Connect with us

Accounting

TIGTA helped save $6B, agency says

Published

on

The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration says it completed 1,032 investigations that contributed to savings of more than $6.1 billion from April through September of this year.

According to TIGTA’s Semiannual Report to Congress, the agency’s offices also issued some 60 reports during the six months touching on varied IRS activities and making recommendations for improvement, some of which the tax service agreed with and some of which it didn’t.

Among TIGTA reports from the period:

1. Staying above $400K. The IRS has made limited progress on the methodology to comply with a Treasury directive to not increase audits for taxpayers with incomes below $400,000. In the directive, which was issued in the wake of $24 billion of Inflation Reduction Act funds allocated to IRS enforcement activities, the Treasury Secretary stated that “enforcement resources will focus on high-end noncompliance.” 

Although the IRS and Treasury chose Tax Year 2018 for the base year, this report reads, as of May 2024, the IRS had yet to calculate the audit coverage for TY 2018 because it had not finalized its methodology for the audit coverage calculation. The IRS and Treasury have been exploring a range of options to develop a different methodology.

2. Hiring delays at the IRS. IRA funds allowed the IRS to expand its hiring; the agency was also granted multiple direct hire authorities to expedite hiring and fill job vacancies. From Oct. 1, 2021, to Sept. 30, 2023, the IRS processed nearly 53,000 new hires. Although the agency used multiple DHAs to expedite its hiring process to fill vacant positions, almost 19,000 of new hires in fiscal years 2022 and 2023 exceeded the Office of Personnel Management’s target of 80 calendar days to hire. 

Delays in hiring, according to the report, resulted from workload constraints and miscommunication, security checks exceeding their targeted completion time and limitations in the IRS’s hiring management system. TIGTA recommended corrective measures that the IRS agreed with.

3. Direct File issues. The Direct File Pilot deployed successfully but security and testing improvements are needed. The IRS launched the Direct File Pilot program on Feb. 1, implementing it to a limited scope of taxpayers. TIGTA found that during systems development, the Direct File Pilot team did not appropriately complete two of its required artifacts and that a later report was issued without the security assessment for the cloud platform where the Pilot resides, among other issues.

4. Serving the underserved. Opportunities remain for better taxpayer service to underserved communities. The IRS uses various models to identify the underserved, underrepresented and rural population, but has no clear definition for these populations, TIGTA found. Actions also need to be taken to ensure the success of the Lifting Communities Up initiative in expanding services and assistance to taxpayers in underserved populations, according to a separate report.

IRS headquarters in Washington, D.C.

5. Too big a footprint. The IRS still has unneeded office space. For FY24, the IRS indicated it would spend some $600 million on real estate costs, including 516 office buildings totaling some 22.3 million square feet, TIGTA found. In FY23, more than half of IRS buildings had a workstation occupancy rate of 50% or less. In addition, the service has not implemented workstation sharing/hoteling for some 61% of its employees. 

6. ERC issues. A little more than a year ago, the IRS placed a moratorium on processing new Employee Retention Credit claims due to a surge in  suspicious claims, updated its identity theft filters, and reported that it had identified more than 155,000 returns making potentially erroneous ERC claims, preventing $487 million in undeserved refunds. TIGTA noted that the IRS does not apply updated filters to tax returns that were previously screened using old criteria, identifying 997 returns reporting $19.6 million in potentially erroneous ERC that the IRS did not identify.

The IRS has implemented initiatives that assessed or prevented erroneous ERC amounts, preventing $1.6 billion in claims and allowed the agency to assess $573 million as of last April. TIGTA nonetheless identified an additional 923 entities that claimed credits worth $105 million that should have received a disallowance letter but were not initially identified by the IRS.

7. Other issues. Additional reports noted that:

  • Millions of taxpayers took early retirement distributions, but some did not pay the additional tax, claim an exception or report the income; 
  • The IRS has been unable to use some of its enforcement tools to match reported virtual currency-related income to taxpayers’ returns; and, 
  • Improvements are needed to ensure that local Taxpayer Advocate Service telephone lines are properly monitored.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

on

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance and Global Regulatory Harmonization in 2026

Published

on

Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.

Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.

Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.

Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.

This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.

Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.

By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.

Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.

Continue Reading

Trending