Connect with us

Economics

Optimism is growing around the UK economy amid U.S.-EU trade disputes

Published

on

UK inflation story is getting better despite hot January print, economist says

LONDON — Some investors are expressing a growing optimism about the U.K.’s economic outlook despite the country’s long-standing structural weaknesses, as its neighbors in the European Union deepen their trade dispute with the United States.

That upbeat tone wasn’t reflected in the messaging of the Bank of England, as it held interest rates steady last Thursday, citing increased geopolitical uncertainty and indicators of financial market volatility. However, U.K. economic growth — tepid at best for the last three years — is finally expected to pick up somewhat in 2025, with Bank of America analysts forecasting a 1.4% expansion.

Inflation is still expected to cool back near-target in the months ahead, the labor market is loosening but remains robust, and the U.K. government has a determined focus — at times controversially — to support growth and reduce the national deficit.

Sanjay Raja, chief U.K. economist at Deutsche Bank, said that, on a recent client trip to the U.S. he noted a “budding sense of optimism” around the U.K. not seen in some time.

Key factors included a pivot toward deregulation and focus on more capital spending, the potential for a strong trade deal with the EU in the coming year, and an expectation the the U.K. will “stay in the US’ ‘good books’ as a trade war kicks off,” Raja said in a note earlier this month.

U.S. President Donald Trump has expressed a willingness to spare the U.K. from blanket or targeted tariffs, with expectations bolstered after U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer conducted a friendly trip to the White House in February.

EU flags flutter in front of European Central Bank (ECB) headquarters in Frankfurt, Germany July 18, 2024. 

EU delays implementing first retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods to middle of April

“Talk of a U.S. trade deal also surfaced in client conversations, and there was increased optimism that the U.K. may be spared from direct and widespread tariffs,” Raja said.

Some felt “structural growth could be on the rise after a steady decline since the global financial crisis,” he continued, while a broad European push to increase national defense spending could benefit U.K. corporates. Points of concern for investors remained January’s sell-off in U.K. government debt, fiscal headroom and the sustainability of spending cuts, Raja observed.

Still trade risks

The U.K. may have been spared the worst of Trump’s rhetoric so far — such as his threat of 200% tariffs on EU alcohol imports — but it is not totally immune from Washington’s protectionist push.

Gabriella Dickens, G7 economist at AXA Investment Managers, noted that the U.K. still faces a hit due to the new U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum. The U.K. exported a total of £370 million ($479.7 million) in steel to the U.S. in 2024, according to trade group UK Steel, accounting for 9% of total U.K. steel exports by value. Britain’s aluminum exports to the U.S. totaled were valued at around £225 million last year, the U.K.’s Aluminium Federation says.

The U.K. will also be impacted by any slowdown in global trade, including if this leads to weaker demand in its key partners such as the EU, and if general uncertainty erodes business and consumer confidence, Dickens told CNBC.

“Investor sentiment may be boosted if the U.K. manages to avoid further tariffs, particularly if trade tensions ramp up with the EU,” Dickens said. In the unlikely event Trump follows through with his prior threat of blanket 25% tariffs on the EU, a “material boost” would be provided to the U.K. as manufacturers would likely look to relocate, she said.

EU flags flutter in front of European Central Bank (ECB) headquarters in Frankfurt, Germany July 18, 2024. 

EU delays implementing first retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods to middle of April

The U.K. could still avoid further tariffs, since it has no large trade surplus with the U.S. and the majority of that is services-based. It has already pledged to boost its defense spending as a share of gross domestic product (GDP), avoiding much of Trump’s ire with other nations.

“Neither of these have spared the U.K. from the steel and aluminum tariffs, though,” Dickens added.

Lindsay James, investment strategist at Quilter Investors, also stressed the existing impact of steel and aluminum duties on the U.K. and flagged potential risks from the reciprocal U.S. tariffs due to be announced early April.

“The idea that VAT is some kind of tariff seems to have taken hold in the White House, placing the U.K. once again at considerable risk of coming into the crosshairs of U.S. trade policy,” James told CNBC.

“Whilst the reality is likely being willfully misrepresented by the White House in order to gain a negotiating advantage, the U.K. is not yet in the clear and, if Donald Trump’s demands on Ukraine are anything to go by, any future trade deal would likely come at a heavy price.”

James added that, while the government was improving the foundations of the U.K. economy in the long run, growth remained on a weak trajectory in the near term, with businesses hit by higher costs stemming from last year’s budget and continued issues with an “older and sicker workforce.”

“Whilst the [U.K.] stock market has so far benefitted from its perception of defensiveness, a modest starting valuation and a strong performance from heavily represented sectors such as oil and gas and financials, the divergence from the performance of the economy could lead to the large cap index continuing to outperform domestic stocks,” she said.

Economics

China targets U.S. services and other areas after decrying ‘meaningless’ tariff hikes on goods

Published

on

Dilara Irem Sancar | Anadolu | Getty Images

China last week announced it was done retaliating against U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariffs, saying any further increases by the U.S. would be a “joke,” and Beijing would “ignore” them.

Instead of continuing to focus on tariffing goods, however, China has chosen to resort to other measures, including steps targeting the American services sector.

Trump has jacked up U.S. levies on select goods from China by up to 245% after several rounds of tit-for-tat measures with Beijing in recent weeks. Before calling it a “meaningless numbers game,” China last week imposed additional duties on imports from the U.S. of up to 125%.

While the Trump administration has largely focused on pressing ahead on his tariff plans, Beijing has rolled out a series of non-tariff restrictive measures including widening export controls of rare-earth minerals and opening antitrust probes into American companies, such as pharmaceutical giant DuPont and IT major Google.

Before the latest escalation, in February Beijing had put dozens of U.S. businesses on a so-called “unreliable entity” list, which would restrict or ban firms from trading with or investing in China. American firms such as PVH, the parent company of Tommy Hilfiger, and Illumina, a gene-sequencing equipment provider, were among those added to the list.

Its tightening of exports of critical mineral elements will require Chinese companies to secure special licenses for exporting these resources, effectively restricting U.S. access to the key minerals needed for semiconductors, missile-defense systems and solar cells.

In its latest move on Tuesday, Beijing went after Boeing — America’s largest exporter — by ordering Chinese airlines not to take any further deliveries for its jets and requested carriers to halt any purchases of aircraft-related equipment and parts from U.S. companies, according to Bloomberg.

Having deliveries to China cut off will add to the cash-strapped plane maker’s troubles, as it struggles with a lingering quality-control crisis.

In another sign of growing hostilities, Chinese police issued notices for apprehending three people they claimed to have engaged in cyberattacks against China on behalf of the U.S. National Security Agency.

Chinese state media, which published the notice, urged domestic users and companies to avoid using American technology and replace them with domestic alternatives.

“Beijing is clearly signaling to Washington that two can play in this retaliation game and that it has many levers to pull, all creating different levels of pain for U.S. companies,” said Wendy Cutler, vice president at Asia Society Policy Institute.

“With high tariffs and other restrictions in place, the decoupling of the two economies is at full steam,” Cutler said.

Targeting trade in services

China is seen by some as seeking to broaden the trade war to encompass services trade — which covers travel, legal, consulting and financial services — where the U.S. has been running a significant surplus with China for years.

China Beige Book CEO: U.S. needs to articulate what they want from China

Earlier this month, a social media account affiliated with Chinese state media Xinhua News Agency, suggested Beijing could impose curbs on U.S. legal consultancy firms and consider a probe into U.S. companies’ China operations for the huge “monopoly benefits” they have gained from intellectual-property rights.

China’s imports of U.S. services surged more than 10-fold to $55 billion in 2024 over the past two decades, according to Nomura estimates, driving U.S. services trade surplus with China to $32 billion last year.

Last week, China said it would reduce imports of U.S. films and warned its citizens against traveling or studying in the U.S., in a sign of Beijing’s intent to put pressure on the U.S. entertainment, tourism and education sectors.

“These measures target high-visibility sectors — aviation, media, and education — that resonate politically in the U.S.,” said Jing Qian, managing director at Center for China Analysis.

While they might be low on actual dollar impact given the smaller scale of these sectors, “reputational effects — such as fewer Chinese students or more cautious Chinese employees — could ripple through academia and the tech talent ecosystem,” he added.

Nomura estimates $24 billion could be at stake if Beijing significantly step up restrictions on travel to the U.S.

Weekly analysis and insights from Asia’s largest economy in your inbox
Subscribe now

Travel dominated U.S. services exports to China, reflecting expenditure by millions of Chinese tourists in the U.S., according to Nomura. Within travel, education-related spending leads at 71%, it estimates, mostly coming from tuition and living expenses for the more than 270,000 Chinese students studying in the U.S.

Entertainment exports, encompassing films, music and television programs, accounted for just 6% of U.S. exports within this sector, the investment firm said, noting that Beijing’s latest move on film imports “carries more symbolic heft than economic bite.”

“We could see deeper decoupling — not only in supply chains, but in people-to-people ties, knowledge exchange, and regulatory frameworks. This may signal a shift from transactional tension to systemic divergence,” said Qian.

Can Beijing get more aggressive?

Analysts largely expect Beijing to continue deploying its arsenal of non-tariff policy tools in an effort to raise its leverage ahead of any potential negotiation with the Trump administration.

“From the Chinese government’s perspective, the U.S. companies’ operations in China are the biggest remaining target for inflicting pain on the U.S .side,” said Gabriel Wildau, managing director at risk advisory firm Teneo.

Apple, Tesla, pharmaceutical and medical device companies are among the businesses that could be targeted as Beijing presses ahead with non-tariff measures, including sanction, regulatory harassment and export controls, Wildau added.

Shoppers and staff are seen inside the Apple Store, with its sleek modern interior design and prominent Apple logo, in Chongqing, China, on Sept. 10, 2024.

Cheng Xin | Getty Images

While a deal may allow both sides to unwind some of the retaliatory measures, hopes for near-term talks between the two leaders are fading fast.

Chinese officials have repeatedly condemned the “unilateral tariffs” imposed by Trump as “bullying” and vowed to “fight to the end.” Still, Beijing has left the door open for negotiations but they must be on “an equal footing.”

On Tuesday, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Trump is open to making a deal with China but Beijing needs to make the first move.

“In the end, only when a country experiences sufficient self-inflicted harm might it consider softening its stance and truly returning to the negotiation table,” said Jianwei Xu, economist at Natixis.

Continue Reading

Economics

Donald Trump’s approval rating is dropping

Published

on

EVEN WHEN Donald Trump does something well, he exaggerates. He won the popular vote last November for the first time in three tries, by a 1.5 point margin. “The mandate was massive,” he told Time. In fact it was the slimmest margin since 2000, but it was an improvement on Mr Trump’s two previous popular-vote losses, by 2.1 points in 2016 and 4.5 points in 2020. (He was elected in 2016 through the vagaries of the Electoral College.)

Continue Reading

Economics

Can Progressives learn to make progress again?

Published

on

In the political wilderness, Democrats are asking themselves how they lost their way

Continue Reading

Trending