Connect with us

Personal Finance

Worried about Social Security’s future? What to know before claiming benefits

Published

on

AleksandarNakic | E+ | Getty Images

When it comes to Social Security, prospective beneficiaries often worry whether their benefits will be there when they retire.

Polls show Americans generally have low confidence in the program’s future.

A 2024 survey from Nationwide Retirement Institute found 72% of adults worry Social Security will run out of funding in their lifetime.

Likewise, an October Bankrate survey found that only 6% of Americans are “not at all concerned” their benefits won’t be paid when they reach retirement age. Gen Xers — who at ages 44 to 59 are getting closer to retirement — are most likely to be concerned about the program’s future, Bankrate found.

More from Personal Finance:
30 million people could qualify to use IRS free Direct File program
Biden forgives student loans for another 150,000 borrowers
How much you can save by not drinking during ‘dry January’

President Joe Biden recently signed the Social Security Fairness Act, which will increase Social Security benefits for nearly 3 million individuals who also receive public pensions. Yet because that legislation did not provide for a way to fund those extra benefit payments, Social Security now has a shorter runway of time that it can afford to pay full benefits.

In 2024, Social Security’s trustees projected the program’s combined funds may last until 2035, at which point 83% of benefits would be payable. The newly enacted changes bring that date closer by six months, according to Congressional Budget Office estimates.

“There’s no new sources of revenue here, and so by definition, depletion is going to happen sooner versus later,” said David Blanchett, head of retirement research at PGIM DC Solutions.

To address the program’s shortfall, Congress may raise taxes, cut benefits or a combination of both.  

Those looming changes may influence claiming decisions — for all beneficiaries, as well as those affected by the new legislation.

Now is the time to ‘stress test’ your plan

Social Security retirement benefits are based on a worker’s earnings history, as well as the age at which they claim.

The earliest claiming age is 62. But claiming that early results in permanently reduced benefits.

By waiting until full retirement age — which ranges from 66 to 67, depending on date of birth — retirees will receive 100% of the benefits they’ve earned.

By delaying even longer — up to age 70 — they stand to receive an 8% benefit boost for every year they wait past full retirement age.

Even if there are benefit cuts in the future, experts say it generally helps to have a higher benefit amount, so long as you can afford to delay claiming benefits.

Year of birth Social Security full retirement age
1943-1954 66
1955 66 and two months
1956 66 and four months
1957 66 and six months
1958 66 and eight months
1959 66 and 10 months
1960 or later 67

Individuals who are in or near retirement may not see imminent changes.

“It’s incredibly unlikely that they’re going to reduce benefits for any current retirees,” Blanchett said.

However, for future beneficiaries, Social Security probably won’t be as generous in 20 or 30 years as it is today, Blanchett said. Exactly how benefits may change will depend on a variety of unknowns, including future immigration and birth rates.

That doesn’t mean Social Security benefits won’t exist at all, Blanchett said. But he said it would be wise to assess how receiving just 80% of today’s benefits, or even 50% of the current value for dual-income households, affects your retirement plan.

Social Security is meant to be just one part of a retirement income plan. If Social Security cuts happen, it helps to have more retirement savings or other assets to rely on.  

“The one thing that you can do to kind of help yourself with all these risks and uncertainties is just to save more so that you’re prepared for whatever may happen,” Blanchett said.

Joe Elsasser, a certified financial planner and president of Covisum, a Social Security claiming software company, said he recommends a “stress test” for retirement plans in light of the possibility of benefit cuts.

“If you can’t live how you want to live even in the presence of a cut, consider reducing spending a bit now so that you don’t have to reduce it a lot more later,” he said.

If new law affects you, ‘take a fresh look’ at your plan

More than 72.5 million people now receive Social Security and Supplemental Security Income benefits, according to agency data.

Consequently, the nearly 3 million people who stand to benefit from the newly enacted Social Security Fairness Act are just a fraction of the beneficiary population.

The new law eliminates certain provisions — the Windfall Elimination Provision, or WEP, and the Government Pension Offset, or GPO — that reduced Social Security benefits for workers who had pensions or disability benefits from work where Social Security payroll taxes were not paid.

Congress passes only 503 bills, one of the least productive in decades

Because those changes have implications for an entire family, the new law may reach double the number of individuals who are directly affected by the changes, after accounting for spouses and children, according to David Freitag, a financial planning consultant and Social Security expert at MassMutual.

The potential difference in benefits may be dramatic. For example, one couple who would have faced a retirement funding shortfall when they had been affected by the WEP and GPO may now have a lifetime surplus of more than $300,000 once those offsets are eliminated, according to MassMutual’s computer models.

The effects of the new changes will vary on a case-by-case basis, and not all beneficiaries stand to see that level of increase. But even just $300 more in monthly income that’s annually adjusted for inflation can make a big difference in retirement, Freitag said.

“If you’re affected by this, you need to take a fresh look at your retirement plan,” Freitag said.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

Forgotten 401(k) fees cost workers thousands in retirement savings

Published

on

No access to a 401(k)?

With more Americans job hopping in the wake of the Great Resignation, the risk of “forgetting” a 401(k) plan with a previous employer has jumped, recent studies show. 

As of 2023, there were 29.2 million left-behind 401(k) accounts holding roughly $1.65 trillion in assets, up 20% from two years earlier, according to the latest data by Capitalize, a fintech firm.

Nearly half of employees leave money in their old plans during work transitions, according to a 2024 report from Vanguard.

However, that can come at a cost.

More from Personal Finance:
Average 401(k) balances drop 3% amid market swings
The average 401(k) savings rate hit a record high
On-time debt payments aren’t a magic fix for your credit score

For starters, 41% of workers are unaware that they are paying 401(k) fees at all, a 2021 survey by the U.S. Government Accountability Office found.

In most cases, 401(k) fees, which can include administrative service costs and fees for investment management, are relatively low, depending on the plan provider. 

But there could be additional fees on 401(k) accounts left behind from previous jobs that come with an extra bite.

Fees on forgotten 401(k)s

Jelena Danilovic | Getty Images

Former employees who don’t take their 401(k) with them could be charged an additional fee to maintain those accounts, according to Romi Savova, CEO of PensionBee, an online retirement provider. “If you leave it with the employer, the employer could force the record keeping costs on to you,” she said.

According to PensionBee’s analysis, a $4.55 monthly nonemployee maintenance fee on top of other costs can add up to nearly $18,000 in lost retirement funds over time. Not only does the monthly fee eat into the principal, but workers also lose the compound growth that would have accumulated on the balance, the study found.

Fees on those forgotten 401(k)s can be particularly devastating for long-term savers, said Gil Baumgarten, founder and CEO of Segment Wealth Management in Houston.

That doesn’t necessarily mean it pays to move your balance, he said.

“There are two sides to every story,” he said. “Lost 401(k)s can be problematic, but rolling into a IRA could come with other costs.”

What to do with your old 401(k)

When workers switch jobs, they may be able to move the funds to a new employer-sponsored plan or roll their old 401(k) funds into an individual retirement account, which many people do.

But IRAs typically have higher investment fees than 401(k)s and those rollovers can also cost workers thousands of dollars over decades, according to another study, by The Pew Charitable Trusts, a nonprofit research organization.

Collectively, workers who roll money into IRAs could pay $45.5 billion in extra fees over a hypothetical retirement period of 25 years, Pew estimated.

Another option is to cash out an old 401(k), which is generally considered the least desirable option because of the hefty tax penalty. Even so, Vanguard found 33% of workers do that.

How to find a forgotten 401(k) 

While leaving your retirement savings in your former employer’s plan is often the simplest option, the risk of losing track of an old plan has been growing.

Now, 25% of all 401(k) plan assets are left behind or forgotten, according to the most recent data from Capitalize, up from 20% two years prior.

However, thanks to “Secure 2.0,” a slew of measures affecting retirement savers, the Department of Labor created the retirement savings lost and found database to help workers find old retirement plans.

“Ultimately, it can’t really be lost,” Baumgarten said. “Every one of these companies has a responsibility to provide statements.” Often simply updating your contact information can help reconnect you with these records, he advised.   

You can also use your Social Security number to track down funds through the National Registry of Unclaimed Retirement Benefits, a private-sector database.

In 2022, a group of large 401(k) plan administrators launched the Portability Services Network.

That consortium works with defined contributor plan rollover specialist Retirement Clearinghouse on auto portability, or the automatic transfer of small-balance 401(k)s. Depending on the plan, employees with up to $7,000 could have their savings automatically transferred into a workplace retirement account with their new employer when they change jobs.

The goal is to consolidate and maintain those retirement savings accounts, rather than cashing them out or risk losing track of them, during employment transitions, according to Mike Shamrell, vice president of thought leadership at Fidelity Investments, the nation’s largest provider of 401(k) plans and a member of the Portability Services Network.

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

‘What’s the point’ of saving money

Published

on

Xavier Lorenzo | Moment | Getty Images

Gen Z seems to have a case of economic malaise.

Nearly half (49%) of its adult members — the oldest of whom are in their late 20s — say planning for the future feels “pointless,” according to a recent Credit Karma poll.

A freewheeling attitude toward summer spending has taken root among young adults who feel financial “despair” and “hopelessness,” said Courtney Alev, a consumer financial advocate at Credit Karma.

They think, “What’s the point when it comes to saving for the future?” Alev said.

That “YOLO mindset” among Generation Z — the cohort born from roughly 1997 through 2012 — can be dangerous: If unchecked, it might lead young adults to rack up high-interest debt they can’t easily repay, perhaps leading to delayed milestones like moving out of their parents’ home or saving for retirement, Alev said.

But your late teens and early 20s is arguably the best time for young people to develop healthy financial habits: Starting to invest now, even a little bit, will yield ample benefits via decades of compound interest, experts said.

“There are a lot of financial implications in the long term if these young people aren’t planning for their financial future and [are] spending willy-nilly however they want,” Alev said.

Why Gen Z feels disillusioned

That said, that many feel disillusioned is understandable in the current environment, experts said.

The labor market has been tough lately for new entrants and those looking to switch jobs, experts said.

The U.S. unemployment rate is relatively low, at 4.2%. However, it’s much higher for Americans 22 to 27 years old: 5.8% for recent college grads and 6.9% for those without a bachelor’s degree, according to Federal Reserve Bank of New York data as of March 2025.

More from FA Playbook:

Here’s a look at other stories affecting the financial advisor business.

Young adults are also saddled with debt concerns, experts said.

“They feel they don’t have any money and many of them are in debt,” said Winnie Sun, co-founder and managing director of Sun Group Wealth Partners, based in Irvine, California. “And they’re wondering if the degree they have (or are working toward) will be of value if A.I. takes all their jobs anyway. So is it just pointless?”

About 50% of bachelor’s degree recipients in the 2022-23 class graduated with student debt, with an average debt of $29,300, according to College Board.

The federal government restarted collections on student debt in default in May, after a five-year pause.

The Biden administration’s efforts to forgive large swaths of student debt, including plans to help reduce monthly payments for struggling borrowers, were largely stymied in court.

“Some hoped some or more of it would be forgiven, and that didn’t turn out to be the case,” said Sun, a member of CNBC’s Financial Advisor Council.

Meanwhile, in a 2024 report, the New York Fed found credit card delinquency rates were rising faster for Gen Z than for other generations. About 15% had maxed out their cards, more than other cohorts, it said.

Market Navigator: Buy now, pay later boom

It’s also “never been easier to buy things,” with the rise of buy now, pay later lending, for example, Alev said.

BNPL has pushed the majority of Gen Z users — 77% — to say the service has encouraged them to spend more than they can afford, according to the Credit Karma survey. The firm polled 1,015 adults ages 18 and older, 182 of whom are from Gen Z.

These financial challenges compound an environment of general political and financial uncertainty, amid on-again-off-again tariff policy and its potential impact on inflation and the U.S. economy, for example, experts said.

“You start stacking all these things on top of each other and it can create a lack of optimism for young people looking to get started in their financial lives,” Alev said.

How to manage that financial malaise

Patricio Nahuelhual | Moment | Getty Images

“This is actually the most exciting time to invest, because you’re young,” Sun said.

Instituting mindful spending habits, such as putting a waiting period of at least 24 hours in place before buying a non-essential item, can help prevent unnecessary spending, she added.

Sun advocates for paying down high-interest debt before focusing on investing, so interest payments don’t quickly spiral out of control. Or, as an alternative, they can try to fund a 401(k) to get their full company match while also working to pay off high-interest debt, she said.

“Instead of getting into the ‘woe is me’ mode, change that into taking action,” Sun said. “Make a plan, take baby steps and get excited about opportunities to invest.”

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

Trump admin seeks Education Department layoff ban lifted

Published

on

A demonstrator speaks through a megaphone during a Defend Our Schools rally to protest U.S. President Donald Trump’s executive order to shut down the U.S. Department of Education, outside its building in Washington, D.C., U.S., March 21, 2025.

Kent Nishimura | Reuters

The Trump administration on Friday asked the Supreme Court to lift a court order to reinstate U.S. Department of Education employees the administration had terminated as part of its efforts to dismantle the agency.

Officials for the administration are arguing to the high court that U.S. District Judge Myong Joun in Boston didn’t have the authority to require the Education Department to rehire the workers. More than 1,300 employees were affected by the mass layoffs.

The staff reduction “effectuates the Administration’s policy of streamlining the Department and eliminating discretionary functions that, in the Administration’s view, are better left to the States,” Solicitor General D. John Sauer wrote in the filing.

A federal appeals court had refused on Wednesday to lift the judge’s ruling.

In his May 22 preliminary injunction, Joun pointed out that the staff cuts led to the closure of seven out of 12 offices tasked with the enforcement of civil rights, including protecting students from discrimination on the basis of race and disability.

Meanwhile, the entire team that supervises the Free Application for Federal Student Aid, or FAFSA, was also eliminated, the judge said. (Around 17 million families apply for college aid each year using the form, according to higher education expert Mark Kantrowitz.)

The Education Dept. announced its reduction in force on March 11 that would have gutted the agency’s staff.

Two days later, 21 states — including Michigan, Nevada and New York — filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration for its staff cuts at the agency.

After President Donald Trump signed an executive order on March 20 aimed at dismantling the Education Department, more parties sued to save the department, including the American Federation of Teachers.

This is breaking news. Please refresh for updates.

Continue Reading

Trending