Connect with us

Personal Finance

Why universal free school lunches may become a campaign issue

Published

on

Will & Deni Mcintyre | Corbis Documentary | Getty Images

The notion of offering free school meals could become a policy issue in the U.S. presidential race, experts say — especially given Vice President Kamala Harris’ choice of Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz as her running mate on the Democratic ticket.

The federal government offered K-12 students free school meals — regardless of income — for two years during the Covid-19 pandemic.

That policy has since ended. However, eight states have passed laws to continue offering free meals.

Among them is Minnesota. Walz, a former teacher, signed a bill in 2023 to provide breakfast and lunch to the state’s public-school students at no charge, regardless of household income.

Kamala Harris' economic plan so far is aimed squarely at household costs: Brookings' Ben Harris

“Should Harris and Walz win the election, his role as vice president and his potential influence on universal school meals could be profound,” wrote Alexina Cather, policy director at Wellness in the Schools, an advocacy group for public school nutrition.

Harris, the Democratic presidential nominee, unveiled some details about her economic policy platform Friday.

School meals weren’t among them. But children and food feature in a few proposals: one to restore and enhance the value of a pandemic-era child tax credit, and another to enact the first-ever federal ban on “corporate price-gouging” on food and groceries.

A spokesperson for the Harris campaign didn’t respond to a request for comment.

How the federal school lunch program works

The typical student pays $1.75 or $1.80 for a full-price breakfast at a school cafeteria, varying by grade level, according to the School Nutrition Association. Lunch typically costs $2.83 to $3.05, according to the group.

(Its data reflects the median price. Prices may be higher or lower based on school district.)

The federal government currently subsidizes meal cost for certain students — based on criteria like annual income — via initiatives like the National School Lunch Program.

Under the NSLP, students in families with income at or below 130% of the federal poverty line qualify for a free meal.

More from Personal Finance:
Why the election may matter for the minimum wage
Trump plan to end taxes on Social Security may be misguided
Trump and Harris both want no taxes on tips

A family of three would need to make less than about $34,000 a year to qualify for free meals, according to Alexis Bylander, interim director of child nutrition programs and policy at the Food Research & Action Center.

Those at 130% to 185% of the poverty line are eligible for reduced-price meals. Such students don’t pay more than 30 cents for breakfast or 40 cents for lunch.

On average, about 20 million students — roughly 71% — ate free or reduced price lunches in 2023, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Former President Donald Trump signed legislation in March 2020 that allowed the U.S. Department of Agriculture to issue nationwide waivers that effectively made meals free for all kids in participating school districts.

That expansion was in place for the 2020-21 and 2021-22 school years.

The “vast majority” — about 90% — of U.S. school districts participated, according to the USDA. (Schools were allowed to serve meals or deliver them even if they were closed during the pandemic.)

Congress didn’t extend the policy for the 2022-23 school year.

Since then, eight states — California, Colorado, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Mexico and Vermont — have passed laws to create universal-free-school-meal programs, according to the Hunter College New York City Food Policy Center.

All of those states are headed by Democrats, with the exception of Vermont Gov. Phil Scott, who is a Republican.

Many other states are “currently planning, drafting, discussing, or negotiating” such legislation for the “near future,” the Food Policy Center added.

“This isn’t a new idea, but it really picked up speed during the pandemic,” FRAC’s Bylander said. “I think there’s a lot of momentum around this issue,” she added.

Some groups dislike universal free school meals

The policy of offering universal free school meals doesn’t seem to have buy-in across conservative circles.

For example, the blueprint for Project 2025 — a collection of policy plans developed by right-leaning groups and spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation — would “reject efforts” around universal free school meals, according to its text.

Democrats have pointed to Project 2025 as an example of what a second Trump term could look like.

The former president made statements distancing himself from the policy blueprint. But several people who formerly worked for Trump were involved in creating the playbook, and a recently resurfaced video from April 2022 shows Trump speaking at a Heritage Foundation gala about the group’s plans.

While in office, the Trump administration had extended the USDA waivers to offer universal free school meals.

A spokesperson for the Trump campaign didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Trump and Harris tackle high prices: Here's what you need to know

Project 2025 would also “restore” the National School Lunch Program to its “original goal” of providing food to K-12 students of low-income families who’d otherwise forgo a meal, and not also to middle and higher earners.

“Federal school meals increasingly resemble entitlement programs that have strayed far from their original objective and represent an example of the ever-expanding federal footprint in local school operations,” according to the text.

Advocates say the universality of free meals is essential, though.

It helps school districts by reducing administrative burdens and, for students, eliminates “the stigma and shame tied to free and reduced-price meals, creating a level playing field for every child in the cafeteria,” Bylander said.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

Missing quarterly tax payment could trigger ‘unexpected penalties’

Published

on

Israel Sebastian | Moment | Getty Images

The fourth-quarter estimated tax deadline for 2024 is Jan. 15, and missing a payment could trigger “unexpected penalties and fees” when filing your return, according to the IRS.

Typically, estimated taxes apply to income without withholdings, such as earnings from freelance work, a small business or investments. But you could still owe taxes for full-time or retirement income if you didn’t withhold enough.

You could also owe fourth-quarter taxes for year-end bonuses, stock dividends, capital gains from mutual fund payouts or profits from crypto sales and more, the IRS said.    

More from Personal Finance:
At the start of 2025, nearly half of credit card users are carrying debt
As natural disasters intensify, affected student loan borrowers have options
Your paycheck could be slightly bigger in 2025 due to tax bracket changes

Federal income taxes are “pay as you go,” meaning the IRS expects payments throughout the year as you make income, said certified public accountant Brian Long, senior tax advisor at Wealth Enhancement in Minneapolis. 

If you miss the Jan. 15 deadline, you may incur an interest-based penalty based on the current interest rate and how much you should have paid. That penalty compounds daily.

Tax withholdings, estimated payments or a combination of the two, can “help avoid a surprise tax bill at tax time,” according to the IRS.

What to know about the ‘safe harbor’ rules

However, you could still owe taxes for 2024 if you make more than expected and don’t adjust your tax payments.

“The good thing about this last quarterly payment is that most individuals should have their year-end numbers finalized,” said Sheneya Wilson, a CPA and founder of Fola Financial in New York.

How to make quarterly estimated tax payments

Tax Tip: Child Credit

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

California wildfire relief: Where to give

Published

on

Firefighters work as a brush fire burns in Pacific Palisades, California on Jan. 7, 2025.

David Swanson | AFP | Getty Images

Massive wildfires are devastating the Los Angeles area of Southern California. As of Thursday morning, at least five people were killed, more than 100,000 residents have been ordered to evacuate and nearly 2,000 homes and businesses were destroyed.

Many people around the country, and world, want to help, whether by donating money or emergency supplies. However, there are already fundraising scams trying to capitalize on the crisis.

To make sure your funds get into the right hands, third-party evaluator Charity Navigator compiled a list of highly rated nonprofits currently engaged in relief and recovery efforts in the Pacific Palisades and the surrounding areas — including support for first responders. 

More from Personal Finance:
How to maximize your tax breaks for charitable giving
You could score a tax break by gifting crypto to charity
Older adults who lost $100,000 to fraud has tripled: FTC

“We’ve vetted the organizations that are there,” said Michael Thatcher, CEO of Charity Navigator. “These are all outstanding.”

Here are some of the groups that earned high marks from the organization for providing immediate support to the victims of the wildfires and wildfire-affected communities.

How to avoid wildfire-related scams

The BBB Wise Giving Alliance also offers tips for donating to the California wildfire relief efforts.

It recommends donors check whether a charity is accredited and take extra precautions on crowdfunding sites, including reviewing how postings are screened as well what transaction fees may apply.

In addition, be wary of relief appeals that have vague descriptions or do not explain what programs your support will assist.

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

New Social Security increases may prompt higher tax bills, Medicare premiums

Published

on

Sdi Productions | E+ | Getty Images

Nearly 3 million individuals are poised to see their Social Security benefits increase, thanks to new changes signed into law by President Joe Biden this week. But with the higher checks could come additional tax burdens.

The Social Security Fairness Act — which passed by a bipartisan majority in both the House and Senate — ends reductions of Social Security benefits for certain individuals who also receive pension income from work in the public sector as firefighters, police officers, teachers and local, state and federal employees.

Those beneficiaries are set to see an increase to their monthly benefit checks. Because the legislation applies to benefits paid throughout 2024, they will also receive lump-sum payments to make up for that time.

The details of how those increases will be implemented are now being determined, according to the Social Security Administration.

In total, the benefit increases will cost $196 billion over a decade, according to the Congressional Budget Office. The additional outlay will move Social Security’s trust fund depletion dates six months closer. The program’s combined trust funds may pay full benefits until 2035, at which point just 83% of scheduled benefits may be payable, the program’s trustees projected last year.

How Social Security benefits may change

About 2.1 million beneficiaries — those who were affected by the Windfall Elimination Provision, or WEP — may see $360 more in monthly benefits on average, according to CBO estimates as of December 2025. The WEP, which has now been eliminated, reduced Social Security benefits for workers who also had pension or disability benefits from jobs where they did not pay Social Security payroll taxes.

More from Personal Finance:
Biden signs Social Security Fairness Act
Big changes to expect from Social Security and Medicare in 2025
73% of workers worry Social Security won’t be able to pay benefits

Additionally, about 380,000 spouses would see average benefit increases of $700 and 390,000 surviving spouses would see an average of $1,190 more, according to CBO’s estimates for December 2025.

Those beneficiaries were affected by the now-defunct Government Pension Offset, or GPO, which reduced Social Security benefits for spouses, widows and widowers who also receive their own pensions from public sector work.

The elimination of the provisions in many ways simplifies retirement income planning for affected beneficiaries, financial advisors say.

“For the people who are affected by this, you’re looking at a pretty significant increase, in many cases, of what their retirement income is going to be,” said Michael Daley, director of marketing at HealthView Services. “It’s good news for them.”

For financial planners and their clients, the challenge now is gauging how much of a benefit increase to expect and when to expect it, said Joe Elsasser, founder and president of Covisum, a Social Security claiming software company.

The extra income may also present some complications when it comes to affected beneficiaries’ taxes and Medicare premiums, experts say.

Beneficiaries could see higher taxes on benefits

Maximizing your Social Security benefits

Individuals pay taxes on up to 50% of their benefits if their combined income is between $25,000 and $34,000, or for married couples with between $32,000 and $44,000.

Individuals may pay taxes on up to 85% of their benefits if their combined income is more than $34,000; or for married couples with more than $44,000.

“Because Social Security benefits are taxed differently than everything else, people are going to really want to pay attention to their other sources of income,” Elsasser said of the anticipated benefit increases and lump sum payments.

For example, if a retiree has both a taxable account and traditional individual retirement account, they may want to prioritize withdrawals from the taxable account because only the gains would be taxed rather than the entire withdrawal, Elsasser explained. In the event the lump-sum payment of retroactive Social Security benefits is not distributed, they may take an IRA withdrawal later in the year.

Beneficiaries may see higher Medicare costs

Additional benefit income for individuals affected by the Social Security Fairness Act may also result in higher income-based surcharges for Medicare Parts B and D.

Medicare beneficiaries with higher incomes must pay what’s known as income-related monthly adjustment amounts, or IRMAAs, for their Part B and Part D premiums.

“If you get a lump sum but you’re not paying attention to your other incomes, you could unwittingly be pushed into higher Medicare premiums two years down the road,” Elsasser said.

That will mostly be a concern for people who are on the cusp of the income thresholds, he said.

In 2025, Medicare Part B beneficiaries who file individual tax returns with $106,000 or less in modified adjusted gross income — or married couples who file jointly with $212,000 or less — pay a standard monthly premium of $185 per month.

Beneficiaries above those income thresholds pay higher Part B premium payments, based on an IRMAA. This year’s rates are based on income on tax returns filed in 2023.

In 2025, Part D beneficiaries over the $106,000 threshold for individuals and $212,000 for married couples are also subject to income-related monthly adjustment amounts in addition to their plan premiums. Those monthly premiums are also based on yearly income reported on tax filings for 2023. In 2025, the national base Part D premium is $36.78.

Steps to take now

Beneficiaries who are affected by the Social Security Fairness Act should consider consulting with a financial advisor to assess the implications of the change on their personal financial circumstances, said Ron Mastrogiovanni, chairman and CEO of HealthView Services.

Additionally, it would help to sit down with a certified public accountant when filing their taxes to plan for 2025, he said.

The Social Security Administration also plans to provide more guidance on the new law as more details become available.

For now, the agency recommends verifying that direct deposit and mailing address it has on file is still accurate. To update that information, the Social Security recommends changing it online or calling or visiting a Social Security office in person.

Some individuals may now become eligible for Social Security benefits for the first time, now that the WEP and GPO provisions have been eliminated.

To file for benefits, the Social Security Administration recommends either filing online or scheduling an appointment with the agency.

Continue Reading

Trending