The Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Friday to implement Section 139E of the Tax Code, created by the Tribal General Welfare Exclusion Act of 2014, excluding from gross income the value of any Tribal general welfare benefit.
The 2014 law allows Tribal governments to provide nontaxable assistance and benefits to tribal members that are excludable from their gross income for federal income tax purposes. The proposed rules would provide that gross income does not include the value of any Indian general welfare benefit paid to or on behalf of a Tribal citizen of a Tribal Nation. They were the result of a historic level of three pre-regulation consultations with Tribal Nations and multi-year consultation with the Treasury Tribal Advisory Committee in partnership with Treasury’s Office of Tribal and Native Affairs, Office of Tax Policy, and the Internal Revenue Service.
A decade ago, Congress passed the Tribal General Welfare Exclusion Act of 2014 to provide an expanded general welfare exclusion specifically for Tribal programs that improved upon the historical administrative general welfare exclusion. The law also created the Treasury Tribal Advisory Committee (TTAC) to advise the Treasury Secretary on Tribal tax matters, and provided for audit suspensions on the Act’s enforcement until IRS field agents and Tribal Financial officers were trained on regulations.
Reflecting input from the TTAC and Tribal Leaders, the proposed regulations affirm the views of the Treasury and the IRS that the Indian Tribal governments themselves are in the best position to determine support for their Tribal citizens. Under the proposed regulations, Indian Tribal governments have flexibility to design general welfare programs that consider the Tribe’s unique cultural practices, history and traditions. In addition, the proposed regulations provide deference to Tribal governments on certain issues, including whether benefits are for the promotion of general welfare and whether benefits are provided in exchange for participation in cultural or ceremonial activities.
The proposed regs also address the statutory prohibition of “lavish or extravagant” Tribal general welfare benefits. The Treasury and the IRS agree with the TTAC and Tribal Leaders that whether a benefit is lavish or extravagant should be based on the facts and circumstances at the time the benefit is provided, including the Tribe’s culture, cultural practices, history, geographic area, traditions, resources and economic conditions or factors. The proposed regulations therefore provide that a benefit will be presumed to not be lavish or extravagant if it is described in, and provided in accordance with, written specified guidelines that Indian Tribal governments establish for their programs.
Section 3(b)(2) of the 2014 law requires consultation with the TTAC in establishing the required education and training of IRS employees and the provision of training and technical assistance to Tribal financial officers. Section 4 of the Act includes a temporary suspension of certain IRS enforcement actions.
Consistent with the TTAC and Tribal Leader comments, the proposed regulations provide that the temporary suspension of audits and examinations described in section 4 of the Act will not be lifted until the education and training prescribed by Section 3(b)(2) of the Act is completed.
Mauled Again (http://mauledagain.blogspot.com/): Not long ago, about a dozen states would seize property for failure to pay property taxes and, instead of simply taking their share of unpaid taxes, interest, and penalties and returning the excess to the property owner, they would pocket the entire proceeds of the sales. Did high court intervention stem this practice? Not so much.
Current Federal Tax Developments (https://www.currentfederaltaxdevelopments.com/): In Surk LLC v. Commissioner, the Tax Court was presented with the question of basis computations related to an interest in a partnership. The taxpayer mistakenly deducted losses that exceeded the limitation in IRC Sec. 704(d), raising the question: Should the taxpayer reduce its basis in subsequent years by the amount of those disallowed losses or compute the basis by treating those losses as if they were never deducted?
Parametric (https://www.parametricportfolio.com/blog): If your clients are using more traditional commingled products for their passive exposures, they may not know how much tax money they’re leaving on the table. A look at possible advantages of a separately managed account.
Turbotax (https://blog.turbotax.intuit.com): Whether they’re talking diversification, gainful hobby or income stream, what to remind them about the tax benefits of investing in real estate.
The National Association of Tax Professionals (https://blog.natptax.com/): Q&A from a recent webinar on day cares’ unique income and expense categories.
Boyum & Barenscheer (https://www.myboyum.com/blog/): For larger manufacturers, compliance under IRC 263A is essential. And for all manufacturers, effective inventory management goes beyond balancing stock levels. Key factors affecting inventory accounting for large and small manufacturing businesses.
Withum (https://www.withum.com/resources/): A look at the recent IRS Memorandum 2024-36010 that denied the application of IRC Sec. 245A to dividends received by a controlled foreign corporation.
PwC made a $1.5 million investment to Bryant University, in Smithfield, Rhode Island, to fund the launch of the PwC AI in Accounting Fellowship.
The experiential learning program allows undergraduate students to explore AI’s impact in accounting by way of engaging in research with faculty, corporate-sponsored projects and professional development that blends traditional accounting principles with AI-driven tools and platforms.
The first cohort of PwC AI in Accounting Fellows will be awarded to members of the Bryant Honors Program planning to study accounting. The fellowship funds can be applied to various educational resources, including conference fees, specialized data sheets, software and travel.
“Aligned with our Vision 2030 strategic plan and our commitment to experiential learning and academic excellence, the fellowship also builds upon PwC’s longstanding relationship with Bryant University,” Bryant University president Ross Gittell said in a statement. “This strong partnership supports institutional objectives and includes the annual PwC Accounting Careers Leadership Institute for rising high school seniors, the PwC Endowed Scholarship Fund, the PwC Book Fund, and the PwC Center for Diversity and Inclusion.”
Bob Calabro, a PwC US partner and 1988 Bryant University alumnus and trustee, helped lead the development of the program.
“We are excited to introduce students to the many opportunities available to them in the accounting field and to prepare them to make the most of those opportunities, This program further illustrates the strong relationship between PwC and Bryant University, where so many of our partners and staff began their career journey in accounting” Calabro said in a statement.
“Bryant’s Accounting faculty are excited to work with our PwC AI in Accounting Fellows to help them develop impactful research projects and create important experiential learning opportunities,” professor Daniel Ames, chair of Bryant’s accounting department, said in a statement. “This program provides an invaluable opportunity for students to apply AI concepts to real-world accounting, shaping their educational journey in significant ways.”
If the incoming Trump administration eliminates $7,500 federal tax credits for electric vehicles, that would mean the end of popular leases that allow U.S. consumers to sidestep restrictions on which EV models qualify for incentives.
President-elect Donald Trump’s transition team intends to revoke the tax credit for purchasing an EV, Reuters reported last week. Whether and when that could happen remains uncertain. A companion EV-leasing credit in the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act would have to be dealt with separately but is widely seen as vulnerable. So people hoping to acquire an electric car might want to act soon.
“If you’re on the fence, right now is probably going to be one of your better opportunities to buy or lease an EV at a good price, at least for a few years,” said Chris Harto, a senior policy analyst at Consumer Reports. “Some of the cheapest ways to get into an electric vehicle over the past year has been an EV lease.”
In October, leases accounted for 79% of EV sales at dealerships, according to Jessica Caldwell, executive director of insights at automotive research firm Edmunds.com Inc. “When you see the tax credit applied to a three-year lease combined with some of the generous incentives the automakers themselves are offering, the EV deals are pretty compelling,” she said.
This week, for instance, you can drive home a luxury electric BMW i4 for $460 a month, about the same price as leasing a middle-of-the-road gasoline Toyota Camry. Hyundai, meanwhile, is currently offering its sporty electric Ioniq 5 for $199 a month on a two-year lease.
Edmunds’ numbers don’t include automakers such as Tesla and Rivian that sell directly to consumers and that don’t release the percentage of their customers who opt for leases.
The IRA limits the purchase tax credit to electric vehicles assembled in North America and requires a percentage of battery components and critical minerals to originate there or in countries that have signed a free-trade agreement with the U.S.
But the sticker price can’t exceed $55,000 for a car or $80,000 for an SUV, and only households earning up to $300,000 annually and individuals making up to $150,000 can claim the tax credit. EVs such as the Chevrolet Equinox, Honda Prologue and Volkswagen ID.4 get the green light, but if buyers have their eye on models like the Hyundai Ioniq 5 or a Polestar 2 — which aren’t assembled in North America and don’t meet the battery and critical mineral requirements — they’re out of luck.
Unless they lease. Those restrictions don’t apply to the federal government’s commercial clean vehicle credit program, which allows fleet owners like automakers’ finance arms to claim the tax credit. That lets manufacturers entice customers by passing on the $7,500 savings in the form of lower lease payments.
Caldwell said leasing is also attractive to prospective EV drivers worried about the risk of purchasing a $50,000 car only to have its technology become outdated while still owing payments. “We’ve also seen pretty heavy depreciation for electric vehicles, so if you lease you’re not left holding the bag if the vehicle declines rapidly in value after three years,” she said.
If the lease loophole is closed, “EVs are going to have to sell on their own merit, which we know is always tough when there is a new technology and people still have concerns about battery longevity, range and infrastructure,” said Caldwell.
Congress would need to pass legislation to kill the EV tax credits, according to Romany Webb, deputy director of the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law at Columbia University. But absent Congressional action, she said Trump could order the IRS to revamp its guidance on how they are used.
The agency “could, for example, revise the list of vehicles that are eligible for the tax credits or add new procedures for claiming the credits,” said Webb. “That could make it more practically challenging for people to take advantage of the credits and, generally, introduce a lot of uncertainty and confusion that could make people less willing to purchase or lease EVs.”
Consumers aren’t the only ones who would feel the impact if the credits are tightened or repealed. “These tax credits are for consumers, but they’re also really for automakers so that they can scale up the production of electric vehicles and can remain competitive,” said Harto. “So while repealing the tax credit will hurt consumers, it probably hurts automakers even more.”