Connect with us

Personal Finance

What you need to know

Published

on

Julpo | E+ | Getty Images

When it comes time to make a purchase, which credit card you use could soon determine how much you pay.

A new settlement announced this week would end a longstanding dispute between businesses and Visa and Mastercard over credit card “swipe” fee practices.

Swipe fees are charged to retailers, service providers and other merchants each time a customer uses their card. Banks and card companies typically levy about 2% or more for every transaction, according to the National Retail Federation. 

Previously, merchants had to “honor all cards” on a network — for example, if they accept one Visa credit card, then they must accept all Visa cards regardless of swipe fee rates charged. Under the proposed settlement, they can reject those cards with high fees to save their bottom line. What’s more, merchants may be able to charge customers different fees depending on which credit card they use. 

“This is a fight between banks and merchants, and consumers are caught in the middle, said Ted Rossman, senior industry analyst at Bankrate.

Read more CNBC personal finance coverage

Roughly 175 million consumers have at least one credit card, making it the most common method of making a purchase, according to TransUnion. Rewards cards are by far the most popular kind of plastic — about 85% of the credit cards issued today are rewards cards, the National Retail Federation also found.

The longstanding battle over swipe fees

Merchants have been battling with card issuers over what they’ve called a “cartel-like pricing practice” for two decades, according to Doug Kantor, an executive committee member at the Merchants Payments Coalition. 

In 2005, retailers and other merchants filed a class-action lawsuit against Visa and Mastercard, which control 80% of the market, alleging that their fees and acceptance terms were anti-competitive. 

Monday’s settlement is the potential conclusion after 20 years of litigation over the fees that banks and credit card companies charge to process payments. “We believe that this is the best resolution for all parties, delivering the clarity, flexibility and consumer protections that were sought in this effort,” a spokesperson for Mastercard said in a statement. Visa did not respond to a request for comment.

Credit card debt?

Under the settlement, credit cards would be classified into three categories:

  • commercial cards
  • premium cards, including rewards cards
  • standard, no-rewards cards

Merchants could then choose which categories to accept, but must still accept all cards within a category. Merchants can also add a surcharge of up to 3% to customers’ bills for paying by credit card. Finally, the settlement caps the fees that banks, as well as Visa and Mastercard, can charge merchants.

The proposed settlement is still months away from being put into practice, and it must be approved by the court, which already rejected a previous agreement. But eventually, experts say, changes may be in store for credit card users. 

Consumers' debt dilemma: Here's what to know

The settlement could make it more common to have certain rewards cards rejected at some retailers, similar to how Costco doesn’t accept American Express cards for purchases, said a person with knowledge of the thinking of a major U.S. bank.

This person, who asked to remain anonymous to speak candidly, said that the ultimate ramifications weren’t yet clear as it involves active litigation. But banks are upset at how the settlement turned out and view this as giving merchants greater leverage when it comes to future negotiations involving the cost of card acceptance.

The settlement could cause some merchants to decide not to accept rewards cards, others to start levying surcharges for their use, and banks could also scale back their rewards programs as a result, they said.

Near-term outlook: ‘Not a lot is going to change’

According to experts, it is unlikely that any retailer will choose to reject all rewards cards. Since nearly 90% of all credit card spending is on rewards cards, merchants really have no choice but to continue to accept them, Rossman said: “In the real world, not a lot is going to change.”

Rejecting some high-cost cards at the point of sale also risks alienating customers who carry them, according to Matt Schulz, chief credit analyst at LendingTree.

For that reason, the proposed settlement is “all window dressing and no substance,” the National Retail Federation’s chief administrative officer Stephanie Martz said in a statement. “The reduction in swipe fees doesn’t begin to go far enough, and the change in the honor-all-cards rule would accomplish nothing,” she said.

Longer-term outlook: More fees, fewer benefits

One potential outcome of the settlement is that retailers will tack on an extra fee for customers who pay with rewards cards to help cover the cost. “You could see a more varied approach to this, which would be surcharging,” said John Cabell, managing director of payments intelligence at J.D. Power.

But more affluent cardholders are already paying a premium. Rewards credit cards generally have higher-than-average interest rates to compensate issuers for the additional perks, in addition to an increasingly common annual fee, which can exceed $500 depending on the card, according to Rossman.

In return, customers earn cash back, miles or points, which have become a sought-after differentiator in the card market. “People love their rewards cards and especially high-income folks,” said Schulz. 

Since the settlement calls for Visa and Mastercard to lower swipe fees by 0.1 percentage point for five years, that may make it harder for card issuers to keep boosting benefits. 

“About 86% of interchange fees go to card issuers to fund credit card rewards and loyalty programs,” according to Trent Swanson, a loyalty points consulting adviser who is known as the “miles husband.” “What’s often overlooked is that the cost of running rewards programs has already been rising.”

In another scenario, merchants raise prices to cover the cost of accepting cards with higher interchange fees. “What, in fact, happens is that all of us pay these huge fees in the form of inflated prices and we don’t know it,” said Kantor. “The cash-paying customer, they get the shortest straw every time.” 

While there may not be an immediate change from the settlement, over time, if merchants start adding surcharges and rewards cards become more expensive to use at the point of sale, it could reign in the upward spiral of rewards and benefits that consumers have grown to appreciate, according to J.D. Power’s Cabell. 

Even relatively modest cards might see a reduction in offerings as well if surcharges become generally more prevalent with mid-tier and premium card groupings, Cabell said. “It is unlikely that this last announcement is the final chapter.”

Stephanie Dhue and Hugh Son contributed to this report.

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

Maximizing Returns in High Rate Climate and market uncertainty

Published

on

Maximizing Returns in High-Rate Climate

In the macroeconomic environment of late July 2026, personal cash management requires an active, structured approach to wealth preservation. With central bank benchmark rates remaining elevated to ensure long-term disinflation, conservative yield-bearing vehicles—such as short-term U.S. Treasury bills, money market funds, and high-yield savings accounts (HYSAs)—continue to offer reliable nominal returns between 4% and 5%. For individual investors, maximizing net returns requires moving beyond passive checking accounts and executing a disciplined cash laddering strategy.

Leaving substantial liquid capital in traditional bank deposits creates an invisible drag on personal net worth due to ongoing inflation. By implementing a tiered liquidity framework, individuals can split emergency cash reserves and short-term capital allocations across rolling maturities. Allocating cash into 4-week, 8-week, and 13-week Treasury bills creates a continuous cycle of maturing liquidity, allowing investors to continuously reinvest capital at prevailing market yields while maintaining immediate access to emergency funds.

Tax efficiency represents a critical dimension of high-yield cash optimization. For high-earning individuals residing in states with substantial local income taxes, direct holdings in short-term U.S. Treasury instruments often deliver superior net post-tax yields compared to standard commercial bank HYSAs. Because interest earned on federal Treasury bills is strictly exempt from state and local taxation, investors can retain a larger portion of their compounding interest gains without taking on additional credit or market risk.

Ultimately, personal wealth accumulation in mid-2026 relies on intentional capital deployment. Cash should be managed as a productive asset class that generates consistent, risk-free returns. Regularly auditing account yield terms, automating recurring transfers, and leveraging tax-advantaged fixed-income instruments ensures that personal liquidity remains fully optimized against macroeconomic fluctuations.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

Algorithmic Wealth Management: Balancing Automated Financial Planning with Human Oversight

Published

on

Balancing Automated Financial Planning with Human Oversight

The personal finance industry in July 2026 is experiencing a technological evolution, driven by the wide deployment of next-generation algorithmic wealth management tools. Modern digital financial platforms have expanded far beyond basic automated index investing; today’s robo-advisors utilize real-time tax-loss harvesting, dynamic portfolio rebalancing, and hyper-personalized spending analysis to optimize retail investor outcomes. However, as these digital solutions become ubiquitous, investors face the crucial challenge of balancing automated execution with human strategic judgment.

The core advantage of automated financial planning platforms lies in their ability to remove emotional bias from investment execution. During periods of market volatility or localized sector realignments, automated algorithms systematically rebalance portfolios back to target asset allocations without falling victim to panic selling or speculative enthusiasm. Furthermore, integrated cash-flow monitoring algorithms analyze individual spending patterns in real time, automatically sweeping surplus income into designated retirement or debt-liquidation accounts to accelerate net worth accumulation.

Despite these operational advantages, algorithmic tools have inherent structural limitations when addressing complex, highly personalized financial life events. Decisions involving multi-generational estate planning, highly complex tax strategies, small business exits, or nuanced real estate transactions require contextual human judgment that software models cannot replicate. Relying solely on automated models without periodic human professional review can result in misaligned risk profiles or overlooked tax liabilities during major life transitions.

The optimal approach for personal financial planning in late 2026 is a hybrid advisory model. Individuals should utilize automated platforms for routine asset allocation, continuous tax optimization, and low-cost passive index tracking, while engaging qualified human financial advisors for periodic strategic planning, estate structuring, and qualitative risk evaluations. This dual approach ensures maximum cost efficiency and disciplined execution while retaining essential strategic guidance.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

High-Yield Optimization: Structuring Personal Cash Reserves in a Sustained Rate Environment

Published

on

Structuring Personal Cash Reserves in a Sustained Rate Environment

In the financial environment of mid-2026, personal cash management has re-emerged as a vital component of holistic wealth building. With central bank policy rates holding firm to maintain long-term price stability, yield-bearing instruments such as money market funds, high-yield savings accounts (HYSAs), and short-term Treasury bills continue to offer compounding returns around 4% to 5%. For individual investors, effectively structuring cash reserves requires shifting away from passive bank deposits toward active yield optimization.

A frequent pitfall in personal asset management is leaving substantial liquid capital in traditional checking or low-yield savings accounts, where real returns are continuously eroded by baseline inflation. By implementing a disciplined ‘cash ladder’ strategy—allocating liquid funds across tiered maturities using ultra-short Treasury instruments and FDIC-insured high-yield accounts—individuals can secure maximal yields while retaining immediate liquidity for emergency expenses or tactical investment opportunities.

Simultaneously, investors must evaluate the tax efficiency of their cash holdings based on their tax bracket and geographic location. For high earners situated in states with high local income taxes, direct holdings in short-term U.S. Treasury bills often yield a higher net post-tax return than standard high-yield savings accounts, as Treasury interest is strictly exempt from state and local taxation. Understanding these nuanced tax distinctions allows individuals to capture significant incremental gains without taking on additional market risk.

Ultimately, personal financial health in late 2026 hinges on intentional liquidity management. Cash reserves should not be viewed merely as static emergency funds, but as a dynamic asset class that contributes positively to net worth growth. Regularly auditing yield terms, automating cash transfers, and optimizing for post-tax efficiency ensures that personal capital remains fully productive across all economic conditions.

Continue Reading

Trending