Connect with us

Personal Finance

What to know about Harris’ affordable housing economic proposals

Published

2 years ago

on

Democratic U.S. presidential candidate, Vice President Kamala Harris, speaks at an Aug. 10 campaign rally in Las Vegas.

Justin Sullivan | Getty Images News | Getty Images

Supply is housing policy’s ‘bipartisan sweet spot’

“The bipartisan sweet spot around the housing affordability challenges that we have today is on increasing supply,” said Dennis Shea, executive director of the Bipartisan Policy Center’s J. Ronald Terwilliger Center for Housing Policy.

Ever since the foreclosure crisis, a major period of property seizures in the U.S. between 2007 and 2010, there have been far fewer new single-family homes and multi-family rental buildings under construction, said Janneke Ratcliffe, vice president of the Housing Finance Policy Center at the Urban Institute, a non-profit think tank in Washington, D.C.

There’s “a more acute shortfall” when it comes to affordable homes, she said, whether for renters looking for quality rental units or first-time buyers looking for their first home.

Housing prices rise despite more supply: Here's why

To get to those 3 million new units, a Harris-Walz administration would introduce a “first-ever tax incentive” for home builders who build starter homes sold to first-time homebuyers, according to the proposals unveiled last week. 

The initiative would complement the Neighborhood Homes Tax Credit, according to the announcement. A bill pending in Congress called the Neighborhood Home Investment Act, which would promote the creation and rehab of starter homes for sale in distressed communities, would create that tax credit, said Shea.

“It would create this tax credit, and that has strong bipartisan support,” he said.

My conclusion is that [Harris’] housing plan would be worse than doing nothing.

Edward Pinto

senior fellow and codirector of the American Enterprise Institute’s Housing Center

Former President Donald Trump has also talked about ways to increase housing supply as part of his presidential campaign proposals.

“We’re going to open up tracks of federal land for housing construction,” Trump said in an Aug. 15 press conference. “We desperately need housing for people who can’t afford what’s going on now.”

But Edward Pinto, senior fellow and codirector of the American Enterprise Institute’s Housing Center, said it’s “much, much harder” for the government to pass “supply-side proposals,” compared to efforts that generate demand by making homebuying easier for consumers.

“My conclusion is that [Harris’] housing plan would be worse than doing nothing,” he said.

‘It’s hard to define what a starter home is’

It will be important for Harris to clarify what she means by “starter home,” said James Tobin, CEO of the National Association of Home Builders.

“It’s hard to define what a starter home is,” said Tobin, as underlying costs make it hard to keep building expenses low.

“In most markets in the country, it’s hard to build to that first-time home buyer because of labor costs, land costs, borrowing costs for a builder, and then material cost,” he said.

Harris economic plan will try to 'tell story' combating inflation criticism

Defining a range of price points for a starter home will also be important, as it may vary widely across different markets, said Tobin.

“In California, a starter home might cost seven or $800,000, but in the South … it might only be $250,000 or $300,000,” he said.

The $40 billion innovation fund seems ‘very high’

The list of Harris’ proposals also includes a $40 billion innovation fund. The money would empower local governments to fund local solutions to build housing, as well as support local solutions to build housing.

Yet some experts are skeptical it will fulfill the intended goal.

“The federal government doesn’t have a whole lot of authority over what happens at the local level,” said Fairweather. “It’s up to the local planning commissions whether they’re going to allow for more housing in order to get that [innovation fund] money.”

“But time and time again, locals and local governments, local homeowners ignore incentives because they’re so resistant to building more housing,” said Fairweather.

Additionally, the $40 billion housing innovation fund may be too high of a cost, making it unlikely to receive bipartisan support, said Shea: “I don’t know if the market could bear that price tag in Congress.”

Aid for first-time home buyers has less support

Harris hopes to provide $25,000 down-payment assistance to first-time homebuyers who have paid rent on time for two years, with more generous support for qualifying first-generation homeowners.

The proposal stems from an idea the Biden-Harris administration presented earlier this year, which called on Congress to implement $25,000 in down-payment assistance exclusively for 400,000 first-generation buyers (or first-time buyers whose parents weren’t homeowners) and a $10,000 tax credit for first-time buyers.

Harris’ blueprint would apply to all first-time buyers and broaden the reach to more than 4 million qualifying applicants over four years.

But “there’s just not a lot of bipartisan support,” said Shea.

During an Aug. 16 appearance on Fox Business, Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C., said Harris’ $25,000 down payment assistance “will only make the demand higher with the supply not moving, which means that prices will go up, fewer people are going to be able to afford it.”

“And frankly, unless they’re going to embed financial literacy in any program, it only means there will be a higher level of default,” said Scott.

To help renters, Harris addressed two pending pieces of legislation. The Democratic presidential nominee called on Congress to pass the Stop Predatory Investing Act, a bill that calls for removing key tax benefits for those who own 50 or more single family properties. This initiative would curtail major investors from buying up large sums of single-family rental homes.

Meanwhile, the Preventing the Algorithmic Facilitation of Rental Housing Cartels Act would crack down on companies who use tools to fix market rent prices.

Related Topics:
Continue Reading

Personal Finance

$20,000 Caution Bond Requirement for US Visa Applications imposed on 50 Countries

Published

7 days ago

on

August 8, 2026

By

The United States Department of State has officially implemented a revised visa policy introducing a mandatory posting requirement for caution payments of up to $20,000 on select foreign travel applications. Under the updated regulatory framework, consular officials are authorized to require temporary nonimmigrant visa applicants from targeted foreign countries to post a refundable financial bond of $20,000 as a condition for visa issuance. The policy mechanism is designed to address diplomatic concerns regarding high overstay rates among temporary visitor, business, and educational visa categories.

The caution bond pilot program applies selectively to foreign nationals from designated countries whose diplomatic entities record historical visa overstay rates exceeding established federal thresholds. Under administrative guidelines published by the State Department, the full financial deposit is posted directly to a dedicated federal escrow account prior to final visa issuance. The entire caution payment is automatically refunded to the applicant upon verified proof of timely departure from the United States in strict compliance with the authorized duration of stay. Conversely, failure to depart within the legal timeframe results in full forfeiture of the posted financial bond to the United States government.

Diplomatic representatives and travel policy experts have expressed varying perspectives regarding the operational implementation of the caution bond system. Administration officials emphasize that the measure serves as an effective, market-based incentive to enforce international travel compliance and preserve domestic immigration security standards. However, international trade organizations and foreign diplomatic missions have raised concerns regarding the financial burden imposed on legitimate business travelers, foreign students, and commercial partners from developing nations.

The United States finalized the rule to make the temporary visa bond program permanent, taking effect on August 3, 2026. The updated permanent regulation replaces the prior 12-month pilot, eliminates the lowest $5,000 tier, and raises the maximum required bond amount to $20,000 for specific B-1/B-2 business and tourist visa applicants.

Here is the list of the 50 countries on the list as o August 3, 2026

African Nations (31 Countries)

  • Algeria
  • Angola
  • Benin
  • Botswana
  • Burundi
  • Cabo Verde (Cape Verde)
  • Central African Republic
  • Côte d’Ivoire (Ivory Coast)
  • Djibouti
  • Ethiopia
  • Gabon
  • The Gambia
  • Ghana
  • Guinea
  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Lesotho
  • Malawi
  • Mauritania
  • Mauritius
  • Mozambique
  • Namibia
  • Nigeria
  • São Tomé and Príncipe
  • Senegal
  • Seychelles
  • Tanzania
  • Togo
  • Tunisia
  • Uganda
  • Zambia
  • Zimbabwe

Asian & Eastern European Nations (11 Countries)

  • Bangladesh
  • Bhutan
  • Cambodia
  • Georgia
  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Mongolia
  • Nepal
  • Papua New Guinea
  • Tajikistan
  • Turkmenistan
  • Uzbekistan

Caribbean & Latin American Nations (5 Countries)

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Cuba
  • Dominica
  • Grenada
  • Venezuela

Oceanian Nations (3 Countries)

  • Fiji
  • Tonga
  • Vanuatu

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

Next-Generation Retirement Planning: Managing Longevity Risk and Variable Income Streams

Published

1 week ago

on

August 7, 2026

By

Retirement planning strategies are evolving in 2026 to address increased life expectancies, shifting dynamic market conditions, and the transition away from traditional defined-benefit pensions. Individual investors and financial advisors are abandoning rigid retirement models in favor of flexible, multi-asset strategies designed to mitigate longevity risk and preserve purchasing power over multi-decade retirement horizons.

Mitigating Longevity Risk with Dynamic Asset Allocation
As average life expectancies extend past eighty-five years, one of the primary financial risks facing retirees is outliving their accumulated wealth. Traditional fixed income allocations—such as the standard 60/40 equity-to-bond portfolio—are being reevaluated to ensure portfolios generate sufficient capital growth alongside reliable income.

Financial planners recommend maintaining a meaningful equity allocation throughout retirement to offset long-term inflation erosion. High-dividend equity funds, global real estate investment trusts (REITs), and inflation-indexed Treasuries are combined to create diversified portfolios that deliver both growth and income stability.

The Transition to Dynamic Withdrawal Strategies
The classic “4% safe withdrawal rule” is increasingly replaced by dynamic withdrawal strategies that adapt annually based on market performance. Under a dynamic withdrawal framework, retirees adjust their annual distribution rates within pre-set caps and floors:
– Market Upside: During strong market returns, retirees can increase discretionary spending or fund family legacy gifts.
– Market Downturns: During market pullbacks, spending distributions are temporarily reduced to prevent sequence-of-returns risk and preserve core investment principal.

Guaranteed Lifetime Income Options and Deferred Annuities
To establish a guaranteed baseline for essential living expenses, individuals are incorporating modern fixed-indexed and deferred longevity annuities into their broader retirement architectures. Modern annuity structures offer competitive return caps, transparent fee schedules, and inflation-adjustment options.

By funding essential expenses—such as housing, healthcare, and insurance—with guaranteed income streams from Social Security, pensions, and annuities, retirees can manage discretionary investment portfolios with greater flexibility and lower emotional stress during market volatility.

Actionable Steps for Future Retirees
1. Calculate Baseline Retirement Expenses: Determine fixed living costs and map guaranteed income sources to cover essential expenditures.
2. Adopt Flexible Withdrawal Rules: Implement dynamic spending rules to protect investment principal against market downturns.
3. Incorporate Inflation-Protected Assets: Maintain exposure to dividend-growing equities and inflation-indexed bonds to safeguard long-term purchasing power.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

Building Generational Wealth: Family Governance, Estate Tax Optimization, and Asset Protection

Published

2 weeks ago

on

August 1, 2026

By

As the largest intergenerational transfer of wealth in history accelerates, high-net-worth families, entrepreneurs, and individual investors are placing heightened emphasis on comprehensive estate planning, family governance, and asset protection. Preserving capital across generations requires a balanced approach combining tax-efficient legal structures with open family communication and financial literacy education.

Optimizing Estate Tax Exemptions and Trust Structures
With potential modifications to federal estate tax exemption thresholds on the horizon, proactive estate planning is essential for high-net-worth households. Estate planning attorneys and wealth advisors are establishing multi-generational trust structures to transfer wealth efficiently while minimizing estate and gift tax exposure.

Popular structural strategies include:
– Irrevocable Life Insurance Trusts (ILITs): Utilizing life insurance proceeds to provide liquidity for estate tax obligations without expanding the taxable estate.
– Grantor Retained Annuity Trusts (GRATs): Transferring rapidly appreciating assets to beneficiaries with minimal gift tax consequences.
– Dynasty Trusts: Preserving wealth across multiple generations while providing long-term asset protection from creditor claims and legal liabilities.

Establishing Family Governance and Financial Education
Legal and financial structures alone cannot guarantee long-term wealth preservation without effective family governance. Financial advisors report that a significant percentage of multi-generational wealth dissipation stems from lack of communication and inadequate financial preparation among heir generations.

Families are establishing formal family governance frameworks, including periodic family meetings, written mission statements, and structured philanthropic foundations. Involving younger family members in charitable grant-making and investment discussions fosters financial stewardship and prepares heirs to manage family assets responsibly.

Digital Asset Custody and Legacy Planning
In today’s modern economy, estate planning must extend beyond physical real estate and traditional brokerage accounts to encompass digital assets. Comprehensive estate plans now include detailed inventories and legal access protocols for corporate domain names, intellectual property, digital media rights, and cryptocurrency holdings.

Fiduciaries and estate executors should be provided with secure, encrypted access mechanisms and clear legal authority to manage and transfer digital holdings in accordance with the owner’s estate directions.

Practical Steps for Legacy Planning
1. Review and Update Estate Documents: Ensure wills, revocable trusts, and power-of-attorney designations accurately reflect current family structures.
2. Establish Structured Trusts: Utilize irrevocable trusts to protect assets from creditors and minimize future estate tax liabilities.
3. Create a Digital Estate Inventory: Document access protocols and legal permissions for all online accounts, intellectual property, and digital assets.

Continue Reading

Trending