Connect with us

Personal Finance

Your financial advisor may not be giving good advice

Published

on

Ascentxmedia | E+ | Getty Images

Many people claim Social Security retirement benefits at the earliest possible claiming age of 62.

But that decision prompts their monthly benefits to be reduced for the rest of their lives.

Working with a financial advisor should help encourage prospective beneficiaries to understand the value of delaying their benefit claims. Yet recent research finds working with a financial professional does not necessarily encourage individuals to claim Social Security at later ages.

The research — co-authored by David Blanchett, head of retirement research for PGIM DC Solutions, and Jason Fichtner, chief economist at the Bipartisan Policy Center — found the results varied based on advisor type. Higher wealth households tend to claim benefits two years later when working with financial professionals who are paid hourly, such as accountants, compared to households that work with commission-based advisors, or brokers.

Affluent households that work with any type of financial professional, particularly brokers, tend to claim Social Security earlier than those that do not, the research found.

The research concluded that delayed Social Security claiming may not be beneficial for advisors because it reduces client assets they can manage and may make retirement planning less complex.

“This research shows that financial advisors may be biased toward strategies that may provide higher advisor compensation, even if those recommendations are not in the best interests of their clients,” Blanchett and Fichtner wrote.

The research results are “really disappointing,” said Joe Elsasser, a certified financial planner who is president of Covisum, a Social Security-claiming software company.

“I would have at least liked to see a general later [claiming age] trend across all advisors,” Elsasser said.

Why it pays to wait to claim Social Security

When Social Security retirement beneficiaries claim at age 62, their benefits are permanently reduced.

If they wait until their full Social Security claiming age — which is generally between 66 and 67, depending on their year of birth — they may receive 100% of the benefits they’ve earned.

As the Social Security full retirement age moves to age 67, benefits available at age 62 are even further reduced.

By waiting until age 70, retirees stand to receive the biggest benefit boost — a monthly benefit that is 77% higher than what beneficiaries may receive at 62, the research notes.

But delaying until that highest claiming age requires beneficiaries to have other income on which they can rely in the interim. “Delayed claiming isn’t a free lunch,” the research states.

Typical Gen X household only has $40K in retirement savings in private accounts

That may mean working longer or bridging to a higher claiming age by turning first to other investments.

Delaying Social Security benefits is so valuable not only because of the increase to benefits, but also the annual cost-of-living adjustments tied to inflation. No annuities on the market provide the same inflation links, the research notes.

To be sure, not everyone can wait to claim until age 70. Those who do delay tend to retire later or have more financial assets, according to the research.

“A lot of Americans don’t have an active choice on when to claim,” Blanchett said.

“If you know that you’re not sick, and you have some money saved for retirement, the odds are you should probably at least delay until 65, 67, maybe 70,” he said.

How to know if you’re getting good claiming advice

Not all financial advisors will have the same knowledge of the ins and outs of Social Security claiming, which comes with a multitude of rules.

Experts say there are signs prospective claimants can watch for to gauge the quality of the guidance they’re getting.

“If a consumer ever gets either a recommendation or an acceptance of an early claim, they’ve got to really evaluate … ‘Why is this advisor giving me that advice?'” Elsasser said.

Try to evaluate your financial professional’s process that led them to that conclusion, he said. Often, it’s a result of longevity assumptions that are too short, or the idea that Social Security benefit income that is claimed early can be invested.

Consumers can gauge longevity estimates using a free online tool, the Actuaries Longevity Illustrator, Elsasser said. Moreover, investment returns that are compared to Social Security should be based on more conservative holdings like government bonds rather than stocks, he said.

More from Personal Finance:
Advice about 401(k) rollovers is poised for a big change. Here’s why
IRS free filing pilot processed more than 140,000 returns, commissioner says
Here’s why new home sales inch higher despite 7% mortgage rates

Written materials provided by the Social Security Administration make it clear that evaluating when to claim is a personal decision, notes Fichtner, who formerly served as acting deputy commissioner at the agency.

A financial professional should also guide you through those same considerations — What is your health status? What other sources of income do you have? How will your claiming decision affect your spouse, if you have one?

Most prospective Social Security claimants are trying to make their money last, rather than maximize their returns, Fichtner said.

Consequently, a financial advisor’s recommendations — whether done independently or through a software — should emphasize protecting lifetime income rather than boosting returns, he said.

Surveys routinely show one of the top reasons Social Security beneficiaries claim early is because they are concerned about the program’s future. The program’s trust funds may run out within the next decade, at which point there may be an across-the-board benefit cut unless Congress acts sooner.

But experts say that’s not a reason to claim early. By delaying, any future prospective cuts would be applied to a higher benefit amount.

Even shorter-term claiming delays of months rather than years can help increase your lifetime income.

“Every month you delay, it’s a benefit increase,” Fichtner said.

Don’t miss these exclusives from CNBC PRO

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

Maximizing Returns in High Rate Climate and market uncertainty

Published

on

Maximizing Returns in High-Rate Climate

In the macroeconomic environment of late July 2026, personal cash management requires an active, structured approach to wealth preservation. With central bank benchmark rates remaining elevated to ensure long-term disinflation, conservative yield-bearing vehicles—such as short-term U.S. Treasury bills, money market funds, and high-yield savings accounts (HYSAs)—continue to offer reliable nominal returns between 4% and 5%. For individual investors, maximizing net returns requires moving beyond passive checking accounts and executing a disciplined cash laddering strategy.

Leaving substantial liquid capital in traditional bank deposits creates an invisible drag on personal net worth due to ongoing inflation. By implementing a tiered liquidity framework, individuals can split emergency cash reserves and short-term capital allocations across rolling maturities. Allocating cash into 4-week, 8-week, and 13-week Treasury bills creates a continuous cycle of maturing liquidity, allowing investors to continuously reinvest capital at prevailing market yields while maintaining immediate access to emergency funds.

Tax efficiency represents a critical dimension of high-yield cash optimization. For high-earning individuals residing in states with substantial local income taxes, direct holdings in short-term U.S. Treasury instruments often deliver superior net post-tax yields compared to standard commercial bank HYSAs. Because interest earned on federal Treasury bills is strictly exempt from state and local taxation, investors can retain a larger portion of their compounding interest gains without taking on additional credit or market risk.

Ultimately, personal wealth accumulation in mid-2026 relies on intentional capital deployment. Cash should be managed as a productive asset class that generates consistent, risk-free returns. Regularly auditing account yield terms, automating recurring transfers, and leveraging tax-advantaged fixed-income instruments ensures that personal liquidity remains fully optimized against macroeconomic fluctuations.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

Algorithmic Wealth Management: Balancing Automated Financial Planning with Human Oversight

Published

on

Balancing Automated Financial Planning with Human Oversight

The personal finance industry in July 2026 is experiencing a technological evolution, driven by the wide deployment of next-generation algorithmic wealth management tools. Modern digital financial platforms have expanded far beyond basic automated index investing; today’s robo-advisors utilize real-time tax-loss harvesting, dynamic portfolio rebalancing, and hyper-personalized spending analysis to optimize retail investor outcomes. However, as these digital solutions become ubiquitous, investors face the crucial challenge of balancing automated execution with human strategic judgment.

The core advantage of automated financial planning platforms lies in their ability to remove emotional bias from investment execution. During periods of market volatility or localized sector realignments, automated algorithms systematically rebalance portfolios back to target asset allocations without falling victim to panic selling or speculative enthusiasm. Furthermore, integrated cash-flow monitoring algorithms analyze individual spending patterns in real time, automatically sweeping surplus income into designated retirement or debt-liquidation accounts to accelerate net worth accumulation.

Despite these operational advantages, algorithmic tools have inherent structural limitations when addressing complex, highly personalized financial life events. Decisions involving multi-generational estate planning, highly complex tax strategies, small business exits, or nuanced real estate transactions require contextual human judgment that software models cannot replicate. Relying solely on automated models without periodic human professional review can result in misaligned risk profiles or overlooked tax liabilities during major life transitions.

The optimal approach for personal financial planning in late 2026 is a hybrid advisory model. Individuals should utilize automated platforms for routine asset allocation, continuous tax optimization, and low-cost passive index tracking, while engaging qualified human financial advisors for periodic strategic planning, estate structuring, and qualitative risk evaluations. This dual approach ensures maximum cost efficiency and disciplined execution while retaining essential strategic guidance.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

High-Yield Optimization: Structuring Personal Cash Reserves in a Sustained Rate Environment

Published

on

Structuring Personal Cash Reserves in a Sustained Rate Environment

In the financial environment of mid-2026, personal cash management has re-emerged as a vital component of holistic wealth building. With central bank policy rates holding firm to maintain long-term price stability, yield-bearing instruments such as money market funds, high-yield savings accounts (HYSAs), and short-term Treasury bills continue to offer compounding returns around 4% to 5%. For individual investors, effectively structuring cash reserves requires shifting away from passive bank deposits toward active yield optimization.

A frequent pitfall in personal asset management is leaving substantial liquid capital in traditional checking or low-yield savings accounts, where real returns are continuously eroded by baseline inflation. By implementing a disciplined ‘cash ladder’ strategy—allocating liquid funds across tiered maturities using ultra-short Treasury instruments and FDIC-insured high-yield accounts—individuals can secure maximal yields while retaining immediate liquidity for emergency expenses or tactical investment opportunities.

Simultaneously, investors must evaluate the tax efficiency of their cash holdings based on their tax bracket and geographic location. For high earners situated in states with high local income taxes, direct holdings in short-term U.S. Treasury bills often yield a higher net post-tax return than standard high-yield savings accounts, as Treasury interest is strictly exempt from state and local taxation. Understanding these nuanced tax distinctions allows individuals to capture significant incremental gains without taking on additional market risk.

Ultimately, personal financial health in late 2026 hinges on intentional liquidity management. Cash reserves should not be viewed merely as static emergency funds, but as a dynamic asset class that contributes positively to net worth growth. Regularly auditing yield terms, automating cash transfers, and optimizing for post-tax efficiency ensures that personal capital remains fully productive across all economic conditions.

Continue Reading

Trending