Personal Finance
Why Trump’s tax plans could be ‘complicated’ in 2025, policy experts say
U.S. President-elect Donald Trump speaks during a meeting with House Republicans at the Hyatt Regency hotel in Washington, D.C., on Nov. 13, 2024.
Allison Robbert | Via Reuters
Congressional lawmakers will soon debate expiring tax breaks and new promises from President-elect Donald Trump.
Agreeing on cuts and spending, however, could be a challenge.
With a majority in the House of Representatives and Senate, Republican lawmakers can pass sweeping tax legislation through “reconciliation,” which bypasses the Senate filibuster. Republicans could begin the budget reconciliation process during Trump’s first 100 days in office.
But choosing priorities could be difficult, particularly amid the federal budget deficit, policy experts said Tuesday at a Brookings Institution event in Washington.
Legislators will be “representing their districts, not their party,” Howard Gleckman, a senior fellow at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center, said Tuesday in a panel discussion at the Brookings event.
“This is a lot more complicated than just the reds against the blues,” he said.
More from Personal Finance:
89% of Americans say they do not consider themselves wealthy
As market experts talk of ‘animal spirits,’ what it means for your investments
How to leverage the 0% capital gains bracket as the price of bitcoin surges
‘Political divisions’ could be a barrier
With a slim majority in Congress, Republican lawmakers will soon negotiate with several blocks within their party. Some of these groups have competing priorities.
Enacted by Trump in 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, or TCJA, is a key priority for the next administration.
Without action from Congress, trillions of tax breaks from the TCJA will expire after 2025. These include lower tax brackets, higher standard deductions, a more generous child tax credit, bigger estate and gift tax exemption, and a 20% tax break for pass-through businesses, among other provisions.
The more things you try to bring in, the more potential political divisions we have to navigate.
Molly Reynolds
senior fellow in Governance Studies at Brookings Institution
Tax bill could take longer than expected
Since budget reconciliation involves multiple steps, policy experts say the Republican tax bill could take months.
Plus, Congress has until Dec. 20 to fund the government and avoid a shutdown. A stopgap bill could push the deadline to January or March, which could take time from Trump’s tax priorities.
“The idea that they’re going to do this in 100 days, I think, is foolish,” Gleckman said. “My over-under is Dec. 31, 2025, and that might be optimistic.”
However, the bill could get through by Oct. 1, 2025, which closes the federal government’s fiscal year, other policy experts say.
Drs Producoes | E+ | Getty Images
The average 401(k) savings rate, including employee deferrals and company contributions, continued to climb in 2023, a new industry survey reported.
In 2023, the average combined savings rate was 12.7%, up from 12.1% in 2022, with employees deferring 7.8% of pay and companies adding 4.9%, according to the Plan Sponsor Council of America’s yearly survey of more than 700 company 401(k) and profit-sharing plans.
“The deferral rate has been trending up over time,” with dips during economic downturns, said Hattie Greenan, director of research and communications for the Plan Sponsor Council of America.
More from Personal Finance:
Paying down debt is Americans’ top money goal for 2025. Here are tips
Here’s what to know before rebalancing your bitcoin profits, advisor says
The Fed cut rates by another quarter point: What that means for your money
Meanwhile, Vanguard reported the average combined savings rate was an estimated 11.7% in 2023, which matched the figures from 2022, according to the company’s yearly analysis of more than 1,500 qualified plans and nearly 5 million participants.
Fidelity Investments, which reports retirement savings rates quarterly, estimated the combined savings rate was 14.1%, as of Sept. 30, 2024, based on an analysis of 26,000 corporate retirement plans.
How much to save in your 401(k)
Vanguard recommends saving 12% to 15% of your earnings every year, including employer contributions, to meet your retirement needs. The combined savings benchmark for Fidelity is 15%.
Typically, companies match employee deferrals up to a specified limit — and you should aim to contribute at least enough to get the full match, said Greenan from the Plan Sponsor Council of America.
“That’s really going to add up over time,” she said.
More than 80% of plans included a matching contribution in 2023, according to the Plan Sponsor Council of America report.
After hitting the match, some experts suggest boosting your deferrals every year, but “you’re going to see growth from whatever you can afford to contribute,” Greenan said.
Starting in 2025, the 401(k) maximum employee deferral will jump to $23,500, up from $23,000 in 2024. The 401(k) catch-up contribution will remain $7,500 for workers 50 and older, but increases to $11,250 for investors aged 60 to 63.
If you’re planning to save more in 2025, right now is “an important time of the year” to boost deferrals, said certified financial planner and enrolled agent Catherine Valega, founder of Boston-area Green Bee Advisory.
Typically, it takes a few paychecks until your 401(k) deferral updates go into effect, so it’s better to make changes in December to be ready for January, she said.
Only 14% of employees maxed out 401(k) plans in 2023, according to Vanguard’s annual report. On top of maxed-out contributions, an estimated 15% of workers made catch-up contributions in plans with the feature, the same report found.
The US Capitol building in Washington, DC, on November 24, 2024.
Daniel Slim | Afp | Getty Images
The Senate is getting closer to a final vote on a bill that would increase Social Security benefits for an estimated 3 million people.
The chamber voted Wednesday to let consideration of the bill — the Social Security Fairness Act — proceed. The bipartisan proposal calls for repealing certain rules that reduce Social Security benefits for individuals who receive pension income from work in the public sector.
Despite a bipartisan 73 majority vote to proceed, the effort to advance the bill was met with some dissent, with Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., citing the costs associated with the change. The Congressional Budget Office has estimated repealing the rules — known as the Windfall Elimination Provision, or WEP, and Government Pension Offset, or GPO — would cost $196 billion over 10 years.
The WEP reduces Social Security benefits for individuals who receive pension or disability benefits from jobs where they did not pay Social Security payroll taxes. The GPO reduces Social Security benefits for spouses, widows and widowers who also receive their own government pension income.
Passing the bill would speed up Social Security’s trust fund insolvency dates by six months, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. Without the change, Social Security’s trustees have projected the trust fund the program relies on to pay retirement benefits will run out in 2033, when 79% of those benefits will be payable.
“We are about to pass an unfunded $200 billion spending package for a trust fund that is likely to go insolvent over the next nine to 10 years, and we’re going to pretend like somebody else has to fix it,” Tillis said during a Senate speech ahead of the vote to advance the bill.
Tillis said lawmakers are not considering the 97% of beneficiaries who would not benefit from the bill, but who would be hurt by future consequences that passing it would have on the program.
More from Personal Finance:
Answers to common questions on the Social Security Fairness Act
73% of workers worry Social Security won’t be able to pay benefits
Early retirement is a surprise for many workers, study finds
“Ladies and gentlemen, this bill has not even had a hearing in any committee in the House or the Senate,” Tillis said.
The Social Security Fairness Act was approved by the House in November after two lawmakers – Reps. Abigail Spanberger, D-Va., and Garret Graves, R-La. – filed a discharge petition to force a vote on the bill. The Senate cloture vote to proceed to a final vote also limited the ability for that chamber to debate the proposal.
The 27 Senate leaders who voted “no” on moving the Social Security Fairness Act to a final vote are all Republicans, with the exception of Sen. Joe Manchin, an independent representing West Virginia.
The Senators who voted to move the bill forward included a mix of Democrats and Republicans, including Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and Vice President-elect and Sen. JD Vance, R-Ohio.
‘No excuse for treating our public servants this way’
Leaders who spoke on the Senate floor in support of the bill ahead of Wednesday’s vote to proceed cited the financial suffering of their constituents.
As of November, more than 2 million people’s Social Security benefits were affected by the WEP, while more than 650,000 people were impacted by the GPO, said Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, who co-led the Senate version of the bill.
One 72-year-old constituent had to return to work after her husband died, since the GPO reduced her Social Security widow benefits by two-thirds, Collins said.
“She did not have the financial security any longer to remain retired, and the GPO penalty left her with few choices but to return to work,” Collins said.
Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., recalled meeting with a retired Louisiana schoolteacher impacted by the GPO, who cried in his office because she didn’t understand why her Social Security spousal benefits were reduced.
“She felt like she was being punished for educating generations of Louisiana children,” Cassidy said. “There’s no excuse for treating our public servants this way.”
If the Senate passes the bill, it will be a win for Collins and Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, who co-led the bill. Collins has pushed for the change for more than two decades, Brown noted in a Wednesday Senate speech. Brown is leaving the Senate after losing a reelection campaign.
Reps. Spanberger and Graves, who introduced the House bill, are also leaving Congress.
“If you love this country and fight for the people who make it work, I urge all my colleagues on both sides to join us — restore the Social Security that people who protect us in service have earned over a lifetime of work,” Brown said during a Wednesday Senate speech.
SEC charges Entergy Corporation with internal accounting controls violations
Alternative investments tax pros need to know
CFPB sues JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Wells Fargo over Zelle fraud
New 2023 K-1 instructions stir the CAMT pot for partnerships and corporations
Are American progressives making themselves sad?
U.S. Beneficial Ownership Information Registry Now Accepting Reports
-
Leaders1 week agoRishi Sunak, The politic and the Successful Businessman
-
Leaders7 days agoAliko Dangote – The Architect of African Industrial Transformation
-
Economics1 week agoProducer price index November 2024
-
Economics6 days agoKaren Friedman Agnifilo: A Champion of Justice and Legal Expertise
-
Accounting6 days agoMastering Petty Cash Management: Best Practices for Efficiency and Control
-
Technology6 days agoThe Rise of Generative AI and Its Applications: Transforming Industries
-
Finance1 week agoADBE, WBD, RIOT and more
-
Economics6 days agoHow to Mitigate Inflation’s Impact on Low Income Earners