Connect with us

Accounting

What tech vendors can learn from CPAs and their practices

Published

on

In the first two parts of this series (here and here), we explored what accounting firms can learn from accounting technology vendors. The first article discussed how vendor business models can inspire accountants to rethink their approaches to innovation and client experience, and the second article highlighted approaches tech companies use in talent management to attract and retain top talent. Now, in a reverse Uno move, let’s explore three ways vendors can learn from CPAs.

1. Camaraderie and Knowledge Sharing in Competition

Technology has introduced a wide array of tools and efficiencies to the accounting field, helping firms tackle capacity challenges and enabling accountants to work faster and more efficiently. The rapid pace of tech innovation has opened doors for transformative solutions—but also brought an overwhelming influx of vendors competing for attention. Given the overlapping nature of solutions, some vendors’ inclination is to take a zero-sum competition mode.

This doesn’t have to be the norm for competitors. Anyone attending events from major alliances and associations, such as the ITA Collective in Palm Springs last week, would quickly notice a striking phenomenon: leaders of competing CPA firms exchanging insights, strategies, and best practices. This openness exists because CPAs understand a fundamental truth—a rising tide lifts all boats. In a field with abundant work and too few qualified professionals, it’s in everyone’s interest to support one another, to collectively advance the profession.

Technology vendors could benefit from adopting this mindset. Tech companies, coming from varied backgrounds—some deeply rooted in the accounting profession, others arriving from different industries—are sometimes accustomed to protecting their innovations tightly. But accounting tech is different. Here, many vendors have simultaneously overlapping, complementary, and competitive features in their products. Acknowledging this dynamic and committing to a connected technology ecosystem can foster a more robust, sustainable market with greater revenue potential and deeper client trust. Adopting a collaborative approach will ultimately prove more valuable than a closed, competitive stance in our profession.

2. Integration with Local Communities

CPA firms have a special bond with the communities they serve. As trusted advisors, CPAs become pillars of their communities, guiding local businesses and individuals through complex financial landscapes. Their relationships with clients are often both professional and personal, rooted in a strong commitment to nurturing the community relationship as a whole.

Let’s compare this with the tech startups that are rooted in the city that I call home today: San Francisco. A city at the heart of the generative AI boom in Silicon Valley, San Francisco is a global epicenter of tech innovation. Yet it also highlights the disconnect between technology-driven wealth and broader community wellbeing. The waves of technology workers and hackers who are furiously working to build the future yet have little community involvement have led to uneven benefits (and also inspired the term “tech bros”).

Local community integration isn’t just about fostering goodwill; it’s a solid business strategy. 

Rooting a business in its community can lead to more empathetic product design and better team cohesion, and an edge in recruiting for the office hubs.

When naming my consulting firm, I chose the name Edgefield Group, inspired by the street I grew up on—Edgefield Street—to reflect the foundational sense of place and rootedness that CPAs embody in their work. Vendors could adopt this principle, fostering meaningful relationships within communities and embracing a relational approach that considers the broader impacts of their technology.

3. Slowing Down to Speed Up: Responsible Innovation

CPAs are known for their conservatism and for their role as stewards of financial data—a role that often requires a level of caution and accountability. This is in stark contrast to tech’s rapid development culture, famously epitomized by Meta CEO’s Mark Zuckerberg’s “move fast and break things” philosophy. While speed and disruption can yield breakthroughs, this approach doesn’t translate well to fields like finance and accounting, where trust and reliability are paramount.

The accounting profession’s cautious, deliberate nature offers a valuable counterpoint to the fast-paced culture of tech, especially regarding emerging technologies like AI and fintech. Take, for example, the recent AICPA Executive Roundtable, which focused on the theme of Responsible AI. This forum allowed vendors and CPA leaders to thoughtfully discuss the responsible use of AI in the profession, emphasizing the importance of anticipating potential risks and considering the long-term implications of technology.

Slowing down may seem counterintuitive, but it creates space for meaningful dialogue, ethical reflection, and deliberate innovation that will advance the technology realm faster. By embracing the “slow down to speed up” principle, tech vendors can craft solutions with a long-term view, protecting and upholding the profession’s values while still meeting the demand for efficiency and innovation. There is a growing need for companies to adopt this mindset, recognizing that sometimes the most responsible—and ultimately most profitable—way forward is to ensure every step is taken with care and consideration.

Conclusion

As the tech and accounting worlds continue to converge, it’s clear that each has much to learn from the other. While accounting firms can gain agility and fresh ideas from tech companies, vendors would do well to emulate CPAs’ collaborative spirit, commitment to community, and cautious approach to innovation.

Ultimately, by embracing these values, tech vendors have an opportunity to create greater value for the industry and the world. Whether through collaborative knowledge-sharing, local community involvement, or thoughtful, responsible development, these lessons from CPAs offer a pathway for vendors to foster sustainable growth and contribute meaningfully to the profession they serve.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending