Connect with us

Accounting

TCJA extension or sunset: Gamechangers for professional athletes

Published

on

March Madness college basketball

Tim Nwachukwu/Photographer: Tim Nwachukwu/Gett

With just over a year to go before many of the provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act sunset, taxpayers and tax professionals are waiting anxiously to see which, if any, will be extended — and professional athletes, who play as many as half of their games in states other than the one in which their team is located, and may reside in yet another state, are high on the list of those who should be paying attention.

W-2 employees with out-of-pocket expenses may see significant tax savings if Congress allows the TCJA to sunset, according to Miklos Ringbauer, of MiklosCPA, an accounting and tax strategy firm based in Southern California. 

“Where possible, athletes may want to consider waiting to pay some expenses until 2026 — when a deduction may be available — versus paying in 2025 (or prepaying in 2024) when the expenses are nondeductible,” he said.

Removing the $10,000 cap on the deduction for state and local income taxes could also be a significant benefit to most professional athletes, Ringbauer observed: “Whether they reside in a high-tax state or low-tax state, since professional athletes incur a ‘jock tax’ as nonresidents of the states and certain cities where they play road games.”

Even if an athlete is a resident of a no-tax state, they may pay significant nonresident state and local taxes from the states and cities where the team travels — which, under TCJA rules, are deductible only up to $10,000.

Under TCJA rules, expenses directly related to endorsement income such as appearances, royalties, sponsorships, and so on (including agency fees, travel expenses, professional fees, etc.) are deductible against business income — which is generally reported on a Schedule C under business profit and loss.

Ringbauer offered this hypothetical example to demonstrate the decisions that athletes must make in planning their career: John Smith is a pitching prospect in Major League Baseball who worked his way through the minor league system. Two teams offer him a one-year contract around the league-minimum salary of $740,000 for 2024. Under the collective bargaining agreement, it is expected to be raised to $760,000 in 2025 and $780,000 in 2026. He had to decide whether to play for a California-based team or a Florida-based team during 2024. After consulting with his tax advisor, he learned that he would be subject to the California state income tax of more than 11% if he signed with the California team, but would not be subject to state income tax if he went with the Florida team because Florida has no income tax. 

After considering the pros and cons, Smith signed with the California team. Although he’ll take home less after taxes, the prospect of living in his home state of California plus the future earning potential of playing for a “big-market” team outweighs the short-term savings in taxes in Florida playing for a lesser-known team. He can always come back to the question of claiming residency in another, non-income-tax state later, when his paycheck is bigger.

Business expenses for self-employed athletes such as golfers or other individual sports are deductible under the TCJA — the deduction rules differ for W-2 employees compared to Form 1099 contractors. Many self-employed or independent contractor athletes may use an S corporation for self-employment tax and state pass-through-entity tax planning purposes.

“Certain states that did not conform to the TCJA have allowed a state-level deduction for unreimbursed employee expenses, including California, Minnesota and Pennsylvania,” Ringbauer noted. “This could potentially reduce taxable income, resulting in lower state taxes owed. CPAs should work with professional athletes and their agencies to develop timing strategies for when certain expenses may bring more beneficial tax deductions. The post-election weeks should bring more clarity to whether Congress will allow all or some of these provisions to sunset, or if the TCJA will be extended.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

In the blogs: Just in time

Published

on

BOI is back; phantom stocks; continuous compliance; and other highlights from our favorite tax bloggers.

Just in time

  • Tax Vox (https://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxvox): Who benefits and who loses from extending major provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act?
  • Taxing Subjects (https://www.drakesoftware.com/blog): The Republican party can shape legislative priorities for the next two years, setting the stage for long-term policy changes. A downloadable resource offers a breakdown of key policy areas and action steps for tax pros and small businesses. 
  • AICPA & CIMA Insights (https://www.aicpa-cima.com/blog): How the IRS and tax pros can both start prepping for any government shutdown.
  • Eide Bailly (https://www.eidebailly.com/taxblog): “Just in time for the holidays,” a federal appeals court has restored the Corporate Transparency Act requirement for businesses to disclose their beneficial owners.
  • Taxable Talk (http://www.taxabletalk.com/): And just like that, yet again, with an injunction’s stay, course is reversed.
  • Current Federal Tax Developments (https://www.currentfederaltaxdevelopments.com/): At least they extended the deadlines a whisker.
  • The Tax Times (https://www.thetaxtimes.com): The IRS continues to claw back from non-filers, to the tune of 10 figures and counting.
  • The National Association of Tax Professionals (https://blog.natptax.com/): Favorite headline of the week: “The best gifts for the tax pro in your life this holiday season.”
  • National Taxpayer Advocate (https://www.taxpayeradvocate.irs.gov/taxnews-information/blogs-nta/): “‘Twas the night before tax season, and all through the land; Tax professionals were working, each with pen in hand; The forms were all sorted with numbers just right; who says tax accounting can’t thrill and excite?”

2025

Continuity

Size matters

Continue Reading

Accounting

H&R Block releases Santa Claus’s tax return

Published

on

p195u5dhs3pmh1ufo1oo27ml818.jpg

That doesn’t look like a 1040 … .

H&R Block has given the world just what it wants to see this holiday season: Santa Claus’s tax return.

Santa has a lot of itemizations to consider. Eight tiny reindeer depend on him for food and shelter, for instance, but are they dependents? How much can you give to one person before reporting it? Does Santa keep good mileage records for his 41.5 million miles? Santa isn’t an employee, so compensation (even in cookie form) over the threshold may create a 1099-NEC.

Old St. Nick, who files MFJ with Mrs. Claus, did all right on 1040 Line 34, but some of his numbers do bear examination: 6.3 million cookies and 2 million gallons of milk means a third of a gallon of milk per cookie. Will the deduction of coal, magic dust and sleighbells stand up to audit? At least Santa has plenty of time on his hands between January and April to find a good preparer.

Santa's tax return

“Even the jolly man in red takes time to report taxes,” reads the announcement from the tax prep giant. “He’s probably the world’s most famous small-business owner, running a gift-giving workshop and distribution network across the globe … Santa is giving us the first ever peek at his tax return and showing us how he used H&R Block Online and AI Tax Assist to get his maximum refund.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

5 changes coming to IRAs and 401(k)s in 2025

Published

on

The SECURE 2.0 Act contained several changes to traditional and Roth individual retirement accounts and 401(k) plans that are being phased in over the coming years, with several notable changes coming in 2025. The Illinois CPA Society highlighted five changes coming to IRAs and 401(k)s in 2025:

Continue Reading

Trending