Connect with us

Accounting

Lessons for tax professionals from the 2025 tax season

Published

on

Tax day concept. The USA tax due date marked on the calendar.

Natasa Adzic/stock.adobe.com

The 2025 filing season has been completed quietly, despite trepidation regarding the Internal Revenue Service’s ability to function effectively in the face of cuts in funding and staff

“It’s been pretty smooth,” according to Roger Harris, president of Padgett Business Services. “A very typical season. Of course, the last four or five days are always a challenge when all the procrastinators come in. There’s always a hiccup during the last week.”

One of the reasons it was smooth was a concerted effort to focus all IRS resources to make it smooth, according to Harris — an important lesson for the future.

(Read more: Struggles ahead for the IRS.)

“The IRS needs to have money and technology and people to work effectively,” he said. “It’s easy to pick on them, but the system wouldn’t work without them, so we need a well-functioning IRS. I don’t know how many people or dollars that takes — like many branches, they can probably do more with less — but we don’t want to cross over the line and become nonfunctional. Hopefully this smooth season is a harbinger of what’s coming.”

The ability of the agency to function effectively will be particularly important in the near future.

“There will be a massive tax bill, which will require the IRS to issue guidance and forms,” Harris explained. “They need the resources just to issue resources and to have the ability to process returns under the new rules. Once the law is passed, the burden is on the IRS to implement it. So many senior people and talented people have left, and we don’t know yet how well they will be able to function without them.”

Complexity for everyone

“It seems that no matter how well we have prepared for tax season with education, conferences, chats, what we can never be ready for is America’s changing taxpayer,” said Beanna Whitlock, managing member and executive director of Tax Pro Fellowship LLC, and former director of national public liaison for the IRS. “I remember when my parents went to the ‘tax man’ to have their taxes done. Normally they went just as soon as my dad got his W-2, because of the small refund they expected, which would normally fund our modest summer vacation. Now taxpayers are looking for the ‘great giveaway,’ whether it is the Earned Income Tax Credit, energy credits or the Child Tax Credit. Almost every taxpayer has a credit available to them. Those that partook of the advanced premium tax credit for health insurance through the exchange were shocked at having to pay some back — in many cases, this was a lot of money. Taxpayers do not understand the complexity of anything that has to do with federal, and in some cases, state tax complexity.”

Whitlock summarized her lessons learned during the busy season:

  • Know your client. Much of this knowledge will come from requiring a deposit on the work to be done. If they balk now, imagine their attitude when the work is finished.
  • Do not feel sorry for your client. You didn’t make their decisions nor were you consulted. The tax professional’s job is to prepare a complete and accurate tax return and, in the process, educate clients about our tax system. 

“Our service to America’s taxpayers is of quality return preparation, and representation of our taxpayer at the highest level,” she said. “When we look in the mirror we should like who we see.”
For those who work primarily with individual and family office clients, tax season begins in late November and December, prior to the beginning of the traditional tax season period, according to Jim Guarino, managing director at Top 100 Firm Baker Newman Noyes. 

“This is primarily due to the concentrated efforts we spend working with our clients to do year-end tax planning,” he explained. “Most tax seasons include a series of ebbs and flows beginning with year-end tax planning in late fall and continuing into mid-January when fourth quarter estimated tax payments are due. We then experience a minor lull between mid-January and mid-February as clients begin to receive their tax forms and assemble their documents. We typically notice an uptick in client correspondence in late February, which then leads to a period of nonstop tax preparation activity for the final six weeks of tax season, culminating on April 15.”

(Read more: Tax season is over; now comes the hard part.)

Guarino agreed with Harris that the 2025 season was fairly smooth: “This past tax season felt like a traditionally typical tax season without any notable hiccups or announcements other than the disaster relief provisions the IRS put in place to assist communities impacted by natural disasters in 2024 and early 2025. Although this past season was relatively uneventful, especially in comparison to tax seasons past, there are always lessons to be learned.”

That doesn’t mean it didn’t offer lessons, however, he said. “There was less client anxiety about the December 2025 expiration date of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act,” said Guarino. “Although nothing has officially changed, there was less concern about initiating early 2025 tax planning. Taxable income spikes — required minimum distributions and capital gains — were higher than in 2023. Many of my retiree clients reported substantially larger 2024 RMDs and capital gain distributions (mutual funds) along with increased realized capital gains in their investment portfolios. This resulted in clients incurring higher tax liabilities in 2024 compared to 2023. 

The importance of thinking ahead

Proper prior planning, of course, can prevent those shocks.

“For many of our planning clients who had balances due, it was not a surprise, due to the year-end planning we did in November,” Guarino continued. “This prevented April tax trauma, and gave their investment advisors time to accumulate cash so they would have the necessary cash available to make their April tax payments.”

“There was an uptick in the number of clients requesting additional tax planning and tax advisory services,” he added. “In effect, clients are looking for holistic financial planning advice, much of which is centered on how taxes impact their financial decisions. The more frequently requested client inquiries included business owners requesting business succession and retirement planning advice, pre-retirement couples requesting advice on traditional IRA rollover and Roth IRA conversion planning, Social Security claiming options, and IRMAA threshold planning [income-related monthly adjustment amount for Medicare Part B and Part D premiums].”

Guarino described a situation in which the firm’s experience and curiosity saved a client thousands of dollars.

“We encountered an unusual situation concerning a Form 1099 reporting error for one of our clients,” he said. “We noticed a substantial short-term capital gain from the sale of three blue-chip type securities during one of our client engagements. The cost basis was extremely low and was not consistent with the fair market value of the securities during 2024. We suspected that the tax basis only represented the cost for an option to purchase the security instead of the actual price, and asked the client’s investment advisor to review whether the assigned tax basis was correct.”

On further review, they determined that the securities sold were the result of a previous stock split, the original stock had been purchased decades earlier, and the allocated tax basis to the news shares was minimal. 

“This explained the very low tax basis assigned to the security sales but did not explain the short-term category of the gains,” Guarino said. “We believed the gain should have been long-term gains, not short-term. If left uncorrected, the client’s short-term capital gain would have been taxed at a 37% tax rate compared to a 15% rate. The difference in federal tax liability would have amounted to more than $15,000.”

“We’ll never know if this reporting error would have been caught by our client if they had prepared their own return, or by a less-experienced tax preparer,” he concluded. “Would most taxpayers have simply input the $70,000 short-term capital gain into their software and not questioned the appropriateness of the 1099 reporting? It was gratifying that our firm’s review process and sense of professional curiosity resulted in our client saving that amount.”

Risks on the rise

The big news from this tax season is that liability claims for tax services are really up, according to John Raspante, senior vice president and director of risk management at McGowanPro. Until this past tax season, Raspante kept a small CPA practice in addition to his work as an insurance executive. 

Part of the reason for the rise is that a lot of firms stopped doing audit work. “Audit engagements just weren’t profitable, especially in government engagements,” he said. “There is not much in the way of fees, and it’s not worth the time needed to satisfy professional standards.”

“Moreover, taxes are not getting any easier,” he observed. “Staffing has caused problems, and although outsourcing has helped, there are still issues. Without outsourcing it could be a perfect storm — lack of staff combined with increased oversight by authorities, including audits and exams. Tax claims continue to be the most common, but they’re the smallest in dollar amount.”

More broadly, Raspante foresees more changes in ownership of accounting firms coming through private equity, as has been the case in other professions, such as dental practices. 

“I get calls about this almost daily,” he said. “It’s a switch in traditional succession planning. Different states have different rules, but as long as the firm is 51% owned by CPAs, it’s good. The problem from a liability standpoint is the fact that down the road, clients may use this as a factor once their liability goes before a jury. Where non-CPAs are involved could be an element of concern.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending