Connect with us

Accounting

UBS will pay $511M to end Credit Suisse US tax probe

Published

on

UBS Group AG agreed to pay $511 million to settle a U.S. investigation into how Credit Suisse Group, the Swiss bank it bought, helped rich Americans evade taxes even after pledging to stop the practice a decade ago. 

A Credit Suisse unit pleaded guilty to conspiring to help its customers hide more than $4 billion from the Internal Revenue Service in at least 475 offshore accounts, the Justice Department said. The U.S. also filed a criminal charge related to U.S. accounts booked at Credit Suisse AG Singapore, which it will drop if the bank cooperates sufficiently. 

The resolution ends a long-running scandal involving Credit Suisse, which used Swiss bank secrecy laws to help Americans hide money from the IRS for decades. Even after reaching a 2014 deal where it pledged to stop the practice, Credit Suisse helped U.S. taxpayers open and maintain accounts they didn’t declare to the IRS, hiding their assets and income. 

“Credit Suisse committed new crimes and breached the May 2014 plea agreement with the United States,” according to documents filed in federal court in Alexandria, Virginia. 

UBS shares were up 0.1% at 9:19 a.m. in Zurich, trading at 25.49 Swiss francs ($30.922).

Credit Suisse unlawfully helped clients hide assets, including a billionaire scion of a wealthy European family, according to the court filings, which didn’t name him. Given his holdings, Credit Suisse had the “highest obligation” to know as much about him as possible but failed to ask about his status, classify him as a U.S. taxpayer, or close his account, the bank said in the filing. 

“As early as 2010, the European billionaire was the subject of numerous news articles that identified him as a U.S. resident living in a mansion and referenced U.S. lawsuits in which he admitted to U.S. residency,” according to the court documents. “Credit Suisse kept the account open for years after it had definitive knowledge of the account holder’s US status.” 

Zero tolerance

UBS must continue to cooperate with the U.S. under the deal, which could expose other clients to prosecution.

“UBS was not involved in the underlying conduct and has zero tolerance for tax evasion,” the bank said in a statement. The bank declined to specify the precise impact that the settlement would have on second-quarter earnings. In its first-quarter report released on April 30, UBS said that its balance sheet reflected provisions for the matter that it believed to be appropriate, without giving an amount. 

The settlement by President Donald Trump’s Justice Department came after prosecutors under former President Joe Biden failed to resolve the case, despite pledging to crack down on repeat corporate offenders. 

Pressure mounted after a 2023 Senate Finance Committee report said there were “major violations” of Credit Suisse’s 2014 plea deal. It put the value of “thousands of previously undeclared accounts” valued at more than $1.3 billion – far below the $4 billion that the bank admitted on Monday. 

“This settlement fully vindicates the findings of my investigation,” Senator Ron Wyden, the ranking Democratic member of the Senate Finance Committee, said in a statement. “Ultra-wealthy and shady Swiss bankers shouldn’t get a free pass to cook up offshore tax evasion schemes when regular Americans are paying their fair share.”

Court documents detailed how Credit Suisse enabled tax cheating by Dan Horsky, an American business professor who pleaded guilty in 2016 to hiding more than $200 million in assets from the IRS. It also detailed how the bank helped a U.S.-Colombian family evade taxes.

Whistleblowers told the Senate committee that the family members held nearly $100 million at Credit Suisse for a decade before transferring those assets to other banks without telling the IRS. One family member, Gilda Rosenberg, pleaded guilty on March 10 to conspiring with two relatives to hide $90 million from the IRS between 2010 and 2017.

An attorney for the whistleblowers, Jeffrey Neiman, said their evidence “uncovered and exposed this ongoing misconduct” despite the risk it posed to them.

“Today, they feel vindicated — for telling the truth, for risking everything, and for standing up to one of the world’s most powerful financial institutions,” Neiman said. 

The tax resolution came after UBS received a key regulatory exemption to manage $11 billion in U.S. pension funds despite four previous convictions between UBS and Credit Suisse. On Jan. 15, the Labor Department granted a five-year extension to UBS of its status as a so-called Qualified Professional Asset Manager.

UBS secured the exemption despite the Labor Department noting the “scope, seriousness, and recurrent nature of UBS’ prohibited misconduct are unique,” according to a notice in the Federal Register. The agency cited the need for independent annual audits to ensure UBS adheres to “applicable fiduciary provisions” and “a strong culture of compliance.”

UBS said in its first-quarter report that it had a provision for potential costs tied to Credit Suisse’s compliance with the 2014 plea deal. It didn’t disclose an amount.

A Bloomberg Intelligence analysis estimated that more than a quarter of the group’s legal reserves of $3.85 billion at the end of March were for Credit Suisse cases in the U.S. UBS also had $2 billion in contingent liabilities relating to litigation, regulatory and similar matters for the Credit Suisse purchase.

The settlement comes amid fresh scrutiny of Credit Suisse’s history of handling Nazi-linked accounts. In December, the bank reinstated Neil Barofsky as an independent ombudsman to oversee its review of those accounts. The decision was announced by the Senate Budget Committee, which is probing Credit Suisse’s internal investigation.

“A clear-eyed and historically complete evaluation of Credit Suisse’s servicing of Nazi-linked accounts demands painful facts to be met head on, not swept aside,” Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa and Senator Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island said in a statement at the time.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending