Connect with us

Accounting

AI leaders on: the progress, promise and peril of AI

Published

on

Accounting’s AI revolution not only continued into 2024 but actually seemed to accelerate, as it has now become near impossible to go to a conference, sit in a strategy meeting or even shop for new software without hearing those two famous letters, often preceded by the word “generative” and followed by the word “powered” or “driven.” This might seem rather strange, as around this time last year we were marveling at how far AI had come in such a short time, and yet at the end of 2024 we find ourselves in this place once more as the current generation of AI tools makes last year’s seem almost quaint. 

This is why, in our second annual AI Thought Leaders Survey, we asked experts in the field what they thought of the past year. The field of AI is both vast and ever-changing, and we wanted to see what people deeply enmeshed in AI in accounting thought of all the changes they’ve seen this year. 

Many noted that AI has gone from being a novelty or an experimental tool in many cases to being a practical, widely-adopted technology integral to daily operations. In this respect, even those who may not consider themselves tech-savvy are now using sophisticated AI tools that would have seemed like science fiction as little as ten years ago. Strategic decision-making, advanced analytics, and personalized client interactions are just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to use cases for accountants. 

“At the beginning of the year, AI in accounting felt like an emerging trend that many were watching from the sidelines,” said Kacee Johnson, vice president of strategy and innovation at CPA.com, talking about the noticeable shift since then. “It’s no longer just about automation; the conversations have evolved to exploring how AI can enhance advisory roles, improve decision-making, and solve capacity challenges. I’ve seen more professionals embracing AI as a tool they need to understand and leverage, not just something that might affect their work down the line.” 

The speed at which AI has advanced this year impressed many, especially its generative capabilities and its application to data both structured and unstructured. In a short time it has transformed workflows, increased productivity, and uncovered new insights their human users had never considered. Meanwhile, the recent rollout of specialized AI agents capable of limited autonomy to handle complex tasks like fraud detection, tax analysis and data reconciliation tells them there’s still so much more to come. 

“We have all seen AI advance significantly in the past year, especially in the area of automation of manual tasks. Think about areas like bill pay, invoicing, expense management, financial statement analysis, etc. AI is putting accountants into more strategic roles and getting them out of the trenches in doing the manual tasks. This past year I have seen a number of players in the tax space surface by leveraging AI. Although many of them still continue to be a work in progress, we are going to see AI totally change the tax space and eliminate the massive tech stacks that exist in many firms today,” said Jim Bourke, managing director of Withum’s advisory services.

Of course, all technologies have their risks and AI is no exception. Indeed, as the technology’s presence in firms grows, so too have the concerns about its use. Our experts cited security risks like data breaches and misuse of sensitive information by AI systems, and many were still worried about the accuracy of their outputs given the tendency to “hallucinate” (i.e. making stuff up). But they also raised broader ethical concerns, such as the perpetuation of bias as well as potential job displacement in the short term. Our experts didn’t think AI was going to wholesale replace accountants anytime soon, but some conceded that it would serve to disrupt job dynamics in certain parts of the profession. 

“It’s poised to replace certain jobs or at least automate specific tasks within jobs. AI agents will influence particular roles, potentially altering the premium placed on certain skills, leading to some traditional jobs disappearing entirely,” said Prashant Ganti, head of product management in Zoho’s Finance and Operations business unit. 

In this, the first of three parts, we look at what our experts—drawn from CPA firms, software vendors and academics all deeply involved in the field of artificial intelligence in the accounting world—thought of three questions: 

* How has your perception or impression of AI in accounting changed from the beginning of this year to now?

* What scares you the most about AI today? What is your biggest concern? 

* What’s impressed you the most about AI this year? What really got your attention? Both in terms of accounting and overall.

We’ll have more from our experts next week.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Accounting

Fraud guilty plea from accountant over $1.4M mortgage loan

Published

on

In a case involving phony documents and unpaid taxes, a prominent Washington, D.C.-based accountant pleaded guilty last week for making false statements on a mortgage application after failing to file IRS returns.

A certified public accountant with expertise on tax compliance and due diligence matters, Timothy Trifilo has held partner or managing director positions at several firms for over four decades. He also taught courses in taxation and real estate as an adjunct professor, the original Department of Justice indictment said. Trifilo was hired as a managing director with consulting firm Alvarez & Marsal earlier this year. 

The fraud allegations resulted from a 2023 purchase, when Trifilo applied for a $1.4 million mortgage on a Washington property. When the unidentified issuing bank advised that they could not locate recent tax returns nor approve his application without them, Trifilo submitted copies of 2021 and 2022 IRS filings to the lender, who then originated the loan.  

Investigators later discovered that, in reality, Trifilo had neither filed returns nor paid taxes for any year beginning in 2012 despite income over the subsequent decade totaling more than $7.7 million. His annual earnings ranged between $636,051 and $948,252 during that time, amounts that required him to file individual tax returns each year.

On documentation delivered to the lender in support of the mortgage application, a former colleague of Trifilo was identified as responsible for preparing, reviewing and signing the falsified returns purportedly submitted to the Internal Revenue Service.  

“This individual did not prepare the returns, has never prepared tax returns for Trifilo and did not authorize Trifilo to use his name on the returns and other documents that Trifilo submitted,” a DOJ press release said.  

A grand jury originally indicted Trifilo in September on seven counts, including bank fraud and failure to file tax returns, as well as aggravated identity theft. His actions led to a tax loss for the IRS of $2.1 million. 

He faces a maximum sentence of three decades in prison for defrauding the lender, as well as one year for failure to file tax returns. Sentencing is scheduled for May 19. 

In addition to potential prison time, Trifilo may be required to forfeit the original loan amount and property acquired through bank fraud, the original indictment stated. He also faces a period of supervised release, monetary penalties and restitution. 

Attorneys from the DOJ’s tax division prosecuted the case, with evidence based on findings from the IRS criminal investigation unit. 

Submission of phony forms and documents have played a role in multiple fraud cases this year, pointing to a pain point in the mortgage process that could end up costing lenders. Problems in income and employment data specifically had a defect rate of 37.01% to lead all underwriting categories between March and June this year, according to Aces Quality Management. The number surged from 23.42% in the first quarter.

Aces’ report found overall defect rates of originated mortgages rising in both the first and second quarters. 

Continue Reading

Accounting

AICPA wants SEC to reject PCAOB standard on firm and engagement metrics

Published

on

The American Institute of CPAs is asking the Securities and Exchange Commission to reject the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s recently adopted standard on firm and engagement metrics, arguing they would drive smaller firms out of the auditing business and affect companies large and small.

The PCAOB voted to adopt the standard last month, along with a related standard on firm reporting, but the new rules still need to be approved by the SEC before they become official and take effect. Under the new rules, PCAOB-registered public accounting firms that audit one or more issuers that qualify as an accelerated filer or large accelerated filer would be required to publicly report specified metrics relating to such audits and their audit practices. The PCAOB made some changes from the originally proposed rules to accommodate some of the objections from the audit industry and public companies, but they remain far reaching in scope. The AICPA argues that the rules would affect more than just accelerated filers and large accelerated filers and could harm smaller companies and their auditors as well. Under SEC rules, accelerated filers are companies that have a public float of between $75 million and $700 million,  annual revenues of $100 million or more, and have filed periodic reports and an annual report within the past year. Larger accelerated filers have a public float of $700 million or more. The AICPA expressed caution soon after the PCAOB voted to approve the new standards, but said it was still studying it. Now it is coming out firmly against the new rules and urging the SEC to reject them.

“Alternative approaches that better balance transparency, cost, and the needs of audit committees, while continuing to support the quality of audit services and choice of audit providers available to perform public company audits and serve the public interest should be pursued, rather than introducing potentially detrimental unproven regulations,” the AICPA said in a comment letter to the SEC.

The AICPA argues the new rules would hurt U.S. capital markets as well as the investing public, in addition to auditing firms of all sizes. 

“We believe these rules will have unintended negative consequences, including driving small and medium-sized firms out of the public company auditing practice,” said AICPA comment letter. “This would result in fewer firms performing audits which are critically important for smaller and medium size companies seeking to access the U.S. capital markets. Consequently, companies will face greater challenges and higher costs in meeting necessary audit requirements to access to the U.S. capital markets. The PCAOB acknowledges that mid-sized and smaller accounting firms serving small to mid-sized public companies will incur substantial, if not prohibitive, costs in complying with the proposed amendments. The final rules reaffirm the PCAOB’s belief that the rules will disproportionately affect smaller firms.”

The AICPA contends it’s overly simplistic to believe the impact of the rules would mostly fall within the market for large accelerated filers. “Smaller audit firms often serve clients of varying sizes, and their departure from the broader public company audit market could result in a substantial loss of audit firm options, particularly for smaller, less complex accelerated filers,” said the AICPA. “The loss of competition and the reduction in available audit firms could lead to higher costs and less favorable engagement terms for these smaller issuers. A landscape in which smaller issuers have fewer options contradicts the PCAOB’s goal of promoting fair competition.”

The AICPA disputes the claim by proponents of the new rules that competition may increase in the non-accelerated filer audit market as firms exit the accelerated filer and large accelerated filer markets. “This fails to account for the fact that non-accelerated filers often rely on firms with specific expertise and resources,” said the AICPA comment letter. “Further, the firms exiting the accelerated filer space may not be able to effectively redeploy their capacity to the non-accelerated filer market. In fact, their exit could lead to a loss of specialized services and a further concentration of resources in the larger end of audit firms, making it harder for non-accelerated filers to secure high-quality, affordable audits.”

The AICPA disagrees with predictions that profitable firms in the larger audit markets could expand their market share against the Big Four. “The resources required to absorb and integrate such capacity are substantial, and many firms may not have the operational flexibility to do so without significant strain on their existing clients and resources,” said the AICPA comment letter. “This further risks driving up audit costs for smaller and mid-sized issuers, which are often less agile and unable to absorb such change without significant disruption.”

The Institute is also concerned about the use of performance metrics within the PCAOB’s inspection and enforcement program, and how they might drive up the risk of enforcement for minor, unintentional reporting errors. It said the PCAOB rejected calls for a threshold based on the severity of reporting errors. The PCAOB declined a request for comment.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Aiwyn raises $113M in funding from KKR, Bessemer

Published

on

Aiwyn, a provider of technology solutions for accountants and CPA firms, has closed a $113 million funding round.

The money will help the company continue its evolution from its original focus on payments and collections for accounting firms into a more comprehensive tool for practice management.

Among other things, that will include building a universal client experience portal, where accountants can access all of their engagements in one place.

Justin Adams, CEO of Aiwyn

Aiwyn CEO Justin Adams

The funding will also be used to accelerate product development on both the company’s practice management platform, and on a tax solution that it is working on.

“Aiwyn is committed to empowering CPA firms to elevate their operations and client relationships,” said chairman and CEO Justin Adams, in a statement. “With this investment, we are poised to redefine how firms manage their operations from the CRM to the general ledger, while setting a new benchmark for client experiences. For too long, firms have had to decide between a legacy vendor or modern point solutions. We are proud that Aiwyn is a trusted platform for CPA firms.”

The round was led by global investment firm KKR and Bessemer Venture Partners. KKR is funding this investment primarily from its Next Generation Technology III Fund.

“The accounting industry represents a large market that has long been served by legacy players. Aiwyn is solving a clear functionality gap in the market with a solution that is easily adopted and rapidly delivers tangible enhancements to the customer experience, most noticeably through significant reductions in days sales outstanding,” said Jackson Hart, a principal on KKR’s technology growth team, in a statement.

“Aiwyn’s product suite is already quite impressive, but the company is really just getting started on its quest to deliver compelling technology to the accounting industry,” added Bessemer partner Jeremy Levine, in a statement.

Cooley LLP served as legal advisor to Aiwyn; Latham & Watkins LLP served as legal advisor to KKR; and Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP served as legal advisor to Bessemer.

Continue Reading

Trending