Connect with us

Personal Finance

Worried about Social Security’s future? What to know before claiming benefits

Published

on

AleksandarNakic | E+ | Getty Images

When it comes to Social Security, prospective beneficiaries often worry whether their benefits will be there when they retire.

Polls show Americans generally have low confidence in the program’s future.

A 2024 survey from Nationwide Retirement Institute found 72% of adults worry Social Security will run out of funding in their lifetime.

Likewise, an October Bankrate survey found that only 6% of Americans are “not at all concerned” their benefits won’t be paid when they reach retirement age. Gen Xers — who at ages 44 to 59 are getting closer to retirement — are most likely to be concerned about the program’s future, Bankrate found.

More from Personal Finance:
30 million people could qualify to use IRS free Direct File program
Biden forgives student loans for another 150,000 borrowers
How much you can save by not drinking during ‘dry January’

President Joe Biden recently signed the Social Security Fairness Act, which will increase Social Security benefits for nearly 3 million individuals who also receive public pensions. Yet because that legislation did not provide for a way to fund those extra benefit payments, Social Security now has a shorter runway of time that it can afford to pay full benefits.

In 2024, Social Security’s trustees projected the program’s combined funds may last until 2035, at which point 83% of benefits would be payable. The newly enacted changes bring that date closer by six months, according to Congressional Budget Office estimates.

“There’s no new sources of revenue here, and so by definition, depletion is going to happen sooner versus later,” said David Blanchett, head of retirement research at PGIM DC Solutions.

To address the program’s shortfall, Congress may raise taxes, cut benefits or a combination of both.  

Those looming changes may influence claiming decisions — for all beneficiaries, as well as those affected by the new legislation.

Now is the time to ‘stress test’ your plan

Social Security retirement benefits are based on a worker’s earnings history, as well as the age at which they claim.

The earliest claiming age is 62. But claiming that early results in permanently reduced benefits.

By waiting until full retirement age — which ranges from 66 to 67, depending on date of birth — retirees will receive 100% of the benefits they’ve earned.

By delaying even longer — up to age 70 — they stand to receive an 8% benefit boost for every year they wait past full retirement age.

Even if there are benefit cuts in the future, experts say it generally helps to have a higher benefit amount, so long as you can afford to delay claiming benefits.

Year of birth Social Security full retirement age
1943-1954 66
1955 66 and two months
1956 66 and four months
1957 66 and six months
1958 66 and eight months
1959 66 and 10 months
1960 or later 67

Individuals who are in or near retirement may not see imminent changes.

“It’s incredibly unlikely that they’re going to reduce benefits for any current retirees,” Blanchett said.

However, for future beneficiaries, Social Security probably won’t be as generous in 20 or 30 years as it is today, Blanchett said. Exactly how benefits may change will depend on a variety of unknowns, including future immigration and birth rates.

That doesn’t mean Social Security benefits won’t exist at all, Blanchett said. But he said it would be wise to assess how receiving just 80% of today’s benefits, or even 50% of the current value for dual-income households, affects your retirement plan.

Social Security is meant to be just one part of a retirement income plan. If Social Security cuts happen, it helps to have more retirement savings or other assets to rely on.  

“The one thing that you can do to kind of help yourself with all these risks and uncertainties is just to save more so that you’re prepared for whatever may happen,” Blanchett said.

Joe Elsasser, a certified financial planner and president of Covisum, a Social Security claiming software company, said he recommends a “stress test” for retirement plans in light of the possibility of benefit cuts.

“If you can’t live how you want to live even in the presence of a cut, consider reducing spending a bit now so that you don’t have to reduce it a lot more later,” he said.

If new law affects you, ‘take a fresh look’ at your plan

More than 72.5 million people now receive Social Security and Supplemental Security Income benefits, according to agency data.

Consequently, the nearly 3 million people who stand to benefit from the newly enacted Social Security Fairness Act are just a fraction of the beneficiary population.

The new law eliminates certain provisions — the Windfall Elimination Provision, or WEP, and the Government Pension Offset, or GPO — that reduced Social Security benefits for workers who had pensions or disability benefits from work where Social Security payroll taxes were not paid.

Congress passes only 503 bills, one of the least productive in decades

Because those changes have implications for an entire family, the new law may reach double the number of individuals who are directly affected by the changes, after accounting for spouses and children, according to David Freitag, a financial planning consultant and Social Security expert at MassMutual.

The potential difference in benefits may be dramatic. For example, one couple who would have faced a retirement funding shortfall when they had been affected by the WEP and GPO may now have a lifetime surplus of more than $300,000 once those offsets are eliminated, according to MassMutual’s computer models.

The effects of the new changes will vary on a case-by-case basis, and not all beneficiaries stand to see that level of increase. But even just $300 more in monthly income that’s annually adjusted for inflation can make a big difference in retirement, Freitag said.

“If you’re affected by this, you need to take a fresh look at your retirement plan,” Freitag said.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

Trump administration loses appeal of DOGE Social Security restraining order

Published

on

A person holds a sign during a protest against cuts made by U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration to the Social Security Administration, in White Plains, New York, U.S., March 22, 2025. 

Nathan Layne | Reuters

The Trump administration’s appeal of a temporary restraining order blocking the so-called Department of Government Efficiency from accessing sensitive personal Social Security Administration data has been dismissed.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit on Tuesday dismissed the government’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The case will proceed in the district court. A motion for a preliminary injunction will be filed later this week, according to national legal organization Democracy Forward.

The temporary restraining order was issued on March 20 by federal Judge Ellen Lipton Hollander and blocks DOGE and related agents and employees from accessing agency systems that contain personally identifiable information.

More from Personal Finance:
Judge slams Social Security chief for agency shutdown ‘threats’
Social Security changes may impact service, benefit payments
Trump pick to lead Social Security faces questions on DOGE

That includes information such as Social Security numbers, medical provider information and treatment records, employer and employee payment records, employee earnings, addresses, bank records, and tax information.

DOGE team members were also ordered to delete all nonanonymized personally identifiable information in their possession.

The plaintiffs include unions and retiree advocacy groups, namely the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, the Alliance for Retired Americans and the American Federation of Teachers. 

“We are pleased the 4th Circuit agreed to let this important case continue in district court,” Richard Fiesta, executive director of the Alliance for Retired Americans, said in a written statement. “Every American retiree must be able to trust that the Social Security Administration will protect their most sensitive and personal data from unwarranted disclosure.”

The Trump administration’s appeal ignored standard legal procedure, according to Democracy Forward. The administration’s efforts to halt the enforcement of the temporary restraining order have also been denied.

“The president will continue to seek all legal remedies available to ensure the will of the American people is executed,” Liz Huston, a White House spokesperson, said via email.

Fiserv CEO on the nomination to Social Security Commisioner role

The Social Security Administration did not respond to a request from CNBC for comment.

Immediately after the March 20 temporary restraining order was put in place, Social Security Administration Acting Commissioner Lee Dudek said in press interviews that he may have to shut down the agency since it “applies to almost all SSA employees.”

Dudek was admonished by Hollander, who called that assertion “inaccurate” and said the court order “expressly applies only to SSA employees working on the DOGE agenda.”

Dudek then said that the “clarifying guidance” issued by the court meant he would not shut down the agency. “SSA employees and their work will continue under the [temporary restraining order],” Dudek said in a March 21 statement.

Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

Most credit card users carry debt, pay over 20% interest: Fed report

Published

on

Julpo | E+ | Getty Images

Many Americans are paying a hefty price for their credit card debt.

As a primary source of unsecured borrowing, 60% of credit cardholders carry debt from month to month, according to a new report by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

At the same time, credit card interest rates are “very high,” averaging 23% annually in 2023, the New York Fed found, also making credit cards one of the most expensive ways to borrow money.

“With the vast majority of the American public using credit cards for their purchases, the interest rate that is attached to these products is significant,” said Erica Sandberg, consumer finance expert at CardRates.com. “The more a debt costs, the more stress this puts on an already tight budget.”

More from Personal Finance:
How to spring-clean your finances
Americans are suffering from ‘sticker shock’ — how to adjust
1 in 5 Americans are ‘doom spending’ — how that can backfire

Most credit cards have a variable rate, which means there’s a direct connection to the Federal Reserve’s benchmark. And yet, credit card lenders set annual percentage rates well above the central bank’s key borrowing rate, currently targeted in a range between 4.25% to 4.5%, where it has been since December.

Following the Federal Reserve’s rate hike in 2022 and 2023, the average credit card rate rose from 16.34% to more than 20% today — a significant increase fueled by the Fed’s actions to combat inflation.

“Card issuers have determined what the market will bear and are comfortable within this range of interest rates,” said Matt Schulz, chief credit analyst at LendingTree.

APRs will come down as the central bank reduces rates, but they will still only ease off extremely high levels. With just a few potential quarter-point cuts on deck, APRs aren’t likely to fall much, according to Schulz.

Credit card debt?

Despite the steep cost, consumers often turn to credit cards, in part because they are more accessible than other types of loans, Schulz said. 

In fact, credit cards are the No. 1 source of unsecured borrowing and Americans’ credit card tab continues to creep higher. In the last year, credit card debt rose to a record $1.21 trillion.

Because credit card lending is unsecured, it is also banks’ riskiest type of lending.

“Lenders adjust interest rates for two primary reasons: cost and risk,” CardRates’ Sandberg said.

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s research shows that credit card charge-offs averaged 3.96% of total balances between 2010 and 2023. That compares to only 0.46% and 0.43% for business loans and residential mortgages, respectively.

As a result, roughly 53% of banks’ annual default losses were due to credit card lending, according to the NY Fed research.

“When you offer a product to everyone you are assuming an awful lot of risk,” Schulz said.

Further, “when times get tough they get tough for most everybody,” he added. “That makes it much more challenging for card issuers.”

The best way to pay off debt

The best move for those struggling to pay down revolving credit card debt is to consolidate with a 0% balance transfer card, experts suggest.

“There is enormous competition in the credit card market,” Sandberg said. Because lenders are constantly trying to capture new cardholders, those 0% balance transfer credit card offers are still widely available.

Cards offering 12, 15 or even 24 months with no interest on transferred balances “are basically the best tool in your toolbelt when it comes to knocking down credit card debt,” Schulz said. “Not accruing interest for two years on a balance is pretty hard to argue with.”

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

The 60/40 portfolio may no longer represent ‘true diversification’: Fink

Published

on

Andrew Ross Sorkin speaks with BlackRock CEO Larry Fink during the New York Times DealBook Summit in the Appel Room at the Jazz at Lincoln Center in New York City on Nov. 30, 2022.

Michael M. Santiago | Getty Images

It may be time to rethink the traditional 60/40 investment portfolio, according to BlackRock CEO Larry Fink.

In a new letter to investors, Fink writes the traditional allocation comprised of 60% stocks and 40% bonds that dates back to the 1950s “may no longer fully represent true diversification.”

“The future standard portfolio may look more like 50/30/20 — stocks, bonds and private assets like real estate, infrastructure and private credit.” Fink writes.

Most professional investors love to talk their book, and Fink is no exception. BlackRock has pursued several recent acquisitions — Global Infrastructure Partners, Preqin and HPS Investment Partners — with the goal of helping to increase investors’ access to private markets.

More from Personal Finance:
Why uncertainty makes the stock market go haywire
Investors are ‘miles ahead’ if they avoid 3 things, CIO says
How investors can ready their portfolios for a recession

The effort to make it easier to incorporate both public and private investments in a portfolio is analogous to index versus active investments in 2009, Fink said.

Those investment strategies that were then considered separately can now be blended easily at a low cost.

Fink hopes the same will eventually be said for public and private markets.

Yet shopping for private investments now can feel “a bit like buying a house in an unfamiliar neighborhood before Zillow existed, where finding accurate prices was difficult or impossible,” Fink writes.

60/40 portfolio still a ‘great starting point’

After both stocks and bonds saw declines in 2022, some analysts declared the 60/40 portfolio strategy dead. In 2024, however, such a balanced portfolio would have provided a return of about 14%.

“If you want to keep things very simple, the 60/40 portfolio or a target date fund is a great starting point,” said Amy Arnott, portfolio strategist at Morningstar.

If you’re willing to add more complexity, you could consider smaller positions in other asset classes like commodities, private equity or private debt, she said.

However, a 20% allocation in private assets is on the aggressive side, Arnott said.

The total value of private assets globally is about $14.3 trillion, while the public markets are worth about $247 trillion, she said.

For investors who want to keep their asset allocations in line with the market value of various asset classes, that would imply a weighting of about 6% instead of 20%, Arnott said.

Yet a 50/30/20 portfolio is a lot closer to how institutional investors have been allocating their portfolios for years, said Michael Rosen, chief investment officer at Angeles Investments.

BlackRock CEO Larry Fink: Infrastructure will be the largest growing sector in private capital

The 60/40 portfolio, which Rosen previously said reached its “expiration date,” hasn’t been used by his firm’s endowment and foundation clients for decades.

There’s a key reason why. Institutional investors need to guarantee a specific return, also while paying for expenses and beating inflation, Rosen said.

While a 50/30/20 allocation may help deliver “truly outsized returns” to the mass retail market, there’s also a “lot of baggage” that comes with that strategy, Rosen said.

There’s a lack of liquidity, which means those holdings aren’t as easily converted to cash, Rosen said.

What’s more, there’s generally a lack of transparency and significantly higher fees, he said.

Prospective investors should be prepared to commit for 10 years to private investments, Arnott said.

And they also need to be aware that measurement issues with asset classes like private equity means past performance data may not be as reliable, she said.

For the average person, the most likely path toward tapping into private equity will be part of a 401(k) plan, Arnott said. So far, not a lot of companies have added private equity to their 401(k) offerings, but that could change, she said.

“We will probably see more plan sponsors adding private equity options to their lineups going forward,” Arnott said.

Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO

Continue Reading

Trending