B. Riley Financial Inc., the embattled investment firm, is struggling to value its assets after months of concern about flawed accounting and a federal investigation culminated in a 52% one-day plunge.
The investment firm late Monday said it couldn’t file its quarterly report with regulators on time, promising only that it would file “as promptly as practical.” The delay, it said, was due to problems in valuing its loans and investments — similar to a weakness auditors identified in April in the company’s annual report.
The Los Angeles-based investment firm suspended its dividend, announced its biggest-ever quarterly loss and confirmed the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is investigating the business. B. Riley faces a widening U.S. probe into its accounting practices and deals with a former business partner tied to a collapsed investment fund, Bloomberg News reported.
That sent B. Riley’s shares into a tailspin, and lenders to the firm and its founder sought to reassure investors on the value of the collateral they hold. It’s the third time this year that B. Riley missed a regulatory filing deadline.
The SEC is assessing whether the Los Angeles-based investment firm adequately disclosed the risks embedded in some of its assets, people familiar with the matter said. The agency is also seeking information on the interactions between founder Bryant Riley and longtime business partner Brian Kahn, the former chief executive of Franchise Group Inc., or FRG, the people said. FRG is one of B. Riley’s larger investment holdings.
The inquiry includes a review of possible improper trading by other insiders, said the people, who asked for anonymity because the probe hasn’t been announced by the agency. Another topic regulators have asked about is the movement between companies of receivables due from cash-strapped retail customers whose repayment might be doubtful, the people said.
The SEC’s overlapping civil probes, which involve agency lawyers in Los Angeles, Washington and Philadelphia, are proceeding along with a federal criminal inquiry in New Jersey. Prosecutors are examining the 2020 collapse of an investment fund, Prophecy Asset Management, where Kahn handled most of its assets.
Prophecy investors who lost money have questioned in a lawsuit whether Kahn improperly used Prophecy proceeds to acquire control of FRG for himself. A co-founder of that fund pleaded guilty in November in a $294 million fraud case and is cooperating with prosecutors, who tagged Kahn as an unindicted co-conspirator, Bloomberg previously reported.
Subpoenas received
Bryant Riley told investors in a Monday conference call that he and the company received subpoenas in July from the SEC focused mainly on B. Riley’s dealings with Kahn.
“We are responding to the subpoenas and are fully cooperating with the SEC,” Bryant Riley said. He expects the SEC will conclude “that we had no involvement with or knowledge of any alleged misconduct concerning Brian Kahn or his affiliates.”
Representatives for Kahn didn’t respond to messages seeking comment. Representatives for the SEC and the U.S. Attorney’s Office in New Jersey declined to comment. Kahn, Riley and their companies haven’t been charged with anything by authorities, and the U.S. probes could conclude with no action against any of them.
“At no time during my former business relationship with Prophecy did I know that Prophecy or its principals were allegedly defrauding their investors, nor did I conspire in any fraud,” Kahn said in a November statement.
B. Riley on Monday warned of losses as it wrote down a portion of its stake in FRG and a related loan receivable. It’s expecting a non-cash markdown of about $330 million to $370 million on those assets, according to a company statement. The firm expects losses for the quarter ended June 30 to total $435 million to $475 million.
The SEC investigation is advancing as B. Riley tries to bounce back from two annual losses and correct flaws in its controls identified by its auditors this year. Short sellers have targeted the stock, which has tumbled in the year after B. Riley helped Kahn stage a management-led buyout of FRG.
B. Riley’s finances are complicated by a series of loans, receivables and other asset transfers between the company, FRG and Kahn. Some of those assets and debts underpin the value of other parts of B. Riley’s empire, and short sellers contend that the writedowns could create a domino-like effect on the company’s finances. B. Riley has firmly rejected such a scenario.
Nomura loan
One of the biggest pieces was the FRG buyout deal, which was funded in part by a $600 million loan that Nomura Holdings Inc. arranged for B. Riley as the administrative agent. The Tokyo-based bank committed $240 million to the debt itself, more than any other lender, Bloomberg News has reported.
B. Riley put up about $1.5 billion of various assets as collateral for the Nomura debt. That included about $220 million of FRG shares and another $200 million in the form of a loan to Kahn that was itself secured by more FRG stock.
Bloomberg reported in January that a team of external advisers had encouraged Nomura to write down the value of its loan to B. Riley, citing the allegations against Kahn and warning that the collateral for the debt could be tainted by fraud. Officials at Nomura took no action at that time.
Nomura said in an emailed statement Monday that it holds less than 25% of the syndicated credit facility, which was funded at about $474 million as of March 31. “Our loan is secured and collateral is significant, with FRG-related assets comprising a minority,” Nomura said.
Separately, Bryant Riley — the firm’s biggest individual shareholder — took out a loan in 2019 from Axos Bank in which he pledged 4,389,553 company shares as collateral, according to a B. Riley filing. The loan “is secured by multiple collateral types in addition to pledged shares,” an Axos spokesperson said Monday via email. “This collateral, other than B. Riley stock, is sufficient to secure a majority of the underlying loan.”
The bank’s spokesperson declined to say whether dropping to a specific price would compel Riley to repay the loan or sell some shares.
FRG’s debt to its own lenders is trading at deeply distressed levels, and the firm hired advisers to help find ways to ease the burden. It’s also been hurt by the demise of Conn’s Inc., another furniture chain that went bankrupt within months after buying rival W.S. Badcock from FRG.
Conn’s debt
Conn’s owed B. Riley at least $93 million on a loan when it filed for court protection, according to company filings. B. Riley had said it expects to be fully repaid. Meanwhile, FRG holds a stake in Conn’s preferred shares, which it received as payment for the Badcock sale. The stake is convertible into Conn’s common stock, but those shares have since collapsed with the bankruptcy, slashing the value of FRG’s holdings.
In turn, B. Riley owns almost a third of FRG’s equity. B. Riley has downplayed the potential impact of Conn’s misfortune, saying FRG’s stake was a small part of that firm’s overall holdings.
But S&P Global Ratings said in a July 24 credit downgrade that Conn’s bankruptcy could lead to FRG violating the terms of its own loan. FRG’s capital structure “appears to be unsustainable,” S&P said in its analysis, and its scenario for recoveries after a default showed little or nothing for second-lien term lenders — which typically means equity holders would be left empty handed.
Depreciation is a cornerstone of financial accounting, playing a critical role in accurately representing an asset’s value over its useful life. Beyond its technical definition, depreciation serves as a vital tool for financial reporting, tax planning, and operational strategy. This article dives into the primary methods of depreciation and their strategic importance for businesses aiming to optimize asset valuation.
At its core, depreciation is the process of allocating the cost of a tangible asset over its expected lifespan. It ensures that financial statements reflect the true economic wear and tear of assets, offering stakeholders a clear picture of a company’s financial health. Choosing the right depreciation method is crucial for aligning financial reporting with operational realities.
One of the most commonly used methods is the straight-line method, celebrated for its simplicity. This approach spreads the depreciation expense evenly across the asset’s useful life. While straightforward, it doesn’t always capture an asset’s actual usage pattern, especially for items that experience higher wear and tear in their early years.
For businesses with assets that lose value more quickly in their initial years, the declining balance method provides a better alternative. As an accelerated depreciation method, it assigns higher depreciation expenses in the earlier periods of an asset’s life. This approach can align better with revenue generation during an asset’s most productive years while potentially offering upfront tax advantages.
The units of production method is particularly suitable for assets whose depreciation is directly tied to usage, such as manufacturing equipment or company vehicles. This method calculates depreciation based on output, ensuring expenses reflect actual wear and tear. It’s a practical choice for industries with fluctuating production volumes.
Another accelerated option, the sum-of-the-years’ digits method, combines aspects of straight-line and declining balance approaches. By applying a weighted percentage to each year of an asset’s life, this method suits technology assets or other items prone to rapid obsolescence, offering a balanced middle ground for depreciation calculation.
Selecting the right depreciation method is a strategic decision that extends beyond regulatory compliance. It directly influences financial statements, tax liabilities, and even operational decision-making. Factors such as the asset type, industry norms, and specific usage patterns should inform this choice. For instance, a construction company might benefit from the units of production method, while a tech startup might prefer an accelerated approach for its rapidly depreciating hardware.
Advancements in financial management software have revolutionized depreciation modeling. These tools allow businesses to simulate various depreciation methods, providing data-driven insights to support strategic decisions. Automated tracking, scenario analysis, and real-time reporting capabilities further streamline the process, ensuring compliance and accuracy.
In conclusion, mastering depreciation methods is essential for businesses aiming to maintain accurate financial records and make informed decisions about asset management. Whether choosing simplicity with the straight-line method or leveraging the flexibility of accelerated approaches, businesses that understand and strategically apply depreciation can enhance transparency, optimize tax planning, and improve operational efficiency. By prioritizing accurate asset valuation, companies can better position themselves for long-term success.
One suspect in the two New Year’s Day incidents being probed as terror attacks was a former U.S. Army sergeant from Texas who recently worked for Big Four firm Deloitte. The other was a U.S. Army special forces sergeant from Colorado on leave from active duty.
Law enforcement officials on Thursday said there appears to be no definitive link between the two deadly events: a truck attack in New Orleans that left at least 15 dead and the explosion of a Tesla Cybertruck outside of President-elect Donald Trump’s hotel in Las Vegas that killed the driver and injured seven.
But in addition to the military backgrounds of the suspects — they both served in Afghanistan in 2009 — on the day of the attacks they shared at least one other striking similarity: Both men used the same rental app to obtain electric vehicles.
The driver of the Cybertruck was identified as Matthew Alan Livelsberger of Colorado Springs. He rented the Cybertruck on Turo, the app also used by Shamsud-Din Jabbar, the suspect in the separate attack in New Orleans hours earlier. Turo said it was working with law enforcement officials on the investigation of both incidents.
There are “very strange similarities and so we’re not prepared to rule in or rule out anything at this point,” said Sheriff Kevin McMahill of the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department.
The gruesome assault on revelers celebrating New Year’s in New Orleans’ famed French Quarter and the explosion in Las Vegas thrust U.S. domestic security back into the spotlight just weeks before Donald Trump is sworn in as president.
Texas roots
As authorities combed through the macabre scene on Wednesday in New Orleans’ historic French Quarter, they said they discovered an ISIS flag with the Ford F-150 electric pickup truck that barreled through the crowd. Two improvised explosive devices were found in the area, according to the FBI.
Jabbar had claimed to join ISIS during the summer and pledged allegiance to the group in videos posted on social media prior to the attack, according to the FBI. An official said there’s no evidence that ISIS coordinated the attack.
Officials said the 42-year-old Jabbar, who lived in the Houston area, exchanged fire with police and was killed at the scene.
Jabbar has said online that he spent “all his life” in the Texas city, with the exception of 10 years working in human resources and information technology in the military, according to a video promoting his real estate business.
After serving as an active-duty soldier from 2006 to 2015 and as a reservist for about five years, Jabbar began a career in technology services, the Wall Street Journal reported. He worked for Accenture, Ernst & Young and Deloitte.
Jabbar was divorced twice, most recently from Shaneen McDaniel, according to Fort Bend County marriage records. The couple, who married in 2017, had one son, and separated in 2020. The divorce was finalized in 2022.
“The marriage has become insupportable due to discord or conflict of personalities that destroys the legitimate ends of the marital relationship and prevents any reasonable expectation of reconciliation,” the petition stated.
McDaniel kept the couple’s four-bedroom home southwest of Houston. She declined to comment when contacted at her house in suburban Houston.
Fort Bragg
Jabbar moved to another residence in Houston, which the FBI and local law enforcement spent all night searching before declaring the neighborhood of mobile homes and single-story houses safe for residents. Agents cleared the scene shortly before 8 a.m. local time without additional comment.
Jabbar’s mobile home is fronted by an 8-foot corrugated steel fence that was partially torn apart to provide search teams access. Weightlifting equipment and a bow hunting target were scattered across the broken concrete walkway. Chickens, Muscovy ducks and guinea fowl roamed the property.
Behind the home, a yellow 2018 Jeep Rubicon sat with its doors left wide open and a hardcover book written in Arabic sitting atop the dashboard. The license plate expired in May 2023.
The other suspect, Livelsberger, was a member of the Army’s elite Green Berets, according to the Associated Press, which cited unidentified Army officials. He had served in the Army since 2006, rising through the ranks, and was on approved leave when he died in the blast.
Livelsberger, 37, spent time at the base formerly known as Fort Bragg, a massive Army base in North Carolina that’s home to Army special forces command. Jabbar also spent time at Fort Bragg, though his service apparently didn’t overlap with Livelsberger’s.
Las Vegas Sheriff McMahill said they found his military identification, a passport, a semiautomatic, fireworks, an iPhone, smartwatch and credit cards in his name, but are still uncertain it’s Livelsberger and are waiting on DNA records.
“His body is burnt beyond recognition and I do still not have confirmation 100% that that is the individual that was inside our vehicle,” he said.
The individual in the car suffered a gunshot wound to his head prior to the detonation of the vehicle.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board today asked stakeholders for feedback on its future standard-setting agenda.
The FASB published an Invitation to Comment and is requesting feedback on improvements to financial accounting and reporting needed to give investors more and better information that informs their capital allocation decision-making, reduce cost and complexity, and maintain and improve the FASB accounting standards codification.
Stakeholders should review and submit feedback by June 30.
“As a result of the significant progress on the 2021 agenda consultation priorities, the FASB staff is once again seeking stakeholder input on the Board’s future agenda and initiatives,” FASB technical director Jackson Day said in a statement. “We encourage stakeholders to take this opportunity to review the ITC and share their views on financial accounting and reporting priorities they think the Board should address going forward.”
The FASB began the current agenda consultation in 2024, doing outreach to over 200 stakeholders, including investors, practitioners, preparers and academics. The discussion in this ITC is based on input received from those stakeholders and does not contain FASB views. Most of those stakeholders said “there is not a case to make major changes to generally accepted accounting principles at this time,” according to the announcement, so many of the topics that were suggested focus on targeted improvements to GAAP.
The board encourages stakeholders to continue to submit agenda requests about needed improvements to GAAP as they arise.