxes.

Garcia was also ordered to pay restitution, including interest and penalties, of more than $548,000.

Attleboro, Massachusetts: David Tetreault, 54, the former bookkeeper for an electrical and contracting business, has agreed to plead guilty to concealing income from the IRS and to stealing disability benefits.

Tetreault worked as a bookkeeper for a Massachusetts-based electrical contractor between 2015 and 2021, when he received wages in cash and used company funds to pay his personal credit card bills. He allegedly manipulated the company’s accounting records and bank statements to disguise these payments as business expenses.

Tetreault underreported his personal income by at least $2.1 million and caused a loss to the IRS of more than $600,000.

Charges also alleged that Tetreault failed to report his work for the electrical contractor or his income to the Social Security Administration and submitted false information about his employment and income to the Employees’ Retirement System of Rhode Island. He collected more than $320,000 in undeserved Social Security Disability Insurance benefits and state disability pension benefits between 2016 and 2024. 

He has agreed to plead guilty to one count of tax evasion, one count of theft of government money and one count of wire fraud. Tax evasion provides for up to five years in prison and three years of supervised release; theft of government money provides for up to 10 years in prison and three years of supervised release; wire fraud provides for up to 20 years in prison and three years of supervised release. All the charges also carry a fine of up to $250,000 or twice the gross gain or loss, whichever is greater.

Chester, Connecticut: Resident Evan Bobzin has pleaded guilty to offenses, including tax charges, from a $2 million embezzlement.

From July 2013 until December 2023, Bobzin was employed by Hoffman’s Gun Center in Newington, Connecticut, and, in 2016, became the head of information technology at Hoffman’s. In January 2016, Bobzin began to steal cash receipts from a company safe in the company’s front office.

Between 2016 and 2023, Bobzin and his former spouse made 287 cash deposits of stolen money from Hoffman’s totaling $1,901,250 into his bank accounts, and seven cash purchases of cashier’s checks totaling $161,330. Bobzin used the funds to pay for personal expenses.

In October 2022, the U.S. Attorney’s Office notified Bobzin that he was conducting cash transactions in amounts below $10,000 in a manner indicative of structuring to avoid having his bank file currency transaction reports. Bobzin ceased making cash deposits at his bank, opened new accounts at a different bank and resumed making structured cash deposits into those accounts.

Bobzin failed to report the stolen income on his federal personal income tax returns for 2016 through 2022, resulting in a loss to the IRS of $436,178. As an example, on his income tax return for the 2020 tax year, Bobzin reported taxable income of $9,914 and tax owed of $0. The return omitted income of some $432,615 and understated tax due and owing by some $110,530.

Sentencing is Nov. 26. Bobzin pleaded guilty to one count of interstate transmission of stolen money, which carries up to 10 years in prison, and one count of tax evasion, which carries a maximum term of five years. He has also agreed to pay $2,062,580 in restitution and to cooperate with the IRS to pay $436,178 in taxes, as well as penalties and interest.

Hands-in-jail-Blotter

Madison, Wisconsin: Investment advisor Eric Upchurch has been sentenced to 28 months in prison for wire fraud, making false statements to the Small Business Administration and money laundering related to the Paycheck Protection Program.

Throughout 2020 and 2021, Upchurch submitted fraudulent PPP loan applications on behalf of several businesses, falsely claiming that his businesses earned hundreds of thousands of dollars in revenue and paid employees tens of thousands of dollars in payroll a month. He also provided lenders with forged payroll reports and tax forms.

None of Upchurch’s companies formally employed anyone besides Upchurch, and none had the revenue necessary to cover the claimed payroll.

Upchurch stole $406,211 and attempted to steal an additional $400,378 in PPP money. He also laundered a portion of his fraudulently obtained PPP funds when he purchased $19,000 worth of bitcoin.

Agawam, Massachusetts: Tax preparer Colleen Gruska, 66, has been sentenced to two months in prison to be followed by a year of supervised release (the first six months to be served in home confinement) for filing false returns.

For more than a decade, Gruska used her tax prep service to file dozens of false returns for herself, her relatives and others. On these returns, she reported business losses that were either dramatically overstated or were for businesses that did not exist, resulting in little or no federal income tax owed by the taxpayer.

In her own filings, Gruska reported $189,000 in expenses over four years for a house and yard cleaning business despite there being no actual expenses, enabling her to avoid $36,079 in taxes. For a relative, she filed false returns that claimed a non-existent soccer coaching business with expenses totaling $233,561, enabling the relative to avoid $39,599 in taxes.

Gruska, who pleaded guilty in January, caused a loss to the IRS of $261,102 and was ordered to pay that amount in restitution.

Lee’s Summit, Missouri: Neurologist Maria Donato has pleaded guilty to failing to report cash income from her practice on her federal returns.

Donato owned and operated Forest Park Neurology, where she practiced from 2012 to 2019. Her patients sometimes paid cash for her services from 2015 through 2019, but Donato failed to report the full extent of her cash income on her federal income tax returns. She specifically pleaded guilty to failing to report more than $120,000 in cash income in 2017. She also failed to properly report her cash income on her Missouri tax returns during those years.

Concord, North Carolina: Exec Ronald James McMurphy has pleaded guilty to failing to collect or pay over taxes.

From around the first quarter of 2016 to and including the third quarter of 2022, he was president of McMurphy Hydraulics Inc. and from around the fourth quarter of 2019 up to and including the third quarter of 2022 was also president of Powertek Equipment Inc., a manufacturer of heavy equipment for construction and forestry.

McMurphy was responsible for accounting for and paying to the IRS the employment taxes for both companies. For various tax periods, McMurphy failed to truthfully account for and pay over the trust fund taxes and employer matching taxes due and owing to the IRS on behalf of the companies’ employees.

The employment tax liability for which McMurphy is accountable is $712,017.

Sentencing is Dec. 12. He faces up to five years in prison, as well as a period of supervised release of up to three years and monetary penalties.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Inventory Management For Financial Accuracy and Operational Success

Published

on

Inventory Management

In the dynamic world of business operations, precise inventory management is more than a routine task—it is a critical factor in achieving financial accuracy and operational efficiency. Beyond simple stock tracking, accurate inventory recording plays a vital role in financial reporting, resource planning, and strategic decision-making. This article explores the essential practices for maintaining accurate inventory records and their profound impact on business performance.

At the heart of effective inventory management is the implementation of a real-time tracking system. By leveraging technologies such as barcode scanners, RFID tags, and IoT sensors, businesses can maintain a perpetual inventory system that updates stock levels instantly. This ensures accuracy, reduces the risk of stockouts or overstocking, and enables better forecasting and planning.

A standardized process for receiving, storing, and dispatching inventory is equally important. Documenting each step—from goods received to final distribution—establishes a clear audit trail, reduces errors, and minimizes the potential for discrepancies. Properly labeled and organized inventory not only saves time but also supports efficient workflows across departments.

Regular physical counts are essential for verifying recorded inventory against actual stock. Whether conducted through periodic cycle counts or comprehensive annual inventories, these audits help identify issues such as shrinkage, theft, or obsolescence. Combining physical counts with real-time systems ensures alignment and strengthens the accuracy of inventory records.

The use of inventory management software has transformed the way businesses maintain inventory data. Advanced systems automate data entry, provide centralized visibility across multiple warehouses or locations, and generate actionable analytics. Features like demand forecasting, low-stock alerts, and real-time reporting empower businesses to make informed decisions and optimize inventory levels.

Accurate inventory valuation is another cornerstone of sound inventory management. Businesses typically choose from methods such as First-In, First-Out (FIFO), Last-In, First-Out (LIFO), or the weighted average cost method. Selecting and consistently applying the appropriate method is essential for financial accuracy, tax compliance, and reflecting inventory flow in financial statements.

Inventory management also has direct implications for financial reporting, tax preparation, and securing business financing. Reliable inventory records instill confidence in stakeholders, demonstrate operational efficiency, and support compliance with accounting standards and regulatory requirements. Additionally, precise data allows businesses to assess their inventory turnover ratio—a key metric for evaluating operational performance and profitability.

In conclusion, accurate inventory recording is a strategic imperative for businesses aiming to enhance financial precision and operational excellence. By adopting advanced technologies, implementing standardized processes, and conducting regular audits, companies can ensure their inventory records remain accurate and reliable. For business leaders and finance professionals, effective inventory management is not just about compliance—it is a powerful tool for driving profitability, improving resource allocation, and maintaining a competitive edge in the market.

Mastering inventory management creates a foundation for long-term success, allowing businesses to operate efficiently, make better decisions, and deliver consistent value to stakeholders.

Continue Reading

Accounting

New IRS regs put some partnership transactions under spotlight

Published

on

Final regulations now identify certain partnership related-party “basis shifting” transactions as “transactions of interest” subject to the rules for reportable transactions.

The final regs apply to related partners and partnerships that participated in the identified transactions through distributions of partnership property or the transfer of an interest in the partnership by a related partner to a related transferee. Affected taxpayers and their material advisors are subject to the disclosure requirements for reportable transactions. 

During the proposal process, the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service received comments that the final regulations should avoid unnecessary burdens for small, family-run businesses, limit retroactive reporting, provide more time for reporting and differentiate publicly traded partnerships, among other suggested changes now reflected in the regs.

  • Increased dollar threshold for basis increase in a TOI. The threshold amount for a basis increase in a TOI has been increased from $5 million to $25 million for tax years before 2025 and $10 million for tax years after. 
  • Limited retroactive reporting for open tax years. Reporting has been limited for open tax years to those that fall within a six-year lookback window. The six-year lookback is the 72-month period before the first month of a taxpayer’s most recent tax year that began before the publication of the final regulations (slated for Jan. 14 in the Federal Register). Also, the threshold amount for a basis increase in a TOI during the six-year lookback is $25 million. 
  • Additional time for reporting. Taxpayers have an additional 90 days from the final regulation’s publication to file disclosure statements for TOIs in open tax years for which a return has already been filed and that fall within the six-year lookback. Material advisors have an additional 90 days to file their disclosure statements for tax statements made before the final regulations. 
  • Publicly traded partnerships. Because PTPs are typically owned by a large number of unrelated owners, the final regulations exclude many owners of PTPs from the disclosure rules. 

The identified transactions generally result from either a tax-free distribution of partnership property to a partner that is related to one or more partners of the partnership, or the tax-free transfer of a partnership interest by a related partner to a related transferee.

IRS headquarters

Bloomberg via Getty Images

The tax-free distribution or transfer generates an increase to the basis of the distributed property or partnership property of $10 million or more ($25 million or more in the case of a TOI undertaken in a tax year before 2025) under the rules of IRC Sections 732(b) or (d), 734(b) or 743(b), but for which no corresponding tax is paid. 

The basis increase to the distributed or partnership property allows the related parties to decrease taxable income through increased cost recovery allowances or decrease taxable gain (or increase taxable loss) on the disposition of the property.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Treasury, IRS propose rules on commercial clean vehicles, issue guidance on clean fuels

Published

on

The Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service proposed new rules for the tax credit for qualified commercial clean vehicles, along with guidance on claiming tax credits for clean fuel under the Inflation Reduction Act.

The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on the credit for qualified commercial clean vehicles (under Section 45W of the Tax Code) says the credit can be claimed by purchasing and placing in service qualified commercial clean vehicles, including certain battery electric vehicles, plug-in hybrid EVs, fuel cell electric vehicles and plug-in hybrid fuel cell electric vehicles.  

The credit is the lesser amount of either 30% of the vehicle’s basis (15% for plug-in hybrid EVs) or the vehicle’s incremental cost in excess of a vehicle comparable in size or use powered solely by gasoline or diesel. A credit up to $7,500 can be claimed for a single qualified commercial clean vehicle for cars and light-duty trucks (with a Gross Vehicle Weight Rating of less than 14,000 pounds), or otherwise $40,000 for vehicles like electric buses and semi-trucks (with a GVWR equal to or greater than 14,000 pounds).

“The release of Treasury’s proposed rules for the commercial clean vehicle credit marks an important step forward in the Biden-Harris Administration’s work to lower transportation costs and strengthen U.S. energy security,” said U.S. Deputy Secretary of the Treasury Wally Adeyemo in a statement Friday. “Today’s guidance will provide the clarity and certainty needed to grow investment in clean vehicle manufacturing.”

The NPRM issued today proposes rules to implement the 45W credit, including proposing various pathways for taxpayers to determine the incremental cost of a qualifying commercial clean vehicle for purposes of calculating the amount of 45W credit. For example, the NPRM proposes that taxpayers can continue to use the incremental cost safe harbors such as those set out in Notice 2023-9 and Notice 2024-5, may rely on a manufacturer’s written cost determination to determine the incremental cost of a qualifying commercial clean vehicle, or may calculate the incremental cost of a qualifying clean vehicle versus an internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicle based on the differing costs of the vehicle powertrains.

The NPRM also proposes rules regarding the types of vehicles that qualify for the credit and aligns certain definitional concepts with those applicable to the 30D and 25E credits. In addition, the NPRM proposes that vehicles are only eligible if they are used 100% for trade or business, excepting de minimis personal use, and that the 45W credit is disallowed for qualified commercial clean vehicles that were previously allowed a clean vehicle credit under 30D or 45W. 

The notice asks for comments over the next 60 days on the proposed regulations such as issues related to off-road mobile machinery, including approaches that might be adopted in applying the definition of mobile machinery to off-road vehicles and whether to create a product identification number system for such machinery in order to comply with statutory requirements. A public hearing is scheduled for April 28, 2025.

Clean Fuels Production Credit

The Treasury the IRS also released guidance Friday on the Clean Fuels Production Credit under Section 45Z of the Tax Code.

Section 45Z provides a tax credit for the production of transportation fuels with lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions below certain levels. The credit is in effect in 2025 and is for sustainable aviation fuel and non-SAF transportation fuels.

The guidance includes both a notice of intent to propose regulations on the Section 45Z credit and a notice providing the annual emissions rate table for Section 45Z, which refers taxpayers to the appropriate methodologies for determining the lifecycle GHG emissions of their fuel. In conjunction with the guidance released Friday, the Department of Energy plans to release the 45ZCF-GREET model for use in determining emissions rates for 45Z in the coming days.

“This guidance will help put America on the cutting-edge of future innovation in aviation and renewable fuel while also lowering transportation costs for consumers,” said Adeyemo in a statement. “Decarbonizing transportation and lowering costs is a win-win for America.”

Section 45Z provides a per-gallon (or gallon-equivalent) tax credit for producers of clean transportation fuels based on the carbon intensity of production. It consolidates and replaces pre-Inflation Reduction Act credits for biodiesel, renewable diesel, and alternative fuels, and an IRA credit for sustainable aviation fuel. Like several other IRA credits, Section 45Z requires the Treasury to establish rules for measuring carbon intensity of production, based on the Clean Air Act’s definition of “lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions.”

The guidance offers more clarity on various issues, including which entities and fuels are eligible for the credit, and how taxpayers determine lifecycle emissions. Specifically, the guidance outlines the Treasury and the IRS’s intent to define key concepts and provide certain rules in a future rulemaking, including clarifying who is eligible for a credit.

The Treasury and the IRS intend to provide that the producer of the eligible clean fuel is eligible to claim the 45Z credit. In keeping with the statute, compressors and blenders of fuel would not be eligible.

Under Section 45Z, a fuel must be “suitable for use” as a transportation fuel. The Treasury and the IRS intend to propose that 45Z-creditable transportation fuel must itself (or when blended into a fuel mixture) have either practical or commercial fitness for use as a fuel in a highway vehicle or aircraft. The guidance clarifies that marine fuels that are otherwise suitable for use in highway vehicles or aircraft, such as marine diesel and methanol, are also 45Z eligible.

Specifically, this would mean that neat SAF that is blended into a fuel mixture that has practical or commercial fitness for use as a fuel would be creditable. Additionally, natural gas alternatives such as renewable natural gas would be suitable for use if produced in a manner such that if it were further compressed it could be used as a transportation fuel.

Today’s guidance publishes the annual emissions rate table that directs taxpayers to the appropriate methodologies for calculating carbon intensities for types and categories of 45Z-eligible fuels.

The table directs taxpayers to use the 45ZCF-GREET model to determine the emissions rate of non-SAF transportation fuel, and either the 45ZCF-GREET model or methodologies from the International Civil Aviation Organization (“CORSIA Default” or “CORSIA Actual”) for SAF.

Taxpayers can use the Provisional Emissions Rate process to obtain an emissions rate for fuel pathway and feedstock combinations not specified in the emissions rate table when guidance is published for the PER process. Guidance for the PER process is expected at a later date.

Outlining climate smart agriculture practices

The guidance released Friday states that the Treasury intends to propose rules for incorporating the emissions benefits from climate-smart agriculture (CSA) practices for cultivating domestic corn, soybeans, and sorghum as feedstocks for SAF and non-SAF transportation fuels. These options would be available to taxpayers after Treasury and the IRS propose regulations for the section 45Z credit, including rules for CSA, and the 45ZCF-GREET model is updated to enable calculation of the lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions rates for CSA crops, taking into account one or more CSA practices.    

CSA practices have multiple benefits, including lower overall GHG emissions associated with biofuels production and increased adoption of farming practices that are associated with other environmental benefits, such as improved water quality and soil health. Agencies across the Federal government have taken important steps to advance the adoption of CSA. In April, Treasury established a first-of-its-kind pilot program to encourage CSA practices within guidance on the section 40B SAF tax credit. Treasury has received and continues to consider substantial feedback from stakeholders on that pilot program. The U.S. Department of Agriculture invested more than $3 billion in 135 Partnerships for Climate-Smart Commodities projects. Combined with the historic investment of $19.5 billion in CSA from the Inflation Reduction Act, the department is estimated to support CSA implementation on over 225 million acres in the next 5 years as well as measurement, monitoring, reporting, and verification to better understand the climate impacts of these practices.

In addition, in June, the U.S. Department of Agriculture published a Request for Information requesting public input on procedures for reporting and verification of CSA practices and measurement of related emissions benefits, and received substantial input from a wide array of stakeholders. The USDA is currently developing voluntary technical guidelines for CSA reporting and verification. The Treasury and the IRS expect to consider those guidelines in proposing rules recognizing the benefits of CSA for purposes of the Section 45Z credit.

Continue Reading

Trending