Connect with us

Accounting

The decline in accounting majors: What’s behind the shift?

Published

on

In recent years, higher education has seen a marked decline in the number of students pursuing accounting degrees, a trend that raises concerns for the profession’s future. 

According to the American Institute of CPAs, the number of accounting graduates dropped by nearly 17% between 2016 and 2020, and the number of candidates sitting for the CPA exam has decreased by 27% over the past decade. This decline is the result of changed perceptions of the profession, more rewarding alternative career paths, and broader challenges affecting higher education. 

Failure of universities to address these changes risks further erosion of their student base. Before college administrators can implement changes to reverse this trend, critical reflection and understanding of the changes underlying the decline are essential. Accordingly, below I will address each of the factors contributing to this issue.

Changed perceptions of the accounting profession

Until recently, accounting has often been associated with high job security, competitive salaries, and career advancement. However, today’s students are drawn to careers that are perceived as more dynamic, offering greater opportunities for growth and innovation. Professions such as finance, marketing and entrepreneurship are seen as more creative, impactful and future-oriented. In contrast, accounting has become associated with routine, rule-bound activities, and limited opportunities for applying critical thinking or adaptive learning to complex decision-making.

Moreover, technological advances — including automation, artificial intelligence, and robotics — have raised concerns about the viability of traditional accounting jobs. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics estimates that employment in bookkeeping, accounting and auditing will decline by 5% from 2022 to 2032 due to automation. Consequently, students are increasingly skeptical about the long-term value of pursuing a degree in accounting when compared to other fields that seem less susceptible to obsolescence.

Influence of other business disciplines

Accounting requires considerable knowledge of tax codes and regulatory reporting frameworks. However, compared to finance, which also involves a numbers-oriented and analytical focus, accounting lacks the appeal of careers in investment banking, private equity, or portfolio management. The average salary for investment bankers in the U.S. is approximately $133,000 per year, significantly higher than the $77,250 median salary for accountants and auditors reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics in 2022.

Similar opportunities abound in fields like data science and business analytics, which students view as more tech-oriented and futuristic. For example, the global market for data science is projected to grow to $103 billion by 2027, with professionals in this field commanding starting salaries often exceeding $100,000. These disciplines also offer greater prestige and the potential for significant financial rewards, making them a major draw for students deciding between business majors.

The financial burden of higher education

Given the rising cost of college tuition, students are increasingly considering the return on investment of their chosen degree. According to the Education Data Initiative, the average cost of a four-year public college education in the U.S. has risen to over $25,000 annually for in-state students, with private institutions exceeding $54,000 annually. In this context, accounting degrees are often viewed as less financially rewarding compared to alternative business disciplines with quicker or more lucrative career trajectories.

College graduates bloomberg

Additionally, accounting students face the significant financial and time investment required to become a CPA. Most states require 150 credit hours for CPA licensure, which often necessitates additional coursework beyond a bachelor’s degree. Furthermore, the CPA exam has a notoriously low pass rate of approximately 50%, adding further risk and uncertainty for prospective accounting majors. 

This combination of costs and challenges makes accounting a less attractive option when compared to other business paths that do not require comparable post-graduate certification hurdles.

What universities can do

If accounting is to survive as a viable career path — a viability with important implications for the future of American and global business — business schools must adopt a more proactive stance in addressing the current decline. Administrators must modernize accounting curricula to incorporate elements of artificial intelligence, data analytics, and blockchain. Emphasizing these technologies would elevate accounting as a science, potentially earning it STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) designation. This shift could help reframe accounting as a forward-thinking and innovative discipline.

Furthermore, universities should highlight the global nature of accounting work and its strategic importance to a variety of organizations, including startups, nonprofits, and multinational corporations. By showcasing the diverse opportunities available to students through an accounting degree, schools can attract those who might otherwise pursue alternative business majors.

To complement these efforts, the CPA certification process should be streamlined. Replacing the additional 30 credit hours most states require for CPA licensure with alternative internship experiences would reduce the financial burden of post-graduate education while providing students with practical experience essential for job success. Offering internships as undergraduate credit would not only lower costs but also enhance students’ readiness for the workforce.

Conclusion

A combination of shifting perceptions, evolving career interests, and financial pressures underlies the decline in the number of students pursuing accounting degrees. Nonetheless, accounting remains a critical component of business, serving as the language for communicating financial results. Moreover, with the retirement of an older generation of accountants and the ongoing demand for qualified professionals, opportunities in the field are likely to grow. 

Reversing the trend will require a significant commitment by business schools to modernize curricula, incorporate emerging technologies, and educate students about the promising career paths arising from these advancements. By making these changes, administrators can ensure that accounting remains at the forefront of business education and continues to attract a new generation of highly motivated professionals.

Continue Reading

Accounting

IAASB tweaks standards on working with outside experts

Published

on

The International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board is proposing to tailor some of its standards to align with recent additions to the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants’ International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants when it comes to using the work of an external expert.

The proposed narrow-scope amendments involve minor changes to several IAASB standards:

  • ISA 620, Using the Work of an Auditor’s Expert;
  • ISRE 2400 (Revised), Engagements to Review Historical Financial Statements;
  • ISAE 3000 (Revised), Assurance Engagements Other than Audits or Reviews of Historical Financial Information;
  • ISRS 4400 (Revised), Agreed-upon Procedures Engagements.

The IAASB is asking for comments via a digital response template that can be found on the IAASB website by July 24, 2025.

In December 2023, the IESBA approved an exposure draft for proposed revisions to the IESBA’s Code of Ethics related to using the work of an external expert. The proposals included three new sections to the Code of Ethics, including provisions for professional accountants in public practice; professional accountants in business and sustainability assurance practitioners. The IESBA approved the provisions on using the work of an external expert at its December 2024 meeting, establishing an ethical framework to guide accountants and sustainability assurance practitioners in evaluating whether an external expert has the necessary competence, capabilities and objectivity to use their work, as well as provisions on applying the Ethics Code’s conceptual framework when using the work of an outside expert.  

Continue Reading

Accounting

Tariffs will hit low-income Americans harder than richest, report says

Published

on

President Donald Trump’s tariffs would effectively cause a tax increase for low-income families that is more than three times higher than what wealthier Americans would pay, according to an analysis from the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy.

The report from the progressive think tank outlined the outcomes for Americans of all backgrounds if the tariffs currently in effect remain in place next year. Those making $28,600 or less would have to spend 6.2% more of their income due to higher prices, while the richest Americans with income of at least $914,900 are expected to spend 1.7% more. Middle-income families making between $55,100 and $94,100 would pay 5% more of their earnings. 

Trump has imposed the steepest U.S. duties in more than a century, including a 145% tariff on many products from China, a 25% rate on most imports from Canada and Mexico, duties on some sectors such as steel and aluminum and a baseline 10% tariff on the rest of the country’s trading partners. He suspended higher, customized tariffs on most countries for 90 days.

Economists have warned that costs from tariff increases would ultimately be passed on to U.S. consumers. And while prices will rise for everyone, lower-income families are expected to lose a larger portion of their budgets because they tend to spend more of their earnings on goods, including food and other necessities, compared to wealthier individuals.

Food prices could rise by 2.6% in the short run due to tariffs, according to an estimate from the Yale Budget Lab. Among all goods impacted, consumers are expected to face the steepest price hikes for clothing at 64%, the report showed. 

The Yale Budget Lab projected that the tariffs would result in a loss of $4,700 a year on average for American households.

Continue Reading

Accounting

At Schellman, AI reshapes a firm’s staffing needs

Published

on

Artificial intelligence is just getting started in the accounting world, but it is already helping firms like technology specialist Schellman do more things with fewer people, allowing the firm to scale back hiring and reduce headcount in certain areas through natural attrition. 

Schellman CEO Avani Desai said there have definitely been some shifts in headcount at the Top 100 Firm, though she stressed it was nothing dramatic, as it mostly reflects natural attrition combined with being more selective with hiring. She said the firm has already made an internal decision to not reduce headcount in force, as that just indicates they didn’t hire properly the first time. 

“It hasn’t been about reducing roles but evolving how we do work, so there wasn’t one specific date where we ‘started’ the reduction. It’s been more case by case. We’ve held back on refilling certain roles when we saw opportunities to streamline, especially with the use of new technologies like AI,” she said. 

One area where the firm has found such opportunities has been in the testing of certain cybersecurity controls, particularly within the SOC framework. The firm examined all the controls it tests on the service side and asked which ones require human judgment or deep expertise. The answer was a lot of them. But for the ones that don’t, AI algorithms have been able to significantly lighten the load. 

“[If] we don’t refill a role, it’s because the need actually has changed, or the process has improved so significantly [that] the workload is lighter or shared across the smarter system. So that’s what’s happening,” said Desai. 

Outside of client services like SOC control testing and reporting, the firm has found efficiencies in administrative functions as well as certain internal operational processes. On the latter point, Desai noted that Schellman’s engineers, including the chief information officer, have been using AI to help develop code, which means they’re not relying as much on outside expertise on the internal service delivery side of things. There are still people in the development process, but their roles are changing: They’re writing less code, and doing more reviewing of code before it gets pushed into production, saving time and creating efficiencies. 

“The best way for me to say this is, to us, this has been intentional. We paused hiring in a few areas where we saw overlaps, where technology was really working,” said Desai.

However, even in an age awash with AI, Schellman acknowledges there are certain jobs that need a human, at least for now. For example, the firm does assessments for the FedRAMP program, which is needed for cloud service providers to contract with certain government agencies. These assessments, even in the most stable of times, can be long and complex engagements, to say nothing of the less predictable nature of the current government. As such, it does not make as much sense to reduce human staff in this area. 

“The way it is right now for us to do FedRAMP engagements, it’s a very manual process. There’s a lot of back and forth between us and a third party, the government, and we don’t see a lot of overall application or technology help… We’re in the federal space and you can imagine, [with] what’s going on right now, there’s a big changing market condition for clients and their pricing pressure,” said Desai. 

As Schellman reduces staff levels in some places, it is increasing them in others. Desai said the firm is actively hiring in certain areas. In particular, it’s adding staff in technical cybersecurity (e.g., penetration testers), the aforementioned FedRAMP engagements, AI assessment (in line with recently becoming an ISO 42001 certification body) and in some client-facing roles like marketing and sales. 

“So, to me, this isn’t about doing more with less … It’s about doing more of the right things with the right people,” said Desai. 

While these moves have resulted in savings, she said that was never really the point, so whatever the firm has saved from staffing efficiencies it has reinvested in its tech stack to build its service line further. When asked for an example, she said the firm would like to focus more on penetration testing by building a SaaS tool for it. While Schellman has a proof of concept developed, she noted it would take a lot of money and time to deploy a full solution — both of which the firm now has more of because of its efficiency moves. 

“What is the ‘why’ behind these decisions? The ‘why’ for us isn’t what I think you traditionally see, which is ‘We need to get profitability high. We need to have less people do more things.’ That’s not what it is like,” said Desai. “I want to be able to focus on quality. And the only way I think I can focus on quality is if my people are not focusing on things that don’t matter … I feel like I’m in a much better place because the smart people that I’ve hired are working on the riskiest and most complicated things.”

Continue Reading

Trending