The purpose of a family office is to organize and centralize the management of a family’s personal and business financial affairs, and to maintain the financial house in as good an order as that of a well-run public company.
The origin of the family office concept came from extremely wealthy families, with net worth in today’s money of more than $250 million. The family office was often a separate entity, with employees ranging from a CEO or CFO and a chief investment officer, to a staff of bookkeepers and personal assistants that could do everything from monthly financial statements through booking travel and personal care appointments.
In a traditional family office, no service or calling is beyond the scope of the office’s services. Employees may be called upon to pick up a car from the auto dealership or bail out a troubled family member facing a precarious situation.
Many of these wealthy families have made their money from success in business. The family office staff is separate from the business financial staff and will not be involved in the operations or even the accounting for the business.
They will, however, be extremely familiar with the business as it relates to the family. The family office will stay on top of business matters as they directly relate to family wealth, with issues such as loan guarantees, cash management, timely reporting to shareholders and the family office, dealing with tax planning or other benefit planning as it relates to family members, obtaining current valuations of the company and ensuring that the value of the business is enhanced by smart family and succession planning. The family office may also assist with acquisitions and sales of various business entities via the lens of the family estate plan, capital resources, investment objectives and the best use of talent and resources.
Answering the eternal questions
Clients, no matter how wealthy, always want to know the answer to this question: “How am I doing”? The right family office set up can answer that question from a financial and a personal perspective. What’s surprising to me, however, is that many entrepreneurs cannot really tell you the IRR or CAGR of their closely held business interests. To me, this is an important benchmark that a family office should provide.
The family lawyer or accountant may be suitable to sit in the chair of the executive of the family office. Clearly it is a role for an educated, well-versed financial executive, and not a salesperson. This person should be knowledgeable in many areas, including accounting and recordkeeping systems, law, finance, markets, taxes and risk management.
In addition to their own personal experience and knowledge, this person should be able to build a team of subject matter experts in any area to support the family’s needs. For example, some family offices own property, businesses, alternative investments or investment accounts overseas. The traditional family office may or may not actually manage the financial assets. It is worth noting that asset oversight is different from asset management. Oversight typically involves coordination and working with investment advisors and money managers, and not actually selecting individual investments. The family office may perform due diligence on investment managers and consultants, but not oversee the actual day-to-day management of the assets. The family office plays a vital role in the independent calculations and evaluation of performance — for each portfolio individually and for the entire portfolio collectively.
Family offices that do get involved with day-to-day asset management are typically those whose fortunes were built by managing investments and those that are so large (typically north of $1 billion) that they have built or acquired their own investment management staff.
The common tasks that a family office may oversee include:
Comprehensive oversight of family assets.
Contemporaneous recordkeeping of all financial assets.
Daily management of property and other real asset holdings.
Preparation of financial reports showing cash flow, income, gains, losses and statement of assets and liabilities.
Coordination of the advice and services received from all the clients other professionals.
Being responsible for implementation and ongoing management for each matter under oversight.
Offering personal concierge services to the family members for personal or business matters.
Family and entity governance and carrying out the wishes of the family matriarch or patriarch.
Oversight of philanthropic activities, foundations or gift trust accounts.
Each family has its own set of unique issues, and each family wants to delegate some or all these matters. But in the traditional family office, where the entity is owned and controlled by the family, there are typically no conflicts of interests or other profit-making activities. The entity’s sole purpose is service to the family. All in the families
The type of family office services that could be provided by a CPA firm is known as the multifamily office. The MFO is a professional services firm that delivers family office services for more than one family. The origin of the multifamily office comes from traditional family offices where the family decided to use their team to help others for a fee. But beyond a traditional family office that decides to serve others, many for-profit private enterprises have flourished in the multifamily office model, including progressive law and CPA firms.
The multifamily office frequently serves families less wealthy than the single family office, but performs many of the same critical functions with respect to the financial side of family life. For the CPA firm with clients whose net worth exceeds $50 million or so, this model offers the opportunity to deliver a very personal and important service for the right CPA firm. The right firm is likely to be already deeply involved in many families’ financial matters and often has a strong personal relationship with the founding or senior members of the family who may have created the wealth.
Of course, the accounting firms that serve these types of clients are frequently larger firms with old-school partners who want nothing to do with matters beyond accounting and tax. This is another matter that falls into the practice management category. But fortunately, as aging partners retire, the younger generation sees the benefit of delivering elevated levels of service to the firm’s better clients.
A multifamily office is intended to be a for-profit entity. And as such, before you as an individual or CPA firm decide to offer these services, you must carefully document your services, compensation methods and the required licenses, if any. You would also want to be sure that your E&O insurance policy provides adequate protection.
Smaller firms also service clients whose net worth exceeds $50 million, yet most seem “too busy” to elevate their services to the level of family office for their best clients. This is a lost opportunity to serve one of the firm’s best clients at the highest level, and deepen the relationship like no other service. If you still do not want in, at least help your client find a firm that is already set up to serve in this capacity.
Getting paid — and licensed
Many CPA firms are still tied to the hours and rates economy and will track their time and simply send bills each month based on the time spent. While this can work, it is not the most common method of compensation. More common than hourly would be flat fees for a list of covered services.
Some firms will also add fees for assets under management or oversight and help to interview and select the actual asset manager. If your firm also intends to offer asset management, consider segregating your fees for AUM versus traditional family office services. If the asset management division becomes significant, a separate entity may also make sense.
Be careful with the asset management part. You do not want to detract from the significant role of the basic family office and drag the relationship down to the less personal and significant commoditized services of asset management.
Whether your family office fees are based on hours or flat-fee billing, the issue of licensing will still apply. CPAs can avoid registration as an investment advisor if their investment advice or financial planning advice is merely incidental to the practice of public accounting, and not advisory in nature.
Naturally, this is a very subjective standard and many CPAs that I talk to do not register. For many firms, however, they could be dancing on the edge of a highly regulated industry and should seek professional counsel as to whether registration as an investment advisor would make sense.
Do not let the name “registered investment advisor” fool you: The registered investment advisor license and registration is the same license that covers all financial planners. You may be deemed by regulators to be practicing investment advice and financial planning to the extent that you get involved in matters such as shaping goals and objectives and providing advice that is more than incidental to the practice of accounting for the family wealth.
Registration as an investment advisor will also subject you to the same rules about compensation, marketing and audit as other financial services firms registered as RIAs, requiring a compliance professional or consultant. To the extent that you can move client money, have logins to financial accounts or have check-signing authority, your registration level will need to be upgraded to that of a custodian.
Some multifamily offices do oversee or manage assets for their family office clients. Offering these services is easier if you are already a larger investment advisory firm with experienced asset managers on staff. This often is not the profile of the typical CPA financial planning shop, and these are not the types of clients where you should be cutting your teeth in the investment advisory business. A model that makes sense here is to use your intelligence to oversee other managers and critically evaluate their offerings in terms of the criteria that you are looking to fill.
Whether your CPA firm has a vibrant wealth management division or not is irrelevant when it comes to offering family office services. The family office role for a CPA firm is just like outsourced CFO work, except for a family rather than an entity. Call it CAS for the wealthy family entity. As that outsourced CFO, you will also rely on other outside subject matter experts and coordinate their efforts so that nothing falls through the cracks.
Should you choose to work with another firm that calls itself a multifamily office, be careful. In my experience, I have seen many financial advisors — from the largest well-known name firms down to small shops who want to move upmarket — simply call themselves a family office without the experience, desire or services to warrant that title.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board issued a proposed accounting standards update Tuesday to establish authoritative guidance on the accounting for government grants received by business entities.
U.S. GAAP currently doesn’t provide specific authoritative guidance about the recognition, measurement, and presentation of a grant received by a business entity from a government. Instead, many businesses currently apply the International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation’s International Accounting Standard 20, Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance, by analogy, at least in part, to account for government grants.
In 2022 FASB issued an Invitation to Comment, Accounting for Government Grants by Business Entities—Potential Incorporation of IAS 20, Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance, into GAAP. In response, most of FASB’s stakeholders supported leveraging the guidance in IAS 20 to develop accounting guidance for government grants in GAAP, believing it would reduce diversity in practice because entities would apply the guidance instead of analogizing to it or other guidance, thus narrowing the variability in accounting for government grants.
The proposed ASU would leverage the guidance in IAS 20 with targeted improvements to establish guidance on how to recognize, measure, and present a government grant including (1) a grant related to an asset and (2) a grant related to income. It also would require, consistent with current disclosure requirements, disclosure about the nature of the government grant received, the accounting policies used to account for the grant, and significant terms and conditions of the grant, among others.
FASB is asking for comments on the proposed ASU by March 31, 2025.
“It will not be a cut and paste of IAS 20,” said FASB technical director Jackson Day during a session at Financial Executives International’s Current Financial Reporting Insights conference last week. “First of all, the scope is going to be a little bit different, probably a little bit more narrow. Second of all, the threshold of recognizing a government grant will be based on ‘probable,’ and ‘probable’ as we think of it in U.S. GAAP terms. We’re also going to do some work to make clarifications, etc. There is a little bit different thinking around the government grants for assets. There will be a deferred income approach or a cost accumulation approach that you can pick. And finally, there will be different disclosures because the disclosures will be based on what the board had previously issued, but it does leverage IAS 20. A few other things it does as far as reducing diversity. Most people analogized IAS 20. That was our anecdotal findings. But what does that mean? How exactly do they do that? This will set forth the specifics. It will also eliminate from the population those that were analogizing to ASC 450 or 958, because there were a few of those too. So it will go a long way in reducing diversity. It will also head down a model that will be generally internationally converged, which we still think about. We still collaborate with the staff [of the International Accounting Standards Board]. We don’t have any joint projects, but we still do our best when it makes sense to align on projects.”
Mauled Again (http://mauledagain.blogspot.com/): Not long ago, about a dozen states would seize property for failure to pay property taxes and, instead of simply taking their share of unpaid taxes, interest, and penalties and returning the excess to the property owner, they would pocket the entire proceeds of the sales. Did high court intervention stem this practice? Not so much.
Current Federal Tax Developments (https://www.currentfederaltaxdevelopments.com/): In Surk LLC v. Commissioner, the Tax Court was presented with the question of basis computations related to an interest in a partnership. The taxpayer mistakenly deducted losses that exceeded the limitation in IRC Sec. 704(d), raising the question: Should the taxpayer reduce its basis in subsequent years by the amount of those disallowed losses or compute the basis by treating those losses as if they were never deducted?
Parametric (https://www.parametricportfolio.com/blog): If your clients are using more traditional commingled products for their passive exposures, they may not know how much tax money they’re leaving on the table. A look at possible advantages of a separately managed account.
Turbotax (https://blog.turbotax.intuit.com): Whether they’re talking diversification, gainful hobby or income stream, what to remind them about the tax benefits of investing in real estate.
The National Association of Tax Professionals (https://blog.natptax.com/): Q&A from a recent webinar on day cares’ unique income and expense categories.
Boyum & Barenscheer (https://www.myboyum.com/blog/): For larger manufacturers, compliance under IRC 263A is essential. And for all manufacturers, effective inventory management goes beyond balancing stock levels. Key factors affecting inventory accounting for large and small manufacturing businesses.
Withum (https://www.withum.com/resources/): A look at the recent IRS Memorandum 2024-36010 that denied the application of IRC Sec. 245A to dividends received by a controlled foreign corporation.
PwC made a $1.5 million investment to Bryant University, in Smithfield, Rhode Island, to fund the launch of the PwC AI in Accounting Fellowship.
The experiential learning program allows undergraduate students to explore AI’s impact in accounting by way of engaging in research with faculty, corporate-sponsored projects and professional development that blends traditional accounting principles with AI-driven tools and platforms.
The first cohort of PwC AI in Accounting Fellows will be awarded to members of the Bryant Honors Program planning to study accounting. The fellowship funds can be applied to various educational resources, including conference fees, specialized data sheets, software and travel.
“Aligned with our Vision 2030 strategic plan and our commitment to experiential learning and academic excellence, the fellowship also builds upon PwC’s longstanding relationship with Bryant University,” Bryant University president Ross Gittell said in a statement. “This strong partnership supports institutional objectives and includes the annual PwC Accounting Careers Leadership Institute for rising high school seniors, the PwC Endowed Scholarship Fund, the PwC Book Fund, and the PwC Center for Diversity and Inclusion.”
Bob Calabro, a PwC US partner and 1988 Bryant University alumnus and trustee, helped lead the development of the program.
“We are excited to introduce students to the many opportunities available to them in the accounting field and to prepare them to make the most of those opportunities, This program further illustrates the strong relationship between PwC and Bryant University, where so many of our partners and staff began their career journey in accounting” Calabro said in a statement.
“Bryant’s Accounting faculty are excited to work with our PwC AI in Accounting Fellows to help them develop impactful research projects and create important experiential learning opportunities,” professor Daniel Ames, chair of Bryant’s accounting department, said in a statement. “This program provides an invaluable opportunity for students to apply AI concepts to real-world accounting, shaping their educational journey in significant ways.”