Connect with us

Accounting

AICPA prepares for possibility of PCAOB being folded into SEC

Published

on

koziel-mark-aicpa-accountants-club.jpg

AICPA & CIMA president and CEO Mark Koziel speaking at the Accountants Club of America

The AICPA & CIMA’s new president and CEO, Mark Koziel, told a group of accountants that the association is preparing for the possibility that the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board is “rolled up” into the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Trump administration.

He noted that President Trump’s nomination for SEC chairman, Paul Atkins, has previously supported that idea. Atkins was formerly a commissioner at the SEC from 2002 to 2008 and previously worked at PricewaterhouseCoopers and its predecessor firm, Coopers & Lybrand. 

“Paul Atkins actually is former PwC, friendly to the profession, so we are hopeful there that we can continue strong relationships with the SEC as we go forward,” said Koziel during a speech at a meeting Monday of the Accountants Club of America in New York.

He noted that the new Office of Management and Budget director, Russell Vought, has already moved to shut down the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and could do the same with the PCAOB.

“I do think that as we look at things going forward, you’re going to see more of that,” said Koziel. “There are rumors we’re dealing with currently, and Paul Atkins, in his prior stint with the SEC, was already pretty vocal about the fact that he wouldn’t mind seeing the PCAOB be shut down, and anything that the PCAOB does get rolled up into the SEC. So that is something that we are working on today in preparation. People have said, ‘Are you for or against PCAOB?’ For us, whatever they decide to do, we’re going to work with whatever regulator we need to work with as a profession to make sure that we’re serving the public interest the way it needs to be. And so if that means trying to help them along the way to make that happen, to help with standard setting, whatever that might be, those are the things that we need to work on today.”

Unlike the moves by the Trump administration’s Department of Government Efficiency to shut down the CFPB and the U.S. Agency for International Development, the PCAOB might not have as many advocates fighting in court for it to survive.

“When you think about the fact that the PCAOB, if they were to shut it down, and DOGE would be able to take credit for it, who would oppose it?” said Koziel. “Because it’s not one of those agencies that the average public is generally aware of. It has a $400 million budget, none of which is paid for by taxpayers. It is all funded by issuers as part of the SEC system. But it’s a $400 million win, if they could say it publicly in some way, shape or form. Now that $400 million would have to be reallocated, and they’re still going to have people doing reviews and doing audits of the audits along the way. This is all speculative, but there are rumors on the Hill that PCAOB — that is a possibility as we get out there. Our view is that we are willing to work with whoever the oversight agency is to the profession, and happy to provide any input that we can, and any assistance that we can along the way.”

Koziel was later asked about what might happen to the PCAOB if it went away or became part of the SEC. “The PCAOB, because they’re not technically a federal agency, if they come under the SEC, they’re subject to governmental rules, and I do think they’re going to have a harder time recruiting than they do as a separate entity, as they are today,” he responded. “I also worry about if that were to happen, there’s a couple factors. Number one, if it rolls up into the SEC, any of the findings could become public under the SEC versus where it’s today with the PCAOB. So there are a lot of good things as to how it is today. And I don’t have an opinion one way or the other. We will work with whoever the oversight agency is at that time. They’re a fine organization, but I do think that the reality is today, that there is some likelihood that they may not be here.”

IRS changes

Koziel also discussed the changes at the Internal Revenue Service and how those might affect tax season as well as the new nominee for IRS commissioner, Billy Long. The AICPA has already been in discussions with its contacts at the IRS and the Treasury Department about what is happening with the federal government’s hiring freeze.

“The hiring freeze is out there,” said Koziel. “It does exempt military and border security. There’s been a number of buyouts that have been talked about. The president is encouraging people to retire early, take the buyout, and get out of the government.”

He noted, however, that IRS employees have since been told they will need to work through May 15, a month beyond the tax deadline, even if they have already accepted the buyout offer.

“As far as the hiring freeze itself, we’ve been talking to the IRS, we’ve been talking to Treasury, and all of the hiring that needed to take place to ramp up for the busy season of 2025 happened before the hiring freeze took place,” said Koziel. “The IRS is trying to give us comfort as best they can that they will be functional.”

Even if the IRS isn’t fully functional, CPAs can assist with answering taxpayer questions, perhaps even by staffing the phone lines. “We want to try and help the IRS anyway we can,” said Koziel. “Is there a way for us to help populate the help lines to make it better for getting the phone calls? The courtesy hangup that we used to talk about in years past, that’s still happening. If they put you on hold, there is some point in time that the IRS says you’ve been on hold long enough, so we’re just going to disconnect you. These are people issues. There are going to be retirements that are going to happen in the very near term. We want the IRS to be able to answer our members’ questions, and take care of our members so that they can take care of their clients. I look forward to the conversation. I am already due to meet with the IRS commissioner in March, provided that Billy Long is the appointed IRS commissioner. We’re happy to have those conversations, to really have the best possible working relationship that we can.”

He is also looking forward to working again with Mike Faulkender, who has been named deputy Treasury secretary. Faulkender worked previously for former Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin during the first Trump administration and kept Koziel and other AICPA officials like CPA.com president and CEO Erik Asgeirsson informed about the Paycheck Protection Program that Faulkender was running.

Tax bill

Another top issue for the AICPA is the ongoing discussions in Washington over the expiring provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Republicans are aiming to pass the tax bill through the budget reconciliation process so they can avoid a possible filibuster in the Senate by Democrats, but it’s unclear right now whether it will be part of a single bill along with immigration reform and spending, or be introduced as two separate bills. In either case, Koziel believes it’s unlikely the tax legislation would pass before December. He noted that during the first Trump administration, Republicans weren’t able to pass the TCJA under the reconciliation procedure until late December.

“Even if they got it into one reconciliation bill, this is not the same Congress and White House that we had in his first term,” he said. “The margin of control is paper thin.”

A potential government shutdown on March 14 could upend tax season. “Imagine, all of you tax practitioners, the government shutting down on March 14, so that all of the clients that you’re working on for a March 15 deadline are going to be even that much more challenging if that happens,” said Koziel. He believes a shutdown is unlikely, but warned it’s possible.

DEI impact

Accountants will also need to keep an eye out for the impact of the tariffs that Trump has ordered on countries like Canada, Mexico and China, as well as his executive order prohibiting diversity, equity and inclusion programs in the federal government. That could run counter to the AICPA’s own efforts to encourage greater diversity in the accounting profession.

“It’s one that worries me a bit, to be honest, because I think we’ve made strides as a profession, a profession that in the days before we identified it, we did not look like the communities we serve,” said Koziel. “We still are not looking entirely like the communities we serve. We’ve done better to try and bring more underrepresented minorities into the profession, to try and get women leaders to be owners and firms and organizations, but we can’t stop that in fear of any type of retaliation. And there could be. We are a federal contractor actually, the AICPA, we provide content to the federal government, and so there are things that we have to watch and some words that most likely will need to change based on all this, but we don’t ask people to do preference hiring based on any of that. We don’t make promotions based on preference promotions for anyone. We’re just saying we need more people in the profession. We need to focus on communities where we are underserved or underserving those communities because we don’t have representation in those communities to be able to do that. And so it definitely has a lot of folks nervous. There were a lot of DEI-related hires within the federal government that have since been laid off. So for us, we want to keep doing what we’re doing. We just may have to change the words along the way as we make that happen, but I am standing here saying we are fully supportive of being a more diverse profession than we have been in years past, and we’re going to continue to drive that as we go forward.”

Pipeline issues

Koziel pointed to the need for the accounting profession to continue to work on increasing its pipeline. He plans to continue the strategic plan of AICPA & CIMA, on implementing the recommendations of its National Pipeline Advisory Group.

“We need to drive more into the profession,” said Koziel. “We need to increase the pipeline. They came out with the recommendations about a year ago. I’ve been through those and they hit it right on the head with all the things that need to be done in this profession.”

He has been mentoring eight young people and encouraging them to enter the accounting profession. “All of us have responsibility for the pipeline, not just the AICPA, not just the state societies, but we can all do our part to try and increase the pipeline,” he said. 

He pointed to work being done in different states on providing alternative paths to a CPA license beyond the traditional 150 credit hours, as in Ohio last month.

“We’ve got to make sure that mobility stays intact as best we can,” said Koziel. “That is something that we continue to work on.”

He noted that two exposure drafts went out for comment late last year proposing changes in the model Uniform Accountancy Act that states follow on alternative pathways to a CPA license and on moving to individual mobility across states. The proposals are still being tweaked after comments arrived by last December. More information is expected, probably in the next 30 days, “but that pathway is a distinct possibility for the country,” said Koziel. 

Accounting Today asked whether the recent news about a 12% increase in accounting undergraduate enrollment in the fall 2024 semester could represent a turning point. Koziel said that was encouraging, but he isn’t ready to declare “mission accomplished” on his 41st day as CEO.

“We still have a lot of work to do,” he responded. “We have to make sure they stay and still work with the schools around that. Getting them to licensure is always going to be something that’s really important.”

Before becoming president and CEO of the AICPA & CIMA, succeeding longtime leader Barry Melancon, Koziel was president and CEO of Allinial Global, an association of independent accounting and advisory firms. Before he left Allineal, he had a meeting with about a dozen member firms in the southeast Panhandle region, including Louisiana, Texas, Florida, and the Carolinas. 

“They said all of our accounting departments are full, so accounting must be doing great because all the schools are full. I said, no, the schools in the Southeast are full. The schools up north are still struggling. They’re still challenged to try and find people,” said Koziel.

Some universities such as the University of Alabama and Louisiana State University are offering generous scholarships to attract accounting students, while other students are enticed by factors such as the weather and climate. “It’s a different environment than when a lot of us went to school, so we still have a lot of work to do, but it’s encouraging to see the 12% increase for sure,” said Koziel. He is inviting CPAs to provide him with feedback by emailing him at [email protected].

Ed Mendlowitz, an emeritus partner at Withum and Accounting Today columnist, was watching the Accountants Club of America meeting online. “Mark provided insights into a lot of the areas CPAs are concerned about,” he said in an email. “Mark said we should be encouraged by the recent increase in accounting student enrollments, but not be complacent about it. We need to make sure they stay and get their CPA license. That requires effort and making sure our firms are using the latest technology to remove the repetitiveness of functions that our staff previously had to do. He also said that adapting technology and how CPA firms are governed are two major areas that need to be jumpstarted. While using technology might be obvious, less so are the many practices that are still being run by a managing partner with huge books of business not being the way to continue. Practices need to be professionally managed and that needs a dedicated CEO leading a C-suite team responsible for running segments of the practice.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

XcelLabs launches to help accountants use AI

Published

on

Jody Padar, an author and speaker known as “The Radical CPA,” and Katie Tolin, a growth strategist for CPAs, together launched a training and technology platform called XcelLabs.

XcelLabs provides solutions to help accountants use artificial technology fluently and strategically. The Pennsylvania Institute of CPAs and CPA Crossings joined with Padar and Tolin as strategic partners and investors.

“To reinvent the profession, we must start by training the professional who can then transform their firms,” Padar said in a statement. “By equipping people with data and insights that help them see things differently, they can provide better advice to their clients and firm.”

Padar-Jody- new 2019

Jody Padar

The platform includes XcelLabs Academy, a series of educational online courses on the basics of AI, being a better advisor, leadership and practice management; Navi, a proprietary tool that uses AI to help accountants turn unstructured data like emails, phone calls and meetings into insights; and training and consulting services. These offerings are currently in beta testing.

“Accountants know they need to be more advisory, but not everyone can figure out how to do it,” Tolin said in a statement. “Couple that with the fact that AI will be doing a lot of the lower-level work accountants do today, and we need to create that next level advisor now. By showing accountants how to unlock patterns in their actions and turn client conversations into emotionally intelligent advice, we can create the accounting professional of the future.”

Tolin-Katie-CPA Growth Guides

Katie Tolin

“AI is transforming how CPAs work, and XcelLabs is focused on helping the profession evolve with it,” PICPA CEO Jennifer Cryder said in a statement. “At PICPA, we’re proud to support a mission that aligns so closely with ours: empowering firms to use AI not just for efficiency, but to drive growth, value and long-term relevance.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Accounting is changing, and the world can’t wait until 2026

Published

on

The accountant the world urgently needs has evolved far beyond the traditional role we recognized just a few years ago. 

The transformation of the accounting profession is not merely an anticipated change; it is a pressing reality that is currently shaping business decisions, academic programs and the expected contributions of professionals. Yet, in many areas, accounting education stubbornly clings to outdated, overly technical models that fail to connect with the actual demands of the market. We must confront a critical question: If we continue to train accountants solely to file tax reports, are we truly equipping them for the challenges of today’s world? 

This shift in mindset extends beyond individual countries or educational systems; it is a global movement. The recent announcement of the CIMA/CGMA 2026 syllabus has made it unmistakably clear: merely knowing how to post journal entries is insufficient. Today’s accountants are required to interpret the landscape, anticipate risks and act with strategic awareness. Critical thinking, sustainable finance, technology and human behavior are not just supplementary topics; they are essential components in the education of any professional seeking to remain relevant. 

The CIMA/CGMA proposal for 2026 is not just a curriculum update; it is a powerful manifesto. This new program positions analytical thinking, strategic business partnering and technology application at the core of accounting education. It unequivocally highlights sustainability, aligning with IFRS S1 and S2, and expands the accountant’s responsibilities beyond mere numbers to encompass conscious leadership, environmental impact and corporate governance. 

The current changes in the accounting profession underscore an urgent shift in expectations from both educators and employers. Today, companies of all sizes and industries demand accountants who can do far more than interpret balance sheets. They expect professionals who grasp the deeper context behind the numbers, identify inconsistencies, anticipate potential issues before they escalate into losses, and act decisively as a bridge between data and decision making. 

To meet these expectations, a radical mindset shift is essential. There are firms still operating on autopilot, mindlessly repeating tasks with minimal critical analysis. Likewise, many academic programs continue to treat accounting as purely a technical discipline, disregarding the vital elements of reflection, strategy and behavioral insight. This outdated approach creates a significant mismatch. While the world forges ahead, parts of the accounting profession remain stuck in the past. 

The consequences of this shift are already becoming evident. The demand for compliance, transparency and sustainability now applies not only to large corporations but also to small and mid-sized businesses. Many of these organizations rely on professionals ill-equipped to drive the necessary changes, putting both business performance and the reputation of the profession at risk. 

The positive news is that accountants who are ready to thrive in this new era do not necessarily need additional degrees. What they truly need is a commitment to awareness, a dedication to continuous learning, and the courage to step beyond their comfort zones. The future of accounting is here, and it is firmly rooted in analytical, strategic and human-oriented perspectives. The 2026 curriculum is a clear indication of the changes underway. Those who fail to think critically and holistically will be left behind. 

In contrast, accountants who see the big picture, understand the ripple effects of their decisions, and actively contribute to the financial and ethical health of organizations will undeniably remain indispensable, anywhere in the world.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Republicans push Musk aside as Trump tax bill barrels forward

Published

on

Congressional Republicans are siding with Donald Trump in the messy divorce between the president and Elon Musk, an optimistic sign for eventual passage of a tax cut bill at the root of the two billionaires’ public feud.

Lawmakers are largely taking their cues from Trump and sticking by the $3 trillion bill at the center of the White House’s economic agenda. Musk, the biggest political donor of the 2024 cycle, has threatened to help primary anyone who votes for the legislation, but lawmakers are betting that staying in the president’s good graces is the safer path to political survival.

“The tax bill is not in jeopardy. We are going to deliver on that,” House Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters on Friday.

“I’ll tell you what — do not doubt, don’t second guess and do not challenge the President of the United States Donald Trump,” he added. “He is the leader of the party. He’s the most consequential political figure of our time.”

A fight between Trump and Musk exploded into public view this week. The sparring started with the tech titan calling the president’s tax bill a “disgusting abomination,” but quickly escalated to more personal attacks and Trump threatening to cancel all federal contracts and subsidies to Musk’s companies, such as Tesla Inc. and SpaceX which have benefitted from government ties.

Republicans on Capitol Hill, who had —  until recently — publicly embraced Musk, said they weren’t swayed by the billionaire’s criticism that the bill cost too much. Lawmakers have refuted official estimates of the package, saying that the tax cuts for households, small businesses and politically important groups — including hospitality and hourly workers — will generate enough economic growth to offset the price tag.

“I don’t tell my friend Elon, I don’t argue with him about how to build rockets, and I wish he wouldn’t argue with me about how to craft legislation and pass it,” Johnson told CNBC earlier Friday.

House Budget Committee Chair Jodey Arrington told reporters that House lawmakers are focused on working with the Senate as it revises the bill to make sure the legislation has the political support in both chambers to make it to Trump’s desk for his signature. 

“We move past the drama and we get the substance of what is needed to make the modest improvements that can be made,” he said.

House fiscal hawks said that they hadn’t changed their prior positions on the legislation based on Musk’s statements. They also said they agree with GOP leaders that there will be other chances to make further spending cuts outside the tax bill. 

Representative Tom McClintock, a fiscal conservative, said “the bill will pass because it has to pass,” adding that both Musk and Trump needed to calm down. “They both need to take a nap,” he said.

Even some of the House bill’s most vociferous critics appeared resigned to its passage. Kentucky Representative Thomas Massie, who voted against the House version, predicted that despite Musk’s objections, the Senate will make only small changes.

“The speaker is right about one thing. This barely passed the House. If they muck with it too much in the Senate, it may not pass the House again,” he said.

Trump is pressuring lawmakers to move at breakneck speed to pass the tax-cut bill, demanding they vote on the bill before the July 4 holiday. The president has been quick to blast critics of the bill — including calling Senator Rand Paul “crazy” for objecting to the inclusion of a debt ceiling increase in the package.

As the legislation worked its way through the House last month, Trump took to social media to criticize holdouts and invited undecided members to the White House to compel them to support the package. It passed by one vote.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune — who is planning to unveil his chamber’s version of the bill as soon as next week — said his timeline is unmoved by Musk. 

“We are already pretty far down the trail,” he said.

Continue Reading

Trending