Connect with us

Personal Finance

Why universal free school lunches may become a campaign issue

Published

on

Will & Deni Mcintyre | Corbis Documentary | Getty Images

The notion of offering free school meals could become a policy issue in the U.S. presidential race, experts say — especially given Vice President Kamala Harris’ choice of Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz as her running mate on the Democratic ticket.

The federal government offered K-12 students free school meals — regardless of income — for two years during the Covid-19 pandemic.

That policy has since ended. However, eight states have passed laws to continue offering free meals.

Among them is Minnesota. Walz, a former teacher, signed a bill in 2023 to provide breakfast and lunch to the state’s public-school students at no charge, regardless of household income.

Kamala Harris' economic plan so far is aimed squarely at household costs: Brookings' Ben Harris

“Should Harris and Walz win the election, his role as vice president and his potential influence on universal school meals could be profound,” wrote Alexina Cather, policy director at Wellness in the Schools, an advocacy group for public school nutrition.

Harris, the Democratic presidential nominee, unveiled some details about her economic policy platform Friday.

School meals weren’t among them. But children and food feature in a few proposals: one to restore and enhance the value of a pandemic-era child tax credit, and another to enact the first-ever federal ban on “corporate price-gouging” on food and groceries.

A spokesperson for the Harris campaign didn’t respond to a request for comment.

How the federal school lunch program works

The typical student pays $1.75 or $1.80 for a full-price breakfast at a school cafeteria, varying by grade level, according to the School Nutrition Association. Lunch typically costs $2.83 to $3.05, according to the group.

(Its data reflects the median price. Prices may be higher or lower based on school district.)

The federal government currently subsidizes meal cost for certain students — based on criteria like annual income — via initiatives like the National School Lunch Program.

Under the NSLP, students in families with income at or below 130% of the federal poverty line qualify for a free meal.

More from Personal Finance:
Why the election may matter for the minimum wage
Trump plan to end taxes on Social Security may be misguided
Trump and Harris both want no taxes on tips

A family of three would need to make less than about $34,000 a year to qualify for free meals, according to Alexis Bylander, interim director of child nutrition programs and policy at the Food Research & Action Center.

Those at 130% to 185% of the poverty line are eligible for reduced-price meals. Such students don’t pay more than 30 cents for breakfast or 40 cents for lunch.

On average, about 20 million students — roughly 71% — ate free or reduced price lunches in 2023, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Former President Donald Trump signed legislation in March 2020 that allowed the U.S. Department of Agriculture to issue nationwide waivers that effectively made meals free for all kids in participating school districts.

That expansion was in place for the 2020-21 and 2021-22 school years.

The “vast majority” — about 90% — of U.S. school districts participated, according to the USDA. (Schools were allowed to serve meals or deliver them even if they were closed during the pandemic.)

Congress didn’t extend the policy for the 2022-23 school year.

Since then, eight states — California, Colorado, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Mexico and Vermont — have passed laws to create universal-free-school-meal programs, according to the Hunter College New York City Food Policy Center.

All of those states are headed by Democrats, with the exception of Vermont Gov. Phil Scott, who is a Republican.

Many other states are “currently planning, drafting, discussing, or negotiating” such legislation for the “near future,” the Food Policy Center added.

“This isn’t a new idea, but it really picked up speed during the pandemic,” FRAC’s Bylander said. “I think there’s a lot of momentum around this issue,” she added.

Some groups dislike universal free school meals

The policy of offering universal free school meals doesn’t seem to have buy-in across conservative circles.

For example, the blueprint for Project 2025 — a collection of policy plans developed by right-leaning groups and spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation — would “reject efforts” around universal free school meals, according to its text.

Democrats have pointed to Project 2025 as an example of what a second Trump term could look like.

The former president made statements distancing himself from the policy blueprint. But several people who formerly worked for Trump were involved in creating the playbook, and a recently resurfaced video from April 2022 shows Trump speaking at a Heritage Foundation gala about the group’s plans.

While in office, the Trump administration had extended the USDA waivers to offer universal free school meals.

A spokesperson for the Trump campaign didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Trump and Harris tackle high prices: Here's what you need to know

Project 2025 would also “restore” the National School Lunch Program to its “original goal” of providing food to K-12 students of low-income families who’d otherwise forgo a meal, and not also to middle and higher earners.

“Federal school meals increasingly resemble entitlement programs that have strayed far from their original objective and represent an example of the ever-expanding federal footprint in local school operations,” according to the text.

Advocates say the universality of free meals is essential, though.

It helps school districts by reducing administrative burdens and, for students, eliminates “the stigma and shame tied to free and reduced-price meals, creating a level playing field for every child in the cafeteria,” Bylander said.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

Why parents will pay $500,000 for Ivy League admissions consulting

Published

on

Ivy League architecture at Princeton University.

Loop Images | Getty Images

At the nation’s top schools, including many in the Ivy League, acceptance rates hover near all-time lows.

“College admissions only ever gets more competitive and there’s a lot of stress from families about the stakes and how to get in,” said Thomas Howell, the founder of Forum Education, a New-York based tutoring company.

For some families, getting their child into a top school is an investment, and to that end there is almost no limit to what they will spend on tutors, college counselors and test prep.

‘Top 20% or bust’

Meanwhile, as the sticker price at some private colleges nears six figures a year, some students have opted for less expensive public schools or alternatives to a degree altogether. For those willing to pay for a four-year, private college, it should be worthwhile, the sentiment often goes.

“The value proposition of higher education is splitting,” Howell said, “it’s either a top school or a real value.”

For this crop of college applicants, it’s “top 20% or bust,” he added.

As a result, universities in the so-called “Ivy Plus” are experiencing a record-breaking increase in applications, according to a report by the Common Application.

The “Ivy Plus” is a group that generally includes the eight private colleges that comprise the Ivy League — Brown, Columbia, Cornell, Dartmouth, Harvard, University of Pennsylvania, Princeton and Yale — plus the University of Chicago, Duke, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Stanford.

To get into this elite group of schools, many families look for outside help to get a leg up.

More from Personal Finance:
More colleges set to close in 2025
These are the top 10 highest-paying college majors
The sticker price at some colleges is now nearly $100,000 a year

“The consensus is it’s only worth going to college if it’s a life changing college,” said Hafeez Lakhani, founder and president of Lakhani Coaching in New York. 

“What hasn’t changed is people with enormous resources willing to invest over $100,000, which is about 20% of our clients,” Lakhani said. “This might be the single largest thing they’ve spent on other than a car.”

Lakhani Coaching’s clients spend an average of $58,000 on counseling, but some have spent as much as $800,000 over the course of several years, according to Lakhani.

At that price point, students receive “essentially a ‘SEAL-team’ level tutor through almost every class,” he said. Lakhani was equating the academic support with the highest level of organization and execution that epitomizes the training of a Navy Seal, the special operation force that stands for sea, air and land teams.

Lakhani charges $1,600 an hour for his services, the top rate at his company, and still, families often choose to work with him over the less senior coaches there, some of whom charge about $290 an hour, he said.

Even if he charged more, that dynamic likely would not change, he added.

Parents often say, “it’s worth the investment,” he added. “That word investment comes up over and over again.”

Christopher Rim, founder and CEO of college consulting firm Command Education.

Courtesy: Christopher Rim

At Command Education in New York, counselors meet with students weekly starting in eight or ninth grade. Families are charged $120,000 per year, not including the Standards Admission Test (SAT) or American College Test (ACT) test prep. By graduation, they’ve spent roughly half a million dollars.

Command caps the clientele at 200 students worldwide, mostly on a first-come, first-served basis, although they will turn students away if they don’t think they can deliver the desired outcome, according to Christopher Rim, the founder and CEO.

“At the end of the day, results are most important,” he said.

‘This is not a neighborhood tutor’

‘An imperfect meritocracy’

Legacy Admissions debate: Why schools are ending the practice

“Higher education is an imperfect meritocracy,” Lakhani said.

However, the wealthiest students hailing form the country’s top private schools are primarily competing amongst themselves as schools look to build a diversified class.

“When you are applying from an affluent family, the people you are competing against are people in a similar bucket,” Lakhani said.

The irony is most don’t want to admit that they’ve received private help, even if they are fortunate enough to get it.

“Every parent wants to say their child does it on their own,” Rim said.

Is an Ivy League degree worth it?

A study by Harvard University-based non-partisan, non-profit research group Opportunity Insights compared the estimated future income of waitlisted students who ultimately attended Ivy League schools with those who went to public universities instead.

In the end, the group of Harvard University- and Brown University-based economists found that attending an Ivy League college has a “statistically insignificant impact” on earnings.

However, there are other advantages beyond income.

For instance, attending a college in the “Ivy-plus” category rather than a highly selective public institution nearly doubles the chances of attending an elite graduate school and triples the chances of working at a prestigious firm, according to Opportunity Insights.

Leadership positions are disproportionately held by graduates of a few highly selective private colleges, the Opportunity Insights report found. 

Further, it increases students’ chances of ultimately reaching the top 1% of the earnings distribution by 60%.

“Highly selective private colleges serve as gateways to the upper echelons of society,” the researchers said.

“Because these colleges currently admit students from high-income families at substantially higher rates than students from lower-income families with comparable academic credentials, they perpetuate privilege,” they added.

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

Maximum Social Security retirement benefit: Here’s who qualifies

Published

on

Twenty47studio | Moment | Getty Images

Millions of Social Security beneficiaries will benefit from the 2.5% cost-of-living adjustment for 2025, set to take effect in January.

With that increase, the maximum Social Security benefit for a worker retiring at full retirement age will jump to $4,018 per month, up from $3,822 per month this year, according to the Social Security Administration.

But while those maximum benefits will see a $196 monthly increase, retirement benefits will go up by about $50 per month on average, according to the agency.

The average monthly benefit for retired workers is expected to increase to $1,976 per month in 2025, a $49 increase from $1,927 per month as of this year, according to the Social Security Administration.

Who gets maximum Social Security benefits?

The highest Social Security benefits generally go to people who have had maximum earnings their entire working career, according to Paul Van de Water, a senior fellow at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

That cohort generally includes a “very small number of people,” he said.

Because Social Security retirement benefits are calculated based on the highest 35 years of earnings, workers need to consistently have wages up to that threshold to earn the maximum retirement benefit.

“Very few people start out at age 21 earning the maximum level,” Van de Water said.

Social Security is a key issue for voters, survey finds: Here’s how to maximize benefits

Workers contribute payroll taxes to Social Security up to what is known as a taxable maximum.

In 2024, a 6.2% tax paid by both workers and employers (or 12.4% for self-employed workers) applies to up to $168,600 in earnings. In 2025, that will go up to $176,100.

Notably, that limit applies only to wages that are subject to federal payroll taxes. If a wealthy person has other sources of income, for example from investments that do not require payroll tax contributions, that will not affect the size of their Social Security benefits, said Jim Blair, vice president of Premier Social Security Consulting and a former Social Security administrator.

How can you increase your Social Security benefits?   

There are beneficiaries who are receiving Social Security checks amounting to more than $4,000 per month, and they usually have waited to claim until age 70, according to Blair.

“Technically, waiting until 70 gets you the most amount of Social Security benefits,” Blair said.

By claiming retirement benefits at the earliest possible age — 62 — beneficiaries receive permanently reduced benefits.

At full retirement age — either 66 or 67, depending on date of birth — retirees receive 100% of the benefits they’ve earned.

And by waiting from full retirement age up to age 70, beneficiaries stand to receive an 8% benefit boost per year.

By waiting from age 62 to 70, beneficiaries may see a 77% increase in benefits.

More from Personal Finance:
House may force vote on bill affecting pensioners’ Social Security benefits
Why children miss out on Social Security survivor benefits
72% of Americans worry Social Security will run out in their lifetimes

However, because everyone’s circumstances are different, it may not always make sense to wait until the highest possible claiming age, Blair said.

Prospective beneficiaries need to evaluate not only how their claiming decision will impact them individually, but also their spouse and any dependents, he said.

“You have to look at your own situation before you apply,” Blair said.

Also, it is important for prospective beneficiaries to create an online My Social Security account to review their benefit statements, he said. That will show estimates of future benefits and the earnings history the agency has on record.

Because that earnings information is used to calculate benefits, individuals should double check that information to make sure it is correct, Blair said. If it is not, they should contact the Social Security Administration to fix it.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

Inherited IRA rules are changing in 2025 — here’s what to know

Published

on

Jacob Wackerhausen | Istock | Getty Images

What to know about the 10-year rule

Before the Secure Act of 2019, heirs could “stretch” inherited IRA withdrawals over their lifetime, which helped reduce yearly taxes.

But certain accounts inherited since 2020 are subject to the “10-year rule,” meaning IRAs must be empty by the 10th year following the original account owner’s death. The rule applies to heirs who are not a spouse, minor child, disabled, chronically ill or certain trusts.

Since then, there’s been confusion about whether the heirs subject to the 10-year rule needed to take yearly withdrawals, known as required minimum distributions, or RMDs.

“You have a multi-dimensional matrix of outcomes for different inherited IRAs,” Dickson said. It’s important to understand how these rules impact your distribution strategy, he added.

After years of waived penalties, the IRS in July confirmed certain heirs will need to begin yearly RMDs from inherited accounts starting in 2025. The rule applies if the original account owner had reached their RMD age before death.

If you miss yearly RMDs or don’t take enough, there is a 25% penalty on the amount you should have withdrawn. But it’s possible to reduce the penalty to 10% if the RMD is “timely corrected” within two years, according to the IRS.

Consider ‘strategic distributions’

If you’re subject to the 10-year rule for your inherited IRA, spreading withdrawals evenly over the 10 years reduces taxes for most heirs, according to research released by Vanguard in June.

However, you should also consider “strategic distributions,” according to certified financial planner Judson Meinhart, director of financial planning at Modera Wealth Management in Winston-Salem, North Carolina.

“It starts by understanding what your current marginal tax rate is” and how that could change over the 10-year window, he said.

Roth conversions on the rise: Here's what to know

For example, it could make sense to make withdrawals during lower-tax years, such as years of unemployment or early retirement before receiving Social Security payments. 

However, boosting adjusted gross income can trigger other consequences, such as eligibility for college financial aid, income-driven student loan payments or Medicare Part B and Part D premiums for retirees.

Continue Reading

Trending