Connect with us

Accounting

Tax Strategy: Options for claiming the 2025 deductions for tips and overtime

Published

on

tip-jar.jpg

Under Notice 2025-62, the Internal Revenue Service provided guidance to employers whose employees receive tips or overtime as to the procedures to follow for documenting qualified tips and qualified overtime on 2025 tax returns. 

Processing Content

That guidance basically asked employers to use their best efforts to provide that documentation; however, recognizing that the legislation creating those deductions was enacted halfway through 2025 and employers may not have the ability to identify qualifying tips and overtime under the new law, the IRS announced that no penalties would be imposed on employers that were unable to document qualified tips and overtime for 2025.

Now, in Notice 2025-69, the IRS has also provided guidance to taxpayers seeking to report their qualified tips and overtime on the 2025 tax return. Taxpayers are not provided with any specific waiver of penalties. However, they are given several options based on the information, or lack of information, provided by their employers. The law normally requires employees to report only the qualified tips and qualified overtime reported to the IRS by their employers. These notices provide an exception to this requirement for 2025 tax returns only.

Tips under Notice 2025-69

Employers are not required to separately account for cash tips on IRS forms or statements furnished to individuals for 2025. Notice 2025-69 states that an employee may treat the requirement that qualified tips be included on a statement furnished to the employee for 2025 as satisfied if the employee’s cash tips are properly reported on the employee’s W-2 without regard to whether there is a separate account for the total amount of cash tips. The employee may calculate the amount of qualified tips under one of the following options:

  1. Use the total amount of Social Security tips reported in Box 7 of Form W-2;
  2. Use the total amount of tips reported by the employee to the employer on Form 4070 (“Employee’s Report of Tips to Employer”), or any similar substitute form; or,
  3. If an employer voluntarily chooses to report the amount of an employee’s cash tips in Box 14 of Form W-2 (or a separate statement), the employee may use that amount to report qualified tips. 
  4. An employee may also include any amount listed on Line 4 of 2025 Form 4137 filed with the employee’s 2025 income tax return.
  • Occupation codes. Whether or not the employer has provided an occupation code for the employee, the employee is still responsible for determining whether the tips were received in an occupation that customarily and regularly received tips on or before Dec. 31, 2024, as provided by the Secretary of the Treasury. As of this writing, the Treasury has identified 68 qualifying occupation codes.
  • Specified service trades or businesses. In general, employees of specified service trades or businesses, such as accounting, law and other professions, are not considered eligible to receive qualified tips. However, for 2025, the IRS will treat an employee as having received tips in a trade or business that is not a SSTB if it is an occupation that is one of the occupation codes provided by the Secretary of the Treasury.
  • Non-employees. Similarly for non-employees, if the non-employee’s cash tips are included in the total amounts reported as other income on Form 1099-MISC, as non-employee compensation on Form 1099-NEC, or as payment card/third-party network transactions on Form 1099-K, then the non-employee may calculate qualified tips using earnings statements or other documentation to corroborate the calculation for 2025. The non-employee may also request additional information from the payor. The occupation code requirements and SSTB waiver for 2025 also apply to non-employees.

Notice 2025-69 also includes a few examples of calculating qualified tips.

Overtime under Notice 2025-69

Notice 2025-69 provides that payments in excess of the Fair Labor Standards Act-required premiums are not qualified overtime. Only the additional one-half of pay premium in excess of regular pay is considered qualified overtime. The employee should confirm that their employer is an FLSA employer.

For 2025, qualified overtime may be reported anywhere on Form W-2 or a separate statement. It also may be on Form 1099-NEC or 1099-MISC. For 2025, an employee may determine qualified overtime from any of the following:

  1. The employee was paid overtime compensation at a rate of 1½ times the regular rate for hours in excess of 40 hours per week and receives a statement separately accounting for overtime premiums;
  2. The employee was paid 1½ time over 40 hours; however, it was not separately stated. Employee may use one third of the total;
  3. If the employee was paid over 1½ time, use the appropriate fraction, e.g., if twice the regular rate, use one-fourth of the total;
  4. The adjustment under Nos. 2 or 3 above may be adjusted to correct an underestimation.
  5. Under any of the above methods, if no statement has been received, the individual may use a reasonable method using regular rate of pay and hours over 40 per week and any employer information provided.
  6. Public sector, hospital and residential care employees may use alternative overtime rules.

Several examples are also provided in the notice for calculating qualified overtime.

Summary

While the IRS is attempting to provide a great deal of flexibility in calculating qualified tips and qualified overtime for 2025, the various options may still be confusing for many taxpayers. The taxpayer must still have documentation of some form to support the deduction of tips and overtime. Taxpayers must also be able to establish that they fall into one of the accepted occupation codes. The taxpayer may also be on their own to make the calculation of qualifying tips and qualifying overtime without clear documentation from the employer or other payor. 

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending