Connect with us

Accounting

The power of public criticism

Published

on

Complimentary Access Pill

Enjoy complimentary access to top ideas and insights — selected by our editors.

Management experts have long advised firm leaders to praise their people publicly and reprimand them privately. However, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, like Bridgewater founder Ray Dalio, advocates criticism in public.

As Huang describes in his new book The Nvidia Way, engaging in public criticism of your people fairly and constructively is a good way to normalize feedback. When public criticism becomes part of the company’s standard operating procedure, people no longer worry about humiliation and shame. As Huang explains, criticism is not the same as insulting. When done constructively, Huang argues that criticism is designed to help individuals and teams get better. 

From where I sit, public criticism can be constructive if the goal is to create a better firm and better client experience. Again, to make public criticism work for you, the first thing to do is normalize the feedback. Let’s face it: at most firms, people are not comfortable receiving constructive criticism about themselves or their colleagues — and that’s a problem. Because if you can get to the point that public criticism can be normalized at your firm, then your team can learn from each other’s mistakes. But if you keep all criticism private, no one can learn from it except the person being criticized — and many others will likely make the same mistake.

Instead, if you say: “Hey, we are going to have public criticism going forward. Not of the person, but potentially of the behavior or action.” That may make your people uncomfortable at first, but in the long run, public criticism will significantly accelerate learning at the firm level when you have shared mistakes.

Culture of accountability

In addition to normalizing feedback and accelerating learning through shared mistakes, public criticism is an excellent way to build a culture of accountability. An accountability culture is one in which everyone takes ownership of the things they do and say. Again, as a leader you must reinforce that the team is not going to be insulting each other. Instead, you’re going to be speaking openly and removing ambiguity by making expectations incredibly clear. And if there’s a problem, or if people are falling short, reaffirm that it’s OK to have these conversations in public. Because if you relegate all of your firm’s criticism to a private office, you’re impeding your team’s ability to learn and get better. And you’re making people fearful of open, unvarnished feedback.

As Nelson Mandela said, I never lose. I either win or learn.”

As I’ve found throughout my business (and parenting) career, growth only happens when you are willing to change and do something different than before. And the only way you will do that is if people are pointing out the things that need to be done differently. Winning is nice, but learning is more valuable.

The right way to criticize

I know some of you reading this article are ready to fire off comments about how public criticism creates a toxic culture. Again, being critical of something is different than insulting someone. By criticizing the right way, you won’t be damaging morale or creating a toxic culture. You need to be clear about what you’re criticizing, which is typically a specific point, with clear feedback about how to improve it. 

Again, the purpose of criticizing publicly is to make your firm better. You’re focusing on specific issues that must be fixed; you’re not denigrating someone’s character or threatening their compensation or job security. You’re not doing character assassinations or gaslighting them. Public criticism is not punishment. When engaging in public criticism, make it clear to everyone within earshot: “This is an opportunity for growth that we want you to have, but we don’t want to remove that opportunity for the rest of the firm.”

As I wrote in my article Autopsies without blame, you want to focus on the issue — not the person — to improve the performance of the firm. 

Real-world example

My team and I were recently in a group meeting with a client. The client said to one of the team members: “Hey, it’s great chatting with you; you’re always great about responding.” And then the client said somewhat jokingly to one of our seniors, “However, I do have a real problem getting hold of you,” while pointing directly at him. The client’s point was that our senior team needed to make themselves more available to clients. That was clearly a public criticism of our seniors and that as a client, she expected a higher degree of communication from senior people on the team. That dialogue was constructive for everyone involved. And we were able to go back and say: “OK, what do we need to adjust here to ensure that our most senior people are available to our best clients?”

Key takeaways

1. Make public criticism a regular part of your company’s culture and operations. Make it normal for people to communicate about things that have gone wrong. It’s not a one-time outburst or public humiliation exercise.

2. Celebrate accelerated learning through shared mistakes. 

3. Lean into the culture of accountability. 

Public criticism is an opportunity for growth, not a punishment. Once you frame it that way, it completely changes the way people communicate at your firm. Public criticism isn’t about protecting people’s feelings, it’s about delivering better experiences for clients and preventing multiple people from making the same mistakes. Tell anyone receiving public criticism: “We’re not talking about you as a person. We’re talking about an issue at hand. Let’s fix it together.”  By the way, this approach works just as well with remote teams and employees as it does in person.

It’s all about “wins and learns” in your regular team meetings. The lesson could be: Here was a mistake that occurred. This was negative feedback we got from a client. This was a mistake we made on a tax return. Here’s how it happened; here’s how we fixed it.” The win was that the client was very appreciative that we acknowledged the mistake and fixed it so quickly. You should feel comfortable discussing these things in public and encouraging your team to do the same.

Put mistakes on the open agenda and review them constructively rather than critically. That will go a long way to making continuous improvement part of your firm’s culture. The Japanese call that “kaizen” — getting 1% better every day.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending