Connect with us

Accounting

Tax Strategy: Updates on the Clean Vehicle Tax Credit

Published

on

The requirements for the Clean Vehicle Credit seemed a little complicated when they were introduced in the Inflation Reduction Act in 2022, and they are proving to be a little difficult in practice. 

There were restrictions based on where the vehicle was assembled and where the critical minerals and battery components originated. Then there were limits on the manufacturer’s suggested retail price for the vehicle and the income of the purchaser. The manufacturer was required to have vehicles pre-approved for a given level of credit and the dealer was required to be registered.

Some provisions were phased in over time, including the option to transfer the credit to the dealer, which became effective for 2024. The Internal Revenue Service then added certain compliance requirements, including filing a time of sale report (the Clean Vehicle Seller Report (Form 15400)) within 72 hours of the vehicle being placed in service and submitting information through an Energy Credits Online portal.

Plug-in vehicle parking spot

Some of these provisions were designed to simplify the process. When a potential purchaser entered the showroom, the purchaser would be able to find out in real time what amount of credit was associated with a particular vehicle. A time-of-sale report could be filed with the IRS electronically via the portal to determine even before the sale was finalized if the vehicle qualified for the credit. 

Unfortunately, things have not worked out quite so well in practice. 

The more simplified requirements in place for purchases in 2023 appear to have lulled dealers into the belief that the same practices would be fine for 2024. Some dealers, far from using the time-of-sale reports to make sure the credit was cleared for approval at the time of sale, failed even to prepare the reports. Purchasers, unaware of the new requirement, failed to demand a copy at the time of sale. In those instances where the purchaser retained entitlement to the credit, rather than transferring it to the dealer, the purchaser found that, when they filed their 2024 tax return in 2025, the IRS rejected the claim for the credit. When the purchaser contacted the dealer about the problem, the dealer found they were unable to correct the issue because the time-of-sale report had not been filed within the required 72-hour period and any late submission was rejected as untimely. 

Only 7% of purchasers in 2024 retained their entitlement to the credit. The rest of the purchasers transferred entitlement to the credit to the dealer, resulting in a price rebate on the vehicle purchase. However, again, when the dealer sought to claim the credit transferred from the purchaser, the dealer encountered the same problem of an untimely time-of-sale report, which could not be corrected because the 72-hour time period had expired.

This glitch in the system impacted dealers even more than purchasers and got the attention of the National Automobile Dealers Association, which immediately started pressuring the IRS and Congress to find a solution to the problem. In response, the IRS has informed NADA that it is waiving the 72-hour requirement and is accepting late time-of-sale reports into the Energy Credits Online portal. The IRS has set no time limits so far on the submission of late reports.

Corrective action

Dealers will want to refile all rejected time-of-sale reports that had been rejected as untimely. Dealers will also want to make sure they are registered with the IRS and notify any purchasers that the credit has now been approved. 

Purchasers will want to contact the dealer for a copy of the time-of-sale report and make sure the dealer is resubmitting the report or submitting it for the first time. Purchasers will need to file a Form 8936, “Clean Vehicle Credits,” to be used for the Clean Vehicle Credit, the Previously Owned Clean Vehicle Credit and the Qualified Commercial Clean Vehicle Credit. Form 8936 is required to be filed either when the purchaser is claiming the credit on the purchaser’s tax return or when the purchaser has transferred the credit to the dealer. 

In some cases, where the purchaser had already filed a tax return where the credit was rejected by the IRS, the purchaser will be required to file an amended tax return to claim the credit once the time-of-sale report has been accepted.

Termination of the Clean Vehicle Credit

While under current law, the Clean Vehicle Credit is scheduled to continue until 2032, Congress is working on tax legislation expected to be enacted this year that might repeal the credit. President Trump has expressed his opposition to many of the clean energy credits included in the Inflation Reduction Act enacted in 2022, and in particular opposition to the Clean Vehicle Credit. 

Congress is still in the early stages of working on this legislation, and it is not clear to what extent this provision might be included in the final legislation. If enacted at all, it is likely that the legislation would not be enacted until later in 2025. This makes it unlikely that any repeal of the Clean Vehicle Credit would be made retroactive to the beginning of 2025. However, it is possible repeal could be effective as of the enactment date of the legislation. 

Taxpayers considering the purchase of an electric vehicle in 2025 may want to monitor the progress of this tax legislation through Congress and whether a repeal of the clean vehicle credit appears to be included. Purchase of the vehicle before enactment of the legislation may preserve the credit for the taxpayer. 

Tariffs

The limit on the manufacturer’s suggested retail price for electric vehicles could become more difficult for manufacturers and dealers to stay under if the tariffs on imported automobiles and auto parts force manufacturers to raise prices. The MSRP limit for vans, SUVs and pick-ups is $80,000 and for other vehicles $55,000. If the electric vehicle currently under consideration for purchase is close to these price limits, a taxpayer might want to consider purchasing the vehicle sooner, before these tariffs achieve their full impact.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Accounting firms seeing increased profits

Published

on

Accounting firms are reporting bigger profits and more clients, according to a new report.

The report, released Monday by Xero, found that nearly three-quarters (73%) of firms reported increased profits over the past year and 56% added new clients thanks to operational efficiency and expanded service offerings.

Some 85% of firms now offer client advisory services, a big spike from 41% in 2023, indicating a strategic shift toward delivering forward-looking financial guidance that clients increasingly expect.

AI adoption is also reshaping the profession, with 80% of firms confident it will positively affect their practice. Currently, the most common use cases for AI include: delivering faster and more responsive client services (33%), enhancing accuracy by reducing bookkeeping and accounting errors (33%), and streamlining workflows through the automation of routine tasks (32%).

“The widespread adoption of AI has been a turning point for the accounting profession, giving accountants an opportunity to scale their impact and take on a more strategic advisory role,” said Ben Richmond, managing director, North America, at Xero, in a statement. “The real value lies not just in working more efficiently, but working smarter, freeing up time to elevate the human element of the profession and in turn, strengthen client relationships.”

Some of the main challenges faced by firms include economic uncertainty (38%), mastering AI (36%) and rising client expectations for strategic advice (35%). 

While 85% of firms have embraced cloud platforms, a sizable number still lag behind, missing out on benefits such as easier data access from anywhere (40%) and enhanced security (36%).

Continue Reading

Accounting

Private equity is investing in accounting: What does that mean for the future of the business?

Published

on

Private equity firms have bought five of the top 26 accounting firms in the past three years as they mount a concerted strategy to reshape the industry. 

The trend should not come as a surprise. It’s one we’ve seen play out in several industries from health care to insurance, where a combination of low-risk, recurring revenue, scalability and an aging population of owners create a target-rich environment. For small to midsized accounting firms, the trend is exacerbated by a technological revolution that’s truly transforming the way accounting work is done, and a growing talent crisis that is threatening tried-and-true business models.

How will this type of consolidation affect the accounting business, and what do firms and their clients need to be on the lookout for as the marketplace evolves?

Assessing the opportunity… and the risk

First and foremost, accounting firm owners need to be aware of just how desirable they are right now. While there has been some buzz in the industry about the growing presence of private equity firms, most of the activity to date has focused on larger, privately held firms. In fact, when we recently asked tax professionals about their exposure to private equity funding in our 2025 State of Tax Professionals Report, we found that just 5% of firms have actually inked a deal and only 11% said they are planning to look, or are currently looking, for a deal with a private equity firm. Another 8% said they are open to discussion. On the one hand, that’s almost a quarter of firms feeling open to private equity investments in some way. But the lion’s share of respondents —  87% — said they were not interested.

Recent private equity deal volume suggests that the holdouts might change their minds when they have a real offer on the table. According to S&P Global, private equity and venture capital-backed deal value in the accounting, auditing and taxation services sector reached more than $6.3 billion in 2024, the highest level since 2015, and the trend shows no signs of slowing. Firm owners would be wise to start watching this trend to see how it might affect their businesses — whether they are interested in selling or not.

Focus on tech and efficiencies of scale

The reason this trend is so important to everyone in the industry right now is that the private equity firms entering this space are not trying to become accountants. They are looking for profitable exits. And they will do that by seizing on a critical inflection point in the industry that’s making it possible to scale accounting firms more rapidly than ever before by leveraging technology to deliver a much wider range of services at a much lower cost. So, whether your firm is interested in partnering with private equity or dead set on going it alone, the hyperscaling that’s happening throughout the industry will affect you one way or another.

Private equity thrives in fragmented businesses where the ability to roll up companies with complementary skill sets and specialized services creates an outsized growth opportunity. Andrew Dodson, managing partner at Parthenon Capital, recently commented after his firm took a stake in the tax and advisory firm Cherry Bekaert, “We think that for firms to thrive, they need to make investments in people and technology, and, obviously, regulatory adherence, to really differentiate themselves in the market. And that’s going to require scale and capital to do it. That’s what gets us excited.”

Over time, this could reshape the industry’s market dynamics by creating the accounting firm equivalent of the Traveling Wilburys — supergroups capable of delivering a wide range of specialized services that smaller, more narrowly focused firms could never previously deliver. It could also put downward pressure on pricing as these larger, platform-style firms start finding economies of scale to deliver services more cost-effectively.

The technology factor

The great equalizer in all of this is technology. Consistently, when I speak to tax professionals actively working in the market today, their top priorities are increased efficiency, growth and talent. Firms recognize they need to streamline workflows and processes through more effective use of technology, and they are investing heavily in AI, automation and data analytics capabilities to do that. Private equity firms, of course, are also investing in tech as they assemble their tax and accounting dream teams, in many cases raising the bar for the industry.

The question is: Can independent firms leverage technology fast enough to keep up with their deep-pocketed competition?

Many firms believe they can, with some even going so far as to publicly declare their independence.  Regardless of the path small to midsized firms take to get there, technology-enabled growth is going to play a key role in the future of the industry. Market dynamics that have been unfolding for the last decade have been accelerated with the introduction of serious investors, and everyone in the industry — large and small — is going to need to up their games to stay competitive.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Trump tax bill would help the richest, hurt the poorest, CBO says

Published

on

The House-passed version of President Donald Trump’s massive tax and spending bill would deliver a financial blow to the poorest Americans but be a boon for higher-income households, according to a new analysis from the Congressional Budget Office.

The bottom 10% of households would lose an average of about $1,600 in resources per year, amounting to a 3.9% cut in their income, according to the analysis released Thursday. Those decreases are largely attributable to cuts in the Medicaid health insurance program and food aid through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

Households in the highest 10% of incomes would see an average $12,000 boost in resources, amounting to a 2.3% increase in their incomes. Those increases are mainly attributable to reductions in taxes owed, according to the report from the nonpartisan CBO.

Households in the middle of the income distribution would see an increase in resources of $500 to $1,000, or between 0.5% and 0.8% of their income. 

The projections are based on the version of the tax legislation that House Republicans passed last month, which includes much of Trump’s economic agenda. The bill would extend tax cuts passed under Trump in 2017 otherwise due to expire at the end of the year and create several new tax breaks. It also imposes new changes to the Medicaid and SNAP programs in an effort to cut spending.

Overall, the legislation would add $2.4 trillion to US deficits over the next 10 years, not accounting for dynamic effects, the CBO previously forecast.

The Senate is considering changes to the legislation including efforts by some Republican senators to scale back cuts to Medicaid.

The projected loss of safety-net resources for low-income families come against the backdrop of higher tariffs, which economists have warned would also disproportionately impact lower-income families. While recent inflation data has shown limited impact from the import duties so far, low-income families tend to spend a larger portion of their income on necessities, such as food, so price increases hit them harder.

The House-passed bill requires that able-bodied individuals without dependents document at least 80 hours of “community engagement” a month, including working a job or participating in an educational program to qualify for Medicaid. It also includes increased costs for health care for enrollees, among other provisions.

More older adults also would have to prove they are working to continue to receive SNAP benefits, also known as food stamps. The legislation helps pay for tax cuts by raising the age for which able bodied adults must work to receive benefits to 64, up from 54. Under the current law, some parents with dependent children under age 18 are exempt from work requirements, but the bill lowers the age for the exemption for dependent children to 7 years old. 

The legislation also shifts a portion of the cost for federal food aid onto state governments.

CBO previously estimated that the expanded work requirements on SNAP would reduce participation in the program by roughly 3.2 million people, and more could lose or face a reduction in benefits due to other changes to the program. A separate analysis from the organization found that 7.8 million people would lose health insurance because of the changes to Medicaid.

Continue Reading

Trending