Finance

UK to introduce stablecoin law in ‘months’: Circle’s Dante Disparte

Published

8 months ago

October 23, 2024

Launched in 2018 by crypto firm Circle, USDC is now the second-biggest stablecoin globally, with more than $30 billion worth of tokens in circulation.

Nurphoto | Getty Images

LONDON — The U.K. is likely to see stablecoin laws introduced in a matter of “months, not years,” according to crypto firm Circle’s top policy executive.

Dante Disparte, Circle’s global head of policy, said that he sees the U.K. will soon bring in legislation for stablecoins, a type of cryptocurrency that aims to maintain a constant peg to government currencies such as the U.S. dollar or British pound

“I think we’re within months, not years” of formal laws for the stablecoin market being introduced, Disparte told CNBC in an interview last week during a visit to London.

The Treasury and the Bank of England were not immediately available for comment when contacted by CNBC.

Disparte suggested the U.K.’s lengthier approach to introducing laws targeted at crypto may have been a good thing given events that transpired in 2022, such as the collapse of FTX, a crypto exchange once worth worth $32 billion, as well as other industry crises.

“You could also look back, and I think many in the U.K. and in other countries would argue that they’re vindicated in not having jumped in too quickly and fully regulating and bringing the environment onshore because of all the issues we’ve seen in crypto over the last few years,” Disparte said.

However, he added that more recently, there’s been a sense of urgency to introduce formal regulations for stablecoins, as well as trading in digital assets and other crypto-related activities.

By not bringing forth stablecoin-specific rules, the U.K. would risk missing out on the benefits of the technology. He added that the U.K. has some catching up to do with the European Union, which has begun enforcing regulation of stablecoins under its MiCa, or Markets in Crypto Assets, regulation. Singapore has also agreed formal laws for the stablecoin industry.

“In the spirit of protecting the U.K. economy from excess risk and crypto, there’s also a point in time in which you end up protecting the economy from job creation and the industries of the future,” Disparte said. He stressed that “you can’t have the economy of the future unless you have the money of the future.”

Among the benefits cited by Disparte are innovation in the wholesale banking industry, real-time payments, and the digitization of the British pound.

Officials at the Bank of England are currently exploring whether or not to introduce a digital version of the pound, which has previously been dubbed “Britcoin” by the media.

How a $60 billion crypto collapse got regulators worried

Dante said he had met with officials from the Bank of England recently and was reassured by their approach to so-called central bank digital currencies, or CBDCs.

What has the UK done so far?

Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s predecessor, Rishi Sunak, had previously envisioned Britain becoming a global crypto hub.

When the Conservative Party was in power, U.K. government officials had signaled that new legislation for stablecoins as well as crypto-related services such as staking, exchange and custody would be in place as early as June or July.

In April, the former government announced plans to become a “world leader” in the crypto space, outlining plans to bring stablecoins into the regulatory fold and consult on a regime for regulating trading of cryptoassets, like bitcoin.

Last October, Sunak’s administration issued a response to a consultation on regulation of the crypto industry, saying it would aim to introduce “phase 2 secondary legislation” in 2024, subject to parliamentary approval.

The new Labour government hasn’t been as vocal as the Conservatives were on crypto regulation. In January, the party released a plan for financial services, which included a proposal to make the U.K. a securities tokenization hub.

Securities tokens are digital assets that represent ownership of a real-world financial asset, such as a share or bond.

Stablecoins are a multibillion industry, worth more than $170 billion, according to CoinGecko data. Tether’s USDT token is the largest stablecoin by value, with a market capitalization of over $120 billion. Circle’s USDC is the second-largest, with the combined value of coins in circulation worth over $34 billion.

However, the market has been shrouded in controversies in the past. In 2022, Tether’s USDT dropped from its $1 peg after a rival stablecoin, terraUSD, collapsed to zero. The events raised doubts over whether USDT was truly backed 1:1 by an equal amount of dollars and other assets in Tether’s reserves.

For its part, Tether says its coin is backed by dollars and dollar-equivalent assets, including government bonds, at all times.

Finance

Stocks making the biggest moves midday: WOOF, TSLA, CRCL, LULU

Published

23 hours ago

June 6, 2025

Business Finance News

Finance

Swiss government proposes tough new capital rules in major blow to UBS

Published

1 day ago

June 6, 2025

Business Finance News

A sign in German that reads “part of the UBS group” in Basel on May 5, 2025.

Fabrice Coffrini | AFP | Getty Images

The Swiss government on Friday proposed strict new capital rules that would require banking giant UBS to hold an additional $26 billion in core capital, following its 2023 takeover of stricken rival Credit Suisse.

The measures would also mean that UBS will need to fully capitalize its foreign units and carry out fewer share buybacks.

“The rise in the going-concern requirement needs to be met with up to USD 26 billion of CET1 capital, to allow the AT1 bond holdings to be reduced by around USD 8 billion,” the government said in a Friday statement, referring to UBS’ holding of Additional Tier 1 (AT1) bonds.

The Swiss National Bank said it supported the measures from the government as they will “significantly strengthen” UBS’ resilience.

“As well as reducing the likelihood of a large systemically important bank such as UBS getting into financial distress, this measure also increases a bank’s room for manoeuvre to stabilise itself in a crisis through its own efforts. This makes it less likely that UBS has to be bailed out by the government in the event of a crisis,” SNB said in a Friday statement.

‘Too big to fail’

UBS has been battling the specter of tighter capital rules since acquiring the country’s second-largest bank at a cut-price following years of strategic errors, mismanagement and scandals at Credit Suisse.

The shock demise of the banking giant also brought Swiss financial regulator FINMA under fire for its perceived scarce supervision of the bank and the ultimate timing of its intervention.

Swiss regulators argue that UBS must have stronger capital requirements to safeguard the national economy and financial system, given the bank’s balance topped $1.7 trillion in 2023, roughly double the projected Swiss economic output of last year. UBS insists it is not “too big to fail” and that the additional capital requirements — set to drain its cash liquidity — will impact the bank’s competitiveness.

At the heart of the standoff are pressing concerns over UBS’ ability to buffer any prospective losses at its foreign units, where it has, until now, had the duty to back 60% of capital with capital at the parent bank.

Higher capital requirements can whittle down a bank’s balance sheet and credit supply by bolstering a lender’s funding costs and choking off their willingness to lend — as well as waning their appetite for risk. For shareholders, of note will be the potential impact on discretionary funds available for distribution, including dividends, share buybacks and bonus payments.

“While winding down Credit Suisse’s legacy businesses should free up capital and reduce costs for UBS, much of these gains could be absorbed by stricter regulatory demands,” Johann Scholtz, senior equity analyst at Morningstar, said in a note preceding the FINMA announcement.

“Such measures may place UBS’s capital requirements well above those faced by rivals in the United States, putting pressure on returns and reducing prospects for narrowing its long-term valuation gap. Even its long-standing premium rating relative to the European banking sector has recently evaporated.”