Individuals and businesses in Puerto Rico and South Dakota who were hit with severe weather earlier this year now have until Feb. 3 to file various federal individual and business tax returns and make tax payments.
The same relief, which applies to all of Puerto Rico and parts of South Dakota, will be available to any other areas added later to the disaster area. The IRS is offering relief to any area designated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the current list of eligible localities is on the tax relief in disaster situations page on IRS.gov.
Individuals and businesses in any of Puerto Rico’s 78 municipalities who were affected by Tropical Storm Ernesto, which began on Aug. 13, qualify for relief that postpones various tax filing and payment deadlines that occurred from last Aug. 13 through Feb. 3, 2025.
Affected individuals and businesses will have until next Feb. 3 to file returns and pay any taxes that were originally due during this period. For example, the February deadline applies to:
Any individual, business or tax-exempt organization that has a valid extension to file their 2023 federal return. Payments on these returns are not eligible for the extra time because they were due last spring, before Ernesto.
Quarterly estimated income tax payments normally due on Sept. 16, 2024, and Jan. 15, 2025.
Quarterly payroll and excise tax returns normally due on Oct. 31, 2024, and Jan. 31, 2025.
Penalties for failing to make payroll and excise tax deposits due on or after Aug. 13 and before Aug. 28, 2024, will also be abated if the deposits are made by Aug. 28, 2024. In South Dakota, individuals and businesses affected by severe storms, straight-line winds and flooding that began last June 16 also now have until Feb. 3, 2025, to file various federal individual and business tax returns and make tax payments.
Individuals who have households that reside or have a business in Aurora, Bennett, Bon Homme, Brule, Buffalo, Charles Mix, Clay, Davison, Douglas, Gregory, Hand, Hanson, Hutchinson, Jackson, Lake, Lincoln, McCook, Miner, Minnehaha, Moody, Sanborn, Tripp, Turner, Union and Yankton Counties qualify.
The relief postpones various tax filing and payment deadlines that occurred from June 16, 2024, through Feb. 3, 2025; affected individuals and businesses have until Feb. 3, 2025, to file returns and pay any taxes originally due during this period.
The February deadline in South Dakota will apply to:
Any individual, business or tax-exempt organization that has a valid extension to file their 2023 federal return. Again, payments on these returns are ineligible for the extra time because they were due last spring, before the storms.
Quarterly estimated income tax payments normally due on June 17 and Sept. 16, 2024, and Jan. 15, 2025.
Quarterly payroll and excise tax returns normally due on July 31 and Oct. 31, 2024, and Jan. 31, 2025.
In addition, penalties for failing to make payroll and excise tax deposits due on or after June 16, 2024, and before July 1, 2024, will be abated as long as the deposits were made by last July 1. The IRS disaster assistance and emergency relief for individuals and businesses page has details on other returns, payments and tax-related actions qualifying for relief during the postponement period.
The IRS automatically provides filing and penalty relief to any taxpayer with an address of record in the disaster area. If an affected taxpayer does not have an address in the area (because, for example, they moved to the area after filing their return), and they receive a late-filing or late-payment penalty notice from the IRS for the postponement period, they should call the number on the notice to have the penalty abated.
The IRS will work with any taxpayer who lives outside the disaster area but has records necessary to meet a deadline occurring during the postponement period in the affected area. Qualifying taxpayers who live outside the disaster area should call the IRS at (866) 562-5227, including workers assisting the relief activities who are with a recognized government or philanthropic organization.
Individuals and businesses in a federally declared disaster area who suffered uninsured or unreimbursed disaster-related losses can choose to claim them on either the return for the year the loss occurred (in these instances, the 2024 return normally filed next year) or the return for the prior year (2023).
Taxpayers have up to six months after the due date of the taxpayer’s federal income tax return for the disaster year (without regard to any extension of time to file) to make the election. Write the FEMA declaration number — 3610-EMfor Puerto Rico, 4807-DR for South Dakota — on any return claiming a loss.
PwC made a $1.5 million investment to Bryant University, in Smithfield, Rhode Island, to fund the launch of the PwC AI in Accounting Fellowship.
The experiential learning program allows undergraduate students to explore AI’s impact in accounting by way of engaging in research with faculty, corporate-sponsored projects and professional development that blends traditional accounting principles with AI-driven tools and platforms.
The first cohort of PwC AI in Accounting Fellows will be awarded to members of the Bryant Honors Program planning to study accounting. The fellowship funds can be applied to various educational resources, including conference fees, specialized data sheets, software and travel.
“Aligned with our Vision 2030 strategic plan and our commitment to experiential learning and academic excellence, the fellowship also builds upon PwC’s longstanding relationship with Bryant University,” Bryant University president Ross Gittell said in a statement. “This strong partnership supports institutional objectives and includes the annual PwC Accounting Careers Leadership Institute for rising high school seniors, the PwC Endowed Scholarship Fund, the PwC Book Fund, and the PwC Center for Diversity and Inclusion.”
Bob Calabro, a PwC US partner and 1988 Bryant University alumnus and trustee, helped lead the development of the program.
“We are excited to introduce students to the many opportunities available to them in the accounting field and to prepare them to make the most of those opportunities, This program further illustrates the strong relationship between PwC and Bryant University, where so many of our partners and staff began their career journey in accounting” Calabro said in a statement.
“Bryant’s Accounting faculty are excited to work with our PwC AI in Accounting Fellows to help them develop impactful research projects and create important experiential learning opportunities,” professor Daniel Ames, chair of Bryant’s accounting department, said in a statement. “This program provides an invaluable opportunity for students to apply AI concepts to real-world accounting, shaping their educational journey in significant ways.”
If the incoming Trump administration eliminates $7,500 federal tax credits for electric vehicles, that would mean the end of popular leases that allow U.S. consumers to sidestep restrictions on which EV models qualify for incentives.
President-elect Donald Trump’s transition team intends to revoke the tax credit for purchasing an EV, Reuters reported last week. Whether and when that could happen remains uncertain. A companion EV-leasing credit in the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act would have to be dealt with separately but is widely seen as vulnerable. So people hoping to acquire an electric car might want to act soon.
“If you’re on the fence, right now is probably going to be one of your better opportunities to buy or lease an EV at a good price, at least for a few years,” said Chris Harto, a senior policy analyst at Consumer Reports. “Some of the cheapest ways to get into an electric vehicle over the past year has been an EV lease.”
In October, leases accounted for 79% of EV sales at dealerships, according to Jessica Caldwell, executive director of insights at automotive research firm Edmunds.com Inc. “When you see the tax credit applied to a three-year lease combined with some of the generous incentives the automakers themselves are offering, the EV deals are pretty compelling,” she said.
This week, for instance, you can drive home a luxury electric BMW i4 for $460 a month, about the same price as leasing a middle-of-the-road gasoline Toyota Camry. Hyundai, meanwhile, is currently offering its sporty electric Ioniq 5 for $199 a month on a two-year lease.
Edmunds’ numbers don’t include automakers such as Tesla and Rivian that sell directly to consumers and that don’t release the percentage of their customers who opt for leases.
The IRA limits the purchase tax credit to electric vehicles assembled in North America and requires a percentage of battery components and critical minerals to originate there or in countries that have signed a free-trade agreement with the U.S.
But the sticker price can’t exceed $55,000 for a car or $80,000 for an SUV, and only households earning up to $300,000 annually and individuals making up to $150,000 can claim the tax credit. EVs such as the Chevrolet Equinox, Honda Prologue and Volkswagen ID.4 get the green light, but if buyers have their eye on models like the Hyundai Ioniq 5 or a Polestar 2 — which aren’t assembled in North America and don’t meet the battery and critical mineral requirements — they’re out of luck.
Unless they lease. Those restrictions don’t apply to the federal government’s commercial clean vehicle credit program, which allows fleet owners like automakers’ finance arms to claim the tax credit. That lets manufacturers entice customers by passing on the $7,500 savings in the form of lower lease payments.
Caldwell said leasing is also attractive to prospective EV drivers worried about the risk of purchasing a $50,000 car only to have its technology become outdated while still owing payments. “We’ve also seen pretty heavy depreciation for electric vehicles, so if you lease you’re not left holding the bag if the vehicle declines rapidly in value after three years,” she said.
If the lease loophole is closed, “EVs are going to have to sell on their own merit, which we know is always tough when there is a new technology and people still have concerns about battery longevity, range and infrastructure,” said Caldwell.
Congress would need to pass legislation to kill the EV tax credits, according to Romany Webb, deputy director of the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law at Columbia University. But absent Congressional action, she said Trump could order the IRS to revamp its guidance on how they are used.
The agency “could, for example, revise the list of vehicles that are eligible for the tax credits or add new procedures for claiming the credits,” said Webb. “That could make it more practically challenging for people to take advantage of the credits and, generally, introduce a lot of uncertainty and confusion that could make people less willing to purchase or lease EVs.”
Consumers aren’t the only ones who would feel the impact if the credits are tightened or repealed. “These tax credits are for consumers, but they’re also really for automakers so that they can scale up the production of electric vehicles and can remain competitive,” said Harto. “So while repealing the tax credit will hurt consumers, it probably hurts automakers even more.”
The International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation and its International Sustainability Standards Board released a new sustainability guide Tuesday.
The guide can help companies identify and disclose material information about sustainability-related risks and opportunities that could reasonably be expected to affect their cash flows, their access to finance or cost of capital over the short, medium or long term.
Investors and global capital markets are increasingly requesting such information to inform investment decision making. The guide focuses on helping companies understand how the concept of sustainability-related risks and opportunities is described in IFRS S1, the ISSB’s sustainability disclosure standard, including how these can come from a company’s dependencies and impacts. Those dependencies and impacts on resources and relationships can lead to sustainability-related risks and opportunities that could reasonably be expected to affect its prospects.
The guide discusses how companies applying ISSB standards can benefit from the process they might already follow in making materiality judgments when preparing financial statements, particularly when applying IFRS accounting standards. The IFRS Foundation oversees both the ISSB and the International Accounting Standards Board.
The guide describes the process a company can follow which is closely aligned with the four-step process illustrated in the IASB’s IFRS Practice Statement 2: Making Materiality Judgments. As a result, although the ISSB standards can be used with any generally accepted accounting principles, those companies already applying IFRS accounting standards — in over 140 jurisdictions worldwide — as well as those such as in the U.S. where there is strong alignment with a focus on providing material information to investors, will be particularly well prepared to apply the concept of materiality using ISSB standards.
The guide also discusses some of the considerations a company might make to drive connectivity between sustainability-related financial disclosures and a company’s financial statements. For those looking to meet the information needs of a wider set of stakeholders, it provides considerations for those applying ISSB standards alongside European Sustainability Reporting Standards or Global Reporting Initiative standards.