Connect with us

Accounting

Tax Strategy: The rise of the below-the-line deduction

Published

on

Until enactment of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, officially P.L. 119-21, the availability of a below-the-line deduction that was not the standard deduction or an itemized deduction was a rare event. It was usually done for a specific policy reason related to the particular deduction.

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act gave us the Code Sec. 199 Qualified Business Income Deduction. The QBI deduction was designed to provide to pass-through entities a benefit similar to the corporate tax cut under the TCJA. In order to maintain parity with the corporate tax cut, it was decided that the QBI deduction should be below the line to prevent adjustments to other adjusted gross income-based deductions and credits from upsetting the parity that the QBI deduction was trying to achieve

The QBI deduction replaced the domestic production activity deduction. DPAD was in a similar way designed to focus on promoting domestic manufacturing, production and construction. The below-the-line deduction was intended to keep the focus on business and not provide an incidental personal benefit through a reduction in adjusted gross income.

Over the years, certain disaster-related deductions were also set up as below-the-line deductions, usually on a temporary basis. The most recent example of a new below-the-line deduction before the OBBBA was the charitable deduction for non-itemizers enacted during COVID. The CARES Act created a $300 above-the-line charitable deduction for non-itemizers.

In the Consolidated Appropriations Act the next year, the charitable deduction for non-itemizers was changed to not only add a $600 deduction for joint filers but also change the deduction from an above-the-line deduction to a below-the-line deduction. The motive for this change appears to be primarily the budgetary impact of the change, rather than some change in the policy view concerning charitable deductions for non-itemizers.

The OBBBA seems to now have made the exception into the rule. Each of the new deductions in the OBBBA — the tips deduction, the overtime deduction, the senior deduction, the car loan interest deduction, and the new charitable contribution deduction for non-itemizers — is a below-the-line deduction. The motive here, like for the $600 below-the-line deduction enacted for 2021, appears to be primarily based on budgetary concerns, rather than policy concerns.

Four of the five OBBBA deductions are allowed for both itemizers and non-itemizers: the tips deduction, the overtime deduction, the senior deduction, and the auto loan interest deduction. The new $1,000 charitable deduction for non-itemizers is logically limited to non-itemizers since itemizers already have the itemized charitable deduction. Although interestingly, and also probably motivated primarily by budgetary concerns, the OBBBA also includes a new 0.5% floor on itemized charitable contribution deductions, creating a new limit on itemized charitable deductions at the same time the OBBBA was creating a new charitable deduction for non-itemizers.

The broader impact of below-the-line deductions

Part of the motive for the move toward below-the-line deductions separate from itemized deductions is likely the fact that so few taxpayers take itemized deductions currently. When the standard deduction was increased in the TCJA, the percentage of individual taxpayers claiming itemized deductions fell to around 10%.

Before the TCJA, the percentage of individual taxpayers claiming itemized deductions was closer to 30%. The increase in the state and local tax deduction limit in the OBBBA and adding a new miscellaneous itemized deduction for education-related expenses could increase the percentage of itemized deduction filers.

Even before the standard deduction was increased in the TCJA, itemized deductions were only benefiting around 30% of taxpayers. Therefore, if Congress wants a new deduction to have an impact on a large segment of taxpayers, particularly lower-income taxpayers, itemized deductions are not the way to go.

If Congress is providing significant new deductions such as the tips deduction, the overtime deduction, and the senior deduction, making those deductions above-the-line deductions could have a significant impact, lowering adjusted gross income and making taxpayers eligible for preexisting tax breaks to which they otherwise would not have been entitled. This could significantly increase the projected cost of these provisions beyond the cost of the provision alone. Such budgetary considerations make a below-the-line deduction relatively attractive for budgeting purposes.

Up until now, these one-off below-the-line deductions have appeared as separate lines directly on Form 1040. Now that we have so many below-the-line deductions, it is likely that the IRS will create a new Form 1040 schedule to address them. Each deduction is likely to be a separate part of the schedule. The schedule is likely to include a modified AGI phase-out calculator for each of the deductions subject to phase-outs, a requirement for occupation codes for individuals claiming the tips or overtime deduction, a Vehicle Identification Number and other purchase details for the auto loan interest deduction, and perhaps even age verification for the senior deduction, although the IRS computers seem to already possess information on the age of taxpayers.

The form of tax breaks that Congress chooses to enact tends to shift in popularity from time to time. For a while, it was to continue to add to the list of itemized deductions. Then, for a while, it was the tax credit, to get a dollar-for-dollar benefit regardless of the tax bracket. Then, the above-the-line deduction became the popular area for new tax breaks to help taxpayers reduce AGI. Next, the refundable credit had a period of popularity to help taxpayers who otherwise could not benefit, since they owed no income taxes. The TCJA made a significant increase in the standard deduction, benefiting taxpayers already taking the standard deduction and at least simplifying life for taxpayers who were now better off with the standard deduction than itemizing.

Now, we have an impressive list of below-the-line deductions from the OBBBA — available to taxpayers whether or not they itemize but restricting side benefits from other tax breaks that might have been enhanced or made available by a reduced AGI. We thought we might get tax exclusions for tips, overtime and Social Security benefits.

Instead, the realities of the budget reconciliation process requirements left us to deal with these new below-the-line deductions and new sets of calculations to see if a taxpayer can really qualify for them. Exclusions might have meant simplification. These new below-the-line deductions do not.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending