The House Financial Services Committee is considering draft legislation that would transfer the responsibilities of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board to the Securities and Exchange Commission. 

The bill would also end the support fees that public companies and broker-dealers pay to support the PCAOB. “The proposal would transfer the authorities of the PCAOB to the SEC,” said a spokesperson for the committee. “It modifies PCAOB’s authority to collect and spend accounting support fees and directs fees to be remitted to Treasury.” The PCAOB did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The bill might be included in the larger tax and spending reconciliation bill that’s currently making its way through Congress, according to the Financial Times. The PCAOB has come under criticism from Republicans, including the new chairman of the SEC, Paul Atkins, who was confirmed by the Senate last week. He was listed as a contributor to the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025, which called for eliminating the PCAOB and rolling back SEC regulations, and was critical of the PCAOB while he was a commissioner. 

Under the draft legislation, all intellectual property retained by the PCAOB in support of its programs for registration, standard-setting and inspection would be shared with the SEC and any pending enforcement and disciplinary actions of the Board would be referred to the SEC or other regulators in accordance with Section 105 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act originally established the PCAOB in response to a wave of accounting scandals in the early 2000s involving Enron, WorldCom and other companies.

Effectively on the transfer date from the PCAOB to the SEC, all unobligated fees collected under Section 109(d) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act would be transferred to the general fund of the Treasury, and the SEC would not be able to collect fees under that section. The duties and powers of the PCAOB in effect as of the day before the transfer date, other than those described in Section 107 of Sarbanes-Oxley, would be transferred to the SEC. That section already grants the SEC general oversight of the PCAOB and the power to review the Board’s actions, including general modification and rescission of Board authority.

The draft legislation says, however, the SEC may not use funds to carry out Section 107 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act for activities related to overseeing the Board. The PCAOB would have to transfer all intellectual property to the SEC, along with existing processes and regulations of the Board, including existing PCAOB auditing standards. Those would continue in effect unless they were modified through rulemaking by the SEC; and any reference to the PCAOB in any law, regulation, document, record, map, or other paper of the United States would be deemed to be a reference to the SEC.

Any PCAOB employee as of the date of enactment of the bill may be offered equivalent positions on the SEC staff, as determined by the Commission, and submit to the Commission’s standard employment policies; and receive pay no higher than the highest paid employee of similarly situated employees of the Commission, according to the draft legislation. That provision could in effect lower the salaries of PCAOB board members, who are some of the highest paid employees in the federal government.

The International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board is proposing to tailor some of its standards to align with recent additions to the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants’ International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants when it comes to using the work of an external expert.

The proposed narrow-scope amendments involve minor changes to several IAASB standards:

• ISA 620, Using the Work of an Auditor’s Expert;
• ISRE 2400 (Revised), Engagements to Review Historical Financial Statements;
• ISAE 3000 (Revised), Assurance Engagements Other than Audits or Reviews of Historical Financial Information;
• ISRS 4400 (Revised), Agreed-upon Procedures Engagements.

The IAASB is asking for comments via a digital response template that can be found on the IAASB website by July 24, 2025.

In December 2023, the IESBA approved an exposure draft for proposed revisions to the IESBA’s Code of Ethics related to using the work of an external expert. The proposals included three new sections to the Code of Ethics, including provisions for professional accountants in public practice; professional accountants in business and sustainability assurance practitioners. The IESBA approved the provisions on using the work of an external expert at its December 2024 meeting, establishing an ethical framework to guide accountants and sustainability assurance practitioners in evaluating whether an external expert has the necessary competence, capabilities and objectivity to use their work, as well as provisions on applying the Ethics Code’s conceptual framework when using the work of an outside expert.  

President Donald Trump’s tariffs would effectively cause a tax increase for low-income families that is more than three times higher than what wealthier Americans would pay, according to an analysis from the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy.

The report from the progressive think tank outlined the outcomes for Americans of all backgrounds if the tariffs currently in effect remain in place next year. Those making $28,600 or less would have to spend 6.2% more of their income due to higher prices, while the richest Americans with income of at least $914,900 are expected to spend 1.7% more. Middle-income families making between $55,100 and $94,100 would pay 5% more of their earnings. 

Trump has imposed the steepest U.S. duties in more than a century, including a 145% tariff on many products from China, a 25% rate on most imports from Canada and Mexico, duties on some sectors such as steel and aluminum and a baseline 10% tariff on the rest of the country’s trading partners. He suspended higher, customized tariffs on most countries for 90 days.

Economists have warned that costs from tariff increases would ultimately be passed on to U.S. consumers. And while prices will rise for everyone, lower-income families are expected to lose a larger portion of their budgets because they tend to spend more of their earnings on goods, including food and other necessities, compared to wealthier individuals.

Food prices could rise by 2.6% in the short run due to tariffs, according to an estimate from the Yale Budget Lab. Among all goods impacted, consumers are expected to face the steepest price hikes for clothing at 64%, the report showed. 

The Yale Budget Lab projected that the tariffs would result in a loss of $4,700 a year on average for American households.